we drew heavily on the work of foner, andn, eric others. it is in there in an unedited way, the way we would have written it. i think that answers the specific question you were getting at, about things that get tapered over. it remains to be seen how that gets substantiated within the monument itself, and there is an ongoing process that will continue about developing the actual site and what kind of interpretation happened there. one model i think is interesting that i so wish michael allen were here -- he talks about a lot of the public history work involvesas done, it the idea that interpreting history to the public is a process, and part of what you are doing is engaging in a dialogue. you might be delivering information people find surprising more upsetting, but the goal is not to necessarily bomb them with it but engages in a conversation about what they are learning and what it means to know that. so in dealing with difficult issues -- or i would hope -- the monument itself will take that as part of the model, that this is some of t