whatsoever. >> no equivocation at all.a lot of members of the house right now probably are in an uproar because they will not be supportive. he has a big job to do in the next week to try to gain support in the house. >> also the other thing that seemed to be standing out is that he came out alone. nancy pelosi was not by his side. what did you make of that? >> well, i think perhaps it was a strategy, he's thinking it's better for him to be alone and be the leader to bring in his republican colleagues and bringing in other members of the house. him standing there with nancy pelosi doesn't help his cause, what he's trying do is bring his fellow republicans and many are absolutely against this. >> so going in to to this particular meeting i asked you when you said you thought it was 50/50. senator john mccain from arizona on board saying the united states needs to take decisive action. and now john boehner, the speaker of the house saying the united states needs to do the same. handicap it for me, does it look like the presi

mandatory discretionary review so for the people who are leaving the room please leave the room equivocally so we can precede with this hearing >> good afternoon president fong i'm with the department staff. the case is a mandatory discretionary review requesting two - the proposed mc d will not allow smoking or vaporizing eating - they're not located within a school or community center that serves persons under the age of 18. they are not located in the alcoholic areas. we've received support to the project and option from four different people. in order to minimize the commercial areas the following conditions are being recommended the business hours are limited from 8 to 4 and the property is a through lot so the seals will be redistrict and they'll have to provide ventilation in the areas and all garbage to be in the building until that pickup day. this is consistent with the planning code. it will not have a commercial store presence. and it is well served by public transit and is in balance with the general plan. we recommend this be profound with the awe for mentioned conditions >> p

he is not going to equivocate on this issue. what he is saying is he's not going to put a dynamic in play in which the congress can willy-nilly in an unfettered way threaten the credit rating of our country every time they want so the policy goal. so we have to have this argued out now. it's better to argue it out now. and there will be consequences. and unfortunately, they won't just be for political parties. they'll be for our country and our economy if the republicans go in this direction. but it's far better for us to settle this matter now. and that's what the president's saying. he's not going to equivocate or compromise one inch. the debt ceiling will not be negotiated. he won't negotiate about the budget and what the spending priorities are. but he's not going to negotiate about the debt limit. and the congress voted to spend this money, and the congress has a responsibility to pay its bills. >> congressman, richard wolf, thank you both for your time tonight. >> thanks reverend. >>> coming um, more on the grand obstructi

. >> if they did it two or three weeks ago, without the he equivocation it would be fine. >> congress is on hold. no votes on any syria resolution as lawmakers wait-and-see how the diplomacy works. the post office says the cash problems are so severe they cannot buy trucks that deliver mail. the age is looking to rent mail delivery vans. they own the largest fleets in the world but most of the vehicles are 18 to 25 years old. the cost of replacing the vehicles cost $6 billion. so leasing came up as a fix. >> mike nicco? >> it has been cooler today and we have had drizzle in the not bay and along the coast. flight arrival delays in sfo with the coldest weather of seven-day forecast today and i will show you the warming trend. big changes for bay area market trade with the new owner and possible closing of you're sure to get a better bundle. just choose the two, three, even four services you want to build a bundle that works for you. [ female announcer ] call at&t now. choose a u-verse triple-play bundle for just $79 a month. get the same great price for two years. plus switch today and

. >>> si no me equivoce, raÚl de molina tiene fotografÍas de este artista, son impresionantes. >>> increÍblee quedaron con la duda por ahora. como siempre nos encanta estar conectados con ustedes, gracias por siempre hacernos nÚmero uno en redes sociales, los invitamos a nuestras pÁginas, "primer impacto", y nuestras personales, con mucho cariÑo respondemos sus mensajes. >>> sÍ, en os despedimos, los esperamos el lunes. en redes socialdel dÍa. ♪. ♪. ♪. >>> hola quÉ tal, viernes 13 de septiembre del 2013 los titulares, la alegrÍa de indocumentado en illinois por recibir licencia de conducir, fue remplazada por la duda de quienes califican para obtenerlas. congresistas de arizona, estuvieron en la frontera, para escuchar a los que viven allÍ, y proponer una reforma migratoria integral. era hispano el hombre rescatado en colorado, cuando su carro fue arrastrado por corrientes por las torrenciales lluvias. hoy hablÓ. por la fuerza la policÍa de mÉxico tomÓ el control del zÓcalo de mÉxico, que los maestros en huelga tomaron, asÍ

