how did you become a member of the ethics council?umerous violations, we can call you back. we understand that the interview phase is currently active and the members of the ethics council are very busy , but we guarantee that we will not stop trying to talk to severin and to get answers to our questions so far, it is difficult to imagine that the circular judicial bail, which has been in effect for decades, will simply cease to exist at any moment, however we believe in the best and for now that the ethical council, whose members themselves have questions about their reputation and skeletons in the closet, continues the selection of candidates for the supreme council of justice, let us remind this key body of the judicial power, which must ensure the independence and integrity of the judicial corps, and such high duties, in the opinion of the ethical council, can be entrusted to judge kharkivskyi district administrative court olena zaichko, she received an opinion from the council about compliance with the criteria of integrity and p

what is ethical and not ethical, it's that era. do this in public, in conversation with one another. not just whispered in bars or among our friends. so that these questions can be argued about, debated, we can correct our assumptions if they are false and in that way move forward to something better. i mean, rethinking sex it's a provocation. it is meant to be a provocation to a certain type of conversation, actually, by affirming what sex, that is meaningful, that it could be spiritual, what are meanings to it -- that mean we want connected to feelings, actually. that some longs might not be acted upon because they aren't good for us. but actually proposing claims that we can talk about and build understandings from there, we can move forward in discussion. >> there are so many thought i have and i feel like you set up the next set of questions i want to ask you really perfectly. one of the things i was thinking about so much as i was reading the book was i was feeling like this book is really offering permission. often i think w

what is ethical what is not ethical etc and do this in public in conversation with each other not just whispered at bars or among our friends. so that these questions can be sort of argued about debated we can correct our assumptions if they're false and in that way move forward to something better. i mean rethinking sex is subtitled a provocation, but you know, it's meant to be a provocation to this kind of conversation actually by making claims about what sex is say that it's that it's meaningful that it could in fact be spiritual about what our experiences with sex might be that we might want to catch feelings. actually, you know that some longings maybe shouldn't be acted upon because they're not good for us. by actually proposing claims that we can talk about and build understandings from there. we can move forward in the discussion. there are so many thoughts i have and i feel like you just set up the next set of questions. i wanted to ask you about really perfectly but one of the things i was thinking so much about when i was reading your book was i feel like this book is is rea

what is ethical what is not ethical etc and do this in public in conversation with each other not just whispered at bars or among our friends. so that these questions can be sort of argued about debated we can correct our assumptions if they're false and in that way move forward to something better. i mean rethinking sex is subtitled a provocation, but you know, it's meant to be a provocation to this kind of conversation actually by making claims about what sex is say that it's that it's meaningful that it could in fact be spiritual about what our experiences with sex might be that we might want to catch feelings. actually, you know that some longings maybe shouldn't be acted upon because they're not good for us. by actually proposing claims that we can talk about and build understandings from there. we can move forward in the discussion. there are so many thoughts i have and i feel like you just set up the next set of questions. i wanted to ask you about really perfectly but one of the things i was thinking so much about when i was reading your book was i feel like this book is is rea

last year, he sabotaged the creation of an ethics council.claimed that judges do not like this law, and internationalists are critical of the council - this is wrong. he hopes the expert of the anti-corruption center halyna chyzhik does not hide her indignation. experts in this is not constitutional, he now goes against participation in the competition, we assume that bohdan monych forgot that he is against judicial reform , which he now wants to be a part of. but we have not forgotten about his bright past. monyach headed the council of judges in 2019, the judge of the district administrative court, pavlo vovk , an official during yanukovych's time, andriy portnov and the then head of the presidential administration, andriy bohdan , ousted oleg tkachuk from the chair of the council chairman, replaced him with the convenient bohdan monich, this was recorded on the so-called wolf tapes made public by our colleagues from the investigation . info correct nikka ne smoženiya nikka er- er never followed orders and did not touch the code, the admini

technical issue i go through the ethic's commission. yes, i would like to echo supervisor peskin's comments. we and thank supervisor peskin for his help and collaboration on these amendments. and also thank the ethic's staff and the commissioners for their attention to the issues. we it does look like the parties are in agreement on the some of the base said on the feedback from staff. i don't believe there are open issues other than the diminimus exception the thousand dollar threshold that remains in our version. regarding the definition of, payments. and i will say a few words. this is up to the commission. you know, we do believe that it is a useful threshold and we -- for a few reasons one is consistent with the previous behested payments reporting regime in place, which required reporting from parties and amounts of 1 thousand dollars or over. the state regulation guess up to 5 thousand. i think a thousand dollars was a workable number locally and it will help to alleviate the administrative burden in terms of need to vet small do

what's the ethics of that? probably not terribly good. so why aren't these ethical lapses? more often recognized why aren't they more? central to the dominant narrative of watergate. what do you think is an explanation as to why we don't hear more about this kind of stuff. maybe because the ethical boxes like weren't i guess the public didn't necessarily see them like as bad as like the watergate scandal itself, so they were willing to accept like, okay. this is like dirty journalism, but like they were willing to accept that over the fact that like the watergate scandal happened in the first place like this wouldn't be great reporting on any other story, but it's because it was over a massive scandal already that it like kind of didn't look that bad to the public i guess so it was kind of more insignificant and the broader context dismissed because people were too preoccupied with the actual story than how the story came to be. do you think that it's possible too that these are more of those details that get in the way of keeping it straight? there's just so much about wat

