you saw the chief of staff out on the sunday shows reiterating the president's strategy and enunciate it, but i think they still have a sales job to do internationally and domestically. one key thing for the administration is to expand the air strikes in iraq and perhaps make some gains that will continue to codify some of the support. i think back home, one question is what kind of signals congress is going to send in terms of funding, in terms of approving funding to train the syrian rebels, which is a big part of this. i'd also, after the midterm elections, if congress does a fuller debate on the war powers act, that would be another question for this administration. they know they have a long, difficult campaign ahead. >> interesting to see the latest execution could strange that strategy. let's talk about being haunted by the ghost of 2008. hillary returns to with a. in her speech she was kind of coy. it remains to be seen whether she'll campaign harder or differently there. what does she have to do differently for the rest of the country, for iowans, to take a second look and a

pressure from not just republicans, but his own party on capitol hill to take stronger action and not enunciatedhis strategy is for what he said yesterday on "meet the press," degrade and destroy and ultimately defeat isis in iraq and also syria. on wednesday, give a speech lay out his strategy what it means. slowly stepped up an air campaign of air strikes. we saw more of those yesterday. this in iraq, he's not talked about his plan for defeating terrorists on their home base in syria. i think that's what he's going to lay out and what it means. said it's not going to be like the iraq war with boots on the ground. what exactly is the strategy? how long will we will there and what is the end result. >> all right. also, reaching a boiling point, immigration. the president 's first pledge t take action, by end of summer. now a delay. not to help em battled democrats in the midterms. it is policy, politics or both? dems like menendez and immigrants saying you're not tackling this? we feel betrayed. >> immigrant groups are very, very upset. promised a number of times by the president he would take s

one, it is harder to find anyone better as you said at phraseology, diction, enunciation. nat king cole. >> the ultimate. >> those two guys have never sang a word that you didn't understand what they were saying. >> that's right. >> it's so clear. >> oh, so clear. >> so beautiful. >> those singers were like that. in fact, i invited johnny mathis. >> ever met johnny mathis? great guy. >> almost did in philadelphia. i want to thank him from the stage. >> it's hard to imagine all you and gregory have done you haven't met mathis. >> i watch your show a lot. you talk about your mother a lot. in my show, my show has evolved into a love letter from my mother. my mother that nurtured gregory and i. she had the vision. is she had the vision for her sons. i say that in my show. at the end of the show, i sing this song. my father went along for the ride now. he did. but she had the vision. i think she's just too marvelous. we found pictures of her when she was 16, young, when she met my father, and it was emotional. it was a very emotional show for me, but it keeps my family with me

department of public health we do have a couple of revisionses to our recommendations which i will enunciate now. again, based on the expenditure data submitted by the department of public health, we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution to amend the not to exceed contract for children youth and families by 915,175 [speaker not understood] to the recommended 19,90 4.52 and adults by 53 3,554 from the requested 23 million 135,605 to the recommended 22 million 60 20 62. the total recommended reduction and the not to exceed contract amount is a million 4 48,718. we requested [speaker not understood] to the recommended, and this is the first, supervisor, instead of [speaker not understood] it should state 42,506 instead of 516, 5 14. and then in the second recommendation we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution, page 1 lines 14 through 17 to correctly state that the contract amounts are increasing by instead of 4 million 756 for 54 3, it should state 3 million 840 7 68 ~. for services for children, youth, and family, and instead of 4 million 425,4 36, it should state 3,891,

articulated very clearly the approach that one would have expected the president of the united states to enunciate. what is that desk disconnect and what can we expect? >> i think that the central command headquarters has responsibility for this region, like all of our intelligence services. they have been tracking isis over these three years and so we need to understand that it comes out so easily and we need to destroy it. it's not a whole strategy, estonia is in a campaign plan. but it's reflective of a body of reflective of a body of work that they have party done. lou: the murder of two islamic hands on our american journalist. creating a third of the casualties in iraq whose sponsorship is staged terror continues. why in the world have we not heard the president speak so forcefully directly and mean what he had died. they convinced themselves one, we are going to get out of the wars in iraq and afghanistan and certainly we are not going to get involved in any more wars in the middle east and three, the world is actually becoming a safer place and the harsh reality is that is not the truth of

♪ >> jimmy: thank you, automated time warner operators, for making me over-enunciate every syllable ofp-re-sen-ta-tive. [ laughter ] hu-man. hu-man. >> steve: you ordered "the croods". >> jimmy: one, one. one. >> steve: one. >> jimmy: one. >> steve: one. >> jimmy: represen-tative. >> steve: representative. i will pass you over. hello? >> jimmy: hey. >> steve: hey. >> jimmy: hello? >> steve: can i help you? >> jimmy: yeah, i'd like to cancel my cable. >> steve: you'd like to do what? [ laughter ] >> jimmy: i would like to cancel my cable. >> steve: do you want crack with that? [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: who did i call? i'm so sorry. bye. ♪ >> jimmy: thank you, ferris wheels for combining my two favorite emotions. fear and boredom. [ laughter ] finally -- ♪ thank you, number two. [ cheers and applause ] for always being number one. congratulations, derek. [ cheers and applause ] those are my thank you notes, we'll be right back with matthew broderick and nathan lane. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ [ female announcer ] we lowered her fever. you raise her spirits. we tackled your shoulde

