we won't be blaming any of the nurses, et cetera. also, when it comes to the temperature and how as far as quarantine the number of days and what to do. if you've been exposed to any of these patients, directly or indirectly, stay out of public scene for 21 days, no discussion about it. so we're hoping that these guidelines will hopefully put everyone at ease and all this fear and panic will disappear. that's what we need from cdc today. >> it's amazing. you talk about the ebola savrmt marc, i want to ask you about this. you're a doctor. the ebola czar is a government official. he's not an md. if he was an md. would there be a standard of medical care that he would have to follow if he were a infectious it is expedisease ex that not the case by having a government bureaucrat? >> that would be a help. it is dismaying for some of us in the medical community to see another politician on top of the situation where there's been maybe too much politics. that's an issue. maybe he can help coordinate services but we already have sylvia burwe

determining a workers' compensation, years of experience, education, job title, job classification, et cetera, there are many variables. and that in order to do this right we didn't want to legislate exactly what data needs to be collected because we didn't feel that our office, or even the city attorney, or even the board of supervisors had all of that expert knowledge to say exactly how to collect data in the way that was going to be most effective and meaning the [speaker not understood] legislation and least burdensome. so, what we did is we put the equal pay advisory board together and have tasked the board to do this. and if you look at the legislation on page -- on page 9, we have required that experts in quantitative gender analysis, including statistics, a person who work in a small or medium size business that has contracted with the city and county of san francisco, a person who is responsible for human resources, responsible for diversity, person with expertise on discrimination, against women of color, a person whos ha worked as a discrimination or employment lawyer with emphasis

part of this, help to form this a we offer more incentives later on, whether they be financial, et cetera. then raise the bar perhaps a little bit higher, but to become a part of the legacy business registry, we want to kind of welcome folks with open arms. >> great. >> i have a question about the rebate for landlords. >> um-hm. >> the extension of the lease for -- from -- >> ten years, um-hm. >> is that only the length of the lease that is taken into account in your opinion? >> it would be an extension of 10 years from the point of the landlord a sold to landlord b, landlord b extending the lease for additional 10 year. >> under the same terms, different term? what would be the -- i'm just curious -- >> i think the term investment legislation, i'd have to double-check the language we use, i believe it would be -- we wouldn't want them to, you know he, increase the rent too much. >> so, at least an additional ten years -- >> correct. >> -- shall be entitled to rebate, did you it mention other term? [multiple voices] >> a lot of that, when he we consulted the city attorney, we have some di

policy overseas, it's for the state department, et cetera, et cetera, it was a lie. it was complete fiction. we didn't know about it in 1992, but we found out about it in 1999. because 44,000 secret internal memos from the fda were forced into the public domain from a lawsuit. not only were they aware u that gmos were significantly different, it was the overwhelming consensus among their own scientists that they were different and of high risk. that they could create allergies, toxins and nutritional problems. they repeatedly urged their superiors to require long-term study. every time they read the policy, they noticed that more and more of their science was removed from that policy till one person wrote, what's become of this document? it's basically a political document. it doesn't deal with the unpredicted side effects. the person in charge of policy at the fda, the political appointee, was michael taylor. monsanto's former attorney. the fda was given instructions by the white house to promote bio technology. they created a position for him. his policy ignored th

policy overseas, it's for the state department, et cetera, et cetera, it was a lie. it was complete fiction. we didn't know about it in 1992, but we found out about it in 1999. because 44,000 secret internal memos from the fda were forced into the public domain from a lawsuit. not only were they aware u that gmos were significantly different, it was the overwhelming consensus among their own scientists that they were different and of high risk. that they could create allergies, toxins and nutritional problems. they repeatedly urged their superiors to require long-term study. every time they read the policy, they noticed that more and more of their science was removed from that policy till one person wrote, what's become of this document? it's basically a political document. it doesn't deal with the unpredicted side effects. the person in charge of policy at the fda, the political appointee, was michael taylor. monsanto's former attorney. the fda was given instructions by the white house to promote bio technology. they created a position for him. his policy ignored th

