be paying more at the pump. >> the epa said it was happening. with the spark miles card from capital one, bjorn earns unlimited rewas for his small business take theseags to room 12 please. [ garth ] bjors small busiss earns double miles on every purchase every day. produce delivery. [ bjorn ] just put it on my spark card. [ garth why settle for less? ahh, oh! [ garth ] great businesses deserve limited reward here's your wake up call. [ male announcer ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimited rewards. choose double miles or 2% cash back on every purchase every day. what's in your wallet? [ crows ] now where's the snooze button? >>> coming up, new allegations the epa is targeting conservative groups, too. how that do mean we pay more at the pump. red >> the epa accused of slappin fees on conservative groups which are normally waived, while giving over 90% of green groupsv a free pass.ar tracy, you say it's not only unfair, but not good for the you economy. >> everyone is so sick of the favoritism at this point. oarlock, yo

it doesn't cost if you are a friend of the epa. inneed. they are destroying people's able to use the waerth. they denoticed the rights that the greep groups were begin. they are trying to develop industry and create jobs and the epa doesn't share those goals. >> gem u one thought? >> it is probably because the organization was trying to destroy the epa and environment with it. nwe'll have to leave it there. thank you for joining thus week. and green lights, and sneaky ways governments are taxing americans and putting their lives in danger at the same time. >> what do i need to be next week in >> this is desperation and stuiditty. shortening the yellow light when you drive. you hit the red and they ticket you quicker. holy crap for money? not to mepgz the safety issue. >> are you red, yellow or green. >> i am looking at green. protecting life. it is 11 percent in the last quarter and a insurance company and i own it and like it very much. >> johnathon you created quite a bit of grown. snshs greece is feeling like latin america. unlawed and

it doesn't cost if you are a iend of the epa. inneed.are destroying people's able to use the waerth. they denoticed the rights that the greep groups were begin. they are trying to develop industry and create jobs and the epa doesn't share those goals. >> gem u one thought? >> it is probably because the organization was trying to destroy the epa and environment with it. nwe'll have to leave it there. thank you for joining thus week. and green lights, and sneaky ways governments are taxing americans and putting their lives in danger at the same time. my mother made the best toffee in the world. it's delicious. so now we've turned her toffee into a business. my goal was to take an idea and make it happen. i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. never really thought i would make money doinghat i love. [ robert ] we created legalzoom to help people start their busine and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your sid and make y[growl]i

for more than a year, the epa gathered information about the watershed. then, in may 2012, their draft assessment was published. it came down hard on the pebble project, detailing the many risks involved, including a major loss of fish habitat, the high probability of a damaging pipeline break, the catastrophic consequences of tailings dam failures, and the never-ending threat of acid mine drainage. the findings are significant in that the epa can unilaterally stop the mine. >> it's outrageous that somebody would stop a project before a project proponent even had a chance to make the plans public. i don't think that's the kind of reputation our country wants to start to get if we want to start to have any kind of investment in large projects. so i think it would set a terrible precedent. >> the future of the pebble mine project took center stage in anchorage tonight. >> about 400 people showed up... >> narrator: in anchorage, many alaskans reacted angrily to the epa's involvement. when the agency called for a series of public hearings to discuss their dra

commerce, education and the -- >> epa? >> epa. there you go. >> rick perry never did remember that third agency during that debate even though he definitely would have gotten rid of it as president whatever it was. turns out he wasn't talking about epa but the person hopefully suggesting to him the epa was mitt romney who as the republican nominee did go on to run for president on an i hate the epa platform. >> i think the epa has gotten completely out of control for a very simple reason. it is a tool in the hands of the president to crush the private enterprise system. >> luckily for us this president is terrible at crushing the private enterprise system. he sucks at it. the dow jones industry average closed at above 15,000 for the 30 straight day. it had never been above 15,000 before and now we've been there all week. president obama sucks at crushing the private enterprise system. still the point is his tool for doing the crushing is the dreaded environmental protection agency. republicans just hate the epa. sure, maybe it was

republicans hate the epa. sure maybe it was created by a republican but regardless, now they hate. one way to demonstrate hatred for that agency to try to get rid of it is to elect somebody who is running on the platform that the epa is a torable tool to crush enterprise. they tried it with mitt romney. he lost and it didn't work and may try to denounce the epa as a gus top poe hoping to turn up the demand it be apoll bollished. the epa, the gestapo of the government has been a claw hook that the government maintains on the backs of our constituents. so run somebody for president who could get rid of the epa. have a congressional leadership. call it the gestapo or you can do what the republicans today today in washington, d.c. jean mccarthy is the top ranking official at the agency for four years or a top-ranking official for four years. today we learned the republican strategy to stop her nomination to run the agency the new strategy to stop the nomination is to question it to death. the senate gets to ask al