the enunciation's of wallace as a red may have added to criticism against him but race, not fear of communism, was the opposition of the other parties. a communist party member in durham, said "there were workers in my mail who did not note the difference between communism and rheumatism. all you would have to do is raise the race issue. around here, and alabama farmer once said that 'communism is anything that we don't like.'" i think this is really the fundamental issue here. this is the notion that the white south was ready for the civil rights movement in 1948 and it was overstated. i think the wallace campaign gives some evidence of that. nonetheless, wallace continued to talk about the real south, a south that he did not see, a self that was out there somewhere, -- a south that was out there somewhere, if only he could find it. what wallace saw this real south, it was a myth. confronting the social cons struct -- construct confirmed the progressive's idea about racism. the myth predetermined categories of misperception rendering one blind to things that did not fit a mental image. this

he's going to have to enunciate how we create a coalition that includes allied boots on the ground -- if they're not ours, they have to be somebody else's -- how this is going to get done. i'm sure he's working with american recruitment in the military, but that's what he's going to have to do. >> mike baker, always good to see you. thank you for your time. >> sure. thank you very much. >>> so we want to know what you think at home. when president obama lays out his strategy to deal with isis, the speech we hear he's going to give on wednesday, what do you at home need or want to hear from the president? tweet us. you can sweet me @shannonbreem. we would love to hear you later on in the show. >>> the president has said he won't take action on immigration until after the midterms. that's despite his promise to take action by the end of the summer. >> they do argue that the president a abandis abandoning powers. republicans say it's proof that president obama has succumbed to political pressures. >> i certainly think it's critical in the sense that he understands how popular that decisi

like when he paired the virgin mary with this fashionable dog in his painting "the enunciation." >> there a sign of her high royal status, her faith, a sign of her wealth. >> at other times fido symbolized more earthly desires, consider this poster created for interior design company by henri. >> this very eager dog at the woman's lap which is to imply a sexual innuendo here. that this man is coming in to do more than just redecorate. >> the dog is helping you know that there's something playful about to happen here. >> correct. >> and in bed. >> but sometimes the picture wasn't so rosy especially for cats. for instance when a medieval renaissance artist included a cat, it signified something sinister. >> the cat since took off the familiar, with sorer isers and witches and knight, darkness, being tellful these attributes of the cat made people think that it was somehow associated with evil. >> sorry, mr. his terse. not every pussy cat here is symbolic. some of loving portraits from the hands that fed them like andrew's golden retriever with a cat that lived with his neighbors named, perk

so let me get into the reasons why i think it is so important that this mission as enunciated by the president, has to be done right and what that means as congress has to be on board with all of it. i want to talk about six things. the constitution. the authorizations that congress passed in the early 2000's that are being used by this administration as justification. this president's own words and actions as a candidate and as a president. the reputation of this current congress. the precedent it sets for future presidents and future congress. and finally, the most important thing, an underlying value that really kind of is spread throughout all of the points that i'll talk about, especially the constitutional allocation of power. governor strickland stated it right with respect to the constitution. the constitution is extremely clear. the constitution is an interesting document composed of both complete precision -- you can't be president if you're not 35 years old -- and very carefully worded ambiguity, you can't take somebody's property without due process of law. nobody can be

you do have to enunciate and speak slowly and clearly. >> okay. >> so do you -- are you handicapping or you don't care in terms of -- >> obviously i care. and we're watching the election, but i don't see it as a big market catalyst this time around. >> what is the biggest market catalyst globally? >> you see how sensitive the market is to the fed. at the end of the day our view is the fed is going to raise rates alongside better growth. and if we have better growth and inflation's low, it might be easier. the thing i worry about more really is if we have worse than expected outcome in europe and it feeds through to the u.s. i see that as a higher probability than a disruptive fed in the near term. >> okay. all right. thank you. we'll have a chance to talk more for the next hour. she'll be with us for the rest of the show. back to andrew now in nantucket. andrew? andrew? there he is. >> i'm right here. when we come back in the 8:00 hour, we are going to have larry summers here. we're going to get those gdp numbers here at 8:30. we will have him react to those. we're also going to talk

i can see us containing isis, but right now i can't see us achieving the goal the president has enunciatedat. that, i don't see. >> you mentioned turkey. we had admiral kirby on earlier today. i want to play you what he said about their role. >> well, turkey was not a participant last night, as you know. i won't speak for another government and what they're willing to do or not do. this is a key nato ally, a partner in the region. they actually have borders with both countries, iraq and syria. they have a refugee issue that they're dealing with. so they are, just at this their geography, they'll be a partner here, they'll be a coalition number. they've indicated they want to participate. but we're leaving it up to each nation. >> sounds hopeful. >> well, if you're depending on geography as the factor that will make them join the alliance, that's a bit of a stretch. you have to depend on their national interest, on their sympathy, on their intent to go after isis the way that we do. i'm right now not convinced. i understand why admiral kirby would say that. if you're trying to enlist an all