my name is ignacio, and i am with erap. i'll keep my remarks brief, but first, i want to say that -- just highlight the process by which we have come with the sfmta and public works to a decision on an infrastructure led joint development process as really the best way forward for this project, and that is fundamentally based on kind of a rigorous analysis of three things. first is the range of all the different delivery options that are available, considering those very carefully. second, forming that position by a market sounding that was started earlier this year, and where we spoke with over 30 firms in the industry, and then thirdly, by looking at case studies and what are the lessons learned that we can bring into this project of case studies of similar joint developments around the country and around the world? and really, the infrastructure led joint development process is -- what is important is because it is a joint development where you have a single building with a dual purpose, what you need is a process to ens

my name is ignacio, and i am with erap. i'll keep my remarks brief, but first, i want to say that -- just highlight the process by which we have come with the sfmta and public works to a decision on an infrastructure led joint development process as really the best way forward for this project, and that is fundamentally based on kind of a rigorous analysis of three things. first is the range of all the different delivery options that are available, considering those very carefully. second, forming that position by a market sounding that was started earlier this year, and where we spoke with over 30 firms in the industry, and then thirdly, by looking at case studies and what are the lessons learned that we can bring into this project of case studies of similar joint developments around the country and around the world? and really, the infrastructure led joint development process is -- what is important is because it is a joint development where you have a single building with a dual purpose, what you need is a process to ens

my name is ignacio, and i am with erap. i'll keep my remarks brief, but first, i want to say that -- just highlight the process by which we have come with the sfmta and public works to a decision on an infrastructure led joint development process as really the best way forward for this project, and that is fundamentally based on kind of a rigorous analysis of three things. first is the range of all the different delivery options that are available, considering those very carefully. second, forming that position by a market sounding that was started earlier this year, and where we spoke with over 30 firms in the industry, and then thirdly, by looking at case studies and what are the lessons learned that we can bring into this project of case studies of similar joint developments around the country and around the world? and really, the infrastructure led joint development process is -- what is important is because it is a joint development where you have a single building with a dual purpose, what you need is a process to ens

my name is ignacio, and i am with erap.rks brief, but first, i want to say that -- just highlight the process by which we have come with the sfmta and public works to a decision on an infrastructure led joint development process as really the best way forward for this project, and that is fundamentally based on kind of a rigorous analysis of three things. first is the range of all the different delivery options that are available, considering those very carefully. second, forming that position by a market sounding that was started earlier this year, and where we spoke with over 30 firms in the industry, and then thirdly, by looking at case studies and what are the lessons learned that we can bring into this project of case studies of similar joint developments around the country and around the world? and really, the infrastructure led joint development process is -- what is important is because it is a joint development where you have a single building with a dual purpose, what you need is a process to ensure the deliverabi

my name is ignacio, and i am with erap. i'll keep my remarks brief, but first, i want to say that -- just highlight the process by which we have come with the sfmta and public works to a decision on an infrastructure led joint development process as really the best way forward for this project, and that is fundamentally based on kind of a rigorous analysis of three things. first is the range of all the different delivery options that are available, considering those very carefully. second, forming that position by a market sounding that was started earlier this year, and where we spoke with over 30 firms in the industry, and then thirdly, by looking at case studies and what are the lessons learned that we can bring into this project of case studies of similar joint developments around the country and around the world? and really, the infrastructure led joint development process is -- what is important is because it is a joint development where you have a single building with a dual purpose, what you need is a process to ens

has been identified from various sources, including the revenue and general fund appropriations and erap appropriations and implementation is underway as of november 2020, including the launch of street crisis teams and the hiring of a new director. and, number three, all of the members of the mental health s.f. implementation working group were appointed in the fall of 2020, and the group is scheduled to begin meeting this month. so consistent with the responses from d.p.h. and the health commission and the civil grand jury as recognized in their comments i move to amend the board response resolution, a copy of which you should have in your email, so that the first two resolve clauses should read, resolve that the board of supervisors report that recommendation number r3 will not be implemented because of the permanent public health is already reclazzified, the department of behavioral hel position to reflect a new structure and salary. that's the recommendation does not need to be implemented and be it further resolved that the board of supervisor reports that recommendation number r4

has been identified from various sources, including the revenue and general fund appropriations and erap appropriations and implementation is underway as of november 2020, including the launch of street crisis teams and the hiring of a new director. and, number three, all of the members of the mental health s.f. implementation working group were appointed in the fall of 2020, and the group is scheduled to begin meeting this month. so consistent with the responses from d.p.h. and the health commission and the civil grand jury as recognized in their comments i move to amend the board response resolution, a copy of which you should have in your email, so that the first two resolve clauses should read, resolve that the board of supervisors report that recommendation number r3 will not be implemented because of the permanent public health is already reclazzified, the department of behavioral hel position to reflect a new structure and salary. that's the recommendation does not need to be implemented and be it further resolved that the board of supervisor reports that recommendation number r4

has been identified from various sources, including the revenue and general fund appropriations and erap appropriations and implementation is underway as of november 2020, including the launch of street crisis teams and the hiring of a new director. and, number three, all of the members of the mental health s.f. implementation working group were appointed in the fall of 2020, and the group is scheduled to begin meeting this month. so consistent with the responses from d.p.h. and the health commission and the civil grand jury as recognized in their comments i move to amend the board response resolution, a copy of which you should have in your email, so that the first two resolve clauses should read, resolve that the board of supervisors report that recommendation number r3 will not be implemented because of the permanent public health is already reclazzified, the department of behavioral hel position to reflect a new structure and salary. that's the recommendation does not need to be implemented and be it further resolved that the board of supervisor reports that recommendation number r4