. >> the epa working to delay the keystone pipeline. did i say epa -- i meant president obama.d by congressman, what happens next is next. how you doing? my name is steve. my family's lived in this neighborhood for years. recently, things got so tight we had to go to our local food bank for help. i lost a lot of sleep wrying about what the neighbors might think. that is, until i saw them there, too. how'd i do, steve? a little stiff. you could have done a little better. what? come on. you know, i have an academy award. yeah, but not for playing me. announcer: play a role in ending hunger. visit feedingamerica.org/hunger and find your local food bank. >>. >> lou: environmental protection agency today opening the door to another keystone pipeline delay picking a fight over the state department that found the pipeline would have no significant impact on climate change. they call the analysis insufficient despite being the most advanced and studied pipeline project in american history. joining us tonight is bob ladda a member of the house committee on energy and commerce. it's grea

. >> the epa working to delay the keystone pipeline. did i say epa -- i meant president obama.ined by congressman, what happens next is next. this is $100,000. we asked total strangers to watch it for us. thank you so much. i appreciate it. i'll be right back. they didn't take a dime. how much in fe does your bank take to watch your money? if your bank takes more money than a stranger, you need an ally. ally bank. your money needs an ally. >>. >> lou: environmental protection agency today opening the door to another keystone pipeline delay picking a fight over the state department that found the pipeline would have no significant impact on climate change. they call the analysis insufficient despite being the most advanced and studied pipeline project in american history. joining us tonight is bob ladda a member of the house committee on energy and commerce. it's great to have you with us. your reaction to the epa. this looks like, this is intramural fight. >> you are absolutely right. this is most studied pipeline in history. we've had just last week, they finished a supplement

. >> the epa working to delay the keystone pipeline. did i say epa -- i meant president obama.ined by congressman, what happens next is next. with fidelity's new options platform, we've completely integrated every step of the process, making it easier to try filters and strategies... to get a list of equity option.. evaluate them with our p&l calculator... and execute faster with our more intuitive trade ticket. i'm greg stevens and i helped create fidety's options platform. it's one more innovative reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. now get 200 free trades when you open an account. >>. >> lou: environmental protection agency today opening the door to another keystone pipeline delay picking a fight over the state department that found the pipeline would have no significant impact on climate change. they call the analysis insufficient despite being the most advanced and studied pipeline project in american history. joining us tonight is bob ladda a member of the house committee on energy and commerce. it's great to have you with us. your reaction to the epa. this lo

you cannot question epa economics, you cannot question epa decision-making. all you can do is hope to find they trip place. president obama can do a lot through the epa. in his last administration, essentially proposed to ban new coal fire power plants. in this administration, he is expected to set standards for existing coal fire power plants that will drive them out of existence. i think -- people think, president obama is for fracking and natural gas. in my view, he is only using natural gas to destroy the coal industry. natural gas prices, there's a glut of natural gas and he likes to glut because his glut has reduced prices so much that the coal can't compete. utilities are starting to plan for a noncoal future. i can assure you that president obama and possibly a president hillary after that, once coal is killed, they are going to kill fracking. then what are we going to do? in my book, i describe how the environmentalist, they don't like fossil fuels, they don't like nuclear power. they don't really like solar either. wherever they can they block these

jane is tremendously qualified to lead the epa.she has more than three decades of public service experience including at the local state and federal level. she understands the importance of protecting the health and safety of children and families. she knows how to get the job done. gina -- i hear our colleague with a sense of humor on his way. gina has already won unanimous confirmation for her current job. she has demonstrated the record of working with republicans and democrats and we need her strong bipartisan commonsense approach to help lead this agency. she has worked for the republican governor of connecticut, the republican governor of massachusetts jane swift emmett romney and the democratic president barack obama. gina has received support from business health officials environmental organizations and scientists. she is a woman most worthy of a promotion. following the nomination heang in thisommtee gina responded to more than 1000 questions that were submitted to her by republicans which is unprecedented. she did it in