, et cetera. had thompson poll to gender specific in each city. to ask them most general questions. >> interesting. >> it was all ranked together by division of thompson roiters. >> as the worst performing cities, bogota a, mexico city and lima, these used to have a terrible reputation in terms of safety. what did they do to change? >> absolutely. they are different. new york 25 years ago, you could not go walking at night alone. i would never do that at the time. or going you never felt safe. there was high crime level et cetera. they have been tough on crime and prosecuting, et cetera. it was the hard way. also you have city tv everywhere. that's the reason why of all bigger cities we have polled here. >> in tokyo there's female only carriages. >> yes. tokyo was also terrible for women. because in tokyo there's very much culture. the two was completely packed. you had to push people in. when you have this, everything is possible. so in tokyo they created women's-only carriage. it has become bett

or made to look difficult with the use of mathematics, crafts, et cetera, et cetera. and even to remaining 5% can be understood, it's not in all technical details, if somebody won't bother to explain in clear wakeup which is what i tried to do in this book. this is the cover of the book. actually it came out only in the uk on different format. this is pocket-sized paperback edition, exact same content with a different publisher, different types of insulin. and, indeed, in order to make this book accessible, in order to make economics accessible to note economies, today's mary poppins, start of the chapter on finance, the matrix, my fair lady, gone with the wind. ned flanders, my favorite simpsons character. so i really try, i don't know how much i succeed but i really try, but don't get me wrong. being accessible doesn't mean that i'm trying to give you some baby version, dummies guide, you know. seven things that you need to know about inflation, three things that you didn't know about this and that. i do not do that because i take my readers very seriously. and i re

takes a while for people to look through the details like wage growth, et cetera. that's what we're looking for. david: very binary. larry shover, thank you, larry. liz: great to see you all. "the willis report" is next. gerri: hello, i'm gerri willis. the economy is strong and getting stronger. that's at least according to the federal government. the u.s. economy growing at a 3 1/2% rate in the third quarter. and that translated into good news on wall street. the dow soaring 220 points. but that growth is not extending to your personal economy. according to folks across the country the economic disconnect may not bode well for incumbents when we go to the polls next week. here to weigh in, steve moore, chief economist from heritage foundation and fox news contributor. steve, great to have you here. the numbers from polls are astonishing. here we are, all three indexes poised at new highs, here is

someone is sick and needs to go to the hospital they don't have a lot of ability to detain people, et cetera and we're about to head into two seasons, one bad, one good. flu season and thanksgiving and christmas holiday and the peak travel season of the year. people traveling with children as well. so that poses a lot of problem for the cdc on retaining and detaining people. and i think that is probably where we run into problems with false positives. it's not going to work for long. >> one additional question. let's assume that today someone

it could feed the world, et cetera. reduce agricultural chemicals but they haven't actually turned out to be true. >> just a clarification. this idea talking points. one of the reasons why some of these things may occur as arguments again and again is that they're actually right. okay? there are many people that are saying these things. they're not using them as talking points. and this is a possibility to consider the same arguments are made generally with other groups there. they're well trodden paths. the second thing is i really think it's a little disingenuous to say that, you know, you have nothing against genetically modified organisms if they were tested enough. because i've heard the same thing with jerry rifkin, environmentalism and stuff. actually, not you personally necessarily, but everything is being done to prevent the kinds of testing that you would require in order to certify that something is safe. it is absolutely impossible to prove that something is safe. you can show that you can't see any damage f

notify it, et cetera. and so these other mechanisms which safeway did at the check out counter, rounding up, allow you to get millions of people involved with small contributions. and i think you can through some policy changes, run some tests here and maybe run them for a year or two and see what happens. i think the risk is in an area i spoke of early, scoring. they're going to tell you that it's going to cost, you know, billions of dollars in future taxes in the next 40 years. but i come back to the statement that 50% of all economic growth has come from advances in extension of life and increasing the quality of life. and i think by accelerating the giving, we have young people in our country today that are in their 20s, that are worth $30 billion. should they wait until they're 70 or 80 years old? or should we try to tap in to both their intellect and their funds today by incentivizing it on a present value basis to support it today. so i think there's a number of areas that we could test. there's tri

small cuts, accidents, et cetera,s if we had a bacterial infection that started to kol lon niez, continueo grow, we had no really fight it with. then this molecule is discovered in 1929, penicillin. penicillin was a game changer in the world of medicine. it still took a while to get it up to production at commercial -- in commercial volumes, but once penicillin and its chemical cousins became available, suddenly we didn't die from microbial infections anywhere near as much. unless you have a very resistant bar tear ya. today we don't get a day off of work. but this was a major life-threatening disease. cancer is treated in a completely different way. we carpet bomb any cell that's growing fast. the look of a cancer patient, the hair falling out, the iv poll, that's actually the treatment. it's not necessarily the cancer. so, we completely obliterate cells in a nondiscriminate way that are growing quickly. more modern medicines are targetive. medicines like her septemberen in the cell. they're very focussed. they tend to be used alongside chemo therapy. but when they work, when those targe

