we didn't -- you know, i wish we had been bilingual, et cetera, et cetera, but it was a different timeings were done differently. here is the thing. i don't think lin-manuel miranda did it intentionally, but he should be aware and everyone should be aware that no community is homogenous, right, especially not in new york as was said. i mean i grew up in new york, and one of the great things about growing up in new york is you see everyone. you know, when i moved to l.a., there was an assumption that if you were latin or spanish or brown that you would be mexican. in new york, puerto rican, dominican, cuban, the list goes on and on and you had different neighborhoods and different cultures and you learned where people are, so there was more of a diversity. so this is good. listen, it is not the end of the world. it is not the worst thing. i think if lin-manuel miranda said, hey, i learned from this, he is a guy that can get things made. you know, part of hollywood, hollywood's favorite color is green and he creates green. as long as he creates green, if in his next project he says he wa

, et cetera. all of those were resolved, and we have them resolved, you could've completed the wall in a couple of months and they decided not to. now i hear rumors that they want to do it, but it is only common sense. they were saying, we want high tech security, and i used to go around in speeches and i said the terrible things that will never get old our wheel and the wall, and that's true. when you get right down to it, the wall really would work. and almost 500 miles of wall, and then another 200 that we were thinking about doing, less important areas from the standpoint of people coming in, but nevertheless, very important. we discussed it and did a great job. within the period of a few months, it was dissipated and in mexico so important, catch and release. we broke that one. chain migration where people come in and bring everybody else in with them. we did a hell of a job and had it down to a science where people weren't getting and unless they came in legally. and then again, the drugs ha

, et cetera. the problem is when the student says something that implicates those subjects but links it in some way to a student or a teacher. what you say is -- and the solicitor general makes a similar argument -- it matters whether the speech targets the school. i have no idea what it means to target the school. now let me give you an example to make this more concrete. and since tinker occurred back during the vietnam war, it will relate to that. so, during the war, a student says, war is immoral, american soldiers are baby killers, i hope there are a lot of casualties so that people will rise up. even if that would cause a disruption in the school, i understand you to say the school couldn't do anything about it. is that right? ms. blatt: that's correct, that would be a heckler's veto, no can do. justice breyer: all right. so now the student says exactly the same thing and he adds, "our classmate, johnny jones' brother, is one of those blankety-blank baby killers." can the school do something

, et cetera. so you see the material is broadened and, but still some work to be done. not the queue for every patient at this point. now on that the antibody treatment a company in japan has applied for regulatory approval for an anti body treatment. for cove in 1900 is this approach the most promising one i think. and then make times you have to react in a very timely and quick manner. so i think the approach that has been used in germany, but also in the u. s. a. was more efficient. so we have except to be sent the bodies without an official labor because this will take months and sometimes a year. so you, but you don't have time to wait. so we're just using the down the bodies and without the label, we tell patients about this. but we have some data from tried that they can even reduce mortality, so that that's reason enough for us to apply these new drugs now called the patients have been treated with drugs for other viral diseases. what can we draw from that? actually we also just this in th

what we saw was disorder, destruction, violations of the law, et cetera.feel sympathy for the united states of america, but we don't want that to happen on our territory. >> you didn't answer my question, sir. if all of your political opponents are dead, in prison, poisoned, doesn't that send a message that you do not want a fair political fight? >> translator: as for who is killing whom, throwing whom in jail, people came to the u.s. congress with political demands. 400 people. over 400 people had criminal charges placed on them. they face prison sentences of up to 20, maybe even 25 years. they're being called domestic terrorists. i'd like to stress once more that we sympathize with what happened in the united states, but we have no desire to allow the same thing to happen in our country. >> reporter: naturally, the president of the united states disagreed with that assessment. >> that's a ridiculous comparison. it's one thing for literally criminals to breakthrough cordon, go into the capitol, kill a police officer, and be held unaccountable, than it is

