the reasons that people have been resonating with this is it's a subject in a he ihehe ihe is sow esoterical way. >> the film brings up parties on campus where is white students dress up as the worst stereotypes possible, and it's something that has been happen forgive years. >> it has been happening, and unfortunately it's been happening now. i think that this movie will actually shine a light on this is a micro aggression. what are you doing? and where i don't feel like a lot of people are doing it with malicious intent, i don't think that they really understand the repercussion of it. >> do you think it has gotten better? >> you know, i personally think that i'v i've--it's been a long time since i've been in college. i think it's gotten a little bit better but it's got a long way to go. it's subtly moved where it's not so overt where it is someone wanting to touch your hair, or you don't need sunscreen because you don't burn. because you're black? random stuff like that that makes you think, what? what do you mean? do you know what you're saying? >> it's at as overt as might have happened

we remember some of those laws, the laws we would ask some esoteric question about the constitution.-huh. >> before you could -- before you could vote. of course, those questions are only asked of african-americans. that's not what this country stands for. this country should be doing everything possible to get everybody out to vote. plus the fact that a lot of these laws are based on a false premise. they say we've got to stop voter fraud. then they point to millions and millions and millions of voters, and they can't find one case of voter fraud. no, it's voter suppression. >> is it your sense or your belief that this is a suppressed strategy being implemented specifically by republicans across the country? is this part of their strategy? >> where we've seen the suppression the most have been in those states with a republican-controlled legislature, republican governor. and they've done -- i use north carolina with tom tillis as an example. we see it in georgia. we see it in texas. we see it elsewhere. you mentioned kansas. you know, in vermont -- again, i go back to my own state o

unmatched, who are scrappy, creative, know the planning code inside and out, know every arbitrary and esoteric part of san francisco's administrative code and they continue to lead and advise and guide this movement and so many of us that want to continue that work either as organizers, as activists or a policy makers, and they are a rock, so stable, that are just there every day. and i hope, i hope that in our generation that we have the same individuals that will be that way. because the generation before us really rejected everything, promotion, money, other cities. there could have been so many thing, but they always stayed every day to continue this work and they never ever tire of it. but most of all, i know that ted ha mentored so many people in this movement and there are so few individuals that lead without taking up space. often to be a leader, you talk a lot and you express a lot of your opinions and you make it really well known, and you take up a lot of space. and ted, ted what a leader without doing that. and i'm really, really going to miss him both as a role model for so many a

this is veriesotery esoteric. so they invite congress to come back with a different formula. i don't know if the obama administration proposed one. putting shelby aside. the wisconsin decision, and that friend of mine brought to my attention, he is in the audience, a decision repderred recently, in case some of you don't know, it held in wisconsin passed a law requiring photo identification. in toward vote, you have to obtain and present a photo id. if you don't have one, the state will give you one for free. and what court in a very long opinion held was that getting that tree photo id, if you didn't have one, impose an unjustified burden on the people who didn't have the photo id. therefore found it unconstituti unconstitutional. the court felt that the class of people impacted would be mostly poor people. included in those categories would african-americans and pla te latinos. it had an impact. i find the scope of that rather expansive. the court went out of its way on crawford that the state did not protect the integrity of the role sufficient to establish that requiremen

he was showing that he had access to esoteric and religious knowledge that his brethren didn't. also buried with this individual was an incredible array of jades. this is far and away the richest single offering of jade found with burials of this middle pre-classic period anywhere in the maya lowlands. keach: clearly, this maya man had acquired great prestige. but was he a big man like ongka, or the leader of a more complex society ? could he have been a chief ? more evidence was needed. some of the last chiefdoms rose and fell among the native americans of the north pacific coast. early in the twentieth century, photographers captured some of their traditions. others were re-enacted. chiefdoms are usually divided into lineages, groups of related people who descend from a common ancestor. individuals more closely related to that ancestor inherited a higher rank. the highest ranking men in each lineage were the chiefs. they inherited a titled position symbolized by the totem pole. each of these titled chiefs wanted to organize the salmon harvests because the leader could briefly

