., etc., etc.. ice think given the german constitution and the power of the kaiser as a major factor, frederick could have what? >> changed germany. he had plans to have a much more constitutional form of government was much more control and he wants to strengthen civil society it is one of the tragedies and it would have made a difference. his son and despise him and wanted to do everything in the opposite direction. >> the want to ask my friend margaret given the fact the rising power of the united states ended was visible at that time could the united states did any other outside party play a role to stop the war if they wished to do so? >> i think it was but so was germany and what is interesting that they nearly came to war with venezuela and they back down and came to the understanding it was successful route changes in the balance could be managed i don't think the united states could have scoffs fluorite begin felt it was not its war and and had no interest. the atlantic was dividing itself.

no need for a library, no scholarship, etc. that would create a very cleanly-bifurcated profession of elite lawyers on the one hand and everybody else on the oh. and i think -- and on the other. and i think that would be very unfortunate. it would just be sad. there's no need for that. one of the virtues i think right now of the legal profession is that it's a unified profession, that there are, of course, lawyers at the very top of the income scale who are doing fantastically well for themselves, and it is pyramid call, and that's unfortunate. however, all lawyers by virtue of sharing in this common experience of a legal education have an awful lot this common with each other. that makes the legal profession itself, i think, somewhat democratic. i think it also contributes to our democracy, to to our national democracy, that we have an ideal of what legal training should be and legal education should be that really is the same, largely the same for everyone regardless of this many and regardless of family background, etc. so i

look at it because as it is and not as it's pro-trade and the media applies to tractors of proponents etc yeah i mean people must do their own homework and check it out more thoroughly but i think the point is when people talk about bitcoin being the equivalent of gold i think they are making a great point and here in london we now have a lloyd's of london offering cold storage of bitcoin and sure cold storage gold money dot com so i want to bring a cold storage service for bitcoin making the equivalency to gold as something with inherent intrinsic value but i want to talk a little bit more about the tech space in general because the last time you were you were on the show reggie you were very excited about google glass now since you came on the show when we asked you about the time the n.s.a. revelations through the snowden reveals have been quite damning for products like google glass and others people are saying i don't want to wear google glass because i'm affectively spying for the n.s.a. so i'm wondering what your current position is on that technology it seems as though you've pivo

for anti-ship phone etc so you know it's of google is that it's connected to a network security and they open it and they say his job is to have security that's what they do all right let's let's stick on this idea for a second because the the n.s.a. revelations pertaining to the snowden revelations pertaining to the end n.s.a. have then led to companies like i.b.m. and cisco sales in around the world have crashed in china they've tumbled boeing lost out on a fighter jet deal with brazil a multi-billion dollar deal so in other words the economics of spying and i'm talking to you as a businessman here not as somebody who might have an insight into the politics but just as a businessman the politics of spying is biting america in the because these big tech companies are now losing huge deals as a result of this invasive spying how can the companies justify the fall of market share in america with technology that nobody wants it's proven to be completely ineffective and it's killing sales overseas as a businessman reggie what are your thoughts well if it's completely ineffective and nobody

etc but that car because car comes with his own road and those roads have no tolls no bridges so you don't have to pay any fees which over the roads in the roads could go anywhere in the world over seas and over country through rivers anywhere there's an internet connection and that car could go faster than all the other cause in the world and there's no in the way that was supposed to be impeded by any government whatsoever or any military or any corporation so taking that a consideration which is more valuable chevrolet or that car going from two cents to one hundred thousand dollars so you have to look at it because as it is and not as it's pro-trade in the media as detractors of proponents etc yeah i mean people must do their own homework and check it out more thoroughly but i think the point is when people talk about bitcoin being the equivalent of gold i think they are making a great point and here in london we now have a lloyd's of london offering cold storage of bitcoin insured cold storage gold money dot com a stand off on a cold storage service for bitcoin making the equiva

., etc., etc.. i think given the us german power of the constitution and we have cited as a major factor, frederick could have what it? >> changed germany. had a more constitutional form of government and i think he wanted to strengthen the it is one of the tragedies. really. in he wanted to do everything in the opposite direction. >> i want to ask margaret a way out question. isn't it true the rising power was the united states and visible even at that time as any other party played a role to stop the war if they wish to do so or have the disposition? >> just to go back to the first part when i think is interesting is they were married so well. they backed down and came to an undersea a thank you and it was successful how changes could be managed. i don't think united states could have stopped the war. if it felt it was not its war and had no interest. the united states from that perspective had very little at stake. and it was the rising power but not yet the power that it would become it was in t