, et cetera.berg is key. it's clear they want him to flip. they are putting pressure on him. whether he will or not, who knows. he's in some legal jeopardy. i think it's clear he's not the big fish here. the big fish is donald trump. i'm not an attorney but this is how things work. you kind of put pressure on someone to get to someone up the food chain. that is trump. i think the question of donald trump's taxes and how he has handled his fiscal matter s out there. it's been out there for a long time. whether it would change any support for donald trump, i doubt it. >> gloria, always a pleasure. thank you so mump. >> good to see you. >> you as well. >>> presidentsending a message to allies, the soul of america is infact and sending it back home to keep it that way, his agenda needs to get passed. we'll look at can he get it down. >>> former senator al franken will explain. there he is, next. it comes from within. it drives you. and it guides you. to shine your brightest. as you charge ahead. illum

but some of what wikileaks have done, et cetera, i think is legitimate for the government to say, we need to figure out how this is happening. this is so important, this is so damaging to national security, we need to do what we can to prevent it from getting worse, et cetera. so i think there are two issues here and both need to be looked at. but agree with adam that codifying a set of standard and a standard ought to be really high for snooping on journalists. >> adam, is there ever a reason to do it? >> in my opinion, i don't think so. but what is particularly egregious about what the prosecutors do is -- what they did is they snuck this under the wire, right. >> right before trump left office you mean? >> right before trump left office when a new administration came in. they saw -- they got -- they saw the order to get the information in late december of 2020. i believe the judge signed it on january 5th. you're telling me they couldn't wait throw weeks after fumbling around on this investigation for years which was a dead end, right, and then they throw this hail mary. they coul

this is truly happening all over the country in florida, texas, indiana, pennsylvania, missouri, et cetera and second, there is an aspect of this dynamic that's curious. lawmakers in many states are trying to ban critical race theory from being taught in the cl classroom even though it not florida. the florida board of education banned critical race theory a push led by florida governor ron desantis. school administrators will admit it's not actually being taught in the closeassroom in florida. make of that what you will. >> not being taught and they are all fired up falling for another big lie, it really sad. thaten that. thank you. i want to bring in brenda she sheraton. thank you so much. i know this has to be -- this is a very busy and frustrating time for you. you were there last night. what did you think when this was happening. >> what was i thinking? i never thought a school board meeting could ever erupt into such violence. we had a meeting two weeks prior on june 8th so we knew that tensions were high. it was our first in person meeting since covid where we allowed public to stay

people talking about risk and benefit in certain populations, et cetera. but they sit on this baseline of understandable mistrust in a lot of the situations. >> thank you. and that's something. i tell you, that to me is difficult to get your arms around and difficult for us to address that situation. you know, we in the doctors' caucus have done everything we can and certainly done a lot to try to build up confidence of people in the vaccine and letting them know it's safe and effective pep it was done quickly because we cut red tape, not corners. they need to to be assured of that. i'm proud to be a member of the doctor's caucus and proud of what we've done in trying to encourage everyone and bringing about, you know, the fact that it is safe and effective. and building up the confidence. one more question, dr. grazzia, you mentioned in your testimony about the real barriers and perceived barriers. what's the difference there? what are you talking about? >> so, you know, real barriers for example, if you don't have access, right to a vaccination site, or

absolutely. touching our faith, et cetera. absolutely-— absolutely. but what i asked ou absolutely. absolutely. but what i asked you peter is what _ absolutely. but what i asked you peter is what you - absolutely. but what i asked you peter is what you are i absolutely. but what i asked i you peter is what you are doing with the chemicals in these products we are buying more and more to keep our surfaces clean, make sure they are not damaging the environment. where is that headed? it is damaging the environment. where is that headed?— is that headed? it is clear that most _ is that headed? it is clear that most of _ is that headed? it is clear that most of the - is that headed? it is clear that most of the cleaning | that most of the cleaning products are made of fossil fuels. not all the ingredients are biodegradable. and a lot of it is packed in plastic. and we all know this is not good. we need to decarbonise and solve the plastic crisis so unilever has developed a strategy called clean future where we actively decarbonise the products and replace fossil fuels by an array of new

registration, et cetera. and a lot of problems have been created for our personnel for money transfers, that sort of thing. we don't have that kind of a problem and, for american media, the american media hasn't complied with all of the requirements of russian law. i think that even here we can work through the ministries of foreign affairs to resolve matters. let's go over here, sure. okay. i was referring to the lady there. but sure, yeah, you can go next. thank you very much. >> translator: from euro news. gillian galanska from euro news. you shaked biden's hand at the very beginning. here is my question, were you able to bring understanding and trust to a different level with the president of the united states? do you think it is realistic at this juncture to have a new set of relations when there are absolutely clear and transparent? will there be an understanding where both countries need to go to? >> translator: let me tell you in life there is no happiness. there is only the specter of happiness. i th

