eric brooks with local grass roots organization our city.and state wide coalition californians for energy choice. you all have received it hopefully in the e-mail and from your secretary the letter that 15 groups presented to you on local clean energy build-out. please do consider this official kind of at the end of the process feedback on plugging us into the climate action plan. in many ways it will help support the climate action plan. in some ways it is crucial to the plan your staff has put forward, especially the equity, economic recovery resilience pieces. i would say with confidence all the groups that signed the letter will tell you you can't get to the goals without a big local clean energy build-out plan. i'll go over quickly the basics of this. we want to see within 10 years of a plan being developed this year, 100% of san francisco's electricity needs to be met within 10 years by locally and reasonably installed clean energy and micro grids. and the key objectives that need to happen with that are local jobs is the first one. sa

eric brooks. i wanted to alert the sfg tv folks that at least on my computer and browsers, the sfgov tv 2 program schedule thanks. >> sfgov, i see maybe you guys can look into it and report back. madam chair. >> right. a motion to approve the regular meeting. i think for all the presentation items 3, 4, and 5, given the fact that we are limited with time in quorum. we want to make sure item number three and four and five. please go ahead for item number three. >> hi good morning i don't have a power the first is i'm asking for your support for this is a non controversial legislation that would make technical nonsubstantiative changes to the court tv government act which governs all lafcos in california. the executive director of cal lafco says that the changes are necessary. and small inconsistencies are found or clarifications needed to make the law. so i've included in your packets, a letter of support, and as i said, this is a noncontroversial legislation. it wouldn't directly affect san franci

eric brooks with local grass roots organization our city.de coalition californians for energy choice. you all have received it hopefully in the e-mail and from your secretary the letter that 15 groups presented to you on local clean energy build-out. please do consider this official kind of at the end of the process feedback on plugging us into the climate action plan. in many ways it will help support the climate action plan. in some ways it is crucial to the plan your staff has put forward, especially the equity, economic recovery resilience pieces. i would say with confidence all the groups that signed the letter will tell you you can't get to the goals without a big local clean energy build-out plan. i'll go over quickly the basics of this. we want to see within 10 years of a plan being developed this year, 100% of san francisco's electricity needs to be met within 10 years by locally and reasonably installed clean energy and micro grids. and the key objectives that need to happen with that are local jobs is the first one. san francisco

eric brooks. so i want to echo the comments of the previous speaker gabriel golfman. you know, it's good that we're proceeding towards at least purchasing one hundred% clean energy within five years, but that's not what clean power sf was supposed to be at all. it was supposed to be a lot more like what gabriel was describing. when we first started working on it in early 2000s, they drafted a plan to build out 100% locally sourced and regionally sourced right here in our bay area renewables, efficiency and all the other resources that gabriel talked about so that we would be energy resilient in our local community. if we continue to just buy energy from long distances as those other communities near those facilities also adapt clean energy policy 100%, we're going to be in conflict with them for those sources of energy. every local on earth needs to localize their energy resources and work aggressively locally on their energy use and we've been asking sfpuc to do this for 16 years now and that plan is not materializing. so my organization and others plan circulating a

. >> brooke: hello, eric. >> eric: good morning, you two. i was, uh, just about to leave for work. >> brooke: oh. well, we could give you a lift. >> eric: is that the purpose of your visit, to chauffeur me into the, uh, into the... >> ridge: uh, okay. take it easy. >> eric: yeah. >> ridge: is quinn still here? >> eric: no, she was gone this morning when i came down for breakfast. >> brooke: hmm. how's it going with you two? >> eric: what is that? another well-intentioned to meddling in my marriage,is rooke:idan pmise youat, caan picndaple ou a more >> eric: q's if anything, i'm hurting her by being unavailable to her physically and emotionally,