we need an administrator at the apa. -- epa. this is not just an administrator for the epa. are republicans make it difficult to get judges on the d.c. court of appeals. there was a discussion about whether or not the national labor relations board is going to be able to function. i think we understand where our republican colleagues are coming from. the question is what we do in response. i think we act strongly. we have the american people -- the american people understand that there are difficult times, and want government to function efficiently. 10 votes cannd it, bring this nomination to the floor. >> that's correct. >> i respectfully request that as soon as possible, as the rules allow, that we hold another meeting, we make sure there are 10 senators here and we passed that. senator cardin touched on this as well. if we bring this nomination to the floor and there is a request for 60 votes, which we are not going to get, it is time for the democratic leadership to do with the american people want, and that is to have majority rule in the united states senate. i was a

answers. >> neil: move over, irs, and make room for the epa.my next guest is right, workers at the environmental protection agency are treating conservative groups rather differently. chris horner said this happened to his group, the competitive enterprise institute. do explain, christopher. >> okay. well, we've got an exact replica of what's going on at the irs which is selectively suppressing the abiflt citizens who are supposed to be treated equally under the law to pursue their chosen endeavor. in this case, if you want to advocate for more epa you'll get your fees waived. if you ask for public documents, and in our case, we use the freedom of informatiofreedom ofe had our request for fee waivers denied either outright or by being ignored 90% of time. the greens left wing groups and so on were getting theirs approved on first pass 92rs before the time. it's an obvious disparity in their treatment. >> neil: if that's the case, what would they cite you on, slow you on, reject you on? what would they use to say all right, this is why we're goi

the former epa air chief under george w. bush, mccarthy has shown a willingness to listen and understand industry's legitimate concerns, and then william becker that's correct of the national association of cleanary agencies: she is brilliantly honest, very fair, how manious, and incredibly hard worker. she is a practitioner, and after her nomination, i listened to the comment modifies republican colleagues and they had nice things to say about her. so she has worm for democrats and run runs. it's well past time to vote on this nomination. madam chair, this has been a pattern on the republican side of the aisle on obstructing president obama's nominations. yesterday we saw in the -- in one of our committees, a technical rule used to block the vote for tom perez to be secretary of labor. that was the second scheduled meeting they had on his vote and they used the fact the senate was still in session, you cooperate have a committee hearing -- couldn't have a committee hearing. so this is a pattern of blocking president obama's

so the epa says no, can't have it. the big company hires heather podesta who's a big time lobbyist, a big time fund raiser for democrats who was married at the time to another big washington democratic fixer named tony podesta, who used to be president of the liberal organization people for the american way. through their connections these two have become the king and queen of influence peddling. lo and behold, some months after the industry hires heather podesta, epa reverses itself and the company gets an exemption and is allowed to pollute the aquifer. to hell with the public health. this is routine, isn't it? >> and it's exactly what you're talking about with the pay to play. so it's, in this case you have companies that have the money and the resources to hire the lobbyists or the lawyers who will go to battle for their clients endlessly. i mean, those of us who are working on the other side in the public interest realize that when we have our wins which we get industry is going to be there and they're going to ke

. >>> today, senate republicans blocked president obama's nominee to head the epa, jenna mccarthy. that was not constructionist. they get a committee vote to deny a quorum and barbara boxer complained republicans should get out of the fringe lane. the republicans wouldn't let the nominee out of committee. here's the other reason blocking this nomination is so compare. she is currently the assistant administrator for the office of air and radiation at the epa, head of the epa's air regulation and as head would have the authority to regulate the biggest pollution we face, which is carbon. that's an idea republicans and their fossil fuel backers really really hate. that's why the committee's ranking republican, senator vitter and his brethren want the epa to first answer more than 1,000 questions, not exaggerating, about the quote underlying data the epa uses for job killing regulations. the epa is our best shot for regulating carbon and it's pretty damned important considering the milestone we're approaching. we learned recently we're about to pass 400 parts per million in the amount

the epa, after cong refused to pass happens rate, this side that we're going to gulate carbon dioxide emissions which said never done d t clean air act of 1970's. i mean the agency going forward and ing things that congress would not pass the eck card, the nationalllabor relations board is installing. how was a good thing? >> there is a certainty. is like working with apple. windows you can do anytng whicis give renotion. buthere is no certainty that you're not going to crest computer if you market up. however, with ape you know, if i follow these pathways i will have a good sult. there are people in business