we are not just talking about facebook and walmart or amazon, et cetera. so, what do you think about that policy? is there aor scope for opening e door somewhat for at least some that can establish that they are relatively safe and don't need to have all of the regulations on the banks? >> an important difference between the bank of england and the fed, they have regulatory authority even over the smallest and that includes not just of the authority but the whole capitaln which the conduct of authority was doing. but also requiring certain kinds of disclosures and good practices. and consumer protections. the fed cannot do that. i think it's a great experiment and it does show. but it's also the importance of the asymmetric regulation. >> we have a question here asking risk-weighted capital requirements force risky borrowers to pay higher rates for loans. why is the inequality driver, why is this i think it should be why is this inequality driver is ignored? first of all we should ask have you ignored it or not and is it important? >> it is important and t

about 2.5 million accounts in it and it's 20% of new sales and it's $5 a month and no overdraft, et cetera and if someone has direct deposit of $2.50 a month we offer it free, and it's also offered free to people under the age of 24 college kids, et cetera and that's a growing product, and i think you'll find out from this group along with the bpi which the top 25 banks has been delving this and driving the bank-owned product five, seven years ago so you'll find out all of the core banks and you're doing the same thing and pushing that bank number down and you'll see them fall in the last few surveys. >> and mr. scharf? >> we announced a bank-owned product with the same features that you heard. many of us have invested in mdis which is a source of serving the underbanked population and others have started a financial inclusion over ten years to really try and get to the unbanked population in multiple way. >> thank you. in the same survey, one-third of those cited and unpredictable bank fees as barriers to getting banked and i would like to ask the same witnesses another yes or no question

this is unfair, et cetera.f there is an indictment, you will hear in the courtroom a very different argument, a very legalistic argument, more along the lines of what i was talking about, which is, you know, lack of intent or lack of sufficient evidence here, et cetera. remember, in these kinds of cases, as you well know, it is documents. we can talk about, you know, witnesses who are critical and they have to get this person to turn or that person. but it is about the papers. it is either there or it's not there in the documents. and, yes, witnesses can help bring to life those documents, but if they have got the paperwork that shows that he lied the way that michael cohen claims exists, then there could be real trouble for donald trump. >> yeah. that makes sense, dan. that's something we were exploring in our reporting tonight because whether this is a good thing or not people can debate. but it is certainly the case that the new york d.a., when it has a tie, the tie has gone to the banks and the big companie

we saw was disorder, destruction, violations of the law, et cetera. we feel sympathy for the united states of america, but we don't want that to happen on our territory. we are doing our utmost in order to not allow it to happen. fear has nothing to do with anything. could you give me the microphone please? >> you didn't answer my question, sir. if all of your opponents are dead, imprison, poison. so that send a message that you don't want a fair political fight? >> as for who is killing whom or throwing whom in jail, people came to the u.s. congress with political mass. 400 people. over 400 people have criminal charges placed on them and they face prison sentences of up to 20 or 25 years. they are being called domestic terrorists. they are being accused of a number of other crimes. so many of them were arrested right away after the event and 30 of them are still. the same thing happens in our country. we sympathize but we've no desire for the same thing to happen in our country. just a few more questions because soon the president will continue. plea

my ambassador, et cetera. we brought everybody in. we had covered so much. and so there was a summary done by him and by me of what we covered. we raised things that required more amplification or made sure we didn't have any misunderstandings. it was kind of after two hours there, we looked at each other like, okay, what next? what is going to happen next is, we're going to be able to look back, look ahead, in three to six months, and say, did the things we agreed to sit down and try to work out, did it work? are we closer to a major strategic stability talks and progress? are we further along in terms of -- and go down the line. that's going to be the test. i'm not sitting here and saying because the president and i agreed that we would do these things, that all of a sudden it's going to work. i'm not saying that. what i'm saying is, i think there's a genuine prospect to significantly improve the relations between our two countries without us giving up a single, solitary thing based on our principles and values. no, there were no threats. as a matter of fa

