, et cetera. so everybody plays to trump's ego in their own way. so i think it's kind of fair game as far as that goes. >> on the unpredictability of the summit is we really -- we don't know what's going to happen. i mean, you never know in a summit, you know, when you have two leaders, especially if it's countries that don't get along, you know, human dynamics or surprises or someone backtracking on agreed upon text, you never quite know how things will go, although normally you try to script it so there are no surprises. but given the fact that north korea has not really articulated what it's looking for and then really the unpredictability of trump, and he embraces that, he wants to beunpredictable. going into it really to me is like the cardinals going into the sistine chapel to pick a pope. the two guys are going to go in, close the door and the world waits with hope and trepidation whether white or black smoke comes outs of the chimney. we really just don't know. i think it will be a case of

they said that's demonization, there's no binary, and they had a sit-in, et cetera. gave my speech how much i love my faith the comments were positive. even though it was horrifically negative before i got in there. when we're given a platform, they can't honestly call me an islamophobe after they listen to what i say and the narrative i believe in as a god-fearing, patriotic, american muslim who feels our community has globally been hijacked by the movements. and the university is ground zero of the speech debate. as so many have seen, the islamists and the left create this climate where we can't have an ability to disagree with one another because they call you a hater, a bigot, et cetera, and shut down any critical thinking. >> why do you think the left, the marxist left, the progressive left, the islamist movement, why do you think they are frequently on the same side of policy and political issues? >> because, a, they're collectivists, both collectivists, and, b, it's the shortcut of suppressing ideas that would defeat them. we've done debates against the imams

if you're italian, then all the italians will vote for you, et cetera. for black candidates becomes racialre, black versus white. we are an ethnic society. those in the harold pointed out and you've seen it played out many times. >> when you look back on his time in office, what dot you think was his greatest accomplishment? what is the greatest lasting accomplishment? what do you think he thought his great accomplishment was when he was mayor. >> he had a saying that he set often, and i think this is wonderful. he said no one but no one in the city will be safe from my fairness. he made that word fairness the touchstone. he wanted people to know that as mayor he was going to be fair and treat all groups fairly, and in some ways i think that was a great accomplishment that he changed the tone in government. he opened it up, he issued executive orders that opened up records to the public, he opened up the budget making process which previously had been done entirely, he opened it up to public participation, and i think he gave a lot of groups and a lot of

are we good here, et cetera. what avenatti's trying to do is get discovery. he wants to try to move the case forward to get more information, more text messages, et cetera. but this is likely a lucid lawsuit. >> if you look at it, right, it appears to be really cozy. there was a report setside earlier sort of a cozy relationship. >> but lawyers are cozy, lawyers in a particular industry that do these kinds of lawsuits, you get to know the people on the other side and it can be frustrating for the clients. it could be anything from real estate to divorce, you fame it. the people on both sides tend to know each other -- >> you don't think it's unusual? >> no i don't. >> this is january 2018 tech mnls between the two men. cohen writes to davidson i have her tentatively scheduled for to day. >> cohen response, it's really important. why. cohen later more frustrated writes, this is no good, we need her by tomorrow. you just greeted another news cycle instead of putting an end to this one. apparently he wanted stormy daniels to deny the comments she made in that in

morgan is another creating small business loans and wage increases et cetera and some of these and alot of these were already under decisions but the point is you can see the difference that some companies were really taking this opportunity to invest in the comps the workforce the investment and relationship in product enhancement and what were telling a good story but not taking the investment opportunity in the long-term opportunity that the tax announcement was about we were told to expect. that is the analysis we trngat and to show that in large part the key finding they can find on the website is so far we continue to track this in 7% of the sum total of the announcements were tracking so far were going t workers. that is paying a bonus or investment in training or wage increase and 80% are going to customers away, 6% products, 2% to communities, 90% to job creation but the bulk, 57% of presumably are going to shareholders and management issues which is stock buybacks and other forms of dividends and this work that is not going into investing in the health of the company in the

