here, even if the jury completely agreed with us, and they very well may have, under these erroneous instructions they still would have been required to convict, because under these instructions, simply referring somebody to a meeting without trying to influence the outcome of that meeting constitutes official governmental action. justice roberts: well, suppose arranging a meeting could be official government action, if that were your job. in other words, you're not just a secretary, but your job was to manage the governor's schedule. you decided who met with him, you decided when, and that that's your job. that's so anything that individual does, i suppose, would be an official act. mr. francisco: i think that's possible, chief justice. of course, in this case we don't have anything like that. we simply have referrals to meetings with other officials so that, at best, the alleged bribe payor here, jonnie williams, can try to persuade them to his cause. justice kagan: well, can i follow up on that? because what you just suggested, right, is that you could suppose that there were a sc

here, even if the jury completely agreed with us, and they very well may have, under these erroneoustructions they still would have been required to convict, because under these instructions, simply referring somebody to a meeting without trying to influence the outcome of that meeting constitutes official governmental action. justice roberts: well, suppose arranging a meeting could be official government action, if that were your job. in other words, you're not just a secretary, but your job was to manage the governor's schedule. you decided who met with him, you decided when, and that that's your job. that's so anything that individual does, i suppose, would be an official act. mr. francisco: i think that's possible, chief justice. of course, in this case we don't have anything like that. we simply have referrals to meetings with other officials so that, at best, the alleged bribe payor here, jonnie williams, can try to persuade them to his cause. justice kagan: well, can i follow up on that? because what you just suggested, right, is that you could suppose that there were a schedu

erron is a specialist in psychiatry and medical ethics. when they poll people and say are you in favour of physician assisted suicide, most say no. >> the california medical association long against the idea recently reduced its stance to neutral. it's controversial with many doctors. this is contrary to a long tradition in medicine, of ethics going back to the hippocratic oath, principles of ethics - physicians use knowledge and skills for the purposes of health and healing. >> have you worked with patients contemplating ending their life because of medical pain. i have worked with patients that said things offhand along the lines that they can't go on. there's something psychologically or in terms of their social support or medically that we need to do a better job to address. once we do that, this desire to die issues. suicide is a distress signal, it's a fry for help >>> as for dan diaz, he says he's only begun to fight. britney. >> why are you still out there on the front fighting for the californians. >> as tamping as this -- taxing

they come forward with two explanations, one illegitimate, one supposedly legitimate, based on erroneous legal advice. on the basis of that, the court split on what the burden of proof was. justice kagan: just to pin this down a little bit, mr. hearne. you are not contesting the factual finding that the predominant motive was to comply with the voting rights act, is that right? mr. hearne: we take the factual finds. we don't protest those. but what we do believe is that the court applied the wrong burden shifting standard in their analysis of those facts. when they have a mixed motive, the proper response would be to say ok, you've shown, we've found one illegitimate motive. justice kagan: you keep on saying mixed motive and people come on back to you trying to figure out whether you are in fact or are not in fact, contesting that the predominant motive was the voting rights act. mr. hearne: when we say the voting rights act -- justice kagan: the attempts to comply with the voting rights act. and the court found, and it is a factual finding, that that's the motive. i don't want to harang

as a businessman, trump knows how erroneous taxes are. hillary clinton has never been in private business her entire adult life, but lived off the public trough. she's clueless. >> bruce, what trump does know is big government pushing out private sector of a lot of things. we saw the gdp figures, pathetic figures this week, .5%, almost a recession. >> well, what i do know, i'm, charles coch is like me in the fact he's taking a look at trump's website and said how big policy positions are, not written in crayon, and let's face it, trump's policies are so vague -- >> with the exception of the tax policies are clear. >> okay. let's take that tax policy. it would blow a hole in the deficit, and if hillary is like her husband, she's a deficit hawk, and trump's not touching social security or medicare. >> steve, first of all, they said the same about reagan, by the way, his tax policies were wrong, but led to a huge boom. in terms of spending, that's right, spending under bush was way more than the spending under president clinton. steve? >> th