it's, as a result of litigation, et cetera, et cetera, and a lot of planning, it is really in the cards that this is closing. it hasn't been through environmental review, the draft d.i.r. is about to come out but environmental review hasn't been completed and action hasn't been taken so we can't say it's a certainty until the fat lady has sung on it but it's as much in the cards as anything you see. >> that being the case, i support the notion that director eiken stated and it would seem to me on the face it it it would make the great highway a close attractive commuter route to start with, no matter what we do. now to the comments. one comment and maybe just to express a disappointment, we have government agencies covering the same ground. i don't mean us and you i mean us and the san francisco county transportation authority. maybe that's just the necessity of moving things through the city bureaucracy. it doesn't help it with the public when we've got two different sets of i think we should ask them about j.f.k. as well because it's another hot potato dropped in our collective lap. b

not all the fancy talk, back patting and elbow bumping et cetera, it is results. remember during the ronald reagan. ronald reagan like trump was tough on the europeans, they called him an amiable dunce all sorts of insults. he turned out to be right. we can win the cold war. he forced the russians into a position where they were cornered where the soviet union died. with trump it was a similar situation. what he said isn't what they wanted to hear but he got the results. instead here, now we're rewarding, for example, russia with its gas pipeline before we even go to negotiations with them. >> right. well, like president reagan president trump was guided by vision as opposed to just sort of this clubness. president biden said america is back at table. that is probably true, they're back at the table. he is being polite and being nice. the clubbiness is all back. photographers snapped biden and french president emmanuel macron literally arm in arm together. like a display how the club is back together. everybody is being polite again. i'm sorry, this is a tough wor

why are we tied down here, et cetera, et cetera. and so, i think biden sees this as an early opportunity in an early public opportunity to demonstrate his personal diplomatic skills. the trump presidency questions challenged up ended many traditional american political and military positions. joe biden might be able to smooth over the cracks, but he can't guarantee that things will be that way after the next election. that relationships that were taken for granted will continue as they always have. biden's biggest challenge will be his summit with russian president vladimir putin . a man, he suggested, is a killer, a man. he believes that behind recent cyber attacks on the us. a man who says america should prepare for some uncomfortable truths at the summit. there are no illusions about the state of the us russia relationship. so the number one priority will be to these put this on a stable and predictable track. need to show that there are real costs and that this is an administration that will stand up to russia's d, stabilizing b

, et cetera.being able to enforce any action on the part of the boards. >> just to be clear, that's not you i'm talking about. you just have familiarity with the building. this wasn't you who was dealing with this board. but i tell you one thing, greg, we know one thing now. it can't just be the engineer in this situation has the duty to tell the board. there has to be a rule that you have to tell the municipality. if you see something that is that much of a concern and the board doesn't seem to get it, it has to be reported and i can't believe that's not the requirement now. >> i've done it before, chris. i've been in situations where i deemed that the damage -- again, it goes back to what the florida rules say, that it's the engineer that is empowered by law to be able to say these things. but in certain cases, i've seen damages that are so extensive that i have had to call the building department and tell them, look, you guys need to do something about this in very strong language. and ultimate

molotov cocktails, fireworks, explosive rocks, bottles, urine, feces, et cetera, et cetera.eo, i just can't justify it. how can you? >> so i think one of the things you have to understand is we're one of the largest agencies in the country or one of the largest cities in the country who do not supply -- equip their officers with body cameras so the event is what you see. what you see is a short segment of what happened. you don't see the young lady trying to help somebody that's being arrested, involved in criminal activity. you don't see the chaos, the violence, the sustained violence not just that night but over 150 days of sustained violence. that was night number 67 or 70 that we had been facing night in, night out. officers on rapid response team and other officers had been out there on the front lines, again, like you said, having objects thrown at them, being threatened, people announcing their home addresses on loud speakers without any support from our elected officials. our elected officials chastised and criticized our officers on a daily basis. they were frustrat

