eppler. so typically, one of the questions that i ask is can we move the meter outside of the structure, right? so the -- that casing implement, right, really coming into the conversation that i'm talking about, risers that are inside the structure or inside, under neath the building. so the first goal is if we can move the meter outside, if there's a location that's acceptable to the property owner, it's acceptable to pg&e, and it's just space because in san francisco we're constrained where we can move this. the first question is hey, can we move this outside, because if we can move it outside with the casing or sleeving, there's no problem at that point. pull the meter set apart, and we deactivate the old steel pipe and insert the plastic pipe in that. >> next question is about this -- the funnel that these cases were put into to get down to the 75. i note that when we got down to the 246 properties that were identified, pg&e went back in and found 128 of them that had been upgraded as par

eppler. in the first replacement program and went onto the -- to these properties. were those, the properties that took everything from 2.6 to 128, were those properties that weren't inputted into the database correctly or were they properties that had been identified by the database? >> it can get a little confusing because when we talk about the replacement, we're talking about replacement of main and lateral service levels, but that's not the only time we replace gas service laterals. if there's other concern, lateral leakage being one of them, we would replace the services, too. so other services have been replaced, [indiscernible], so they weren't on the radar as far as gprp [indiscernible] so the whole block hasn't necessarily come up hot as a scoring for gprp, where some of these 75 may be in areas of -- it's just the main is in good shape, there's no issue there. that's why some of these ended up in locations where we hadn't replaced the whole neighborhood yet. >> so, so the reason wh