the va inspector general found management in a regional office in kansas told staff to erroneously list medical conditions for dozens of patients in an effort apparently to speed up the claims process. the incorrect data may have resulted in veterans not receiving the correct information regarding their claims. the wichita office agreed with the report's finding and says it plans to implement changes. >>> is the gop warming up to the idea of a trump nomination? we'll discuss it with the panel, next. >>> i think the party is seeing me that way. i'm getting calls that as i said, you wouldn't believe. i'm getting calls from people that i really can't even know how they can do it. because they've said such horrible things about me and now they want to join the team. >> donald trump talking about now that he's going to be acting like the presumptive nominee. let's talk about it with the panel. judge andrew napolitano, and julie pace, white house correspondent for the "associated press" and syndicated columnist, charles krauthammer. >> judge, i'll start with you. is it smart, he hasn't locked

this is the spokesperson arguing on behalf of 200 new yorkers who said that they were erroneously taken off the voting rolls or without consent. >> certainly we have to investigate that postelection period but i do try not to be highly unusual. if anyone tampered in that way. >> it shows a drop of 120,000 registered democrats just since november last year. even mayor bill de blasio says it is the startling. >> i have decided to audit the management and operations of the new york city board of elections. we are going to go in and asked very tough questions. reporter: mayor bill de blasio says the supports the comptroller's audit and calling upon the board of elections to reduce the purge of voters as soon as possible. the attorney general received a total of 150 complaints. stacey delikat for "fox 5 dari: donald trump may want to check the registration of one of his private planes that expired in january. we are not talking about the beautiful boeing 777. we are talking about a smaller cessna plane. it lost its registered status in january and has over $5 of these go to the faa. the trum

he totally ridiculed that title, which is the title that is sometimes erroneously associated with george washington today. specifically denigrates that title and then speech on to say in his on the house floor, he alludes to washington and says any title would go against the true executive.this first andlso refers to washington washington's displeasure over titles in letters. to jefferson and several others. >> it is very persuasive and it fits with the part of washington that is sometimes lost. he was a great politician. this was bad politics. we know from what happens after the debate in congress. you describe how the controversy becomes a more public controversy. what happens then? when the american people find out what the senate has been doing for the first three weeks of the session, what do they say? dr. bartoloni-tuazon: remember the senate met behind closed doors at this time. they have been arguing about the title for three weeks, from april 23, which was the day when they first started the resolution to come up with the title for the president. which happened to be the same da

the saudi embassy in washington calls a "60 minutes" report on 28 pages comb pi laegs -- compi of erroneous. >> i find it hard to believe, people who had never beenn school education could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the united states. >> reporter: and you believe the 28 pages are crucial to this? >> i think they are a key part. >> former u.s. senator bob graham has been trying to get the 28 pages released since the day they were classified back in 2003. when he played a major role in the first government investigation into 9/11. >> i remain deeply disturbed by the amount of material that has been censored from this report. >> reporter: at the time graham was chairman of the senate select committee on intelligence. >> i call the joint committee to order. >> reporter: co-chair of the joint congressional inquiry into intelligence failures surrounding the attacks. the joint inquiry reviewed half a million documents. interviewed hundreds of witnesses and pre deuced an 838 page report minus the final chapter which was excised by the bush administrati

saudi arabia says in a statement, quote, the cbs 60 minutes program was a complilation of myths and erroneous charges that have been addressed by the saudi government and the 9/11 commission and the u.s. court. former members of congress who read the document told steve kroft last night's 60 minutes, it points to a possible saudi link. they want the obama administration to declassify the report. >> this is your office? >> bob graham won't discuss the classified information in the 28 pages. he will say only that they outline a network of people that he believes supported the hijackers while they were in the u.s. >> you believe that support came from saudi arabia? >> substantially. >> when we say the saudis, you mean the government, rich people in the country, charities? >> all of the above. >> graham and others believe the saudi role has been soft pedalled, to protect a delicate relationship with a complicated kingdom where the rulers, royalty, riches and religion are all deeply intertwined in its institutions. did you happen to ask the fbi director why it was classified? >> we did in a genera