they're going through this, but the president is not going to equivocate one inch.ot going to compromise one iota and we'll have the fight if we need to have it. how much do we need to hurt our own economy for the republicans to learn that they lost the last presidential election. >> thanks for coming on the show by the way. this is going to be heated argument not just here. let me ask about next week. the senate is expected because it's a democrat led senate. it's not going to include elimination of obama care in the resolution. that will come back to the house of representatives sometime next week. hopefully in time for the leadership to do something for speaker boehner. what do you want speaker boehner to do if he's confronted with the fact that the senate did not go along with the house? >> it's hard to deal with the hypotheticals of what could happen next week, chris. we want to keep government open and our goal is rid the american people of obama care. it gives us multiple opportunities to bring this policy forward. the president has already signed seven bills

you've got to balance america's security would have the rest of the people of the world with quite equivocating it would be nice to have seen him put up a more robust defense of democracy too sure there have to be a balance but it has to be proportionate in any democratic society and overwhelming and endemic data mining of all our information of all our communications is not proportionate so that of the road the basic principles of human rights stay with us here in r.t. for the latest from the un general assembly in new york. thirty greenpeace activists are facing charges of piracy after trying to board a russian oil platform in protest against drilling in the arctic both russian and foreign activists are among those being investigated. the details. this could entailed up to fifteen years in prison and up to a half a million fine now also from the russian investigators that after the boat the arctic sunrise was seized in the waters in the economic waters of the russian federation close to the oil rig. also they found some kind of electronic equipment on board that vessel the equipment which is

you've got to balance america's security with the of the rest of the people of the world with quite equivocating it would be nice to have seen him put up a more robust defense for democracy to assure the have to be a balance but i have to be proportionate in any democratic society and overwhelming and endemic data mining of all our information of all our communications is not proportionate so that of the road the basic principles of human rights are to live here in moscow other news coming up for you after this short break stay with us if you can. you knew his secret laboratory. was able to build most sophisticated robots which all unfortunately doesn't give a darn about anything tim's mission to teach creation why it should care about humans and. this is why you should care watch only on the dot com. take knowledge is the name in aviation is the game bush's latest stealth politics to the max. brings innovations you can down the ground night she looks of. news continues here in r.t. kenya security forces say they're in control of nairobi's westgate mall the site of kenya's worst terrorist attack

balance the america's security here is he with the rest of the peoples of the world was quite equivocating it would be nice to have seen him put up more of us defense for democracy too sure there has to be a balance but it has to be proportionate in any democratic society and overwhelming and endemic data mining of all our information of all our communications is not proportionate so that does erode the basic principles of human rights. yeah and she also urged the journalist somebody to first tagged cyberspace from spying activities and summer taj and said brazil will equip itself with legislation and technology to protect its online users do you think it is possible for brazil to fully isolate its cyber space. well it's a difficult one because we've all become globally so dependent on the u.s. infrastructure the u.s. systems and u.s. corporate internet services such as google and what have you so that could be more difficult however many internet pioneers many internet activists of p. years now been talking about moving away from the need to move away from prior tree american owners softw

mission has now confirmed on equivocally and objectively that chemical weapons were used in syria on august twenty first in the area of a damascus suburb called the incident a war crime he told members of the security council that this report is the most significant confirm use of chemical weapons against civilians since saddam hussein used them in one thousand nine hundred eighty eight the u.n. chief said ecological chemical and medical samples that were collected in syria give the u.n. convincing evidence that surface to surface missiles were used during the during the conflict on august twenty first and that the chemical weapons that were were used contained sarin gas and he believes he believes he says that this report proves that the chemical weapons were were used killed hundreds of civilians there in children this is a report that the international community has been waiting on for some weeks now now the u.n. inspectors were mandated by ki-moon to report on whether chemical weapons were used and if so which ones but the inspectors are not responsible to say who used the chemic

