so this seep eseemed like a gre opportunity to do something significant and important. so i approached him. i said, i'm interested in doing this series. and you know, i would really like your collaboration. i know your name would really be important in terms of bringing people in. and would you be interested in partnering with me? that start aed a conversation. >> how many interviews did do you? >> 51. >> how did you decide who to talk to? >> well, we started out trying to think about categories of leaders. so first we wanted to start with people who we felt had had a major, major impact on the african-american community. so when you fwhi ththink about you think about three categories. you think about educators. you think about lawyers. and you think about ministers. or members of the clergy. so once we came up with categories, we then started to think about, who in those categories could best represent some of those areas? and then, of course, we also wanted to get to people who we thought we might lose because they were aging. and then we wanted a diversity of age and

ja wit king.ma bof be wonri y sh decid meatloerareprotes andarst i httomy eseemeds nifoears he g s.gele c anlu ihiel wha one. es you a t ofhemazihos. on theat t a but thecushe we my de rld c ws es'str dame yconts. heckac w ule ber fhe morning s from thest new i'm scott lley caus i de cnt a it rcivalaf pi l baterptron sora m vehim pce a a claim to thetitle, esblteat mihuckho w iht s a droout.ons vto ll oerwhhahodeur sen y ongndes nok americn epents to te. toniisic fve aman wndanha af sviveht lon ar t o pde atonrsaly ca rit e on wainon tooliona rsthen l n e teeq at oight note fr the mocrarr the publ pevm a par ritse fr eadel rnro, fel ventres en l , fe ud ilamwi s g nsrt hiun iant mioue pre scy or y e rn>> anded sec you. i'm oredreor tnglaed o ra af ined inudg hkaha collrid se ratis.weevti gono, avpo at s w mpe.ne ut on a wne wbepe.a t erk. aoi laimg ct iop s-- d'tno ngwiee, dokn ats intothy otle mabi tthprms e oti wee m tiand the h and w hly.to aninwe eallerni wthllro t. lyo tnk y. u'al wl beac tis. f ihtomre a bar thyou.th ebo. anu. f me d cncr nt ts caffoosm thti owe cefomohecae d he e

eseemed prove that debate. i think it is >> another disder i am not. >> i north moment. something that jeb bush people were sort of circulating another moment where he sort of receipted talking points. and rehearsed and said same thing over and over again. he had that moment. i think it was last night or couple nights ago and so shows are kinds things that i think you know leaving last-minute voters with these lasting impregs. i do think kasich showing tonight, and bush's showing could be telling. that could be the story. next. if kasich actually has good showing, that's -- he gets to move on. there is no question here. he told me earlier this week, it looks like he going to pack it up head back to ohio. if in fact he does not have decent showing. but so far so good. yes mark brings up very good point we still have lot more pre since to report. >> right but establishments here, i mean this is kinds of like the last stands if they -- away finally results here. it means the center does not hold in republican party. >> tom let me ask you this can p you can add on that this

so this seep eseemed like a gre opportunity to do something significant and important. so i approached him. i said, i'm interested in doing this series. and you know, i would really like your collaboration. i know your name would really be important in terms of bringing people in. and would you be interested in partnering with me? that start aed a conversation. >> how many interviews did do you? >> 51. >> how did you decide who to talk to? >> well, we started out trying to think about categories of leaders. so first we wanted to start with people who we felt had had a major, m