then go off and vote for stuff that has nothing to do with what they want or pass laws that are erroneousfor them. that's the way that the democracy ought to work. and that's why this corrupts democracy and why i don't think that it's going to pass anyway but it would be better than trying to pass any kind of law that can be abused by those that have the power to use it. >> host: so the different churches -- >> all the organizations that do get out the vote and registration off to be doing education and picking candidates and holding candidates accountable and showing them how to do it. >> host: what let me ask about the role of the race. the reason that it's difficult is because there is a frame of people of color violating the law into kind of casting a stone said thursday civil-rights narrative which is access to inclusion and these people just want to participate and there is this counter narrative which is kind of a law and order just as they commit all that crying they are fraudulent in terms of their voting etc.. so there is a kind of racial narrative that's out there. how does you

the judgments about his character that i think people can conclude from that are very erroneous. i want to say that he was a very exemplary person, a morally exemplary person. factors are a lot of that go into this lady's question in a point that i would make. he had a situation in 1865, where relatively few free african american men voted in the north. you had a situation that they could continue to serve as occupying soldiers in the south protecting voting rights for , newly freed slaves. for example, in iowa they could not vote nor did they received the vote. secondly, what has been not discussed today was the tremendous activism of union veterans, black and white, decades after the civil war in relation to equality. what is more important to the discussion about abraham lincoln is taking a look at what the men who clearly affected lincoln's growth during the civil war were his own soul jewelers -- own soldiers black and white. , what happened after the war, in the decades after the war, is there were only -- is the only institutions that refused to accept the color line where

in fact one environmental expert said it was an erroneous and misleading report.il safe's lawyers hired an expert toxicologist whose report they say thoroughly rebuts any claim that the engineered phil used at the dream park is creating any human health or ecological risk at the facility. the soil safe expert says that doctors who wrote the johns hopkins report quote failed to apply generally accepted scientific methodology and you've the wrong soil samples to draw their conclusionsns. the expert went on to say, the concentrations of chemicals of concern to the plaintiffs do not exceed and may well be below the stringent health protective standards mandated by the new jersey department of environmental protect. >> i think we'll just have to wait to see what it turns up. >> reporter: the johns hopkins study contends that because of the levels of bap in the soil, "the cancer risk was estimated to be higher than the acceptable cancer risk identified by both the us environmental protect agency and the new jersey department of environmental protect. but the soil safe e

the va inspector general found management in a regional office in kansas told staff to erroneously list medical conditions for dozens of patients in an effort apparently to speed up the claims process. the incorrect data may have resulted in veterans not receiving the correct information regarding their claims. the wichita office agreed with the report's finding and says it plans to implement changes. >>> is the gop warming up to the idea of a trump nomination? we'll discuss it with the panel, next. my mom loves giving me advice. she even gives me advice... ...about my toothpaste and mouthwash. but she's a dentist so...i kind of have to listen. she said "jen, go pro with crest pro-health advanced." advance to healthier gums... ...and stronger teeth from day one. using crest toothpaste and mouthwash makes my... ...whole mouth feel awesome. and my teeth are stronger too. crest-pro health advanced... ...is superior to colgate total... ...in these 5 areas dentists check. this check up? so good. go pro with crest pro-health advanced. mom's right...again! ♪ it was always just a hobby. somethi

justice usa which was in federal government arguing on behalf of 200 new yorkers who say they were erroneously taken off the rolls or had their party affiliation switched without consent. this is the lead plaintiff. >> i've not requested this change. the change has been pushed through. i'm no longer part of the party i registered for initially. executive director of the board of elections about the claims. >> certainly we have to investigate that post-election. but i would find that to be highly unusual. if anyone tampered with the voter rolls in that way. >> this as records show a drop of 120,000 registered democrats in brooklyn since november of last year, a stat mayor de blasio says is startling and one scott stringer will investigate. >> i've decided to audit the management and operations of the new york city board of elections. we are going to go in and ask some very tough questions. >> reporter: mayor de blasio now weighing in this afternoon. he just released a statement saying he supports the comptroller's audit and is calling on the board of elections to reduce the purge of voters from