she is currently the assistant administrator for the office of air and radiation at the epa, head of epa's air regulation and as head would have the authority to regulate the biggest pollution we face, which is carbon. that's an idea republicans and their fossil fuel backers really really hate. that's why the committee's ranking republican, senator vitter and his brethren want the epa to first answer more than 1,000 questions, not exaggerating, about the quote underlying data the epa uses for job killing regulations. the epa is our best shot for regulating carbon and it's pretty damned important considering the milestone we're approaching. we learned recently we're about to pass 400 parts per million in the amount of carbon in the atmosphere. that may not mean anything to you. it certainly didn't mean anything to me. here's the context for it. the last time we had 400 parts per million of carbon in the atmosphere wasn't a century ago or 1,000 years ago, it was 800,000 years ago according to records of ice core data. that spike at the top, notice how much higher it is over the past 80

they served as epa administrators republicans. i would say this to my republican friends if they were here. why don't you listen to these mainstream republicans? the out of the fringe lane. american people want clean air, clean water. they want action. they want tougher rules and regulations to protect their health and their family's health. ask the kids who are in your states who are in public school, how many of them have asthma. how many of them know someone with asthma?half the hands will go up. get out of the fringe lane. work with us. i will tell you, this nominee, one of the most qualified ever, her name was put up on march 4. i'm going to close with some of her supporters. robert engle, vice president, domestic policy and american automotive policy. upon confirmation, we look forward to working with gina mccarthy, who has demonstrated a willingness to consider the views of those impacted by the agency and to find practical solutions to issues facing the auto industry. not good enough for the fringe. the president and ceo o

couldn't epa run better if it had a confirmed administrator? it is hard to imagine that the epa could run any worse than it's been running. all they have to do is agree to the facts. chuck, one of the famous quotes that i liked over the years. you're entitled to your own opinion, but not entitled to your own facts. the fish and wildlife people and the usda and the epa just won't agree on the fundamental facts involved and they're going to do that before i release this hold. to ask the government to stop fighting with the government, clearly we don't want the government to fight with ordinary citizens, but this is a case where the government is fighting with the government and they're going to have to stop this. this is not an unreasonable request. i'm shocked that a month late they didn't do what they said they were going to do by march 15th. >> roy blunt the republican senator from the state of missouri. thanks for coming on this morning. >> you bet. >>> up next, the obama administration's unprecedented effort at plugging leaks. nbc news has l

we're not asking for the epa to i think which the policy on any fundamental epa issues. we're asking for openness and transparency. four of these five asks are things that are clearly required under current law that we're trying to get out of them kicking and screaming. and one is very consistent with openness and transparency that they have the full capability and authority to do. and again, these are in the area of e-mail and policy. getting unredacted e-mails which due us. getting the underlying research data used to promulgate the major roles. having full economic analysis performed with regard to major rule makes as required by law, and executive order, and having openness and transparency to these subtle agreements. so that's the first point. we're not asking this epa to change its policy and views. we're asking for openness and transparency as required by law. secondly, you express shock and said you have never seen it before. well, in fact you have seen it before. you have participated in it in 2003 -- . >> never. don't say what i did. >> okay. you did see this a

lot toident obama into a the epa.n his last administration he sent to the proposed to ban new coal-fired power plants. in this administration, he is expected to set standards for existing coal-fired power plants that will drive them out of existence. think, well,people president obama is for fracking and natural gas. in my view, he is only using natural gas to destroy the coal industry. there is a glut of natural gas. he likes that because it has reduced prices so much c coal, which is really pretty cheap fuel, cannot really compete with it in the u.s. anymore so utilities are starting to plan for a non-coal future relying on his continued gluit. i can assure you president obama's of the president and hillary after the ones coal is killed, they will kill fracking. and then we're going to do? they book, i describe how environmentalist do not like fossil fuels or nuclear power. they don't really like solar and wind, either. wherever they can, they block these things. senator dianne feinstein had a bill a couple of years

if they got the epa out of the way for the nonsense regulation, we could beat opec. >> and the fraccingthere is so much alarmism a round this and we are talking about injecting water and food based chemicals. we saw the governor of california drink it. and there is a methodology that is used over decades. we don't want american people to think that the water is contaminated because of this. that is coming from the white house. >> the chief rhetoric and the winner in the rhetoric against carbon fuels was the head of the energy department and the new guy is more sympathetic to your views. we find progress here. thank you, gang. and should you have to look like this to shop at amber krom bee and fitch. the ceo under fire for wanting to only sell to cool kids. [ male announcer ] hunt...farm...or trail... polaris has what you want. legendary atvs.. led by the powerful sportsman 850 ho. value-minded side-by-sides... featuring the new ranger 800 midsize. and full-size workhorses including the all-new, class-leading, 60-horsepower, ranger xp 900. polaris. hardest working, smoothest riding. huge