et cetera. >> next question is have somebody using the handle "debatable."nd this is a really good point. "if it takes 21 days for someone to show symptoms, have have they cleared the ems who transported the patient on 9/28." they're talking about the ambulance crew that would have transported the patient from dallas there. they have been give an clear. they were tested negative for ebola. how could that be? >> i'm not sure that they were given a clear. they may have tested negative but i will tell you a negative test doesn't mean anything. if you have -- if you're infected with ebola but not yet showing symptoms, you're going to test negative. you only test positive when you start having symptoms. and even then for the first day or two it takes a while for it to kick in. so, again, you're going to be negative until you have symptoms so i highly doubt that they tested these people who were told they're all well, got a negative result and said "see ya" and sent them on their way. >> so they'll keep monitoring them? >> right. they're monitoring them and tellin

, et cetera? >> other interesting thing about gas prices, what's been noted is it's peculiar the way we buy it. we sit there and watch the dollars roll by. even more than the the actu effect on income is this psychological effect on consumer confidence because we really notice when those prices move around as we watch them go by. >> sreenivasan: to recap, the big reasons are that china is perhaps demanding less oil. >> absolutely. >> sreenivasan: and at the same time the u.s. is creating more natural gas and oil reserves? >> yeah, so the u.s. is producing a lot more oil domestically, importing a lot less, which makes a lot more oil available on the world market to go to asia. but china is not-- the growth is slowing down there. also, in developing countries, cars are getting more efficient and people are driving less. so demand globally is growing at the slowest pace since 2009 and 29 was, obviously, a very weak year. and at the same time there is also awl this supply coming on from the u.s. and s

, et cetera, et cetera and most frightening a quarantine. can you tell me why the quarantine of the fear that you must have certainly felt what are these people up to getting, you know, a police are ride with sirens anding over to the the hospital. so i understand that fear. and not knowing what is going on, but tell me what is frightening about a quarantine. >> well, for me, it is two things. and i have experienced it. so unfortunately, i think that i can say these two things pretty confidently, and the first is that -- for instance, all of the health care workers taking care of me. they are seeing me, and the ppe and then going home to their families, so that the quarantine doesn't in how it is being carried out, it does not make common sense. it is not evidence-based. and secondly, i set inhumane. i just came back from one of the most difficult months of my life, and i am complete ly -- ad nobody can predict if i will develop ebola, but to quarantine everyone in case when you cannot predict who may develop ebola or not, and to make me sta

one plan, et cetera. that helped us a lot in trying to do. but the issue here is we really need to accelerate region economic integration. one think i keep repeating, we have more reforms in africa than in here in united states. we have more funds than you guys. we have 550 more bag phones in africa, more than europe. but we don't make one muba iphone. realize the missed opportunity. i think this is a major issue. so i think a few things need to be done. i have a few suggestions. >> go ahead. >> yeah? i'll troob very quick. we need to continue to improve governments in africa which is already improving according to data published. available you to free of charge if you want. one thing i think will help investment if we have a then african stock exchange. bl any ininvestors goes into any country, he is looking for the exit door. we have only six or seven siliqd exchanges in africa. that doesn't work. we need to have regional exchanges or ban it. it's not difficult. it's simple and easy. >> i think also i have a word for you, it's business. it'

, et cetera.ink that at least in the united states where we don't have kind of monolithic privacy rules they have in europe, it's going to be solved more on safety purposes rather than privacy. because the one thing we can agree on is we don't want that thing flying over our backyard, whether it's taking pictures or not. >> any other comments? no? >> i would just say that there's a lot of existing tort law in this space as well around privacy, and in many cases flying over your neighbor's yard and taking pictures is actually more of a civil case than it's going to be a criminal case. or a case where the faa needs to be involved at all. >> so a lot of people don't really know what these are yet and they don't know what kind of cameras they carry. they assume if they can see one, it can see you, and that's not really the case. it might be ten pixels in a resulting picture. two weeks ago a bguy was attackd by a woman on a public beach because he was flying one. it was vertical video which shouldn't b