field's bruces did it feel that they were erroneous? >> the initial photographs we received were a couple of days old because it was a delayed reporting. when i met with detectives in my office afterwards, i asked him to reach out and see if he could obtain a photograph. she had taken a photograph on the iphone that evening and there was nothing really there. it was an investigation that i was wanting him to do to make a more thorough and complete investigation but the photograph that we have from herr, from actually the jupiter police department do show bruises but, you know, it wasn't anything that was -- what we got from her the actual night that it happened. >> her phone did not show any -- >> her phone didn't show any bruising, no. it wasn't until the photographs the detective would have picked up a couple of days later. >> but that's the quality of the photo, that's not that there was no injury? >> well, that's -- that's -- that's what can be happens when someone's bruised. >> it comes out later? >> yes, sir. can you talk about th

in fact one environmental expert said it was erroneous and misleading report. safe's lawyers hired an expert toxicologist whose report they say thoroughly rebuts any claim that the engineered fill used at the dream park is creating any human health or ecological risk at the facility. the soil safe expert says that doctors who wrote the johns hopkins report quote failed to apply generally accepted scientific methodology and used the wrong soil samples to draw their conclusions. the expert went on to say, the concentrations of chemicals of concern to the plaintiffs do not exceed and may well be below the stringent health protective standards mandated by the new jersey department of environmental protection. >> i think we'll just have to say wait to see what it turns up. >> reporter: johns hopkins study contends that because of the levels of bap in the soil quote the cancer risk was estimated to be higher than the acceptable cancer risk identified by both the u.s. environmental protection agency and the new jersey department of environmental protect. but the soil

i suspect you get that erroneous information from a website.nt is 9%. 68% of african-americans graduate from high school on time. >> i watch you and irish catholic conservatives that if women decides to have an abortion because of a my grain or a man left them. >>> some progressives want no limits at all on abortion. if that situation was imposed any woman could have an abortion at any time for any reason. thus i give examples to illustrate the absurdity of that position. honesty remains the best policy. >> i'm a college student whose political views don't match up. some of my classmates. i became a member so i can listen to the podcast. in the late 60s my believes did not match up with some of my college peers either and look where i am today. so hang tough. >>> and finally today, two very smart ladies have books out. we have ri"rich is not a four letter word." i like the chapter about buying and maintaining homes because that's the primary investment for most of us. also "terrible tornados." excellent book for kids. we hope you check the book

the rest were erroneous trades at a few pennies. my question here, what exactly happened? when is the stock going to reopen, if at all? >> bats says it's been aggressively testing its auction system to make sure it can handle the volume today. >>> stocks to watch today. yahoo! modifying its severance plan if they sell all of its operating business. dick's sporting goods has reportedly expressed interest in buying assets of sports authority, which will be on a sale in a bankruptcy auction. a california judge has ruled that sumner redstone will not be deposed in a trial regarding his mental competency. redstone owns voting stakes of roughly 80% of viacom. >>> sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but monday is tax day. an important reminder. if you're leaving prep to the last minute or if you're waiting for your refund to come, there are some things you should know. landon dowdy joins us with more on what we need to know for tax day. >> hey there, sara. good morning. it is that time of year. we all know tax day is today, april 15th. but this year it's extended to april 18th du

the right there, congressman kelly's office later said they needed to clarify what they said were erroneous of an endorsement. they wanted to clear it up saying congressman has not endorsed donald trump, merely voted for donald trump and is attending pro-trump meetings on capitol hill. but that is not an endorsement. i don't even know how to spell endorsement. why would you think that's endorsement? what's going on? i find this shrewdly ridiculous. analyst for nbc and this netw k network, thank you for being here. >> thank you for having me. >> as an outsider looking in on republican politics, this makes no sense to me at all. do you have any explanation for what's going on with these guys? >> it really is just the chaos of 2016 and having 16 candidates, fairly strong candidates throughout this whole process. this goes back months and months and months to when all these candidates starting getting into the race over the summer around endorsements didn't trickle in because there were so many different alliances and people didn't want to choose and they wanted to just let everything go its co

polling staffs were unable to operate voting machines to mugabe out conflicting information, and erroneouslyirected voters to alternate sites. the new york city mayor issued a statement tuesday decrying the disenfranchisement, writing -- democratic candidate bernie sanders expressed concern about new york's voting process late on tuesday after rival hillary clinton won the state's primary. >> like congratulate secretary clinton, i must say that i am really concerned about the conduct of the voting process in new york state. and i hope that process will change in the future. and i'm not alone about my concerns. the comptroller of the city of new york talked today about voter irregularities and about chaos at the polling places. amy: new york city comptroller scott stringer said his office had received reports of polling stations had failed to open on time and poll workers who were unable to tell voters when they would be operational. stringer ordered an audit of the new york selection authorities citing deep concern over , widespread reports of poll site problems and irregularities. for more

