et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. that's legacy. we just need to take it further. >> yes, sir. >> sir, my question is, you talked about how the tactics you all used won't work anymore because the laws have changed but what lessons can we take from your work so that all the people here, individual people, can work to fulfill the goals that you all tried to achieve? >> to fulfill them. one of the things i tried to do, i always tried to make sure my ideas, my beliefs, my understanding, i research and i read a lot. make sure my ideas, beliefs and understanding corresponded correctly to reality. i had an aunt zelma, my mother was named thelma, they were identical twins, and look and shape and stature, but they were two different personalities. aunt zelma is a die-hard christian. when i run around 10, 12, 11, about 12 years old, i was telling some other kids in the back room, no, it ain't, no, it ain't, the earth spin on its own axis at a thousand miles an hour, i'm talking to my friends, and then, and then the earth take a 600 million mi

et cetera et cetera. it's costly. it may not be irrationale. opec has been difficult for any cartel to preserve a cartel price unless they are propped up by government regulation and opec is not. it's difficult for them to make price increases stick since early 1970s when opec became important. but i don't think it's zero. they can effect prices but not as much aps used to be the case. >> one area that i imagine you witnessed firsthand, the russian/saudi understanding. there was a lot of direct moves by putin within his own energy space. i think there's a kind of confond thinking based on other factors it showed a disagreement there's space to have cooperation and also some incentive and cut res neft is this a sign that russia that the russian is going somewhere or was this a one time agreement? >> i don't think energy, it's not about energy. when we read about energy russia saudi or russian economy it's not about energy. it's not dissertation on free market verse not. i think it's about russia is becoming closer and closer to becoming opec-sty

, et cetera. but that means when the price rises again the efficiencies are there. so we can get to 8.7 million barrels a day with only 525 rigs. that means if we keep the prices at $55 to $60 as opec, quote unquote, hopes, then opec loses and the united states wins. because production will continue to rise because we have the ability to produce shale oil at $32 a barrel in some formations, $40 in others, et cetera. so actually giving this window a cushion for american companies to increase production, that's the result of the opec decision. so the short-term gain of a few hundred million dollars a month in the increased price between -- if you calculate the loss of production, gets erased. and when does it fall apart to your point? when market share starts getting affected in the next couple of years. we lifted the ban. so at some point if knees nominations are continuing to cut and the united states can replace it -- >> you mean the export ban. >> the export ban on crude oil. then all of a sudde

et cetera. so we have done that.econd, while we always talk about nuclear, coal, gas, renewables, the fifth energy source is doing retro fits. we have 54 million square feet in the city of chicago in major buildings under retrofit which is one of the biggest emitters and our resources we put in or our buildings, we have private. we have done the first element through the infrastructure trust. millennials is one of the drivers of the economic engines of urban centers, they want to go to a building that is environmentally energy positive, in a positive, affirmative way. we have driven that now in the residential a lot harder. people think it is the panacea. it is very hard on the window, caulking, insulation. very difficult, unlike an office building where you can kind of move faster. the city is never going back from this. it is in our self-interest. it is a classic case where the federal government, if he pulls out of the international agreements, i don't see the city reversing what it is going to do. but it's the go

, et cetera.could make a laundry list of noble things she did, no doubt about it. the political epitaph is that two times she ran for president where she was the overwhelming favorite, in 2008 and in 2016, she lost to barack obama in 2008 in an epic, historic, super close race, and then she nearly lost to bernie sanders, who was a septuagenarian, self-described socialist, senator from vermont who, again, nearly beat her, right? she's not a good politician. and i think even her friends really dispute that. she's not good at politics. she was -- i think many people think a very good and very successful secretary of state. she was beloved, a senator who even many republicans enjoyed working with and co-sponsoring legislative with. in the practice of governance, she is extraordinarily competent, she knows policy as well as anyone, she is pragma c pragmatic, cuts deals, all that stuff. in the political realm, she struggled. in her two most high-profile runs for office. and she came -- as i said, she ca

we've generated companies like google, facebook, apple, et cetera, et cetera, plus the entertainment industry. that kind of prosperity drives up prices, so, i think it more has to do with market demand than regulation, even though we are overregulated. david: well, john, i love it when the liberals who are quick at making up rules realize when it affects them they're no good. george mcgovern, a liberal who ran for president in the '70s, got out of politics and started a small one and went bankrupt. i wish during the years i was in public office, i had experience about the difficulties business people face every day. one size fits all ignores the reality of the market place, he said. >> yeah, well politicians don't realize that housing is a market just like every other. if you free up the market there will be different prices. >> it will be in san francisco and beverly hills, it will be expensive no matter what. >> i don't think it's an epip any for jerry brown. you look at the empire, suburban sprawl and it's an interesting caveat he made. david: okay, bruce. >> jerry brown said he d