nixon indeed was guilty of obstruction of justice, et cetera, et cetera.is is a much larger notion of sat sat satisfying every whim and will not sat 'tisfy this. there is nobody willing to say except for liz cheney, it's not mcconnell or kevin mccarthy. they have laid down and the train is running over them and the train is running over our democratic principles that have guided this country throughout the history. we've never had a political party that has tried to suppress votes such as we're seeing now. we had the dixiecrats and democrats who control and tried to keep black people from voting but most of the party did not go along with that. >> what can or should the current justice department or merrick garland do? should joe biden do about this? because you don't think it's over. donald trump is the former president but you don't think this is over? >> it's obviously not over. all we have to do is listen to your show, anderson, every night and what we put on the air and read in the new york times and washington post. look, what we ought to be doing as

meetings et cetera. ., ., , , , ,, , cetera. businesses in portugal, yesterday's - cetera. for many businesses in portugal, yesterday's news - cetera. for many businesses in | portugal, yesterday's news was cetera. for many businesses in l portugal, yesterday's news was a huge disappointment. this decision will cost me — huge disappointment. this decision will cost me a _ huge disappointment. this decision will cost me a lot _ huge disappointment. this decision will cost me a lot of _ huge disappointment. this decision will cost me a lot of money, - huge disappointment. this decision l will cost me a lot of money, because we have _ will cost me a lot of money, because we have took the decision because of this travel_ we have took the decision because of this travel possibilities to portugal injune for the uk customers, we reopened hotels, we have already some cancellations during _ have already some cancellations during yesterday and today in the morning. — during yesterday and today in the morning, but even more welcome. no new

he's still concerned that we, in fact, are looking to take him down and et cetera. he still has those concerns. i don't think they are the driving force as to the kind of relationship he's looking forewith the united states. jennifer, jenniferfor ewith the united states. jennifer, jenniferwith the unit. jennifer, jennifer jacobs. >> is there a particular reason the summit lasted three hours and we know you allotted four to five hours and it ran shorter. putin said there were no threats or scare tactics issued? did you touch on afghanistan and the safe withdrawal of troops? >> yes, yes and yes. let me go back to the first part. the reason it didn't go longer is when the last time two heads of state spent two hours in direct conversation directly across the table go into detail? you may know of a time, but i don't. i can't think of one. so we didn't need -- when we got through and brought in our larger group, our -- my foreign minister, and my secretary of state was with me the whole time, and our ambassador and et cetera, brought everybody in. we had covered so much,

see that whether you're looking at meme stocks or crypto or whatever non-fungible tokens, spacs, et cetera the thing you have to remember, we have been through this before 1999 was the last time we had sort of creative valuations in your terms and we saw that with e-commerce, for example, right amazon at the peek in 1999, stock was at $106 a share. over the next two years, from 99 to 2001, the revenues doubled almost from 1.6 billion to $3.1 billion. that creative valuation went from $106 a share all the way down to $6 so the thing is when you have easy money like you do now, and, by the way, you had easy money back in the late '90s as well as during the housing market, and look at money supplies as a good indicator of that, valuations just got absolutely killed once you got away from that and i think the fed is going to be forced into that soon, between inflation on the one side, and then you got unemployment on the other and with both of those things moving, that's going to be hard. >> well, dan, i'm not talking about the crypto markets or even the meme stocks. i'm talking more your call

wonder, given the way these ransomware hackers behave, the dark web, bitcoin, digital currencies, et cetera, is there a way for law enforcement to cut off that money supply, to try to control the money side of this business? >> i think it's a fantastic idea. i do believe that disrupting the flow of money is a tremendous opportunity to basically get some control over this situation. it won't be perfect. none of these solutions will be perfect. but i'm really excited about the idea of a whole of government approach. we are deep into a vicious cycle already. this was a huge problem last year when they started targeting hospitals in the middle of a pandemic. it's much worse now. and it's high time for a whole of government approach to go after this. >> can i -- go ahead, jim. >> no, i was going to say, they go after hospitals, too, right, because they know that, you know in that case, it's not just, say, customers at risk who might be impacted. it's people's lives. they are smart how they do this. and they're brutal. >> for sure. and alex, to button it up, yes going after the money is so effect

they would have to rehearse, practice, et cetera. so one of the lessons, ad hoc is not that good when you're facing a mob of folks. the other aspect, too, just for the s, just for the record, the national guard is still waiting to get paid. hundreds of millions of dollars, which could affect their training this summer. for all of my colleagues, if you could urge everyone to pay the national guard, that would be useful. one of the most difficult issues that you face in your intelligence capacity is trying to recognize and respect first amendment rights to communicate freely with your responsibility to monitor what's going on the web. can you give us an idea of how you make that call? i presume you have active -- let me not presume. do you have active sort of intelligence agents that are going lieu the web and trying to identify? >> so, it's -- this is a complicated topic. i'll try to do my best to give sort of a shorthand version but there might be nuances that get lost in my description. >> that's okay. >> there are long standing pol

