commissioner trasvina, i commissioner lundberg, i commissioner epler i president swig. all right. that motion carries 5 to 0 and they're adopted as amended. so we are now moving on to item number four. an and this is appeal number 20 3-030. bruce and deborah mccloud versus department of building inspection planning department approval subject property 144 25th avenue appealing the issuance on june 9th, 2023 to frank bellizzi of an alteration permit. the project generally consists of replacement of the existing first floor deck and expanding the deck to the rear yard setback line, an addition of a roof deck above the second bedroom office floor accessed via four new doors from the third floor office. this is permit number 2023 0202 1229. note on august 2nd, 2023, upon motion by commissioner eppler, the board voted 5 to 0 to continue this item to september 27th in order to give the parties an opportunity to confer and seek a resolution to the matter with input from the planning department. the board further encouraged the project sponsor to reach out to members of the public who exp

i commissioner epler. aye. so that motion carries 5 to 0. thank you. thank you. we'll let you know when the when we're finished. okay so president swig you, you would like to address the parties for item seven. so on item seven, i read the brief and it reminded me of, of it was like a horrors of christmas past. and a christmas past was only a couple of weeks ago when we heard a tree case that is still under discussion. but where we went through an entire hearing and we realized, man, we are just full of holes here and there are things missing and there's testimony from the department that's missing. there were holes and this is not to criticize the departments or criticize the appellants in those cases. it just happened. and we went through a two hour hearing and came up with absolutely nothing because we realized we didn't have the materials in a full enough fashion to enable us to make a just decision for both for either party. in that case. and we motion to postpone having the hearing. so we could get all the data in front of us so that we could do our jobs pr