, et cetera.use them. they can supply information. the kinds of things we would have looked up in books years ago we now to two phones for. and we used them all day. but our day ate constant nagging distraction? —— but are they a co nsta nt distraction? —— but are they a constant nagging distraction? you give kids these days a paper and pens and they are not quite sure what to do with them. it is too dull, they don't want to use their creative side. that is what taking where the phone could potentially do. we did not get onto the issue of mental health and social —— cyber bullying and social media. that is for another day. thank you so much for another day. thank you so much for coming in. and for sharing your thoughts. thank you as well. so good to hear from so thoughts. thank you as well. so good to hearfrom so many thoughts. thank you as well. so good to hear from so many of you. if you wa nt to to hear from so many of you. if you want to be involved in the debate go to the briefing online. hel

they make the accusations about the expect of the investigation, et cetera, et cetera.ct of the matter is, and either gowdy or jordan said they're losing confidence in the investigation. well, may be. the fact is the investigation is being conducted properly. there are no leaks from this investigation. all we know, for good or ill about the investigation, are 20 people have been indicted, 5 pleaded guilty, including very close associates of the president of the campaign. and all we know is the indictments and the information we know from court filings. no leaks. whether the investigation is being done properly, not properly, et cetera, we don't know except that there have been no leaks. the campaign of defamation against the special prosecutor and against rosenstein has been one sided. >> thank you for being with us today. >> thank you. >>> president trump offering a better trade deal for france but what would france have to give up next. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla.

the microsoft system has to interact with the adobe system, et cetera. the net effect is that the system grows more complex and more interactive, they are used out there in the field on navy ships. we are constantly changing the system in a variety of ways. one of the recent reports observed is beyond their turning. this points to the need for not justhe beginning, but also continuously and that's different. >> i absolutely agree with a lot of the risk isn't frontloaded. some hefty percentage is backloaded or appears in operation. and i am also very sympathetic to the notion that the risks are really wide. they are difficult to quantify or identify. so i am very much in favor of reading broad-minded considering all the things that can go wrong. when it starts to bring in this concept of just undefinable risk so it is infinite risk and that's what it stakes out to mathematically. that leaves you in a tricky spot because you have to act and choose between the options. in choosing bet optio y e hopefully explicitly, but often implicitly making judgments. so

have they actually been convicted of something, et cetera, et cetera. that was never the goal.rt. we want to express a lot of diverse opinions. we don't want to be the judge and the moral police of that. >> talk about that a little bit then we'll get into your business. what's wrong with values? i don't quite -- i have a lot of arguments with people. the reason you don't like values is you have to make decisions about things and you have to make choices and you have to pur purse people off and make values. why are values such a problem and they don't want to state them? which they have, by the way. >> i don't think there is anything wrong with having values, but i think being a platform from being an editorial driven service is having totally different. in our case, we have 3 million artists and what we wanted to be was transparent. we didn't want to get into a position about talking about who gets to do exactly what or what the situation is on spotify. there are certain things which i think the rules should be pretty clear about and there should be, you know, if you are talkin

, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera?ow, i'll give the president a little bit of slack on this one. i it's distasteful, for sure. when i went to a meeting with some north koreans, i spent a lot of time talking with my friends about how i should comport myself. because on the one hand, you do want to have a constructive conversation about our differences, but on the other hand, it is distasteful to backslap with people who are basically benefiting from a pretty awful system. having said that, i think that's the only way trump knows how to schmooze. so it's distasteful, but you know, we elected a price distateful man. >> he is a tactile man, i'll tell you that. he is fond of the arm touches and what not. let's play something that senator tom cotton said to my colleague hugh hewitt a little bit earlier. >> there is a school of thought that the united states should sit down, that the united states president should not sit down with two-bit dictators. i think there's some validity to that school of thought, with the nuclear we

of the leading experts in mexico on politics, both executive, presidential, legislative, state, et cetera your this is hand-picked panel. it wasn't just three people we found randomly on the streets of mexico city. delighted to have a global fellow with the mexican institute back with us again. his last presentation here a few months ago on the election race really left a big mark here so jorge will be giving us an overview and a couple minutes about what we stand in the polling numbers. many of you already know what the presidential race looks like but jorge has a bunch of other data in there that will give you extra texture on that. delighted to have with us joy langston. joy is not an old friend, a longtime friend from mexico. she works at the cide university and is an expert on state-level politics on the pre-and pre-ann governors in mexico in particular. i asked her to talk about what will be having at the state level. last but by no no, no means erc magar, leukocytes of art. great to have you here. i hope we will have three opening presentations about 15-20 15-20 minutes each and we

