frank morgan -- it is very esoteric. i do not know how the conception of this will be.ould like to write a judge story, have music in it, and have some kind of connection between writing and music. i do not outline my books. i am an interview -- am an improviser. you take the framework of a song, but he goes off of it. there are connections. i would like to explore that in a novel. tavis: have you been a jazz had a while? >> 20 years. i was a blues and rock and roll. i was a reporter. so i knew what to find for him. i knew to get to people who would advise me on what harry would listen to. you cannot do it all as research and not let the music get in. it is growing on me. i am probably listening to more jazz than anything else right now. tavis: what has the exposure to that music done for you? >> it has been inspirational. on a practical level, it is something i can listen to when i write. without the lyrics, it is no intrusion, just wonderful music. i am real particular about the people i listened to. i like to know the story behind the music. somehow, that makes it mo

this notion of youth adult partnership is esoteric in its term but on the ground how do you operationalize it, those things in the public school who are working so hard to meet the required mandates. schools are driven by mandates, academic achievement, achievement, enrollment. but the conditions in which the virus grows, if you follow the metaphor that bullying is a systemic virus, then the environment has to change so the virus cannot grow and the only way the environment changes is if youth and adults begin to speak with one voice about changing the social norms that allows it to happen. it makes sense to most of us, you have it khaifrpb the social norms. we must educate. but we must go beyond thinking more rigor will get us better achievement. we have to remember a school is a community and in a xhuept, people look out for each other. they've got each other's back. how do we begin to promote that idea that we are in this thing together? we believe

if you engage in both sides of it, it's esoteric and i'm not zen. trust me >> for a while i wouldn't forgive myself, anything less than perfect and pretty and nice and great. you just smile and people liked you and that was it. that's exhausting. >> the model to actress. >> you lead me out early to have dinner with the kids >> star of the stage >> you covered all the points. >> i think go where the water is warm go where they want you in this business there times when it's chilly in one area and you think you know what, that's not going to stop me you don't want me in this thing right now and say i can't do it? fine i will take that and put all my energy into theater or writing a book or it's just that i don't like to be told i'm not allowed to do things and i'm not invited to the party i go to another party and i get invited and had a lot of fun i will come back around and sooner or later, the invite will come >> what was your highest personal moment over the course of the last 40 or so years >> it's so cliche. i have something to do with children

there seemed, there was a kind of slightly esoteric discussion of where the red line should be, whether it was capability or having, or being close to having a weapon. can you kind of parse for us a little bit about, um, kind of what netanyahu's red lines appear to be and what our u.s. goth red lines are? -- government red lines are? is there a difference right now between the two? >> there certainly is. i'm not sure i can parse it as finely as it certainly exists in some classified form, but basically the technology of enrichment itself once you get to 20% enriched uranium 235, you're then, you then have a very brief period of time to get it up into the 75, 80% range that you can start using it to fabricate a crude, initial nuclear explosive. i think the iranians argue that we've foresworn nuclear weapons and that we want this technology to bring electricity, to produce medical isotopes and to demonstrate that we have the technology, and also to preserve our oil resources by using nuclear power to feed the national grid, to run the national electrical grid and then sell our oil resourc

that is an esoteric topic for a lot of americans. the president of the united states has proposed to have, at his discretion, be able to raise the debt ceiling of the united states in an unlimited way forever. without the approval of congress. what is the big deal? >> it is practically the most frightening proposal that has come out of this town, and a lot have. when you add on the entitlements that are unfunded, the president, i do not think, has a knowledge, and maybe he does not recognize that one of the greatest threats to economic freedom and to the american dream home -- i have a five- year-old and a three-year-old. i think most people that have young kids recognize the ability to have the same opportunity we have today is at risk because of spending. they will not play a single cut on the table. he comes up with a ludicrous proposal to have unlimited increases in the debt ceiling, so he can continue expanding as much as he wants. >> i am sure you are aware of the research of our economists have done on how to solve the fiscal

we are getting -- it is not an esoteric discussion. it was very clear requirements for each one. >> after the questions about implementations of the report, have we attach to the timeline to all of the various recommendations for when there are going to get done? is that something we can be made available to the committee? >> we broke the 29 recommendations on individual tasks. it is critically important. we assigned individuals to each task. we give them the day when the task completed an whatever recommendations that will derive from them. the venture that with the committee at the appropriate time. >> can you talk about the coordination between the state department and the department of defense? there is a new york times story that points out of the time of the crisis in benghazi they had no forces that could be sent. there were no armed drowns within range. given the potential for further on the breast and enter syria and egypt and across the middle east, it seems to me that is a question that is really critical as we looked at how

that is an esoteric topic for a lot of americans. the president of the united states has proposed to have, at his discretion, be able to raise the debt ceiling of the united states in an unlimited way forever. without the approval of congress. what is the big deal? >> it is practically the most frightening proposal that has come out of this town, and a lot have. when you add on the entitlements that are unfunded, the president, i do not think, has a knowledge, and maybe he does not recognize that one of the greatest threats to economic freedom and to the american dream home -- i have a five-year-old and a three-year- old. i think most people that have young kids recognize the ability to have the same opportunity we have today is at risk because of spending. they will not play a single cut on the table. he comes up with a ludicrous proposal to have unlimited increases in the debt ceiling, so he can continue expanding as much as he wants. >> i am sure you are aware of the research of our economists have done on how to solve the fiscal