basically we're going to be like a hub where people can come to get services, help, information, et ceteraat you see here on this table are a whole variety of did you ever rent things from tools, some walki-talkies. this helps people know what is going on in their neighborhood. over here you have a whole variety of water and canned goods. we're really hoping that people will stock up for themselves at least for the first 72 hours if not more. i know that i have a ton of canned food and other sorts of things such as water within my own home. and everybody should, but there's going to come a time where people are going to end up running out and needing more. so, that's what we've got right here. >> so, this neighborhood support center, this doesn't look to be a major city sponsored fully stocked space. it can be a small commercial space, even somebody's garage as long as they have the information, a guide of information, who to call for what, communications equipment, some power, have a generator. >> that's right. >> thinking of lights and charge your cell phones and so on. and probably be o

takes a while for people to look through the details like wage growth, et cetera. we're looking for. david: very binary. larry shover, thank you, larry. liz: great to see you all. "the willis report" is next. gerri: hello, i'm gerri willis. the economy is strong and getting stronger. that's at least according to the federal government. the u.s. economy growing at a 3 1/2% rate in the third quarter. and that translated into good news on wall street. the dow soaring 220 points. but that growth is not extending to your personal economy. according to folks across the country the economic disconnect may not bode well for incumbents when we go to the polls next week. here to weigh in, steve moore, chief economist from heritage foundation and fox news contributor. steve, great to have you here. the numbers from polls are astonishing. here we are, all three indexes poised

and japan, et cetera. and that they -- people aren't alone. and that was the message. and we have already heard a lot of that. so when i went to interview another mcdonald's worker, i said, you know, what do you think about all this. and she said, we'll win if we all stick together. because that's what a union does. and when you think about it, i don't know, 30 years ago, you know, when i was younger, we talked about wow you know, all these young people working at fast-food. we should be organizing in the fast-food. it was like, impossible. that's going to be impossible to do that. and now, look at what's happening. you know, fast-food workers, wal-mart workers, organizing, doing this. and you know, earlier today we stood up when roberta asked who is in a union and a lot of people stood up. i was like really impressed with the union members. but then i realized, why didn't everybody stand up? because of the labor movement has opened its doors all wide. and can say, join working america. and join fast-food forward. and join the fight for 15. joan our wal-mart. and every

spencer, trains, restaurants, et cetera. it's much easier if the person is home. again, doctors without borders, which is the organization that commissioner bassett mentioned, their policy now is to remain out of work for three weeks. just as a decompression period, again, my word, not theirs. this takes it one more step. and please remain at home. enjoy yourself, enjoy your family but remain at home. easier to operate. and if, god forbid, the person becomes infected, we will have known with certainty the number of people who were exposed to that person during that period of time. >> i want to emphasize for a moment, a key point that the governor and commissioner zucker made. communicating with the individual from the moment of arrival, openly explaining what the policy is, accommodating their needs, protecting their salary and their work status. everything that the nurse didn't experience in the last few days. i want to say it is very important point. if someone is told with the respect they deserve as a returning hero how a policy works and it is done in a suppo

for what purpose, to what area, et cetera, et cetera. we didn't have a clue. how can you then coordinate? the capacity building, building the institutions that you mentioned, one-third of it was done with the knowledge of the afghan government. how can you then build institutions? there had to be a partnership between the two. that simply was not there. finally, i must say, the bitterness that is there today, i think we have to -- in the beginning the afghans did not have any institution and there was spoon feeding from the international community. and as one member of government said, you don't bite the hand that feeds you. much was accepted at the time, and then came a different situation where the afghans felt that now we're strong enough to say what we think about this, and the bitterness increased, and you saw the reaction you had from karzai. and even one of those who spent the longest time abroad and came back as member of the government said, we really had to tolerate a lot at that time that we should not have tolerated. again, as he said, i cannot quo

they did all the handrails, et cetera, et cetera. is that an overabundance of caution or is that exactly what this takes? >> this is a beautiful execution of a very thoroughly thought-through plan. i was very impressed. they were prepared for all of these contingencies and they moved on them very expeditiously. you know the somewhat delay the first time getting into the apartment was given a lot of play. i thought that that was overplayed. you just had to close the door and that was not a problem. and then this virus, which is fierce within the body, once it gets out into the environment starts to deteriorate, starts to die off very quickly. >> dr. schaffner, i want you to hold on a bit for me. we have our senior medical correspondent, elizabeth cohen. i don't know, elizabeth, whether you're on the phone or in front of a camera. there you are. i understand you have some news about the patient. >> right. i've been told by an official that this patient, this health care worker, is a nurse and is a woman and so those are all the details