morgan is another that screening small business loans, wage increases, et cetera.some of these were already underway, these decisions, but the point is you can see the difference that some companies were really taking this opportunity to invest in the long-term health of their company through workforce investment, through community relationship, product enhancement and which ones were sort of telling a good story but not actually taking the investment opportunity and the long-term opportunity that the tax announcement was about that we sort of were told to expect. that's the kind of analysis we are trying to create and to show that in large part, the key finding that you can find on our website, but so far we continue to track this, 7% of the sum total of the announcements we are tracking so far are going to workers. that is paying a bonus or an investment in training or wage increase, 8% are going to customers in some way, 6% are going to products, 3% are going to communities, 19% are going to job creation. but the bloke, 57% is presumably going to shareholder and

he goes on to say crime is up 10%, et cetera, et cetera and government officials don't want to admit those figures. with friends like that, mr. weber, how are you going to devise a policy? >> well, it's an intensive discussion, absolutely, all over the world. globalization has migration challenges ahead of us. one thing i want to clarify, there is no increase of any kind of crime in germany. at this point trump is wrong tweeting this. generally speaking again, what we tried to do in europe and what angela merkel is standing for is to combine two points, strict border control, ambitious approach and to be still ready to respect the humanitarian faith of this continent. we want to be ready as europeans, as an economically strong christian-based continent and migrants looking for a better life. i respect that. that is not refugee, not somebody fleeing from the civil war. that separation is needed. asylum seekers, refugees from civil war and illegal migrants. for illegal migrants, there is only one way possible, to go back home to your people of origin. >> for people like yourself and fo

it's about obvious demographics like veteran, nonveteran, your religious background, et cetera, et cetera, your ethnic background, women, men, tons of ways in which we're divided, but i think what we have lost is the ability, of course, to come back and realize that fundamental truth of the things that unite us. it is my nature to frame these things in a hopeful way and i hope not to be polly annaish about it. -- pollyannaish about it. i'm finishing up a study now looking at congress and how internationalist is congress. it uses completely different sets of data. that's actually quite promising, that you find areas and how about this for a weird area, foreign aid? it's always bipartisan support across different demographics, why they're looking at it, whether they believe in the international order, because they have humanitarian interest, maybe tied to strong religious views, but that's one example of the kinds of issues that endure as a bridge that we can start to build other policies on. the administration doesn't play that game. they're not in that. so i think what you have to do is l

involved in this, from us to the north koreans to the chinese, to the russians, to the japanese, et cetera, and the south koreans, i think assad is just a bit player. >> admiral mike mullen, thank you so much for your perspective. thanks for joining us tonight. now, on the face of it, it does look like the trump administration is more solicitous of this adversary as it prepares for this summit than america's closest allies, take a listen to some of them. >> the idea that we are somehow national security threat to the united states is quite frankly insulting and unacceptable. >> we are friends and allies aen feel deep angry about this. >> now they are mexico is bourbon. canada drawing up their tariffs so they can sting the administration without an all out trade war. as i heard from prime minister solberg. welcome to the program. >> thank you. >> so here you are in europe at a time when things couldn't be more rocky between europe and the united states. >> yeah. difficult times. >> how do you assess these trade tariffs that are being imposed on steel and aluminum? >> well, using security me

et cetera. et cetera. that's persistent. could say there's a fixation there and part of a largest strategy. remember, we are dealing with a master brander. right? and this to be clear is a campaign. what do i mean by that? themes to get in the jury's mind and angry democrats, resonates. witch hunt, resonates. how many time we heard that? co-oping the debate and believing that's what this is about. there's no investigation that has any type of merit whatsoever. this is a witch hunt designed to undermine me. and remember, wolf, at the end of the day it's about impeachment. you can't indict a sitting president and whether or not the congress has the courage or will to do and if the american people say no because of the fact no good, no collusion, the congress will say no and won't have the votes in the house and certainly have the two thirds in the senate and all goes away. branding. that's his message. >> look at all the great stuff i'm doing for you. the american people. and meanwhile, these terrible people keep pursuing me f

missed a bunch of games in the rock et cetera series. kevin love is playing out of concussion protocol. fare more on the injury side let's go to mindy boff hi, mindy. >> yes andre iguodala recovering day to day as he recovers from the bone bruise. he is lebron james primary defensive nemesis. he held him to if the first final when they first met. steve kerr says he will use a combination of four different players to defend he bjorn ton. iguodala certainy expects to return sometime during the series. >> i don't have too much doubt. based on how long it's been, four and a half and -- i'm not that far away. >> preparing every day like you are playing. first and foremost. so last couple of games in the houston series was you know interacting a lot with the coach and a few of the guys coming off the welcome and making sure that we're all on the same page. so it's almost like you're playing just not on the floor. >> so kevin love will return and start in the front court for the cavaliers this evening. larry, he missed game 7 in the eastern con