etc., etc. he was also the heir to the german throne, and he was subject to the imperial aptitude and swagger and so forth of bismarck's germany. germany became, in that generation from the time that william's grandfather became emperor after the collapse of france, became the greatest industrial and military power on the continent. with the great army. but i wholly agree -- she said it better than i could have -- that all these factors -- industrial, military and so forth -- were at the disposition not play things, but the apparatus which individuals were operating. and, therefore, it was very important who these individuals were, what their antisee departments have been die nastically, gene logically, politically. william was the emperor of germany. he was physically afflicted and psychologically, i think, afflicted man. he was, he had great power for i won't say, call it evil, but for destruction. and he was constantly shifting back and forth between a sort of pallid desire to do good, to be

businessmen, clergy, etc. but coaches still seem like people who practice tough love, like a good father would be and i think that has to do with their high standing in society. host: who was a coach you liked? guest: frank boomer, virginia tech. i knew there would be portions very critical but i wanted to also show it could be done in an ethical manner. so i intent the 2011 football season with the virginia tech football program. in the locker room, traveled with them and so on. the book explains how it is that frank boomer has been able to have 20 consecutive winning seasons and yet aggravated assault 77% of his players. if all college programs graduated 77% of their players, college football would not be notorious. host: we got interested in this book for the connection to the taxpayer. i want to show you video from 2006. an economics professor roger knoll from stanford. >> in order for to it be an anti-trust violation for the nfl to negotiate as a league, broadcasting rights, one has to prove that televise

a symbol of comparable values and etc. etc..l, i think that is a little silly. .his is not a rolex i could buy a sixpack for the x -- but so what? >> that was a highlight from the interview with tom perkins and emily chang. welcome back. still with us is austan goolsbee, who i know enjoyed the interview as well. what is interesting about this debate is you can laugh at him and ridicule him all you want about the sixpack of rolex watches, but i think what was getting lost here is is there a moral responsibility for the top one percent to take care of the of not only, 50% this country but the world essentially? you have bill gates and warren buffett who believe it, and then tom perkins comes out and says where did this come from? >> different people have different points of view. i believe absolutely, yes. the question is how best to do that. do you give away the capital or du roll up your sleeves and get to work and try to produce things that will grow the economy. >> i will point out the support of an over 80-year-old man. exclu

for how parties are supposed to operate, etc. the constitutional process in south sudan has not moved forward. and that gives us a vehicle for dealing with a lot of participation from civil society, the churches, etc. in a new constitution for south sudan, there would be proceed the next elections and maybe bring new leadership to the country. there should be an advisory committee from the u.n., the u.s., africa union, etc. the same goes for the economy. there is an oil driven economy. there has to be a much more dynamic relationship between the international community and south sudan over the management of the economy and how people can be helped. otherwise going back to the old institutions will not be sufficient. we have invested the united states heavily in this process. between sudan and south sudan, since 2005, the united states has spent i estimate around $12 billion in peace keeping, in darfur, in humanitarian activities and the birthing of south sudan. we can't turn back on this. it's going to take a lot of time and effo

so no changes to any policies regarding the national parks etc., would really be rk9 often what we do. while it's an open space resource by distinguishing it in color it's part of the city but not what we manage under the vision program. intellectually it would be more honest to do that we're one of the few cities that have the benefit of having the incredible resources with an incredibly managed park. it would be good to manage that and a commissioner antonini >> i'd like to make a motion to initiate amendments to the san francisco general plan to a reflect the 2013 recreation update. >> second and a commissioners on that motion anthony than to adapt. commissioner antonini. commissioner borden excuse me. commissioner hillis >> commissioner moore. >> commissioner sugaya. >> no. >> commissioner wu and president fong. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes - that motion passes 5 to one commissioners and as it was acknowledged you should i believe establish a date. maybe we can check with 0 staff important that. i think that has to be part of the motion >> yeah. i think on or after

i'm an advocate for recession and others are advocates for dogs and a places for them to play etc. so we're a board group that's working for consensus. i know that commissions with one of the things that's a balance between what's a policy and how to convert it going into action. i advocate that you pay attention to language. for example, if you talk about different needs with regards to recreation. another t was very clear to say no buildings in our parks where in the current rose with regards to lose of private recreation it should be considered. there's a difference between the guidance of operations that are take place. i know you want to have this approved. it's been around this process for with quite a while. if you are going to take any public comment? eave submitted a letter to each one of you commissioners and john ram you don't acquit consider this to be final. we've tried to be conservative in our concerns but we have concerns as we're almost there to the finish line. we're appreciative to all the changes from the last time you've saw the rose there's a few more things t