for what purpose, to what area, et cetera, et cetera. we didn't have a clue. how can you then coordinate? the capacity building, building the institutions that you mentioned, one-third of it was done with the knowledge of the afghan government. how can you then build institutions? there had to be a partnership between the two. that simply was not there. finally, i must say, the bitterness that is there today, i think we have to -- in the beginning the afghans did not have any institution and there was spoon feeding from the international community. and as one member of government said, you don't bite the hand that feeds you. much was accepted at the time, and then came a different situation where the afghans felt that now we're strong enough to say what we think about this, and the bitterness increased, and you saw the reaction you had from karzai. and even one of those who spent the longest time abroad and came back as member of the government said, we really had to tolerate a lot at that time that we should not have tolerated. again, as he said, i cannot quo

and europe et cetera. the w.h.o. now even criticizing itself in effect. >> right. >> in your view, how bad were those errors early on? >> this entire epidemic has been about too little too, slow, too late. and, you know, we're dealing with the kwenconsequences of th now. the u.s. has pledged now to build 17 ebola treatment units. they have barely set up a separate unit for treatment of health care workers. the first of those 17 ebola treatment units is still being built. the health organization is saying in two months we could have 10,000 cases on our hands. we need to be gearing up much more quickly. >> too little too late too slowly, but how about today? >> still the same. we've geared up some but we're still not anywhere near -- you have to catch up with the virus and we're nowhere near that. >> that's in west africa. how about in the u.s.? >> the u.s. it s a different story. i think we've learned a lot from the experience in dallas. i think hospitals are responding. there's more that still needs to be done. i thi

feed the world, et cetera, reduce chemicals. they haven't actually turned out to be true. >> just a clarification. this idea talking points. one of the reasons why some of these things may occur as arguments again and again is that they're actually right. okay? there are many people that are saying these things. they're not using them as talking points. and this is a possibility to consider the same arguments are made generally with other groups there. they're well trodden paths. the second thing is i really think it's a little disingeneralous to say you have nothing against genetically modified organism it's they were tested enough. i heard the same thing with environmentalism and stuff. actually, not you personally necessarily, but everything is being done to prevent the kinds of testing that you would require in order to certify that something is safe. it is absolutely impossible to prove that something is safe. you can show that you can't see any damage from it given the kinds of test that's are done. you cannot make that pr

we have four parks, garfield, rolf park, larossa park, et cetera.we have been hearing rumbles for quite a few years now regarding those parks and access. it started with when the parks we're being rehabilitated. one thing i want to say, too, i have been hearing people say this is a rule -- you know, that people have to follow rules, but rules are not always right. rules sometimes don't work. so we have to have the power to be able to look at those rules and look at those laws and see how they are working or not work and like now it's not working. there was one family that i heard about that was at the park and asked to leave by a woman with a permit. the next day they checked to see if that particular hour and time was reserved and it was not. so the park sat there without being used. this is evidently a system that is not working and it's not utilizing that space. another instance is where -- i'm going to speak for rita alvarar. rita has been working with that park for decades, making sure that the park is activity and safe and making sure that par

it is not an airborne disease, you have to have close contact with bodily fluids, et cetera.ntributing to this fear has been the response so far, right? i was speaking to health officials before there was the first u.s. case, heads of cdc and ih et cetera saying our health care system is so much better than africa's you could never have an outbreak here. hospitals will identify it, health care workers will continue it, yet we've seen the holes in that in response to the hospital in texas. not enough to justify the fear, but enough to raise hard questions about how prepared we are, don't you think? >> absolutely. i think that's the pivotal issue here. i think that the issue has really turned to two sides. the apocalypse or we're handling it fine. i think the answer is somewhere in the middle. and i think that the idea that the cdc has fallen short, that some of their protocols haven't worked can co-exist with the idea that, you know, they're still at extremely low risk despite some of their missteps, extremely low risk. as mel said, this is a virus that's difficult to catch. >