, et cetera. we need to know more, we have dig deeper, we have to investigate. there is something that put tin is holding over his head. >> what in that dossier resonates? >> what i have heard about the dossier, it's about his involvement with woman, it's about pros statutitutes involve he has sounded that way. he has acted that way, it gives reason to think maybe something is to this ask we need to find out more. >> we have ridiculed by most news source, we are saying let's take something somebody wrote when start an investigation. >> there is not just an old body who did the report. this is a respected -- this is respected intelligence agent that did the report. you can't just bush it aside and say there's nothing to do. let's do the investigating that's needed to be done to find out whether or not we're putting a man in office and the most important office in the free world who may be held hostage by russia. >> thank you for coming on. >>> coming up donald trump tells robert cos ster obama plan

. > et cetera mr. ' take it outside than a get a look at the weather out there, which is another drizzly day, as you said yesterday, rinse and repeat. it's the exact same way a as its was yesterday. we won't make it through another > we're back where we wereere yesterday at this time with most the measurable rain over.in

but there is putting up, et cetera. but there isa is putting up, et cetera. of trade? another crucial thing this morning is chinese gdp numbers have come out. crucial thing this morning is chinese gdp numbers have come outlj think there certainly is restraint at the moment on the part of the chinese government. at this time of year we go to all manner of new year receptions and speak the chinese government officials and that's the message we are getting regarding trump. they are all holding back and trying to be restrained. but those comments that xi jinping made, trying to be restrained. but those comments that xijinping made, of course he is talking about the possibility of tariffs. the chinese position has long been that. free trade has benefited not only china, but the us, especially consumers, and they don't want tariffs, they wa nt and they don't want tariffs, they want free trade between these two powers. at the moment they aren't being so strident and expressing this, but i think on the inauguration has happened that might change. indeed. we will be w

i mean, you changed yourself, and your mom and dad, i bet, and your girlfriends, and et cetera, et cetera. but did you change the world? >> well, i think it's... you know, you really want to look at... when you start thinking about changing the world, the first person you want to start to change is yourself. and so i think that as i am related to everyone else in the world, changing yourself, changing myself, did in some ways change the world. in a larger sense, when i started walking, when i just started... got out of my car and started walking, and walked across the united states, if someone had said to me, "john, you'll change the world," or, "you'll make a difference if you just get out of your automobile and start walking east," and as i got a little bit further on they said, "yeah, and shut up, too. you're going to change the world, you're going to make a difference," you know? and i would have thought maybe, you know, they'd been doing something that they shouldn't have been doing. but that's what happened.t to te east coast, i had a ph.d. in environmental studies, i had written on

i don't blame the representatives and various presidents, et cetera, of mexico. what i say is we shouldn't have allowed that to happen. it's not going to happen anymore. in order to get the wall started, mexico will pay for the wall. but it will be reimbursed. okay? it supreme court judge. so as you know, i have a list of 20. i have gone through them. we've met with numerous candidates. they're outstanding in every case. they were largely recommended and highly recommended by federalist society. jim dimint was involved, and he is a fantastic guy. between leo and jim dimint and senators and congress people, we have a great group of people, i'll be making the decision on who we will put up for justice of the united states supreme court. a replacement for the great, great justice scalia. that will be probably within two weeks of the 20th. within about two weeks. probably the second week. i consider the first day because we'll also be doing some -- some pretty good signings, and i think what we'll do is we'll wait until monday. that will be our really first business