syria, the president is over his head and doesn't know where to go after years of waiting and equivocatingnd not making a dgsz. as far as libya is concerned, that's political. covered up the fact that it was a decided terrorist attack and therefore dragged their feet in response that it would be critically important. the longer you wait, the more difficult it makes your options. we can still act there and send a strong signal. but, instead, we're looking at syria and punting to congress and handing sluxs to putin. . >> scott, in terms of the infiltration of special operators into benghazi or into militia head quarters, don't we have libya nationals that we could con tratract this operati too? but couldn't we get libyans or someone who looks like libyans to carry out an almost law enforcement snatch and grab or, indeed. >> i don't want to specialize so much on covert operations in so far as what we can and can't do. we certainly can support our libyan counter parts to bring folks to justice. we should have done so a long time ago. >> is retrobugs, scott, is that a valid military goal? is th

syria, the president is over his head and doesn't know where to go after years of waiting and equivocatingnd not making a dgsz. as far as libya is concerned, that's political. covered up the fact that it was a decided terrorist attack and therefore dragged their feet in response that it would be critically important. the longer you wait, the more difficult it makes your options. we can still act there and send a strong signal. but, instead, we're looking at syria and punting to congress and handing sluxs to putin. . >> scott, in terms of the infiltration of special operators into benghazi or into militia head quarters, don't we have libya nationals that we could con tratract this operati too? but couldn't we get libyans or someone who looks like libyans to carry out an almost law enforcement snatch and grab or, indeed. >> i don't want to specialize so much on covert operations in so far as what we can and can't do. we certainly can support our libyan counter parts to bring folks to justice. we should have done so a long time ago. >> is retrobugs, scott, is that a valid military goal? is th

unequaled goal and we can show -- an equivocal and we can show you the latest figures from the senatestill a lot of the fence. in the house, it is even heavier. this is the latest numbers from public opinion will stop 36% in favor. democrats more in favor of intervention that republicans. you heard joshua landis who is living and republican oklahoma where people are against it. this is going backwards compared to the past in a way. >> you are trying to compare two things that are not comparable. we have a real moral question here and let's face it, some republicans who are doing some politicking. they would probably like to take some good digs at the president. there is one thing i would like to say a cuss it is interesting you make a parallel the for the syrian regime and the american administration communication. it is much easier to communicate in a dictatorship that in a democracy. what we have an america and as americans we are thankful for this, is debate on stop this is how the founding fathers designed the system. -- is a debate. this is how the founding fathers designed the s

i didn't come here to equivocate. i have it on tape. she comes back enraged by that experience. and she writes in "tomorrow is now" did not we learn anything from the war? this is what the nazis did to the jews. she is mad. but she will not let go of her belief in the country. so this book is a declaration as powerful as the universal declaration of human rights that says that america was born in a vision. that vision wasn't perfect. we had to tweak it all the way. and a lot of times we got it right, and a lot of times we screwed it up. it's continually marching forward. and yet in the early '60s we scummed is a cummed to excessive fear. not hysteria. that said we can't change that. it if we do this, somebody is going to come get us. disple about growth. human righting are about political and civil rights. they're about social and economic and culture right. they are about the right to food, the right to shelter, the right to an income. the right to go to school. is the right to dream and to is dare. eleanor roosevelt said if people go to bed hungry every night and they don't ha

as a small business and being around other small businesses i can tell you un equivocally that is one of the problems. >> g.e. isn't a small business. what do they know about a small business maybe? so what can the government do about capital? what do you want from them? >> from the government's perspective what do, what we all know we can do is what we all need which is roads, schools, bridges, infrastructure in this country. that helps to get the small person working who gets money for small businesses. the average person working spending dollars spend s it on small business which spends it. the dollars roll over. >> sounds like a stimulus bill that didn't get the economy stimulated when the money was supposed to go out for roads, infrastructure and all that. here we are . >> two points. >> okay. >> one, all the money didn't go out. the money that did go out did keep us from going over -- well, we did go over the cliff but it padded the landing. it would have been worse without stimulus. >> a lot of people say, look, since the government didn't do a great job, the fear of what would

it is equivocal and they believe they can have if he can. wanted to be is more specific as to what the goal are so that they can be judged to have achieved those goals. but overall, i want to come back to your first point and to something charlie said. i thought he made the point for congress supporting this president when the vote comes. that's not clear that vote is there right now to support him. the argument made on a personal level, i was not supportive of this along with 80% of americans, democrats and republicans who think we have been in wars and it is not clear what we were doing if we went into syria. whose side we were on and whether or not the bad guys, assad was in fact holding back people who might one day bite us. al qaeda. i think the president and secretary of state kerry made strong case leading up to this moment which is why it feels so empty right now. that they didn't act. but if you look out at the broader picture, the fact that the american people have questions about intervention. the fact the congress has been very c