et cetera, et cetera. the biggest frenemy is the public. because the public is basically saying we are annoyed by your ads. your ads are too long, too intrusive, particularly on my cell phone, i don't want to be interrupted by your ad so 20% of americans, one-third of western europeans use something called ad blockers to block ads. >> yet programs such as this one and many others on network television and the like depend on them, right? what will happen in five years from now to the kind of program we're watching on tv right now. >> well, $64,000 question. the reason i wrote this book, i don't see this as the book about just the advertising chemistry. i see it as a book about an industry that subsidized the media and without that subsidy much of the media will continue to die in a much more accelerated rate. >> so let's play delight devil's a advocate. the story of the demise of the media as we know it has been told over and over again and yet we're still flourishing and i would say and many say and you probably have written about it, too,

we tried to provide schools, highways, et cetera, et cetera. what we should have looked at is what were the services that the taliban and the terrorists and the insurgents providing which made the people relatively happy? you don't have to give them everything at the start. the everything is do it incrementally. and everything i would tell the president is despite your inclination to do it quickly, announce a success and declare victory, sue for peace, go home, it's going to take a long time. let's be realistic about this. let's be honest to the american people and to the american congress that none of these things can be done quickly and successfully. so those would be some of my advice. >> okay. so the president is dutifully impressed with thi and then lays t bombshell on you that we always expect these days and that is this is goingo be a coalition effort, it's not just the united states. so, mr. sopko, please advise the president of the united states on how he and she should be thinking about how a community of nations effort for a stabiliz

et cetera. do the americans says decade old can continue to be one assessing relations with russia because it does seem to me that the media in america have. a much shorter attention span and so does the public we see the whole picture and they think well why cycling will are so right this is a bigger problem even than you know the average journalist working in foreign affairs working on russia i have to remind them as preparation for their interview of me what happened five years ago it's as if not just with every administration but every turnover of the bureau staff no americans you know we tend to approach everything as if we can start from scratch it's a very enduring and positive characteristics of america a kind of can do overcome the obstacles don't get stuck in the past but sometimes we go too far and there are elements of the past that cannot be ignored if we want to approach a country doesn't just mean russia china has historical grievances it issues with its neighbors with us with jap

as the government today looks at new infrastructure plans that connect america fund, et cetera. a greater awareness from a federal judge they are going to be used. we have to target funds were brought in does not exist and not the areas where people like other aca members have provided ibm today. those areas should be respect did for the in the equity and sweat equity that many companies have put in to deploy abroad again. it's a growing awareness about where we are with broadband today in the communities and let's respect that, but let's focus our resources were scarce as they aren't errors were brought and doesn't exist. >> host: matt polka, are they penalized because they choose to liberally in high prices? >> guest: that's a really good question particularly when it comes to cable program content as true mention the second most expensive part of the business. and yes it is very difficult for consumers to subscribe to cable, cable linear service, the typical cable package and the same for satellite subscribers because of the nature of how content has continued to be controlle

this proves his point, this is a witch hunt against him et cetera, et cetera you have all these peoplet were really out to get ahead. can you imagine, we are talking about the fbi. >> jesse: one of the give almost out to get him to my peter strzok, may come in and testify soon as next week. juan, how do you feel about your good friend peter on capitol hill? >> juan: my body. i think peter strzok says he's glad to testify. to me, this issue is about the president and his, i guess his surrogates, making the case that somehow the fbi and the comey investigation and the special counsel are not to be trusted. anything that's found out about president trump, just ignore it, america because guess what. peter strzok says he doesn't like president trump and doesn't want him elected. imagine that? how many americans can say the same thing? how many people go about doing their job. what the inspector general found was there was no evidence that the job was done in any biased manner. the larger point here is if anybody has a complaint, it is hillary clinton because guess what. that's what comey di

your religious background, et cetera, et cetera. ethnic background, women, men. tons of ways in which we're divided. but i think what we have lost is the ability, of course, to come back and realize that fundamental truth of the things that unite us. and it is my nature to frame these things in a hopeful way and i hope not to be pollyanish about it. i wake up terrified pretty much every day, but this is our job. right? which is to find those bridges to, find the ways to bring people together. i'm finishing up a study now with some colleagues at csi that's looking at congress and how internationalist is congress. and using completely different sets of data, that's actually quite promising, that you find areas -- and how about this for a weird area -- foreign aid, strong bipartisan support across different demographics, across -- why they're looking at it, whether it's because they believe in international order, whether it's because they have humanitarian interests, maybe it's tied to strong religious views. but that's one example of the kinds of issues that endur