et cetera, et cetera. so there are legitimate reasons to avoid this space but if you do, you are going to be very far away from the market. >> i'm an absolute return investor. you're an investor with a benchmark. i don't have the bernnchmark. i'm looking at what an absolute return profile is. >> not a word today about regulation at all. taking some of the regulations or easing some regulations in various sectors. not a mention. >> not a question about it either. >> that was my point at the outset. my point to you and i'll push back from what you said earlier, was that if the administration is bogged down in any kind of formal investigation or hearing on capitol hill as it relates to mr. trump's relationship in any way shape or form with russia, you don't think that that has the potential to delay the implementation of key parts of the agenda that the market has already traded forward on? >> first of all, you said if. and that's where i would take it from, scott. if. so if martians land tomorrow will that c

you are saying, oh, it's complicated, but we want good things for him, et cetera, et cetera, et ceteraaaron rodgers was asked about this comment, and he says he does not want to speak about his family's drama in public. he responded this way. i just don't think it's appropriate talking about family stuff publicly. that is that. >> coming up, you're going to love these. stick around for our favorite things at the end of the show. they are worth it. >> okay. it's our big 4-0 for joe, and orlando bloom this weekend. >> what? we're going to have celebrations coming up on celebrity buzz coming u andrew wanted nothing to do with his volcano demonstration. tears, tantrums and stalling. then his boss informed him, there was a sweet bonus attached if he saw the project through. and with that extra bit of motivation, the science project is complete, and andrew is back in good standing. management 101. that's just good business mom. return to real food. dairy products made with california milk. from our family farms to your table. return to real. look for the seal. listerof bad breath germs for a

for special interest tax breaks, et cetera, unpaid for, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. so that's how we get to without president obama, the national debt would be even higher. republicans are putting forth -- $9 trillion to the deficit, if you go down that path to the bill. nothing brings more money to the than the nothing, education of the american people. early k-12, postgrad, lifetime learning -- nothing reduces the deficit more than investing in education. that is something they are not interested in investing in, m ake us pay for. >> catalog later, there are reports that michael flynn has with theegular contact u.s. investor from russia. sean spicer said that they text each other. are you aware of these contacts? rep. pelosi: no. but i do think that communication with ambassadors is probably an okay thing. that is why ambassadors are here, to communicate with an administration to be. of course we have serious concerns about the president's national security advisor flynn. what i am more concerned about is what possible connection there was between the trunk campai

he's doing it to the most dangerous countries in terms of terrorist, iraq, iran, syria, et cetera, et cetera. he's saying, look, let me step back, see what we need, investigate, i can still let people through on a per case basis. i applaud him, let's see what we don't know and act on it. dagen: john, we need to assess whether the vetting is good enough. a refugee program, the numbers have been going up by 20% in the last year, in the coming year even more than that in terms of the number of refugees the u.s. is letting in. >> yeah, because we can't vet. the people are saying that we have biometric data, we don't. they don't have library to go to. i agree with gary b. in what he's saying. we have 70,000 refugees relocate every year at a cost of $1.1 blion. only about 10,000 of those are syrian. that means that the 10 million that are displaced in syria right now over 99% we are not affecting, we are doing this to show the world, look what we are doing, we are not making any difference at all. this is a rounding error. better taking the billion dollars and spending in refugee camps in m

really sharp edged bold democratic plan, that will help us at the same time, the affordable care act, et cetera. >> we had a polarized eight years with president obama. >> we're not going to impose something because of said. we will work with them on trade. if he was to repeal carried against exemption, we'll support them, but where the values are different we'll oppose them. the affordable care act, rolling back, clean air, clean water, it

harmed through trying to figure out what to do, how to travel, how to come back to the country, et ceterathat's one part of it that's just really inexcusable. at the actual border security, this is just the most blunt tool inmanageable. we're going of close the door on 100 plus million people until we figure out in 90 days or more. surely with all the people from tech that are advising the new president to the national security apparatus that is around him, we could have done something a little bit more nuanced. >> on paypal itself said it had six employees effected by the confusion over the executive order over the weekend. just this morning speaker paul ryan said it was regrettable that the rollout was confusing but on ago forward basis his confident secretary kelly and his team will be able to manage this in a way that is a little bit clearer to everybody involved. do you have any confidence that that will happen? >> remains to be seen. i'm at the very least encouraged by the fact the administration has heard the peaceful protests, the rhetoric that's come out over the weekend against