. >> our position is un equivocal. we won'ting negotiate with republicans in congress. ♪ >> he will certainly meet with -- >> i can discuss this with president putin. this is not new. i have been discussing it with putin for some time now. >> karl rove joins us. nice to see you. >> great to be here. >> the gloves are off. first we have the speaker boehner clip. then jay carney said boehner has putin envy. >> we'll ignore that childish comment from jay carney. let's roll it back to to 2006. the president has a fundamental problem. in 2006 he led an effort in the senate to not raise the debt ceiling saying that any president asking for an increase in the debt ceiling displayed a failure of leadership. he wanted to defund the iraq war. he attempted to stop the war by leading the effort against raising the debt ceiling. he was supported by senator schumer who we just saw. when the american people get lectureded on why we should raise the debt ceiling without any offsets on spending or when we get lectured by senator schume

they're going through this but the president is not going to equivocate one inch, not going to compromisene iota. we're going to have this fight if we need to have it. the question is how much are we going to hurt our own economy for the republicans to learn they lost the last election? >> this is going to be a heated argument not just here, by the way. let me ask you how it's going to go next week. the senate is expected because it's a democrat-led senate that it's not going to eliminate obama care in the resolution. that will come back to the house of representatives. hopefully in time for the leadership to do something for speaker boehner. what do you want speaker boehner to do if he's confronted with the fact the senate did not go along with the house. what do you want him to do? >> it's hard to deal with the hypotheticals. we want to rid the american people of obama care. we have two major issues before us. both the continuing resolution and the debt limit as well. gives us multiple opportunities to bring bring this policy forward. the president has already signed seven bills that ha

the police chief was somewhat equivocal saying there are potentially more shooters and she's going to report back later once she has more information but i think the white house decided that the president would address the shootingses off the top. he was already going to in the beginning make a turn from the crisis in syria which has dominated so much of our attention to the financial crisis of the state of the economy and i think they decided clearly to express sympathy and condolences, investigative help to local authorities and then move on. >> does the president risk, though, criticism for being somewhat tone deaf, given the fact that it is still an active story in washington, by making the speech and as you pointed out last hour, the government has to go on and business has it to get done in washington, but what are the risks for him of getting criticism for addressing those issues when you do have fatalities basically right down the street? >> i don't see any risk from that, sue. the only risk i see from the information for the administration is that the message the president de

. >> it's paralyzing equivocation on his part. you may support him going on. he should have gone in before. if you do a body count, there was justification to go in earlier. i get the thing drawing the line about chemical. now he's a man without supporters. now he has to turn to mccain and graham, that's untenable position. he's going to have the anti-war democrats all over him. enough votes to ensure those guys that they don't have to support this for him. he's got a big problem on his hands. if he doesn't go in without congressional support, he's going to look -- >> the good news is, robert, i hate to cut you off, i'm getting yelled at by your supporters. we're going to have a -- we're going to continue the analysis of a possible military strike on syria and later, the best and worst stories of the summer. we'll run down them. could the five of us ever live together? some companies are having co-workers cohabitate. we'll try to imagine what that would be like. [ male announcer ] don't miss red lobster's endless shrimp. t's as much as you like, any way you li

and i say that without equivocation. and so to see someone like ted cruz wrap his arms around that very troublesome legacy and say that ought to be the future of not only the gop but the future of this country really speaks a lot to not only what jesse helms's legacy was but what the character integrity of ted krcr looks like today. >> you know, dana, ted cruz is making front pages of magazines. he's the rising star in the republican party. for him to say this, to say that as a kid his first political donation was to jesse helms, i mean, did he grow up in north carolina? why would he be attracted from another state to jesse helms? what does that say about ted cruz and those that are likeminded? >> well, he grew up in canada. so maybe the f.e.c. needs to investigate that contribution. look, ted cruz is the rising star in a shrinking party. and i think we can really just look at two book ends here. a decade ago you had trent lott make a very similar remark about strom thurmond. i think it was his 100th birthday. and what h