revitalize public housing, both through the hope sf programs like hunters view and alice griffith , et cetera. it will extend the useful life of that housing and bring to that housing stock overall 500 million in rehabilitation, something that the federal government cannot do and is not prepared to do. we will continue to build more permanently affordable housing, whether it's a part of the redevelopment plans of the office of community investment and instrument, or part of parcels provided to us through land dedication and through public sites. >> mr. lee, we won't hold it against you if you use your backup plan. [laughter ] >> okay, i will keep that in mind. we also need to expand the overall stock of housing. and that means both market-rate, as well as affordable housing. and that through this process the mayor has clearly directed city staff, city departments to talk about streamlining and that is why the report was directed primarily at the mayor's office on housing, but also in coordination of the work that the mayor's office on housing does with the department of building inspection, t

the diamond might be interested in buying bobby sue's nuts at some point, general mills might be, et cetera. >> they're interested in acquiring innovations for a number of different ways. to give you an example though, last year, the m and a market in consumer and retame was twice the size as it is in tech. that's how large our consumer retail companies grow. >> actually get the product they want is they tend to buy it. >> if you look at the last ten years, you look at nestly or coke, they've started on one hand. they don't start brands, they buy brand. that's a great thing for the investors on circle up, you're investing into the brands before their professionalismed by -- >> what are the downside risks. >> first of all, it's a high ring class. i mean private investing is high risk, you have to have a failure rate earlier, it's high. to accommodate for that, people don't have to be okay with the long-term hold. typically these companies have take, as i mentioned before, four and a half years to earn a payback, many can't afford to wait that long. eat key consideration is the diversificatio

. >> the same people on the list, the same politicians, et cetera, et cetera. nobody knew.re is no good programs. everything is the same in 2014 as in 2010. >> bosnia's different ethnic and religious groups all want change but they are pulling in different directions meaning this country is stagnating. barnaby phillips, al jazeera, sarajevo. >> neim bol eve i can't have begun voting around 6 million vegstered voters are eligible to cast their ballots. president morales is expected to be re-elected for a third time. polling in second is candidate samuel medina. . >> the u.s. centers for disease control and prevention says a breach of care protocol resulted in a nurse in texas testing positive for ebola. she helped care for the first person ever diagnosed with the virus in the united states. the cdc is monitoring more healthcare workers who could have made the same mistake. >> sdpornl, it is possible in the coming days that we will see additional cases of ebola. this is because the healthcare workers who cared for this individual may have had a breach of the same nature of th

they took his passport, et cetera. what did he tell the authorities in terms of where he was originally traveling from? >> so once they came back to question him, another flight attendant came back, two came together. and to describe the symptoms again and the second flight attendant said where are you originating from. and he said liberia. >> he did say he was from liberia. tell me a bit about what happened when you landed, because we know that the -- the cdc did get involved immediately. we saw these photos of officials coming on the plane. what were they wearing, what kind of protective gear were they wearing and what did they tell and you all the other passengers to do? >> so originally, while we were waiting for the cdc to come on board, the flight attendants had come back and said that we were in row 27, and the flight attendant said rows 25 through 28 would need to stay on the plane. on that side of the plane, anyway. and everyone else would be able to deplane. and then cdc came on. they were wearing like a prot

is an anxiety about the government being competent to handle these real assaults of ebola, isis, et cetera. it seems to me part of the competence question is connected to the word candor. i do think the american people hear the government talk and it incessantly talks and talks in a concentrated way from a few people 0 in the white house, as they hold on to their sort of concentrated power, but there is a lack of a sense in so many of these stories that you are getting it straight. that they are telling you really what they know, that they are telling you what you can do. there is always a sense, especially with the h ebola thig that they are trying to keep you calm and it has that patronizing sound of we don't want you little people to get nervous. look, nobody wants the american public to get nervous but we would all be less nervous if we had a sense we were getting it straight from our governmental bodies. >> schieffer:. >> you know, i think people do want to hear the truth. i am struck, i read something this week that said the virus is multiplaying on virus time. it grows exponentially