i know a lot of people are trying to look for esoteric complex and economic reasons for why the economydoing well. i do my own economic research kind of like you do, and i do it by out in the marketplace and sitting around having luncheons with business leaders all of the time so over the course of the year i'll talk to 400 or 500 business leaders and can them the question. are you investing? . if not, why? 95% of the time over the last two years going right up until very recent they would say i'm only investing defensively, that is to say the truck broke down and i have to do something. i'm not investing for aggressiveness and i'm not investing to create new cash flows because i'm concerned about taxation, regulation and the uncertainties coming out of washington. here's to good fuse. when we see more confidence coming out of washington, i believe out of more positive oriented leadership and not politics here and this is across the board, but when they start taking this country back to the great place, well r is so pent up-demand out there you will see a resurgence of growth in this co

this is very esoteric. in the shelby case, what the court said has come back with a different formula. they threw out that formula. they invited congress to come back with a different formula. i don't know whether the obama administration has proposed one. putting shelby aside. the wisconsin decision which a friend of mine brought to my attention and he's in the audience that decision was rendered recently, what that held in case some of you don't know, it held that in wisconsin passed a law requiring a photo identification. in order to be able to vote, you had to obtain and present a photo i.d. if you didn't have one, the state would give it to you for free. for free. and what the court in a very long opinion held was that getting that free photo i.d., if you didn't have one, would impose an unjustified burden on those people who didn't have the photo i.d. and therefore, found it unconstitutional. and the court also held that the class of people who would be impacted were mostly the poor people and that in

because we're talking about very esoteric things. and it takes a little bit of work to understand the significance. in this case, we all immediately know, wow, that led light, which is on my smartphone, which powers my battery, which is changing the way street lighting works, it's changing things in the third world in very significant ways where people are turning in kerosene lanterns for led lights, it's had a huge impact and it's only really just begun in some ways. >> in our last minute or, so let's turn to yesterday's announcement, which was the prize for medicine. this was described as a kind of gps system for the brain, using another kind of technology that we're all now familiar with but applying it to brain research. >> the award was split between three scientists, two teams. the first bit of research goes back a while to the discovery that the hippocampus part of our brain is what maps our orientation. they actually looked inside a row -- rodent's brain when it was moving around the room and could see when it was in any plac

that's a very esoteric field.hen he moved to work for a hedge fund and went on to help build and now lead one of the world's most successful hedge funds. >> he is a hedge fund operator and started off in computer linguistics. why is he going to go from that to being so politically active? what is in it for him? >> that's another great question. it's very difficult to read into the motives behind some of this giving but he is giving an externally large amount. you just don't see that that often. there is so few people in the country who can give million-dollar checks and do. mind isnt that comes to his fund has been hauled before congress. aboutummer over questions how it calculates taxes. asking -- they were using a method to calculate taxes that saved his investors $6 billion over 14 years. that suddenly makes $8 million in political giving not seem so big. >> it doesn't at all. by the way, the reason you're not seeing a lot of pages of this man -- let's roll the one picture we were able to find of him. he accept

. >> within this conversation, we are having an esoteric discussion on the macroeconomics of japan and bow tied economics and none of it matters when the nation is struggling like this. >> because people don't think this way. i want to pull up a chart of dissatisfaction with the congress. the inflection part is 1998. through everything we've been doing since then, every election cycle is spitting in the wind. we talk about issues, people are dissatisfied. is there any one point, gary, that can focus, this dissatisfaction? >> well, here's one point. while we've had this economic discontent, it has turned to sharper political disconsent and there are a few reasons. we can look back to the shutdown of the federal government and we can look in the botched rollout of obama care. they didn't create the perception that the government was incompetent but it reinforced it in a really powerful way and that's where we're at today. looking for solutions and not seeing any opportunity for political leadership by either party to lead us out of the wilderness. >> there's also an issue of are we getti