, et cetera? that are overdue, or have other outstanding obligations to the commission, and find some way to sort of tag all of these people. so that we can publicize them, maybe encourage folks to contact the commission, and provide the funds or forms or whatever is outstanding and get out of that bad place? so perhaps we'll have a larger discussion of that when we get to enforcement. i appreciate that we have now heard from board of bdr about their process and better communication between the commission and bdr and treasurer's staff. thank you. >> good evening commissioners, my name is ace washington, better known as ace on the case. this is my first time coming before this commission and i have read about this agency and i see you are on the case. the reason i said i came before the ethics commission some five years ago, and the dates that you were all talking about -- excuse me -- about the african american democratic party -- you had charles spencer back there and the deal is i'm just trying

i like its products, et cetera, et cetera.his is a stock for sale on every rally. >> no percentages here? >> what's that? >> no percentages? >> on what? >> on like what they've traded down? >> no. i'll come back to you on that. this is a stock that's been in a downtrend for a while. until it's able to break that, it's not the kind of thing that i want to be involved with. i bought nike recently, reverse that downtrend. stocks has been heading higher. the set-up is just a little bit better. >>> coming up on the "halftime report," pete sees some unusual activity in a tech name and he is buying in. we'll tell you what it is. stephanie link making changes to her portfolio. she's buying a big name in defense, dropping one big tech name and buying another. and the original sheriff of wall street, eliot spitzer is here on the stock analyst you can trust, the ones you should ignore. the ones you should ignore. he's backing a business that 90% of the world's largest supercomputers run on intel? that means you can take a universe of dat

, et cetera, et cetera.think these people are thinking that technology has changed, donald trump has the views that he does and this is going to change and we're going to change it. >> as a presidential historian, what is the impact of twitter on donald trump's presidency and having a president who does -- tweet? >> it changed everything. there's no donald trump presidency without twitter. he is using that technology. he will continue to use it. i don't believe the esquire story that they're going to shut down the press corps. i think what they will do is expand it. they will find ways to have a lot more breitbart news type reporters, bloggers and all. they will blow it up and not call on people he doesn't like. it will be very nixonian. trump is to me the ghost of richard nixon, except he's acting like spiro agnew. [ laughter ] he's going to kill the press. [ all speak at once ] >> but he has made the press his enemy. i think he wants to divide and concur. now with twitter, he has fox new, he's got the "new

growth rates, feed consumed, illnesses, deaths, et cetera. they found there was no difference. >> and that made a tremendous impact on me. and we wrote this up with the assistance and not eventually the agreement of the purdue company but we contacted them to use their data. and that really convinced me, he ne we need to look at this again. it may not be the case that we need antibiotics at this point. as you know a lot of things happened with growing chickens and hogs since 1987. we have been breeding, mixing different nutrient into feeds and changing the environmental conditions of the houses in which animals are raised. perhaps there was an effect that was observed though i'm a little doubtful given the scanty evidence. but maybe there was back then in 1948. but at this point in time i'm not sure that there is. >> let me ask you something. i've not been in the business of growing chickens. but when you talk to a lost farmers, and talk to people at land grant schools, notwithstanding the fact there are harmful impacts of antibiotics and how

you're going to have hearings, et cetera. discussions of new sanctions.isten, you talk about wanting to turn the page. the president wants to move on. is that going to be possible in this environment? i would say unlikely. >> this is a very broad investigation. if you go down that laundry list of things that they are looking at, it touches upon everything. even if it's quiet and done quietly, when the report comes out, it's going to kind of bring it all back again. >> and those of us who have covered these investigations over the years in washington, you know it often starts out pretty focused, but it can expand -- >> started out, right -- >> it can go on and on and on. >> right. >>> there's more breaking news we're following. the surprise honor that brought the vice president of the united states, joe biden, to tears. we'll update you on that. we'll be right back. are you getting this? these numbers are off the charts... sir! what's the status? there's a meteor hurtling towards earth. how long until impact? less than a minute. what do you want to do, sir

construction people et cetera. >> he could just say that. that would be good. >> i think he will -- >> but do you understand? >> i do. >> if you were punjabi woman or sikh, environment would make you nervous? >> i probably would be nervous. went to women's march and people saying things i can't say on camera. had a friend with me. >> but that's terrible. that's terrible. and both sides -- that's the kind of stuff that needs to stop in america. you should be able to go to rally and be part of it. okay. we've got one more person before they yank me out of here. i'm big environmentalist. >> no! this was not on the briefing card. >> want to hear from lisa levine. attorney in new york. >> why does donald trump refuse to accept climate change science? >> there are a lot of people who don't accept it. and bring this around to the problem we have with political correctness, climate science is a lot of things out there. there is this feeling if a certain group of people -- for instance this figure debunked in the "wall street journal" about 97% and s