, how do i deal with 4g-lte, et cetera, so you have a lot of dynamic issues.e one thing we realize in the automotive industry is whatever we put on that vehicle, we want it to be safe. number one, we want it to be safe. it can't fail. it can't go to the blue screen of death. it's got to operate seamlessly, flawlessly. yet, on the other hand, we want to be responsive to our customers. the ultimate consumer that's going to purchase those features and functions. all of that is possible, but we need to do it in such a way that it's effective and it's affordable and we truly can benefit from it. we don't want to have our technologies legislated or mandated that drive us to a solution that ultimately won't pan out because we won't survive one failure. we want it to be done right. secondly, the industry needs the opportunity to continue to innovate so we get proven solutions that work and we understand the ramifications. so we're on that pathway, but in the meantime, you know, we got the smartphone, we got the tablets, now we got i-watches and wearable devices. all o

et cetera, et cetera. i write one column about anti-semitism in the muslim community suddenly all the communities are you sold out, you secret zionist, what are you doing for your you're a secret zionist, what are you doing to your career. doesn't matter what you've done previously. you know, you write anything that doesn't follow the party line on israel, you're a secret zionist. you go to white house, you might as well be flying the drone itself that dropped the bomb on pakistani children. this is the level sometimes of the discourse in our community which is one perceived bad deed, even if it's not a bad deed, cancels out everything else and we're suspicious of the motivations of those of us who are on the same journey. yes, the right path is pretty broad and capacious in my view. you can be on that path and heading in the same correction as everyone else but doing your struggle in a different way. you can be a doctor or engineer. you can be a pom politician or journalist. you can take a more engaged st

gerrymdering, et cetera. there is something new with the administration what they brought america. >> called socialism. there's a need o have everyone on the government dole. more people on welfare under this president than in story. the villeification o the rich is killing us, tooo you are bifurcating this countrmore and more, that's what's different. it wasn't like that under bill clinton. >> the real issue is if it's about big government, why isn't governnt taking control of thebola situation. >>ecause they hav a handle on it now. i don't think they have a handle on it. >> okay, gang, we got a lot more to talk about. thinkhe american public is worried aboutebola? wait until you see how the markets are reacting. go ahead and put your bag right here. have a nice flight! traveling can feel like one big mystery. you're never quite sure what icoming your way. but wh you've got an entire company who knows that the most on-time fligs are nothing if we can't get your things there too. it's no wonder more people ch

, et cetera, and most frightening a quarantine. can you tell me why the quarantine of the fear you certainly mvp felt, what are these people up to, getting a police ride with sirens and everything to the hospital, to understand that fear, not knowing what's going on, but tell me what's frightening about a quarantine. >> for me, it's two things, and i've experienced it, so unfortunately i think i can say these two things pretty confidently. the first has been this is not a -- case. for instance, are all of the workers taking care of me being -- no, they are seeing me, in their ppe, and they're going home to their families. so the quarantine does -- in its -- in how it's being carried out doesn't make scientific sense. the 1ekd thing is it's really inhumane. i just came back from one of the most different months of my life, and i am completely -- and no one knows -- no one can -- if i will develop ebola or not in the next 21 days. most aid workers that come back will not. so to quarantine everyone in case when you cannot predict who

gerrymandering, et cetera. there is something new with the administration what they brought to america. >> called socialism. there's a need o have everyone on the government dole. more people on welfare under this president than in history. the villeification of the rich is killing us, tooo you are bifurcating this country more and more, that's what's different. it wasn't like that under bill clinton. >> the real issue is if it's about big government, why isn't government taking control of the ebola situation. >> because they have a handle on it now. i don't think they have a handle on it. >> okay, gang, we got a lot more to talk about. think the american public is worried about ebola? wait until you see how the markets are reacting. so ally ballhas no hidden fees savings accou tha'. i's just tt i'worried out you know "hidden tngs." okwhy's th? no hidden fe, from tank wherno branches equals great rates. erwas no questio she minds yoevery y y. ane the mome is rit. helps you be ready buuld be auestion of blood u

and he waxed he will kwept about the flaws of these virginian presidents, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera not that adams was particularly sympathetic of the new englanders, but you're right, that bias has entered the history and there wasn't so much they wrote it but that they believed the word of the new englanders. >> madison was onu1ñ the potoma but i can't find any writings about it. >> the call council in the city of philadelphia after th b burning of washington did make it known to the add manipulation that if the federal government wanted to move, they're welcome to move back to philadelphia, which, of course, he had been there before in 1800. this was debated at quite?wv so length in congress. madison appeared to be largely inactive or passive behind the  cerebral pal scenes. why is it that every time i go through another reading that go. but i did find that madison let it be known that had that bill be passed, he would be killed. the source of that is not madison himself, but it can be documented on the period. >> where would you say are the most serious kargts of the war of 18