i believe he went to testify about the weapons of mass destruction etc., etc..y feeling was that if he had resigned in protest as to what they were doing in the lead-up situation, things may have been different. >> guest: that's a good question in a very important one. in fact his deputy secretary of state richard armitage one point did, i read the review on the bug urge call him told to resign the argument being that the white house is using powell as cover for policies that otherwise wouldn't get as much public support, but secretary powell didn't see it that way. he didn't resign obviously. believed in being a good soldier and the truth is you're right, he was relied and about it but he never actually said no. he went to the president and brought along list he had written out on a long yellow legal pad of the different consequences of the war and thinks he thought the present up to consider before going to war. if you break it you own it in effect and all the possible negative effects. but push came to shove in the presence that i think i'm going to go for it

for how parties are supposed to operate, etc. the constitutional process in south sudan has not moved forward. and that gives us a vehicle for dealing with a lot of participation from civil society, the churches, etc. in a new constitution for south sudan, there would be proceed the next elections and maybe bring new leadership to the country. there should be an advisory committee from the u.n., the u.s., africa union, etc. the same goes for the economy. there is an oil driven economy. there has to be a much more dynamic relationship between the international community and south sudan over the management of the economy and how people can be helped. otherwise going back to the old institutions will not be sufficient. we have invested the united states heavily in this process. between sudan and south sudan, since 2005, the united states has spent i estimate around $12 billion in peace keeping, in darfur, in humanitarian activities and the birthing of south sudan. we can't turn back on this. it's going to take a lot of time and effo

so inpatient visits, outpatient visits, drug care, etc. indirect cost are related to work force productivity. these include absenteeism which is sick leave and disability and presentism. which while being present at work, people who are suffering with these conditions are less productive during the workday. additionally, we want to take our projections and take the final analysis and see how much of the cost is attributed to sugar sweet and beverages. we found two rigorous studies that developed, quantified the percentages to understand those cost projections. one is done here from the department of public health 2009 nexus study where they looked directly at the impacts in san francisco of consuming sugary beverage and they found 86 percent of all the cost related could be attributed to sugary sweet and beverages. similarly there were reports from the department of public health of illinois that looked at the diabetic population and they found a number of 8.45 percent. this slide goes through some of the studies that we use to refer to in

for how parties are supposed to operate, etc. the constitutional process in south sudan has not moved forward. and that gives us a vehicle for dealing with a lot of participation from civil society, the churches, etc. in a new constitution for south sudan, there would be proceed the next elections and maybe bring new leadership to the country. there should be an advisory committee from the u.n., the u.s., africa union, etc. the same goes for the economy. there is an oil driven economy. there has to be a much more dynamic relationship between the international community and south sudan over the management of the economy and how people can be helped. otherwise going back to the old institutions will not be sufficient. we have invested the united states heavily in this process. between sudan and south sudan, since 2005, the united states has spent i estimate around $12 billion in peace keeping, in darfur, in humanitarian activities and the birthing of south sudan. we can't turn back on this. it's going to take a lot of time and effo

less developed etc etc this is really a technical matter that will be discussed but the principle has been really i can eat and we have no problem you know just to to to continue discussing about the retore as well mr kerry has also proposed a joint israeli palestinian presence on the west bank jordan border but israel insists on idea of control well at palace and we continue to insist on international presence there against any involvement. didn't you just you know. just you know. thought of what's you know the line of questions first of all you were asking about us recognizing the jewish nature of the state then us accepting you know the settlement situation then us accepting israel having almost a third minutes military presence i don't know what kind of palestinian state it will look like you know under such israeli is it's extra what you call it condition as i think you know if we are going to reach an agreement with with the israelis as israelis have to accept the fact that you know a capacious has to end their whole germany over the palestinian life and future has to stop and t

., etc.? so you have a lot of dynamic issues. when we realize in the automotive industry is whatever we put on a vehicle, we wanted to be safe. number one. it cannot fail, it cannot go to the blue screen of death, it has got to operate seamlessly. on the other hand, we want to respond to our customers, the ultimate consumer that is going to purchase those features and functions. all of that is possible, but we need to do it in such a way that it is effective and it is affordable and we truly can benefit from it. we do not want to have our technologies legislated or mandated that drive us to a solution that ultimately will not pan out because we won't survive one failure. we want it to be done right. secondly, the industry needs the opportunity to continue to innovate so that we get proven solutions that work and we understand the ramifications. so we are on that pathway, but in the meantime, you know, we got the smartphone, we got the tablets, now we got iwatches and wearable devices, all of t