what would make them more susceptible to changing their behavior on human rights, et cetera. again, i think of the agreement as a concrete achievement that sets a new baseline or a new reality to think about all these other problems. it does not solve the big iran problem. there is still, you know, a multifaceted challenge because iran is, after all, you know, a revisionist power in the region. they like to say oh, no we are now a status quo power. we are for stability in the region, we are not for regime change in the region. but in fact from the perspective of most other countries iran is challenging the order, for what it's worth -- as disorderly as the order may be. and so it's -- but it, in theory, to me again, just last point, it is that ability to engage government to government that in theory creates a different and better opportunity to talk to iran about all these other issues. i doesn't -- it has no automaticity that any of those other problems can be solved by this agreement. maybe later in the discussion we will talk about these gray areas of when iran says this

, et cetera? is that frustrating? >> so again, the structural issue is one that is solvable by the chairman simply by saying, okay i'm putting this task force together and that's where we're going to work this out. the thing that's forgotten a lot is that, you know, the wireless bureau, for instance the wireless bureau handles 35,000 wireless licensed transfers a month. now, that's something you just can't throw over into another bureau. there are specific issues that have to be dealt with there. so there are multiple ways of skinning the rabbit. i chose one way, which is how do you bring everybody together in specialized groups focused on a specific thing. and i think that's the way to do it, but, you know, others may have other ideas. >> speaking of the wireless bureau, the incentive option looks like it could be possibly close to wrapping up. and i've noticed that the fcc has had to reduce the amount of spectrum it's trying to buy back from tv station as few times and broadcasters have question

things like more risk adjustment, et cetera. then finally, i think, on my list is that when we talk about the private sector, we probably do need to look at the anti-kickback rules that were set up in a different era, set up in a fee for service era where we were trying to say if anyone talks to anyone else they are trying to influence them to get a kickback for the care. we are in a different world now where we are trying to encourage collaboration, encourage coordination and that's an important law that needs to get done. now, i will just finish up with saying one thing. i was asked to be here for the most part because of my background work wg the senate finance committee. i'm chief officer for the association of american medical colleges. when i hear about the private sector and look at reference pricing and looking at giving more transparency about the price of providers, as we do that, again, we cannot look at those issues in a silo. we have to look across the board in terms of all the health care that occurs. so if you loo

, et cetera, and therefore, it is, i think, very clear to the u.s. government that china simply is not a normal country in the sense of play playing by the rules, and being market driven and having -- it is not a normal country in that regard, and so it behooves us to use the investment review as a tool to push back against the chinese policy. i mean, i -- whether mr. trump or president trump, excuse me, puts in place the tariffs or not, and whatever we do here, we need to be thinking of the tools to get the chinese government to roll back their innovation mer kcan tillism, and to me, it is simply a tool. if they were to sort of roll back and go back to being more normal if that sense, then maybe you can take it away and go back to normal. >> thank you very much. finally, mr. woodall, i don't have the time to ask questions, but i come from the farm state, and your testimony and the description of the transactions are really, really important, and excellent testimony, and we ap pree appreciate that. >> senator tallinn. >> i don't know if this question

and the wall is getting built, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera and there's competing views of what hast transpired. >> and at the same time he is bringing in, she the one pushing the question of the legitimacy of at the election if the white house. we said we're not talking about the 2016 election. this is a bigger picture of preserving american democracy and you just heard the interview that chris did with the man that claims to have proof but would not present it. what are americans supposed to do with that this morning? . >> and somehow by inference or somebody showed him this supposed data or this guy's information and run with it. it's just like the birther claims that donald trump asserted over and over and over. there is no known basis of fact. it's in the realm of lying. absent any proof by this one person and it's extraordinary that the country can get taken on a ride as it did with birtherism by this kind of assertion and president of the united states in his first week we have seen over and over and over again lying. and that is what is so disturbing and the people that you