the saudi arabian embassy denounced the story as "myths and erroneous charges." but since it aired, members of congress and the families of 9/11 victims have renewed their demands for the white house to declassify the 28 pages. president obama has since said a decision will be made fairly soon. i'm steve kroft. we'll be back next week with another edition of "60 minutes." every auto insurance policy has a number. but not every insurance company understands the life behind it. those who have served our nation. have earned the very best service in return. usaa. we know what it means to serve. get an auto insurance quote and see you added fish. dr. sherman: well, i'm hoping they have more luck than the plants. i couldn't seem to keep them alive. elizabeth: we tried a fish tank when the kids were little,

approval by the flatterers and sycophants in their court who went unchallenged and absolutely factually erroneoustements by including me who was just looking for money from them for my candidates and i really think this is it. no one told donald trump. donald trump never thought about the abortion issue. >> woodruff: the interview he did this week with chris matthews. >> with chris matthews, who was accredited with a determined job of interrogation. this is an issue with which america has been divided 43 years, nationally divided. america is pro-choice and anti-abortion. and he had no idea of the debates and i think this is the consequence. >> i would like to defend the intellectual curiosity of 1%. (laughter) i think it's unique to himself. most of us, when we appear on television or even go to a job interview, you want to do some background preparation so you don't make a total fool of yourself, but he feels no compunctuation and his knowledge base is minuscule. we've seen it in every single interview. but there is consistency to donald trump. no alarm bells went off because he thinks a woman i

people are making erroneous associations thinking that inflation is always bad.h.rie, i give her she states with the program. guy will be back with "on the move." brexit debate continues to cast a long shadow over the policy decisions made by those at the central bank here in the u.k.. jamie, good morning to you. brexit casting a long shadow. the pound is where we see most obviously. do you see it everywhere? jamie: we do. our cat litters out. we have made adjustments to it. later's -- calc ulator's out, and our adjustments. there is a 30% chance of brexit, we have tried to adjust that market curb they stumble within the bank of england would have to do. the white line is market expectations. we used our+++ we expect there will be movement one way or the other. who was he other rates priced and the risk of brexit being priced out of entirely, or we will see people starting to panic. that is ever central expectation for how it is moving on june the 24th. anna: that gives us an idea of where it could go. manus: there is a great disparity. many of it has been betwee

remember, this is the exchange operator's second attempt at going public after 2012 which resulted in erroneouss one of the most anticipated trades of 2016. bass global will go back on the exchange tomorrow pricing at $19. >> top of the range there. is this any indicator of an ipo market that may be coming back, guy? >> we haven't had an ipo now, one or two the entire calendar year. is it indicative of anything? i would say no. one does not make a trend. give me a few more and we can have a conversation. >> but if it is a market that's opening up again, that's more supply of stocks. for me, if i look at supply/demand dynamics, i don't want to see an ipo market that opens up. the bulls would want to see less supply. >> interesting. >> no one wants to bring their ipo to market. obviously this is a different situation with bass. they tried it before. they're trying it again. they haven't had terribly amount of good luck. but it's indicative of a market that's getting its footing back. but like guy said, one does not make a trend. >> it better go a lot more smoothly. >> yeah. >> we might not be mov

he manipulates the titles of his shots where he associates them erroneously and fraudulently with major figures who died on , if you, where in fact will come our the ordinary casualties of the ordinary soldier. but then the famous rebel sharpshooters are notorious, where he and his assistance poll an infantry men out of the line and manipulate him about 70 miles. visual tableaus of the fate of this unfortunate soldier and it is complete fraud. it was discovered later. in the 1960's, i forensic theographer actually found soldier who appears in the rubble sharpshooter picture in a previous photograph in the line of dad being ready to be buried. gardner, that is why your question is so interesting. at the very moment at which photography is claiming absolute truth and in which lincoln is theg it to deal with emotional state and the eight physical state he is in, gardner starts to create an uncertainty about what he creates that we live with today. is it a real shot? is it staged? there is a famous photograph from the spanish civil war, the moment of a republican soldiers death. he is laid