exists that caused undue with constitutional responsibility and such as performing research results etc. and this is the case here. and in today's conflict of interest, i want to know about the environmental impact report and eir shall be repaired when there is serious public controversy and this is not just about trees, but it is about everything going on in the park, including the project to tear it down, this iconic, only two of a kind, in the west of the mississippi garden of apartment complex, where the environment is foremost to be preserved and protected in these days. this is not something that we take for granted it is a prize to be protected. last time someone was discussing park merced as available land. this land is just as available as his own backyard. we live there, we love it there. and we want to protect it and there is too much unethical controversy surrounding this. the eir, this that is a big problem and the three trees are just a image of the whole problem going on, when a project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or eliminate the important

., etc.they haven't come through yet so. there's a little bit of mistiming of that. >> talking about timing, how much time will the market give him to fix this business? he's been on the job 17 days, yet when he ran the chemicals business, he turned it around really quickly. are we going to see a replication of that? >> well, the point is that shell isn't run on a quarter-by-quarter basis. it's on the big, longer, medium term scale is what they run on. and what the previous c.e.o. was suggesting is that they could make about $90 billion over the next two years in terms of cash flow from operations. they're only going to make $40 billion this year, $50 billion next year, but most people anticipate that oil and gas prices are going to be lower rather than higher unless there is a substantial improvement in performance and in volumes, they're not going to be anywhere near that number. >> but you think that the c.e.o. is the right man for the job. this was a little bit of a controversial decision

the the affiliates around there around africa around in the middle east in syria etc but to the goal was to get rid of them and we could not convince that then taliban authorities to hand them over that was against their they saw as against their interests in their tradition richard. richard don't you think now the united states if it wants a semblance of a anything that we can even agree with on the word normality should the united states the negotiate with the taliban directly to have an exit where the country is still saw it all together go ahead i think i think that's coming. to karzai has been very irritated and paranoic if you will about reports that the been some efforts to advance a better understanding between washington and the taliban now that's got to come ok peter in washington i'm calling this program legacies here what is the legacy of american occupation in an invasion of these countries you know twelve years on now for both end in context of what's going on in the middle east today. it's a very sad legacy it's very very difficult to point to anything even remotely po

etc. etc. and so i think that we and therefore the public, through us, need to be privy to all of those documents and whatever communication that we have with them and just to get a sense of how we are doing that. >> and so, i am sorry that i am preempting the executive director bill san der son, sorry bill, but i do think that this is actually a very good point to clarify in that what is being proposed is not the plan. and it is, and with all due respect to the amendment that has been adopted, it is an option that we to not deny the diploma and the plan is to make a full a, through, g course of study and i think that what is important to highlight is what is referenced earlier in the terms of the significant number of students that have actually risen to this higher standard and this higher bar, of which we are all very, very, excited about, and has been the result of some for mittable work that our counselors and our schools are doing and that our principal and assistant principal and qu

running a small radio station and why is this amount of money going to radio instead of classrooms and etc. and it was a little bit of a leap of faith but i think now what you are demonstrating is that, there really is value to this. and the two questions that i asked you every year, is the first is about student involvement with your programming and i am delighted to see the student testimonials of how that has really come to life and the audio academy is really addressing the needs that our students have in understanding the whole broadcasting industry. and the second question that i always ask is i am class that you have embarked on the planning but i hope that you will convene a board to keep that momentum going and to guide you so that it is a broad cross section of supporters and stake holers who can help to guide the station into the future. >> just to address your second point. this, i think that the strategic work and i think that is one of the things driving the work to me is the organized community support. and really, in part depends upon a clear vision that comes from within,

., etc.. i think that is a little silly. this is not a rolex. buy a sixpack of rolexes, but for what? >> that is tom perkins, the founder of klein perkins, speaking in a controversial interview aced on a controversial piece he wrote in one wall street journal" wealth. my guess is back with me, wishing that today was not the "money moves." what do you think about putting the entire silicon valley in focus? >> this is an albatross strapped to the wrist. we are in a world where most people do not wear watches anymore. >> or they wear smart watches and other things. >> that is coming back. they probably were not wearing a watch in the first place. things are being team at your allies. you are not valued by your book collection or record collection anymore. rights arebragging now ideas, right? >> ideas is the new world, and what you are finding today with funding companies and founders, and i give you an example of one that was announced today, indy raised $40 million to help people democratize fun