there's been equivocation from the american side over the years on this particular issue.t said, i think the chemical aspect and its use is probably the most -- one of the most powerful arguments this president has made, that if we're going to declare these types of weapons, chemical weapons can be used without any sort of consequence on the national stage, we're setting -- maybe it's not the first time but we're continuing a dangerous precedent that becomes more and more difficult to enforce and he's been full throat at the president in calling out the u.n. for making promises on paper and not enforcing them. there's been questions about how much our interest is at stake. jon: we'll see if congress gives them the go ahead for this unbelievably small strike. pete, thank you. >> thanks, jon. jon: the president is sitting down to talk syria with chris wallace. you can see the interview tonight at 6:00 p.m. eastern on "special report." you do not want to miss the questions that chris will have for the president and his responses. jenna: we do not. in the meantime we'll turn t

psychological momentum to assad after his devastating attack on his own people by this recent equivocationability to deliver a significant strike but he is also going to take, you know, the three to four weeks to make those targets as protected as possible. his mobile sites certainly will be tucked in among the civilian population. the buildings he has significant functions in, he will pull out of those. heather: you have the syrian rebels themselves reportedly already setting up in some of those areas in order to take advantage of any military strike from the u.s. they would be sitting ducks, possibly, human targets themselves. but i want to go back to the rebels that you mentioned. you talked about recall aing them with small arms, assisting them, giving them the power. we're not just talking about one group of rebels. there is a lot of different groups, some of which are backed by hamas, hezbollah, al qaeda. how do we know that we don't put the chemical weapons into their hands? >> that's a great question. there's a lot of misunderstanding about that issue. the largest group of oppositi

especially when they, in their view, see the united states and the world community equivocating somewhatbit of a respite. why would they do anything that would generate more heat on them than already exists? i don't see anything happening. now, you know, if the u.s. does strike at some point, you know, the question will be, will it affect a change of behavior? certainly not a change of regime, but a change of behavior. then we'll see at that point. >> what do you think? >> i think again the bashar al assad regime is doing things in a very calibrated way. it's a calibrated way of bloodshed. enough to do the job and protect the regime and to defeat the rebels. but not enough to bring down the wrath of the world community. and so far they've really been treading right at that line and crossing it. so i suspect they may draw back a little bit from that, at least for a time, and concentrate on their most immediate problems. >> david lesch, thank you so much for your insight. having met this man multiple times. professor, middle east studies. thank you so much. i really appreciate it. >> my pl

he said there is un equivocal evidence it was the assad regime.set foot oud syria they will be arrested, indicted. not threatened so much with the military force, but let's do something if he doesn't. >> none of this is ever going to happen. first of all, the idea that john kerry, standing up there convinced a single person, he didn't convince russia, china. they will. >> oh oh, sergei, you have taken over for us. we ego from mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall to mr. putin, whatever you think is best. we are here because of the mishandling of this important matter by this administration are you saying we should have bombed them earlier ? >> no. if barack obama thought it was in the interest of the country he could act. he didn't need to do go to congress if he believed it was in the national security of the country. >> if he hit assad moodily, i agree. once we find the hot blood cool it was incumbent on us to bring in the rest of the world. why? this is a crime against humanity, not specifically the united states. >> no one is with military action

legislation that will meet the needs of the tea party, the anarchists -- and i say that without any equivocation. they do not want government to work on any level, not the local level, not the state level, and certainly not here. any day that's a bad day for government is a cheering day for them. so i am so impressed with the senator's speech, but i am distressed about what's going on here in the united states senate about trying to get things done. bipartisanship is a thing of the past. now all we do is gotcha legislation. i was given the assurance by many republicans, let's do energy. energy efficiency, let's do it. we'll work together on a bipartisan basis, and the first thing out of the box is something that will derail this legislation. so i am thankful that we have a new senator who is as talented and as good as he is, but i wish his talents could be more put to work here in the senate. ms. warren: madam president, i'm proud to come to the floor today to welcome my colleague, ed markey, on giving his first speech on the floor of the united states senate. long before i came a united states