it's, as a result of litigation, et cetera, et cetera, and a lot of planning, it is really in the cards that this is closing. it hasn't been through environmental review, the draft d.i.r. is about to come out but environmental review hasn't been completed and action hasn't been taken so we can't say it's a certainty until the fat lady has sung on it but it's as much in the cards as anything you see. >> that being the case, i support the notion that director eiken stated and it would seem to me on the face it it it would make the great highway a close attractive commuter route to start with, no matter what we do. now to the comments. one comment and maybe just to express a disappointment, we have government agencies covering the same ground. i don't mean us and you i mean us and the san francisco county transportation authority. maybe that's just the necessity of moving things through the city bureaucracy. it doesn't help it with the public when we've got two different sets of i think we should ask them about j.f.k. as well because it's another hot potato dropped in our collective lap. b

et cetera. he knows there are consequences. look, one of the consequences that i know -- i don't know, that's unfair of me. i suspect you may all think doesn't matter, confidence matters to him, and to other world leaders of big nations his credibility worldwide shrinks. let's get this straight. how would it be if the united states were viewed by the rest of the world as interfering with the elections directly of other countries and everybody knew it? what would it be like if we engaged in activities that he's engaged in it diminishes the standing of a country that is desperately trying to make sure it maintains its standing as a major world power. and so it's not just what i do it's what the actions that other countries take, in this case, russia, that are contrary to international norms. it's the price they pay. they are not, they are not able to dictate what happens in the world. there are other nations of significant consequence, ie, the united states of america being one of them. >> mr. president, a quick follow on the sam

we closed down some of their facilities in the united states, et cetera. he knows there are consequences. now, look, one of the consequences that i know -- i don't know, i shouldn't say this, it's unfair of me. i suspect you may all think doesn't matter. but i'm confident it matters to him and other world leaders of big nations. his credibility worldwide shrinks. let's get this straight. how would it be if the united states were viewed by the rest of the world as interfering with the election directly of other countries? and everybody knew it? what would it be like if we engaged in activities that he's engaged in? it diminishes the standing of a country that is desperately trying to make sure it maintains its standing, as a major world power. and so, it's not just what i do, it's what the actions that other countries take. in this case, russia, that are contrary to international norms. it's the price they pay. they are not -- they are not able to dictate what happens in the world. there are other nations of significant consequence, i.e., the united states

great depression, et cetera, et cetera.nt they have any ability to do these big things, to push them through. this is when they do them. so, biden getting these things passed if he can get infrastructure all the way through is consistent with what we have seen, in the past. and i will tell you, if a republican gets elected in 2024, in 2025, there's probably going to be a thing that says tax cut here, next to the next president of the united states. if history -- if past is prolog, john. >> yeah, the thing is, though, look, to get this agreement with moderate-democrats and republicans, they had to jettison a lot of stuff that liberal-democrats would want, right? >> yes. >> so, how is that going to work with getting that support from the left wing of the party? >> that's right. so, i think one of the important things to say is, this is a moment. okay? i don't think we in washington sometimes underplay. oh, well, it's not -- it's not a done deal, yet, et cetera. it isn't a done deal, yet. but the fact they have ten senators, f

et cetera. at community health centers through the federal program we have and more than 58% of the shots administered in federally run vaccination sites have gone to people of color. it makes a gigantic difference. and across the nation, people of color accounted for more than half of all the vaccinations in the last month. the more we close the racial gap and vaccination rates, the more lives we can save. if i can -- [ applause ] and if i can pause for one second, that's why i've called for spending billions of dollars at nih focusing on new ways to deal with obesity, diabetes, alzheimer's and cancer. focused just on those diseases. money that private drug companies don't have the money to invest in or the inclination to because, guess what, in most black communities across america and hispanic communities, how many stores have fresh vegetables? i go down the list. it matters. the health condition a person enters this fight over makes a big difference as to what in fact is going to be able to