epa makes a decision. the headline in the washington post and everywhere else, the ap was not epa makes decision. bush administration and white house makes decision. when it comes to president obama it is like he is totally ab so -- absolved from running the government. they are very careful to write the irs and it has nothing to do with the white house is accused of. from a pure media perspective you have to work harder. i recommend they should not underestimate the depth of anger and disgust across the board about this. in their hopes of winning the 2014 house back from the republicans are over. >> i was going to say the political point is enormous. they are suspicious of obama's big government about to take over immigration, this is going to do it. don't blow it. >> i am waiting for the e-mail that surfaces that comes from the white house from somebody in that area to the irs saying you know that scandal, break it now. >> coming up, a verdict reached this afternoon in the trial of dr. kermit gosnell. ki

i don't know who they want to be the head of the epa. may be the head of some polluting oil company or coal company. that would make them happy. but that's not what the american people want. the american people want in overwhelming numbers their health protected. and if the republicans think we are going to be quiet about this, they have another guess coming. gene mccarthy is going to be, the poster child of their instruction is him. gina mccarthy is a woman who deserves this promotion. 78% of voters say that clean air is extremely or very important. 69% of voters favored epa updated standards with stricter limits on air pollution. i say to my republican friends on this committee, it's a pleasure to work with them on infrastructure. but when it comes to the environment, there in the right fringe lane, and were not going to let the people forget it. we're going to take the story of gina mccarthy and her success, a record, her fairness, her broad support in america. we're going to take this to the american people. and so will the president

"the epa has documented how air quality in wyoming around fracking sites is worse than what we're finding in los angeles. so the question that we have is, should we deepen our dependence on dirty fuels, should we extend our dependence on natural gas, or should we shift?" "the epa this week released a statement saying that from 1990 to 2007, natural gas production has increased by a whopping 40%, and at the same time the industry has lowered emissions from methane by 20% and the climate change battle is not as severe as once thought." proponents remain largely focused on the economic benefits to communities with fracking jobs, while critics are concerned about limited regulations. the lumber business is building strength from the housing recovery. fourteen lumber mills in the u.s. and canada will reopen after shutting down following the housing crisis. also, lumber prices are on the rise, which is causing home prices to increase. reports say the industry was slow to re- invest following the depth of the housing industry downturn. president obama is making two more nominations: he's naming

cruz wences/residente de epa x 20 años 2:57:20 ya cuando salimos ya empezaron a llegar la ambulancia, muchachos estaban heridos. este el ms reciente incidente de violencia que la policia atribuye a una pandilla a quien se rehuz nombrar esta maÑana en esta rueda de prensa, pero a quien le pidio desistir de la violencia. s.o.t. ron davis/jefe de policía de epa 27:46:11 there are very few shootings or murders in east palo alto that occur in which we don't know in short order who is responsible. el jefe de polica dijo que son pocos los tiroteos en los que no descubren en poco tiempomquien es el responsable... el reto es que testigos cooperen para poder enjuiciarlos. con la ayuda de agencias vecinas, implementaran un operativo anti-pandillas.. cansada de la violencia, mariana snchez decidi mudarse de east palo alto. s.o.t. mariana sánchez/residente de east palo alto 1:08:06 alguna vez fui testigo de un muchacho que quisieron asaltar y lo navajeraon, lo dejaron todo desangrado. la rueda de prensa de hoy se hizo en parte para tranquilizar a los residentes. s.o.t. ruben abrica/alcalde de east

melissa: steve, the epa said quote, repeatedly coirmed hydrauc fracki has caused no proven incidentser contaminatioo. fracking is not new. it has been going on for a long time. just the technology has gotten better, we can do re of it. that's why you're aring more about itow. is there anything that can be done? they say in claudia's rept they're waiting to make sure it is sfe and clean so we don't wreck california. if i cld take them at their word but i would say that makes sense. but the epa who doesn't like energy already said there is no proven case of groundwater contamination, so what more do they need? >> to be against hydraulic fracturing is like being ainst a cure of cancer. that is how big a breakthrough this isin terms of oil and gas resources. as you said, it is happening, melissa, all over the country. it is happening in north dakota. it has been ppening in texas for many years. there have been no water contamination issues there. it is happening in west virgina and pennsylvania and those states are getting ch. look, i agree you have to be very careful about this. it is a