verye talking about esoteric languages. major emphasis on the study of terrorism.these have issues with national security and the economy. it is very closely tied to the agencies of the federal government. just in a student is an a, what sort of major does the university of maryland offer? these go beyond national security itself. that's what we have expertise in language, flagship language security,cyber science and technology. there is an ormiston manned in those fields. continue our national supremacy in science and technology. we are also very strong in the performing arts. we are a comprehensive university. the access to the federal government and federal agencies in partnership with other institutions is broadly expanding the opportunities for education and research. the advisoryes board do? guest: i am sorry? i don't know what it is. -- go there are lots of ahead. i'm not firmly with that advisory board. in 2005.was created it is 20 university presidents that meet collectively in d.c.. they consult with federal agencies. i am wondering, what does the federma

how you look how government can push forward it is esoteric. pipeline it is very clear if you like it or you are on the democratic side and against it most people support it but it is a clear example of of thousands of new jobs go to north dakota anywhere across the country with so little regional airport with 500 pickup trucks with great paying jobs. but that this sitting and harry reid desk those who are in favor in the president after a billionaire decided to spend tens of millions of dollars on campaigns to back off the keystone pipeline. how that legislation creates jobs? now with all right and passing budget proposals he did not go anywhere for five straight years the president was in charge of the country as a ceo in did not pass a budget in five years? that stifles job creation in this country. obamacare is another example of small businesses closing to not pay the premiums. there are three examples were a republican controlled senate can make a difference. it is important we do that. >> thank you for your time here. and sharing your pe

it can be esoteric if you don't break it down into a forific example but one sure is keystone pipeline. it's very clear, whether you or you're on the democratic side and against it, i think most people support it a clearcountry but it's example of thousands of new jobs. minot, northo to dakota, or any oil patch across the country, you go to a regional airport with 500 pickup trucks parked outside of these and they're great paying jobs and they're good for thelies and it provides us national security, as well, in becoming more energy independent and that'sone sitting on harry reid's desk and for a while it looked like a lot are democratsat were in favor of it and the president, after a billionaire named tom stir, decided to spend millions of dollars on campaigns, suddenly the keystone backed off of pipeline. how can legislation in washington create jobs. that's one. when paul ryan passed five or budget proposals -- they're tough budgets but they're real and when they just didn't do go anywhere for five straight year that the president was in charge of this country as and didn't pass a t

stop fracking in the united states and i think you take it down to 85 in a very peculiar and very esoteric sophisticated economic term that's the puke point in energy prices. >> thank you, dennis. that's funny. tom, thank you to you, too, as well. >> thanks, guys. >>> jp morgan with details about the summer's hack attack and turns out 76 million households had personal information stolen. that's not the most outrageous part of the story, though. that's next. >>> remember when kevin said on back on "the closing bell" in june. >> i don't care $200 million for your home or $200,000, this is going to be a crappy investment for 5 to 10 years. >> well, all-star real estate broker dolly lens says he's completely wrong. she came down here to the stock exchange to tell him why. >>> plus, we want to know whether you think housing is a good long-term investment. your chance to vote is coming up. >>> jpmorgan turns out to have dw dwor offed the hackers of target and home depot. >> well, what the qul wall street journal" is reporting the way they got into this system is through the personal computer of

this is veriesotery esoteric. so they invite congress to come back with a different formula. i don't know if the obama administration proposed one. putting shelby aside. the wisconsin decision, and that friend of mine brought to my attention, he is in the audience, a decision repderred recently, in case some of you don't know, it held in wisconsin passed a law requiring photo identification. in toward vote, you have to obtain and present a photo id. if you don't have one, the state will give you one for free. and what court in a very long opinion held was that getting that tree photo id, if you didn't have one, impose an unjustified burden on the people who didn't have the photo id. therefore found it unconstituti unconstitutional. the court felt that the class of people impacted would be mostly poor people. included in those categories would african-americans and pla te latinos. it had an impact. i find the scope of that rather expansive. the court went out of its way on crawford that the state did not protect the integrity of the role sufficient to establish that requiremen

we need to be able to provide our students not just with the esoteric knowledge or the humanistic knowledge that makes us all citizens, but also with the analytical skills that allows us to succeed in the environments that we want to earn our living in. host: the next phone call is from lorna in upper marble, maryland. i want to talk about -- first off, i'm happy that in 2009, the president came into the office and you begin -- and he redid how federal student loans were coming through third-party banking institutions, which was double dipping money from the students. and causing students to go into more debt. the banks were being paid by the students and the banks are being paid by the federal government. that was a policy that was --tituted in the early 90's in 1982 under the reagan administration. and since that time, the federal government had depleted funds from the budget. they should have gone into public education and to universities throughout the united states. this cost universities to become skeletonized in a lot of ways in which no institution can without the resources they nee