fairness to veterans erroneously discharged from the military. that is the name of the bill. if you could take a look at that and see if that is providing you additional authority that you think you need which is obviously an issue that seems to be a big issue if you're looking at 200,000 cases. i had another question on the veterans affairs committee and i asked the question of our service organizations, on the designation ptsd there has been some discussion, we talk about the stigma, the posttraumatic stress disorder. a disorder kind of comes with a little bit of implications and so some people have mentioned to me will maybe this should be referred to as posttraumatic stress injury so if you receive this in combat and you are injured obviously is like getting shot. nobody calls a wound getting shot at a disorder, they call it an injury. and some veteran groups think that might be a good idea. others don't for reasons that might have to do with benefits and how things are actually categorized in the va. if you don't call it a disorder you might lose a certain amount. you. y

recently as last january, the page called recent extreme weather business as usual while still erroneously climat -- clio the highate us argument. just this week they published and editorial saying that any link that people had talked about between climate change and national security threats, something we hear from our armed services, from our intelligence services, that that all is silliness, to use the word of the author they quoted. the polluter playbook also produced the usual "journal" warnings that cost, that co2 tasms tax would make the world poorer than it otherwise would be. about motivations, that this was all really motivated by what they called political actors seeking to gain economic control. and about the science, claiming that global surface temperatures have remained flat. but here's my particular favorite. a december 2009 "wall street journal" editorial claimed that climate scientists were suspect because they -- here's the quote -- "have been on the receiving end of climate change-related funding, so," the journal continues, "all of them must believe in the reality and

here, even if the jury completely agreed with us, and they very well may have, under these erroneoustructions they still would have been required to convict, because under these instructions, simply referring somebody to a meeting without trying to influence the outcome of that meeting constitutes official governmental action. justice roberts: well, suppose arranging a meeting could be official government action, if that were your job. in other words, you're not just a secretary, but your job was to manage the governor's schedule. you decided who met with him, you decided when, and that that's your job. that's so anything that individual does, i suppose, would be an official act. mr. francisco: i think that's possible, chief justice. of course, in this case we don't have anything like that. we simply have referrals to meetings with other officials so that, at best, the alleged bribe payor here, jonnie williams, can try to persuade them to his cause. justice kagan: well, can i follow up on that? because what you just suggested, right, is that you could suppose that there were a schedu

in one case this last fall, we are seeing erroneous news about acome up resurgence of avian influenza that was not at all accurate. but working through the national wildlife health center, also with the department of interior, as well as our colleagues at usda, we are able to push through those agencies and camp these storiest that could have economic consequences. the one health approach is so critical to everything that we do. we need to continue to bridge this divide. >> just briefly, to support the administrator here. we have a very intense scientific interchange between usda on influenza, and also food-borne diseases. there are pockets of collaboration. sen. mccaskill: very good, i appreciate that so much. we heard about this earlier, last year, the cultural secretary was rocked by the callednfluenza, commonly bird flu. this was devastating in iowa, where it resulted in the death hit0 billion birds, and a to our economy and iowa. the livestock sector is also regularly impacted by these diseases. they struggled to control them with new ones popping up each year, we have talked abo

constitutional invalidation on the fact that this case which aren't even challenged here are clearly erroneous. the court has no further questions. thank you. john roberts thank you, counsel. mrs. harrington. mrs. harrington: may it please the court. the question in this case is not whether section 5 can compel deviation from a perfect population standard. the question is whether to minimus deviations are permitted by the constitution. this court has made very clear that when they are in 10% from a perfect population equality standard, those plans are presumed to be constitutional. that presumption is a substantive rule. justify can briefly take them off. the first is such deviations do not by themselves violate equal protection. the second is that giving states a 10% leeway actually enhances citizens fair and equal representation by allowing states to pursue other important districting principles. and the third is that limiting federal court intervention in inimusimus -- de m deviation cases protects state'' sovereign rights. justice roberts: is 10% really de minimus? i think you can say it's