but we're getting very -- that was not an esoteric discussion, very clear and very specific requirements for each one of those posts. >> and apropos senator corker and senator casey's questions about implementations of the report, have we attached a timeline to all of the various recommendations for windows are going to get done? and is that something that can be made available to this committee? >> yes. we have come as put out we broke the right conditions and individual tasks, as monday now that might sound, it is crippling important. we assign individuals to each task. we've given them dates that we want the task completed. and whatever recommendations as we do right on them. we can certainly share that with the committee at the appropriate time. >> thank you. also can you talk about the coordination between the state department and the department of defense? it is a "new york times" story today that points out that at the time of the crisis in benghazi, the pentagon had no forces that could be readily sent. the closest gunship was in afghanistan. there were no armed drones within ran

that's somewhat esoteric. people say what's that mean, vote fens the previous question. that's some political jargon they quse in washington. what it means if, if we vote against the previous question, we will be empowered to bring forward the middle class tax cut bill. and we'll put it on the floor and mr. walz will be our leader on this pause he's put it in the hopper. may i have 30 additional sends? ms. slaughter: i yield the gentleman another minute. mr. hoyer: we'll put that on the floor and every member of this house, all 433 of us here, 435 members will have the opportunity to say to the american people, yes. yes, on december 12, we're going to tell you that on january 1, your taxes will not go up. give us that opportunity. give us that opportunity to say, yes, to the american middle class. give us the opportunity to say yes to certainty in our economy. give us the opportunity to say yes, we agree on something and aren't you proud of the fact that when we agree, your congress can act. let's say yes. vote no on the previous question and then vote yes for the middle

but we're getting very -- that was not an esoteric discussion, very clear and very specific requirements for each one of those posts. >> and apropos senator corker and senator casey's questions about implementations of the report, have we attached a timeline to all of the various recommendations for windows are going to get done? and is that something that can be made available to this committee? >> yes. we have come as put out we broke the right conditions and individual tasks, as monday now that might sound, it is crippling important. we assign individuals to each task. we've given them dates that we want the task completed. and whatever recommendations as we do right on them. we can certainly share that with the committee at the appropriate time. >> thank you. also can you talk about the coordination between the state department and the department of defense? it is a "new york times" story today that points out that at the time of the crisis in benghazi, the pentagon had no forces that could be readily sent. the closest gunship was in afghanistan. there were no armed drones within ran

that's somewhat esoteric. people say what's that mean, vote fens the previous question. that's some political jargon they quse in washington. what it means if, if we vote against the previous question, we will be empowered to bring forward the middle class tax cut bill. and we'll put it on the floor and mr. walz will be our leader on this pause he's put it in the hopper. may i have 30 additional seconds? ms. slaughter: i yield the gentleman another minute. mr. hoyer: we'll put that on the floor and every member of this house, all 433 of us here, 435 members will have the opportunity to say to the american people, yes. yes, on december 12, we're going to tell you that on january 1, your taxes will not go up. give us that opportunity. give us that opportunity to say, yes, to the american middle class. give us the opportunity to say yes to certainty in our economy. give us the opportunity to say yes, we agree on something and aren't you proud of the fact that when we agree, your congress can act. let's say yes. vote no on the previous question and then vote yes for the midd

first, sort of esoteric, it's the way we budget. we have outlays and we have budget authority. and while the outlays may not be great for this year, because not all the money will be spent, we've always had budget authority that recognizes that things take more than a year to build. and to cut back on the budget authority -- not the outlays -- would be against the way we budget around here in a new double standard i think that will tie us up in knots in the future. second argument: how can you build a year at a time when many of these projects take more than a year to design, plan, and construct? we have to redo the brooklyn battery tunnel, the largest underwater tunnel in the world, certainly in the country. are we going to say we'll give you enough money to build a quarter of it today, and then come back next year and we'll see if we should build the second quarter? no business would work that way. no government should work that way. most of these projects need to begin now but may take more than a year. and to say we're only giving money for the year doesn't make such sense.

that's an esoteric topic for a lot of americans. the president of the united states has proposed, as many of you know, to have -- at his discretion be able to raise the debt ceiling for the united states in an unlimited way forever without the approval of congress. so what? what's the big deal, steve? >> i think it's primarily the most frightening proposals that's come out of this town, and there have been a lot of frightening proposals. if you look at where we are in terms of our national debt and when you add on the entitlements that are unfunded, the president i don't think has acknowledged and maybe he just doesn't recognize that one of the greatest threats to not only economic freedom but to the american dream for my children, like jim's children, i have a 5-year-old and a 3-year-old. i think most people that have young kids recognize the ability for our children to have the same opportunity that we enjoy today is at risk because of spending. period. the biggest threat. and yet the president will not lay a single cut on the tab