that really our culture convinces them by the time they're 10, science and engineering, its board, esoteric, difficult than the delivery guys. white guys. yard megan smith this point, a lot of doubletalk about this issue. investment and get our culture reemerge as to be passionate about inventing, solving problems, working hard at things that matter, we are going to become what we deserved to become. specs of the basic ideas how to create a demand toward that science education. >> at first was set up with a single goal, create demand, particularly among women and minorities, to excel at something that could be a career choice for them. we claim we have a job shortage in this country. that's not true. we have a skills shortage in this country. i've had a little company with six indigenous and by 100 openings. every tech company i know would kill to get more people. we do not go rent any major university, go to any place whether doing genomics, code, nanotechnology, advanced materials. everybody is desperately looking for smart people. technology has moved so quickly and, unfortunately, our e

this is very esoteric. in the shelby case, what the court said has come back with a different formula. they invited congress to come back with a different formula. i don't know whether the obama administration has proposed one. the wisconsin decision which a friend of mine brought to my attention and he's in the audience that decision was rendered recently, what that held in case some of you don't know, it held that in wisconsin passed a law requiring a photo identification. in order to be able to vote, you had to obtain and present a photo i.d. if you didn't have one, the state would give it to you for free. for free. and what the court in a very long opinion held was that getting that free photo i.d., if you didn't have one, would impose an unjustified burdenen on those people who didn't have the photo i.d. and therefore, found it unconstitutional. and the court also held that the class of people who would be impacted were mostly the poor people and that including those categories would be african-america

we need to be able to provide our students not just with the esoteric knowledge or the humanistic knowledge that makes us all citizens, but also with the analytical skills that allows us to succeed in the environments that we want to earn our living in. host: the next phone call is from lorna in upper marble, maryland. i want to talk about -- first off, i'm happy that in 2009, the president came into the office and you begin -- and he redid how federal student loans were coming through third-party banking institutions, which was double dipping money from the students. and causing students to go into more debt. the banks were being paid by the students and the banks are being paid by the federal government. that was a policy that was --tituted in the early 90's in 1982 under the reagan administration. and since that time, the federal government had depleted funds from the budget. they should have gone into public education and to universities throughout the united states. this cost universities to become skeletonized in a lot of ways in which no institution can without the resources they nee

and you were so concerned about toggle switches and all these different esoteric investments that wereay of showing how the credit issuers were. >> i think the markets are definitely more contained. there's been a lot of lessons learned from the '07 period. and i also want to make sure to understand the yield environment isn't just impacting fixed income. the rally in stock prices really has been a lowering of the discount rate that we're using for future earnings. what is a stock price? it's a discounted value -- >> moving out the risk curve. >> look at new york real estate. you have a stream of cash flows that potentially will actually go up. so there's income and potentially inflation protection. all these markets are being impacted by investor incentives. are there going to be mispricings? absolutely. >> is bill gross going to shine in this environment? he knows so much about bond investing that that's where janus, the one he's managing, is going to be where all the big returns are in the bond universe now? >> hard to tell. completely different setup. hard to read. and the way we t

verye talking about esoteric languages. major emphasis on the study of terrorism.hese have issues with national security and the economy. it is very closely tied to the agencies of the federal government. just in a student is an a, what sort of major does the university of maryland offer? these go beyond national security itself. that's what we have expertise in language, flagship language security,cyber science and technology. there is an ormiston manned in those fields. continue our national supremacy in science and technology. we are also very strong in the performing arts. we are a comprehensive university. the access to the federal government and federal agencies in partnership with other institutions is broadly expanding the opportunities for education and research. the advisoryes board do? guest: i am sorry? i don't know what it is. -- go there are lots of ahead. i'm not firmly with that advisory board. in 2005.was created it is 20 university presidents that meet collectively in d.c.. they consult with federal agencies. i am wondering, what does the federman