et cetera, et cetera. crossing the border. where are the people in those stories. who has benefitted from this? and the answer is in this book, and in these stories. i wanted to talk briefly about the idea of americans in mexico because it's something i worked pretty hard on. the numbers actually probably between 1.6 and 1.8 million. that's americans who live full or part time in mexico. it's a very rough figure because we have no way of really measuring unless they use u.s. government services. but we do think that about 600,000, as many as 600,000 americans are children of people who returned to mexico, whether voluntarily or deported, who were born in the united states. and we've launched a program, the u.s. government has launched a program with the mexican government in which we are trying to ensure that those 600,000 or more kids, because they range from newborn to over 18, get their documentation. they are entitled to usa passport. but just as important is their mexican documentation because despite the fact that they might be absolutely have a right to go t

wade et cetera, et cetera so what you do is you say exley this is a bipartisan effort and we have people on both sides of the aisle that support those nominees so i think that's the smartest thing for the white house to be doing and they should absolutely be doing that right now. >> harris: you think it's important to do it now or do you think that divide between the publicans and democrats will only grow greater over the summer or can there be a cooling-off period when they get home to their constituents? >> trish: i don't think there's going to be any kind of cooling off any time. you ain't seen nothing yet. this is going to be a display that i don't think any of us are really going to like to see. but it's going to be intensified in the coming weeks, coming days, coming months. in this partisan divide is going to go stronger and stronger because you think about something like roe vs. wade which has already been fought out. for decades now. and is now taking on a whole other level. and people are going to say look, this has the power to reverse that for the future et cetera. there is s

, et cetera, and a new permit will be issued. the risk of that, once it is issued again, is it will be appealed by the current appellant and will be back here again. at which point we will have a choice as to whether the permit, at that point, if the process was issued properly or not. we hope it will be at that point. >> exactly. >> those are our choices. or, if we fine for the appellant, and we put conditions on and, then it goes through the same process. but then there won't be a reappeal, potentially. >> okay. >> i think we should continue. >> i think so too. >> definitely. [laughter] >> i know. ok. do we want to continue the matter? >> we have to submit the matter first. >> okay. i'm sorry. [laughter] >> you were all looking at me so i assumed you wanted to continue. the matter has been submitted. thank you. >> now we can make a decision. ok. >> ask them how long they need. >> do you have a question? >> we are supposed to ask you the question. [laughter] >> you are talking about a continuance. what would that be for. or is t

and that, of course, also means that cities nowadays are competing for jobs, for employment, et cetera, using those type of factors, using the natural environment, for example, as an attractive feature for businesses to come here. let me give just one illustration of that. you all know, of course, that amazon has called for competition for its second headquarters. right? if you look at the criteria that it has put forth, one of them is quality of life. and when they talk about quality of life, they actually talk about the natural environment. and why is that? well, because they very explicitly say they want to go to a place where people want to live. and, again, in the modern economy that is service based we have a lot more choice of where we want to live. and from that point of view, i would make a strong argument of saying that taking care of our natural environment, improving the green spaces. make being our cities more attractive makes a lot of sense not just from an environmental or ecological poichb view, which it does, but also from a business or economics point of view. so i re

nixon found out about it and branded the project and made a big press conference, et cetera, about it. so in 1963 i went to africa wit my uncle. i finally got to go. my uncle -- we went to kenya. in 1968 when my father was killed on june 6, all of the elder kids in the family were dispersed so that my mother would be able to spend time with the younger children and kind of get their life organized. so my brother joe was sent to be a guide, and mountaineer with jim whitaker who is close to my family. my sister kathleen was sent to work with the eskimos in alaska. my brother david went to work for doctor shabbos in california, and i got to go to africa for the summer. i spent until august in africa, the following august, or in september, he was assassinated. he was how he would've been the successor. kenya was turned into a kind of a dictatorship. in 2004 i was living with larry david on martha's vineyard with the 2 million who i had lived with him for two years out there. that was when he was writing seinfeld. he eventually would introduce me to my wife who plays his wife, but he did k