we have over 5000 scientists at epa. it is a core capability we have to maintain the three kinds of decisions for the public. have fellowships the the laboratory. identify innovative teachers who might be interested. we're trying to work closely with students. we do have the mission to help attract. we have these programs that keep our face in front of people we want to attract. we're working on that. it is challenging in the current environment. the interesting thing i have seen, and i followed the survey very closely. i always talk about this as one of my most important report cards i get, whether i like the grades or not. >> 54. >> think you. -- thank you. [laughter] >> appreciate your reminding me. i often find the hardest part is not the recruitment peace. i think project early president obama said one of his jobs was to make public-service cool again. then there was 10 years ago or 20 years ago to get into public service. i think it is how we as leaders keep those folks and build career paths that as so often the c

narrator: epa standards did not safeguard against cryptosporidium, because it was an unknown threat. once it contaminated the water supply, the treatment plant had no capability to kill the pathogen. so it spread throughout the system. biedrzycki: we saw an expenditure of $90 million to upgrade both water treatment plants. kaminski: cryptosporidium was a wake-up call. it was a wake-up call for us. it's a wake-up call for the nation. take care of your infrastructure before you have the kind of problem we had. biedrzycki: by no stretch of the imagination do i think we're out of the woods. recent cdc statistics indicate that up to 32 million cases of waterborne disease occur each year in this country. roy: but the vast majority of waterborne outbreaks go undetected. when people first get ill, they think, "oh, it's something i ate last night." they don't think, "oh, it's something i drank last night." narrator: the milwaukee incident pointed out the potential vulnerability of our drinking water infrastructure in controlling the spread of illness. biedrzycki: it's incumbent upon us to try

but the epa who doesn't like energy already said there is no proven case of groundwater contaminationthey need? >> to be against hydraulic fracturing is like being against a cure of cancer. that is how big a breakthrough this is in terms of oil and gas resources. as you said, it is happening, melissa, all over the country. it is happening in north dakota. it has been happening in texas for many years. there have been no water contamination issues there. it is happening in west virgina and pennsylvania and those states are getting rich. look, i agree you have to be very careful about this. it is a new technology. california's a beautiful state. you don't want contamination of the drinking water but you know, we can walk and chewum the same time. this should be regulated to protect the drinking water, but it can be done in ways that will raise tens of billions of dollars for the state. by the way that is a way to pay off huge unfunded liabilities, to improve the school. so it's a win-win for the private sector and the government sector. melissa: aaron, i was in northern california this

the epa says it is safe.say they're not against all ethanol, only how much they're required to blend. >> we just feel that it is not safe for the consumers. it is not safe for their engines. >> the refiners don't like it. neither do most environmentalists or automakers. >> 95% of the today's cars are not suited for e15 based on what the people who make those cars have told us. >> so why does the federal government require consumers pump more and more ethanol into their tank? >> when the law was passed we were 60% dependent on imported oil for liquid transportation fuels. today we're only 41% dependent. a good part of the reason for that is the growth in ethanol. >> first mandated by congress in 2007 as a clean, domestic fuel, gas sold in the u.s. is now 10% ethanol. the epa supports increasing that to 15%. but the auto industry says e15 corrodes pumps, fuel lines and injectors. >> the problem is that congress has mandated more ethanol into the, gasoline pool than we can safely put. >> put e15 in vehicle not d

the bush administration bpa had a harder time than the obama epa. is has the d.c.friendly to the obama administration? in. >> in case after case, whether it is involving rules, implementing dodd-frank, whether it is involving cigarette warnings, for young people, whether it is allowing the department of labor to have additional people at the helm, epa regulations, this particular court led by judges who used lit nous tests, hostile to workers rights, consumer and environmental protection. >> well, there are plenty of examples where they haven't. >> most recently there were epa regulations involving air pollution. so i think if you look at the recent history of this circuit, you will see a court driven by ultra conservatives to reach result that really are very harmful to all of us. >> nan, i appreciate you walking us through that. i think another time we will do an hour of d.c. jurisprudence with a battle. we will good all deep on that. >> let's do it. >> we'll do it. thank you for spending time with us, and richard krourdry is another one of those examples. thank