your most important immediate, et cetera, et cetera. [applause] >> that is hard to follow. i'm struck all evening the presence of the past. how vividly he occupies this room again and how welcome we were all were at that table. first and last saw daniel when he was the size of this shoe. so, i'm going to follow jimmy's lead and because i am a writer and by definition of a writer is take more care with the language we put on a page than that which rolls eloquently off our tongues i thought i would read to you from the book to which jules kindly referred and in which he quotes in the welcome table, a book of mine that came out almost 30 years ago about our shared neighborhood. it is called, running in place, scenes from the south of france. my wife and i in fact were in the south of france this very week and returned from it, having given -- st. paul devans a birth. the house and its history is no longer a happy one but my memories are wholly happy and i thought i would share a few pages about the book about that. i first met jimmy in inconsequentially as it were in istanbul

i don't blame the representatives and various presidents, et cetera, of mexico. what i say is we shouldn't have allowed that to happen. it's not going to happen anymore. so in order to get the wall started, mexico will pay for the wall. but it'll be reimbursed, okay. supreme court judge, so, as you know i have a list of 20. i've gone through them. we've met with numerous candidates. they're outstanding in every case. they were largely recommended and highly recommended by federalist society jim demint was very much involved and his group which is fantastic and he is a fantastic guy so between senators and congress people we have a great group of people. i'll be making the decision on who we will put up for justice of the united states supreme court, a replacement for the great, great justice scalia, that will be probably within two weeks of the 20th, so within about two weeks probably the second week i consider the first day because we'll also be doing some pretty good signings and i think what we'll do is we'll wait till monday, that will be our really first bus

, et cetera. that's part of the story. there are a couple of stories coming together. also, let's be fair to donald trump that this is why these things are going to be investigated, to see if there's anything there by the congress of the united states inevitably, as well as by the intelligence agencies. more important, the president-elect in that latest tweet seemed to indicate that this was going to be a fight with the intelligence community. if you look at that tweet, he declared war on the intelligence agency agencies. that is an extraordinary situation. one of the things the outgoing intelligence chiefs, and some of them are not outgoing, is to lay down a marker for the incoming president and for an ongoing investigation that is going to be almost impossible or very difficult for him to thwart. he can't stop this process unless he does something that is liable to produce a very, very troubling political reaction. >> carl, clarissa, evan, thank you very much. >>> this plays into another dynamic

i don't blame the representatives and various presidents, et cetera, of mexico. what i say is we shouldn't have allowed that to happen. it's not going to happen anymore. so in order to get the wall started, mexico will pay for the wall. but it'll be reimbursed, okay. supreme court judge, so, as you know i have a list of 20. i've gone through them. we've met with numerous candidates. they're outstanding in every case. they were largely recommended and highly recommended by federalist society jim demint was very much involved and his group which is fantastic and he is a fantastic guy so between leo and jim demint and some senators and congress people we have a great group of people. i'll be making the decision on who we will put up for justice of the united states supreme court, a replacement for the great, great justice scalia, that will be probably within two weeks of the 20th, so within about two weeks probably the second week i consider the first day because we'll also be doing some pretty good signings and i think what we'll do is we'll wait till monday, that

the experience of scaling from two people to closer to a thousand people worldwide, ten offices, et cetera. that's the real difference. we want to partner with major capital firms and give the value of helping companies go from zero to 100 immediately. >> a minute ago, when you were talking about raising money, you think a lot of private companies stay private for longer but eventually, you may start to consider what the next step might be? where are you on things like ipo plans and in general, what's your opinion on a company like razor going public? could you go public if you wanted to right now, for example? >> sure. i think for us, we considered going public for some time, but the key for us is we want to make sure that we are a company that is ready to go public. i think there is no real reason for us to stay private, but remain opportunistic. we want to be, i mean, we want to make sure that all the governess is a governance is addressed and crossed the t's and dotted the i's and a factor of the economy and how the market, when it's open, et cetera, but we remain open to that and just

other issues, et cetera. yet the first day of the week that he's the president of the united states, he's assembled with a group of the foremost ceos who are very familiar to our audience in a room discussing some of the very initiatives he says he was going to do. >> exactly right. my point is, that's great. if that keeps going, that's great. my only point is, does it come to a point where that overwhelms? the first day in office, actually, was saturday. and what was that marked by? an alternate fact pattern, to use a quote, about the attendance at the inaugural. he could be the most achieving president we've ever had. i'm glad we have a ceo there. and i'm a big fan of all the programs he has. everything he signed today, what he signed on saturday. i would just love for him to dial that back so we can get that done. and that would be, to me, the greatest presidency we've had. >> what will the market react to more, joe, a tweet or a meeting with ceos like kevin plank and gorsky, liveris, fields? >> the market