i have never personally had issues with friends, associates, et cetera, because of my political leaningsink a lot of republicans are because you think about a lot of the things that come from the trump administration, a lot of people associate those things with intolerance, with racism, sexism, misogyny, et cetera. so it is very difficult for most rational people to sort of reconcile those things by associating themselves with individuals who work for someone who uphold those types of values. >> daniel litman, when you look at the sarah huckabee sanders situation, there are two sides to the story. you have her getting kicked out of the restaurant. a lot of people upset about that happening. some were not upset with that happening. the other issue is the ethical one. walter schwab, head of ethics in president obama's administration tweeting out, it was essentially inappropriate sarah huckabee sanders would use her white house twitter account representing herself as a representative of the administration to criticize this restaurant, to call it out by name, to mention where it is, et ceter

spaces et cetera. because people are paying more it, more attention to businesses are paying more attention to it. why is that? go where people want people businesses need to work for them. tendency at growing our ects a change in economy. a you go back in time to us tury ago when most of were farmers, we didn't of essarily have a choice where to live, because if you were employed in agriculture, live where the land fertile and you can be productive. when you thing of industrialization, it happened sources, where the goldfields are. modern day, if you go to the economy that is surface based. can happen anywhere. in a on't need to be particular place to be productive. they can go choice, where they want to go. that means that living in a environment becomes a determining factor of where will live in the future, and it will be a determining factor of where businesses and in the ent will go future. nowadaysns that cities are competing for jobs, for cetera. ent, et using those types of factors, right. usin

et cetera, so it's not like he wants to crush the economy and that's what paul jones said recently and warren buffett said obviously lloyd blankfein from goldman sachs. all these smart people are saying listen trump is not from rome burning the whole town in flames. he just wants a slightly better deal so obviously it's not zero but i don't see 250 billion is going to go through it all. this is classic donald trump art of the deal. melissa: it is. i mean susan, you have to believe that the person on the other side of the table is willing to carry through with their threat, or else it doesn't work. so the world has to believe that he's willing to do this and he has to do it in some case. one of the things he could do is work out a deal with one other partner with no tariff and set that as the example. >> well that would be great if that would happen but as you saw the g7 it's tough to negotiate. i want to get back to china because i think people realize at the end of the day, yes, we're looking at maybe $450 billion at least that's not the threat, that is not reality but if you look at

the difference is about 25 cents to ten cents, et cetera.students, from myo understandin, it still has happened numerous times on campus, and that year someone had happened to live stream as your passing by. it just, it was everywhere. i remember i was in class when he was talking about it. [inaud] there is an area where a lot of protests were back in 1976 and there was a lot of yelling cut student body president. they were talking about his opinions and what that looked like. it was a big crowd and right afteafter there were student government representatives that walk together and in the beginning of us to condemn the d. organization for their actions and then they are talking to several leaders in the organization of may minority groups. i was a student leader and one of the groups under the multicultural engagement center and a couple of us signed on to the legislation the reason being to showcase a and in the sense that they felt that much and felt that they were being listened to. the reason was to draw attention as well you can have f

, et cetera, is part of the problem. and so i actually applaud the fact that they tried go after the question of the structure of the chinese economy within the international system, given that china was admitsed into the wto under special circumstances because everybody saw this freight train coming down the track of the billion people and we did admit china to wto as a developing country, and it really isn't. so, i understand why they've gone after this. the problem is, for me, the narrative that surrounds all of this. the american system -- i'll call it the american system -- put in place after world war ii, was decidedly one that was not zero sum game. this belief was that the international economy didn't have to be conflicted. it could be competetive, could be a positive sum game, not zero sum game and that we be a correction for what happened after world war ii when beg gar thy neighbor trading policies ps and violent competition over resources and currency manipulation led to the depression. and so the narrative i

these are an existing city policy and adopted plans, et cetera. but they are to declare guiding the different services and their companies towards what our goals are so that it's making clear to them what we stand or and what we're looking for them to do. we use these 10 principles to develop criteria and i'm going to walk through this carefully because it's new. the first is we identified outcome metrics. these are the outcomes that are specifically listed in the guiding principles. in this case, you're seeing safety. safety principle is, of course, related to vision 0. so measure them, we want to see a reduction in the collision rates. this is the outcome metric for collisions. that said, we also, through a series of conversations with community stakeholders and the companies themselves, recognize that there are other ways to measure and understand these different services and their offerings and so we added policy and design features that often relate to the outcome metric we're trying to measure and in some cases, therere other pieces of the p