eric brooks.i wanted to alert the sfg tv folks that at least on my computer and browsers, the sfgov tv 2 program schedule thanks. >> sfgov, i see maybe you guys can look into it and report back. madam chair. >> right. a motion to approve the regular meeting. i think for all the presentation items 3, 4, and 5, given the fact that we are limited with time in quorum. we want to make sure item number three and four and five. please go ahead for item number three. >> hi good morning i don't have a power the first is i'm asking for your support for this is a non controversial legislation that would make technical nonsubstantiative changes to the court tv government act which governs all lafcos in california. the executive director of cal lafco says that the changes are necessary. and small inconsistencies are found or clarifications needed to make the law. so i've included in your packets, a letter of support, and as i said, this is a noncontroversial legislation. it wouldn't directly affect san francis

. >> brooke: eric, why would she wanna upset this wonderful life that she has here? she's risen to such a position that she never thought possible when she was scrounging for living in vegas. cheating on you would just send her right back out to the streets and she'd never have a chance with you again. >> eric: so you're saying that her faithfulness to me is calculation? >> broe: i'm jusyi do there's really no telling what she might do.

to do this we have a panel of great brookings scholars. eric austen is a senior fellow here brookings. he served with me in the clinton administration and is a member of countless -- has written countless articles on public policy. next is molly reynolds, senior fellow in government studies. she studies congress with an emphasis on how congressional roles and procedure affect domestic policy outcomes. she's the author of the book, exceptions to the rule. she also is editor of the vital statistics on congress, one of the most important compendiums of data on the united states congress. camille doucette is the director of our race, prosperity, and inclusion initiative and focuses on issues of equity, racial justice, economic mobility for low income communities and communities of color. her work at brookings is focused on systemic racism, the economic advancement of black and native americans and importance of relationships to economic mobility and equity in healthcare and local government. john's deputy director at the center for effective public

. >> eric: i heard what you were saying, that you wouldn't allow one evening to spoil our marriage. what does that mean? what happened while i was gone? ♪♪ >> brookee media blasts look great. i'm sure eye on fashion is gonna wanna sit down. >> flo: uh, katie already reserved a spot for hope. >> brooke: wonderful. well, thank you for updating me.

brooks cofounded the anti- police pantera project. edison oakland-ba the peace police. both from alameda are why police should not be calling to mental health calls.health call. with spoke with alameda city manager eric lovett. >> where the council's focus is to try to have mental health response the second and have an initial responder that would be different than just police. that is one of the things we are looking looking looking loo >> bill scott agrees. >> we have been saying these things for a while. everything that has happened in the past year, now everybody else is saying it. there are things police officers are cut out to do. >> sfp de la not answer to mental health calls alone. mental health clinicians should always be present during those situations. >> we call them tothem tothem to >> brooks doesn't feel that will work. >> it feels like this is retribution for derek chauvin. -- for derek chauvin. >> any police officer on this planet or country is using any form of force is retribution for what happened minneapolis, i think that is twisted. if it happens here, we will call it out. >> in oakland the city is implementing a pilot program this fall. it will operate under the fire department

eric swalwell, lawyers for rudy giuliani argued he wasn't literally arguing for an insurrection over the 2020 election results at a rally whose entire theme was advocate fogger the overturn of the election. congressman mow brooks is also named in the lawsuit. he is the one who told the crowd it's time for patriots to start taking aims and kicking ass up on capitol hill. tomorrow congressman brooks will vote on the bicommission. so will liz cheney, who wants leader mccarthy to testify before. so will leader mccarthy, for that matter. they'll all be on record. his members are undecided given t through they went through that day. this assault on democracy is likely to echo through history. what a strange thing it is to be noncommittal about investigating. in the meantime, cnn special correspondent jamie gangel's new reporting on the state in play. she joins us along with gloria borger. jamie, walk us through your reporting. what's behind kevin mccarthy's opposition to this commission, and why is he so afraid to testify? >> so kevin mccarthy sent his colleague, new york congressman john katko in to negotiate a deal that kevin mccarthy never wanted. he just never told john katko that. and the democrats, made conces