in fact, they seem to be emboldened by this indecisiveness, this equivocation on the part of the president say we do go. president obama says we're going anyway. we hit the airfields which is what i think they're going for, so they don't actually deliver the weapons. they're not actually going after the weapons. assad is still in power. iran does something to israel or iraq. where are we? then do we have to declare war on syria? >> what do you think will happen if we don't go? it will leave every despot in the world who wants to use chemical weapons to go ahead and use it. >> you don't know that. >> you know who is against america on this? left wing democrats and anti-war democrats and right wing republicans. >> and the american public. >> the polling on this is ridiculous. >> is it inaccurate? they're all inaccurate? >> i would like to poll right after the president's speech and see what it says. >> i'd like to ask dana this. this is what i'm worried. you watch russia send the ships over there. is this really going to lead to that showdown? will i be sleeping on the couch for the rest of

and the senate has made it clear that they have no intentions of retreating or equivocating one inch on this matter. all we are going to do is spin our wheels. health care delays is health care denied. in our country after some 90 plus years, multiple presidents, have come to the conclusion that there are americans that need access to health care, that there is going to be away for them to get rid of those exchanges are going to open on october 1, no matter what we do, and the majority needs to speak a little hard truth in the mirror to itself on this matter, the sooner the better. >> the time of the gentleman has expired. the gentleman from kentucky. >> i yield two minutes to the distinguished gentleman from pennsylvania, the vice chairman of the appropriations subcommittee on state and foreign operations. the speaker pro tempore: recognize for two minutes. >> thank you, mr. speaker. i want to say very clearly, i certainly oppose shutting down the government. i certainly oppose defaulting on his country's obligations. we have an obligation to govern. i take that very seriously. bill

downll market down -- mark and equivocal answer. willie exchanges be ready -- will be exchanges be ready? >> it's the same answer. >> consumers will be able -- >> to go online, get a determination of what they are eligible for, find out what the subsidy amount is. they will be able to look at the plans available to them where will be abled they to -- they will see the premium that of subsidy and they will be able to choose a plan and get enrolled in a plan. 1 and i will be ready january -- that will be ready january 1? >> it will be ready october 1. that is my understanding. >> full implementation of the law come a will it cause employers to alter or drop coverage for their employees? >> i don't know the answer to that question. employers make lots of decisions for lots of reasons. some having to do with the affordable care act, some not. >> willful implementation result in reduced costs for all american -- willful implementation -- will full implementation result in a reduced cost for all americans? petition is causing competitive

and the senate has made it clear that they have no intention of retreating or equivocating one inch on this matter. all we're doing is spinning our wheels. so to delay health care, i would say this -- health care delay is health care denied. in our country, after some 90-plus years, multiple presidents have come to the conclusion that when there are americans who need access to health care, there's going to be a way for them to get it. those exchanges are going to open on october 1, no matter what we do and the majority needs to speak a little hard truth in the mirror to itself on this matter, the sooner, the better. the speaker pro tempore: the time of the gentlelady has expired. the gentleman from kentucky. mr. rogers: i yield two minutes to the distinguished gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. pitt who is the vice chairman of the appropriations subcommittee on state and foreign operations, mr. dent. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. dent: i certainly oppose shutting down the government, i certainly oppose defaulting on this country's only fwation well, have an o

it continues to expand its nuclear weapons potential and states equivocal he -- unequivocably that it has no intention of giving up its weapons. what reason should we have for optimism in this case? you have mentioned, of course, six-party talks on the anniversary of the september 2000 five agreement, in which of course china played a vital role . what reasons would we have for optimism for what could result from any presumed talks, and how do you see the united states and test caseerating as a of major power relations? thank you. >> both questions are important ones. for the question raised by me, it iscohen, for the first time to hear it, that is the line has been changed into a solid one. what i can say to you is there has been no change in china's position with respect to the 9 dash line. line shouldnk this become a solid one, but if you did see such a map showing this, i would maybe have to look into it and check it. this line, the 9 dash line, was drawn by the r.o.c. government back in 1948 and this has been upheld by successive chinese governments and i do not think there has b