them down, and wearing them out in terms of navigation right, maritime rates, air zone rights and et cetera. tramp bellintrampling on their , interfering with their fishing rights, it has been going on for some time. we have to organize our allies and stand up to chinese, we're on a collision course with chinese economically, you know, that we fighting over trade deficits and tariffics. steestealing intellectual prope. and their geopolitical goals are significant, domination of the region, expulsion of u.s. in region, and replace u.s. as preimplement probe -- global power in the world. >> stomach to to that. and the guts. and the strategy. there is trump took -- doctorate has been working from day that president stepped into the office, if shows no signs of weakening. it will be a considerable prospect that will be pondered for a while, general good to have you with us. we appreciate the briefing, thank you. >> okay thank you, lou. lou: general jack keane, up next, slad shadow government ex, how barack obama used foreign leaders to subvert the trump presidency. see take it up with tom fento

i understand the risk aversion and what's going on with the tariffs, et cetera, but as earnings startg out, i think there's going to be a rude awakening. >> some of your picks, coca-cola. sticking with them >> keep in mind on altria , we upgraded the stock we had an underperform on the stock for about a year and a half so with england t-- we thid reward looks good. honestly, tobacco stocks don't deal with thme problems as these other consumer staples commodityt, and retail evolution online. it's illegal to sell cigarettes online so they don't get disrupted in that way. on cody, we had -- we were negative on cody for quite a while. this new ceo and cfo came in and they've made changes we think we're at the very early inflection point of that applies biz and th -- business and that company starting to do better. >> there's news about pinnacle today, deals there more of the same of what we're seeing in this industry, right these guys feel like they got to get bigger in order to get scale and offset some of these trends that you inferred but -- >> yeah, exactly i'm surprised we haven't se

, et cetera. what if any role do you think the military can play in counring some of these developments? how should these efforts be coordinated with other parts of the government and who should be coordinating them? >> well, the military's role in the asia infrastructure investment bank or the belt and road initiative is really new. and this raises the point that with the rebalance, we may be doing a lot of things on the military side, for example, the four largest base construction projects since world war ii are now going on in asia at this time. and they're all paid for by somebody else. camp humphrey in korea is paid for by the republic of korea. the continued expansion of marine corps air station iwakuni, and it's got marines and a large japanese aviation component, is being paid for by the japanese. the relocation of marine corps station futenma is being paid for by the japanese and a large portion, about 49% of the original costs, or the base build-up in guam is being paid for bth japanese

, et cetera. unequivocal violation and a violation of article 11, it says you may not impose quotas. all right we've imposed quotas on korean, brazil and argentina and imposed them in the most draconian way we could have possibly suggested. we told the koreans we were going to give them a quota. it was the equivalent of 70% of trade in steel the last two years, 2.68 million tons. then you heard nothing about exactly how was this quota going to be administered. nobody knew at 9:00 at night on the evening at which the quotas would go into effect at midnight. what did the u.s. administration do, divided up to 54 specific limits and quarterly on top of those. 216 specific limits of the quota and no flexibility. no ability to move quota from one category to another, no ability to borrow quota from next year to this year and so you don't embargo. and no to the quota to next year's. for those of us in the quota world, flexibility is part of that sing in the the 1980's. in this instance zero flexibility.

it's taken us a while, but both aviation, uien et cetera, personnel, it's going in the right direction. as far as the metrics, whether or not they are useful and helpful in the way we describe our readiness posture, there are challenges with any snapshot of readiness. you know, literally, the change of a flag from oneand to the other can change your readiness profile from one day to another and move you readiness needle, if you will, in a direction that may be good or bad. so, i think if we are going to entertain readiness met or readiness reporting or readiness discussions, we have to acknowledge that it's the commanders assessments piece of that that we really need to pay attention to, the over-time trends and wha that communicates to the institution aboutneed. so, if i have as an operational commander, if i have the confidence that my readiness reporting is being received and acted upon by the institution, then i'm pretty happy with that readiness reporting regime. the point at which that no longer helps me communicate my readiness concerns, then we need to talk about whether or not

role in the open-mindedness of students and faculty and administrators and the parents back home et cetera and about campuses and speeches interrupted and effectively censored pipe testers and they set a backdrop for some individuals and [inaudible] i can speak differently because i write columns for a living. [inaudible] [inaudible] >> hello, how are you -- sorry, my apologies the journalists are late and this guy knows nothing. [laughter] >> you may have heard the news happening in washington but not in more important than this. in any case, as i say with had a rising wave of clashes on campuses and we have had type of folks like the conservative writer, charles murphy, i talked to a number times and he's faced from 1994 from the bell curve which got into a less troubling area with in intellectual abilities and i did not agree with the book and he redeemed himself in my view in his most recent book and i felt that it was a much safer -- [inaudible] [inaudible] a month before that there was a event and i called him a comedian myself but it's me low enough lis[inaudible] bud when a small t

