of state says before any deal can be agreed north korea must first dismantle its nuclear facilities erisa rotten co-founder of the national campaign to end the korean war says america shouldn't stand in a way of a peaceful solution. we forget you know you can reach agreements even with people you have profound differences with the word exercises where we simulate landing two hundred thousand troops and taking over beyond and it pending against other types of attacks only serves to amp it up and certainly change their comments and expressions from the north don't help either so you have both sides who need to step back and certainly begin to look at peaceful exercises of their relationship there north korea has not indeed as always indicated that for a peace treaty and formalized relations with the united states that it would give up its nuclear weapon capability that has always been on the table and we should be grabbing that as a real opportunity because up more than one hundred fifty countries have normalized relations with the north and we need formal channels to begin to deal with the

and like the investment company act, actually, erisa -- which is the statute they're interpreting -- has a kind of shadow exemptions. .. at the same time they put the cart before the horse, created an exception to the prohibited transaction deceptions of prohibitions that completely swallow the rule and creates but no as a seller exception to say because i am a seller i don't owe you a fiduciary duty. indeed a while has a prohibited transaction exemption. i think it's pte 71 that covers exactly the transaction and proposal that it created so is the exemption, greatly expanding the category without real thought as to whether it's appropriate, especially as to retail investors appeared to give an example, it would mean the mom-and-pop goes by municipal security would not be good. that is religious the beginning of the problems that a short op-ed can deal with. there are problems in the drafting of the rule. there's a fundamental problem of the department's consideration extended to individual retirement accounts, which are fundamentally not a significant problem that is really caught m