as a historian, when one looks at the names of the people, leonardo, etc. in our current age -- >> what? i couldn't hear -- >> in our 31st century -- 21st century -- >> oh, okay. >> are there people 200,300 years from now we'll be talking about with the same reverence, and what was so unique about their surroundings -- maybe lack of tv, lack of internet, etc. -- that allowed them to have such amazing greatness that as gone on for hundreds of years? >> well, as far as the renaissance goes, the renaissance is an almost -- to begin with, almost an entirely italian phenomenon. it spreads out as it goes along. but to be honest about it, it starts off as a florentine phenomenon. it's not even italian. why were the florentines so good at this because most of the artists really did come from florence. i think they were very good at pleasure. [laughter] and i think that's where art begins. it doesn't begin in pain. so could that happen again? well, yeah. if all the, you know, the all the elements -- if all the elements are there. so who knows? in, many eras we're mu

product and i want the dollar back i can ask you for it you don't like we fight in court arbitration etc with bitcoin you could program their currency so i can actually give it to you but you can't spend it until you can see. the contract the agreement is is agree. both don't agree that the reason i give you that money is valid then that money can be spent so we can actually program to do that which are a simple much and many more complicated things and the distinction that you make between you know coin with a capital b. and big climb with a lowercase b. is an important thing as well but i want to go back to the lower case because you would say we haven't seen an annual nine hundred percent increase in anything since to what mania and you know it begs the question do you honestly not think that big corn is just a little bubble it seems that's too much in one year. as a stand alone currency it's a possibility is a bubble that he looks publishes ok but you also have to look at what you comparing it to you comparing to to that so the utility value of a tulip is maybe in a flower at the end

product and i'm not the dollars back i can ask you for it you don't like we fight in court arbitration etc with bitcoin you could program the currency so i can actually give it to you but you can't spend it until you can see. the contract the agreement is is agree. don't agree that the reason i give you that money is valid then that money can be spent so we can actually program to do that which are a simple much and many more complicated things and the distinction that you make between you know coin with a capital b. and big climate a lowercase b. is an important thing as well but i want to go back to the lower case b. as you would say we haven't seen an annual nine hundred percent increase in anything since two let me near and you know it begs the question do you honestly not think that big corn is just a little bubble it seems that's too much in one year. as a stand alone currency it's a possibility is a bubble there she looks publishes ok but you also have to look at what you comparing it to you comparing to tulips so the utility value of a tulip is maybe a flower at the end of the day

is going to get more and more wealthy you're going to do better your social standing will increase etc etc that's coming to a screeching halt in the industrialized world and i absolutely agree that changing of the generations will bring new ideas and who bring new people who understand the poverty and the division of the social of the social means in a completely different way. i really apologize that i will go back to my favorite topic it's a social media but the sharing of knowledge the sharing of understanding how people even the different parts of the world group who bring to a completely new generation which i'm calling generation have of course from facebook that will pay attention not only to their countries because sitting in the us or in bulgaria even our in germany belgium to go wherever it's very easy to find solutions or to try to. find photos how to find how to fight with our poverty. is to think globally and to look how the american people can help the poverty in india or how the european people can have the poverty in africa or china or whatever so because in our countri

big processors, mainframes, etc. it is now mainframe centric.uestion, are there other edward snowden's out there that could make your life miserable? >> i am a believer in transparency. we don't allow any government in the world including our own any unique access to our products. there are no backdoors. we don't help any government in the world. if the russian government trusts us, the american government trusts us, every government around the world i think you will find will trust cisco. that is why we will become the number one security player. we think this creates an opportunity for us. to becomepossibility a number one security player. >> john chambers, thank you for your visit here in davos. a beautiful day, not as spectacular as yesterday. a little colder today. we will have much more for you through the entire day here in davos. >> tom, look forward to those commerce asians. fasten -- those conversations. fascinating conversation with the head of cisco. later in the hour, we had back to davos. francine lacqua is going to be sticking wit

product and i'm not the dollars back i can ask you for it you don't like we fight in court arbitration etc with bitcoin you could program the currency so i can actually give it to you but you can't spend it until you can see. the contract the agreement is is agree. so if you break through and agree that the reason i give you that money is valid then that money can be spent so we can actually program to do that which are a simple much and many more complicated things and the distinction that you make between you know coin with a capital b. and big crime with a lower case the is an important thing as well but i want to go back to the lower case b. as you would say we haven't seen an annual nine hundred percent increase in anything since two of mania and you know it begs the question do you honestly not think that big corn is just a little bubble it seems that's too much in one year. as a stand alone currency it's a possibility is a bubble that he looks publishes ok but you also have to look at what you comparing it to you comparing to tulips so the utility value of a tulip is maybe in a flow