, et cetera. but, look, black elephant in the room is big, poor government. what we know about iraq, what we go about syria, is that, you know, people to turn to religion often for ideas, not social justice, when ere is deep inequality, when the security forces and apparatus are targeted, are target populations that are part of the underclass, when there is deep inthe government. so, you know, of course there is isgrt tation to kind of talk about grievance and the abstract, but it is really important to understand one of the biggest investments that we are bound to make, is in regrowing and reconstructive government in places like mosul, in such a way atere is much ft appeal in some of the argument. >> plausible, very good point. i am not going to venture into a long discourse on how we might th but i the oblem is mul recognize how people turn towards religion. largely consequences underlying political and economicth are ways, innovative ways, that we can deal with that i don't ow if current polic

at lunch healthy,ther he's whether he's not so healthy, whether his heart is going to hold out, et cetera is, there's non doubt, let's say he makes it perfectly well through the six-year sex secteniel. then he leaves after six years and then what happens to the party that's expected to win 50% lower half of congress and even a greater percentage of the senate? will this party survive the exit from politics of its leader? say, mr., you leave politics after six years. but what will he be, 72, 74? his ability to influence politics definitely goes down with age. so what do these results mean system?mexican party in terms of state populations, i'm going to show you data about how many voters are going to governors,morena p.r.i. governors, p.a.n. governors, from the new election and we'll see morena does extremely well. terms of ine money, the electoral institute that gives out money for campaign finance. so the money comes from ine. does ine determine the money? through the results of the lower house of congress so if you do poorly in the lower house of congress, your national party gets less

that's debilitating to culture, governments, structure, et cetera.we've got to think about your ple when we have over the air transaction and change capabili, how does the next crew understand how they suld interact? oes come from? our education process right now is dropping generations out it was going to figure out how to fix that. >> i would like to add on to that. you mentioned that we need to better understand what that means and how we are using that phrase. i will say something somewhat contentious right now so what to make clear that it's me and not darpa speaking. i think the sure and learning is a misnomer. i don't believe we have machines that were. they were learning machines they would tell you when they were giving the wrong answer. i believe we have machine train systems. so the information that they give back to us is only as good as both of these are programmed in for trained them to do in a function of the input data that were asking them to evaluate. so the notion that these machines are at fault were somehow misleading a is in its

exacerbated by social media and the use of the internet, et cetera. almost running out of time.of my colleagues said that it is that happen post— gdpr they would have been looking at a massive fine. they would have been. this 6 million marinkovic hard—pack they would have been. this 6 million marinkovic ha rd—pack has they would have been. this 6 million marinkovic hard—pack has taken place pretty much before gdpr that my credit card hack. —— credit card hack. let us see what the commission wa nts to hack. let us see what the commission wants to do about this. we are watching this space. it has been great to have you on the briefing. most of you believe brazil or germany will win the world cup. that isa germany will win the world cup. that is a shocker. i will see you soon. hello once again. i know it's the second week injune, but i have to start this particular show by reminding you we've got a named storm on our hands, and there's an amber warning from the met office for gusts of wind on thursday morning which could, in extremis, get up to around 60mph if not 70mph. where's al

ambassadorfor do for charity and how you are an ambassador for mist america arrays lot of muggy, et ceterathis america announcement about all of this, they have hatched tag by brian mckinney, —— #byebyebikini. i would like your response. it could be realistic, is it realistic to have a beauty pageant about inner beauty, but you would have to blindfold the judges. he says, we spend our lives judging people i looks, so swimsuit or not, there will bejudged people i looks, so swimsuit or not, there will be judged on their looks. is that the case? i am afraid we are alljudged on how i look. is that the case? i am afraid we are alljudged on howl look. in television? that is why you are the presenter, of course. you had to look the part and it is a product of a rather sexist, outdated thing, and to be honest, anything that is slow, showers the decline of that —— we will see you soon. hello once again. it's variations on a theme, rather than a great change of weather type that many of you are experiencing just at the moment. blue skies on tuesday in the sheffield area. it didn't start that way but