health reimbursements, et cetera. eli ziad at wells fargo did a good job of showing how they are seeing an uptick in utilization quality from hnas and hsas. and i think one of the most promising aspects of the new reform environment we're in is i hope we can broaden the utilization of those lessons. broadly speaking, we've been living in this era for about 50 years now where the central dogma of health care economics was handed to us on stone tablets by ken arrow at stanford, who said that the laws of economics were magically suspended when you talked about health care. and i think what large employers are relearning on our behalf is that the laws of economics are not magically suspended when we talk about health care. laws of economics apply to every good and service that's trance mitted in the economy. and if you give patients more control over the health care dollars that are being spent on their behalf, well, voila, you have a more patient-centered health care system. that shouldn't be surprising because that's ho

cashiers won't even accept the money, et cetera, et cetera. her perceived ugliness was even commented on by those who allegedly appreciated her as an historical figure. one tweet said tubman's life story and impact are priceless to america but, wow, not a looker. that's going to be one ugly $20 bill. and what was striking to me about this, right -- there's a whole lot we could unpack during our q & a about misogyny, colorism, racism in its intersectional nature. but what was interesting -- catherine alluded to this in her presentation -- was the desire particularly on the part of black people, and particularly by black women to sort of claim a beautiful harriet, right? to the point where there began circulating an image of a black woman in the 19th century dressed in a sumptuous victorian gown against the backdrop of flowers, touted as the young tubman and there were calls even from those who wanted tubman on the bill, maybe we should use this picture. of course, that picture was not tubman. that was of a woman named lady sarah forbes bennett.

i don't blame the representatives and various presidents et cetera of mexico. what i say is, shouldn't have allowed that to happen. it's not going to happen anymore. so in order to get the wall started, mexico will pay for the wall. but it will be reimbursed. okay? supreme court judge. so as you know i have a list of 20. i've gone through them. we've met with numerous candidates. they are outstanding in every case. they were largely recommended and highly recommended by federalist society. jim demint was also very much involved in this group which is fantastic and he's a fantastic guy. so between leo and jim demint and some senators and some congress great-grandmother of people. i'll be making the -- group of people. i'll be making the decision on who we will put up for justice of the united states supreme court. a replacement for the great, great justice scalia. that will be probably within two weeks of the 20th. so within about two weeks, probably the second week, i consider the first day because we'll also be doing some -- some pretty good signings and i thi

her ipod, et cetera. she made almost no attempt to keep them secure. she trying to keep them secure from the republicans? probably. but in terms -- go >> sean: the reason we have these laws though are for transparency. she wanted to avoid congressional oversight. >> that is that is absolutely my interpretation as well. this is probably actually against our interests as a publisher. but we believe that people have the right to know true information about what the government is doing. the freedom of information act is being subverted. we published sarah palin's emails. why? because she when she was governor of alaska, she maintained an account that was being used intentionally or not to evade the lasting free information act. >> sean: during the 2016 election, i if you head to the bank and wait to get approved for a mortgage, that newly listed ranch will be gone. or, you could push that button. sfx: rocket launching. skip the bank. get approved in minutes. lift the burden of getting a home loan with rocket mortgage by quicken loans. (whisper) rocket ever

good old days before the civil war and these were performers who picked cotton and sang and danced et cetera. >> this was for decades after the civil war and yet this was still happening in the united states. >> that's right. this is post reconstruction when there has been a reconciliation between the white cells in the t white north which really placed african-americans in a position of struggle and challenge. >> something else that people, when they reach your book will be thrown for a loop, it has to do with animal welfare. there are a couple of events that were very shocking. one in the book tells about the planned execution of an elephant known as jumbo too. the first jumble was this very beloved animal that was paraded around the country. >> yes very popular. >> the second incident concerns the mass slaughter of dogs that actually occurred at the exhibition where people were paying extra tickets to actually witness this so perhaps you can tell us a little bit about those two. >> let's start with the dog.ith i would say this is one of the most shocking things i came across which was in