you tackle ethics. there are different competing system of ethics.y many of them appeal to a belief in a higher power them god creates these ethics. are there ethics in the nonhuman rest of the galaxy? >> i don't know. you know, ethics as well as just sort of morality. i can tell thank you -- whatever ethics or morality we agree to have as society progresses -- and by the way, the ethos of today wasn't the same as yesterday. there would have been a day where i would have been a slave. so ethics and morality evolves and it evolves to sort of rational discourse about what is right and what is wrong. >> are there permanent ethics on earth? can you point to any that are permanent? >> i don't know what's permanent, but if you think something is permanent, that's usually not a good sign. you attach to it, and then as the world moves on, you could have a different outlook on that. i'm old enough to remember the sunday newspaper had a section called "the women's section." that was ethically the right thing, because what do women do? they're at home, and in t

arthur caplan is a professor at nyu and medical ethics expert.scape of ethics in research during the �*60s was a mixed bag. we'd had terrible experiments conducted by german scientists under the nazi regime in the concentration camps, and as a result it issued codes of ethics to bind researchers internationally. the number one principle in those codes, the helsinki code of ethics, was the informed consent of all subjects is absolutely essential. however, there were violations of that code which, by the way, was written by western judges, including americans. it was as if we said, "well, the nazis had done bad things but american researchers, we don't have to worry about that, we would not do such bad things." but we were doing terrible things and this twin experiment took place during the 60s as part of a series of these violations. there were some informed consent forms drafted early but never properly signed. they tried to make it ethical in the '70s by getting parents to sign it, but some did not, and some did not think the form adequately cov

make sure people know you for your work ethic. most people are not known for their work ethic.y says how do you work so much or work so hard. you probably have friends the psychiatric communities will say you have a mental illness because you are obsessed with having an unbelievable life for your family. i have been labeled odd. they want to criticize people who dream of the american dream. and they have to work to get the american dream and keep it so no government can provide that for me. no college education is going to give that to me. dan: grant car don't, thanks. we appreciate. we have 52 days before the election. we are losing our country. i opened up talking about the police state. i ran for office myself and it didn't work out. but i decided i had to do something. we have an election coming up in 52 days. will it solve all our problems if the republicans take back the house and the senate? absolutely not. have our problems going to get worse if we don't keep the house and the senate? republicans may not be the solution to all your problems but the cause right now is th

but not all of them are ethically so straightforward.orter: they are large, they are muscly, and they're the pride and joy of their breeders. we are squeezing as much as we can out of our animals. the world is getting ever hungrier for meat and milk. but by pushing animals to their limits, we're doing the same to our planet. but if we can turn our animals into food-production machines, couldn't we also breed them to be more environmentally friendly? suzanne: there's hardly any ecological niche where genetics or genomics can't come up with a solution. reporter: scientists are working on designing more sustainable animals, by selective breeding or even by artificially changing their genetic code. revolutionary ways to make food production more sustainable, or a dangerous manipulation of nature? for more than 10,000 years, we humans have optimized corn and rice harvests, and engineered zucchinis to be non-toxic, sheep stronger, and wolves more obedient. john: we've been doing this very successfully. reporter: this is professor john duprÉ. h

the subject of not one but 2 ethic's commission meetings all of that is in the ethic's files. as to their thoughts regarding amendments that were proposed both by this supervisor and by the mayor's office. which ultimate low were the subject of their august 12th vote. which was put in the file as i mentioned left week when we heard this for the first time or 7th time. and those are the body and substance of what the ethic's commission, proved they have been in this file since august 15th. prop e required that they be public low available for 30 days and the reason we took no action last week was because a hair short of 30 days. there has been plenty of time for everybody to go through all of the substance of these amendments. and with that, i am prepared to you move the amendments in the file since august the 15th and on that motion mr. clerk, a roll call, please. >> yes. on the motion to amend. supervisor chan? >> aye. >> vice chair mandelman. >> aye. chair peskin. >> aye. >> the motion passed without objection. >> and then i would like to make a motion to move the item as am

his areas of expertise are everything from war theory military ethics especially the ethics of remote and autonomous weapons. he's a senior pilot with more than 1400 pilot and instructor pilot hours and many flown in of major u.s. combat humanitarian operations. he currently serves on the air force staff, so staffs, artificial intelligence, cross functional team. but, you know, the more we see u.s. military involved in other parts of the world, the more we see the use of drones and other remote weapons. and so now a good time to discuss whether that is moral or. so please join me in welcoming joseph chapter. thank you, tony, for the kind introduction. thank you for being here. this is really a privilege. i would be lying if i told you that i expected someday to write a book and to be able to talk to folks like you about it. i never thought that was going to be the case. this is really exciting. and to do so at this historic place is something special for me. also i would be remiss if i didn't mention that president carter wrote a new york times op ed in 2012, in which made it very cle

his areas of expertise are everything from war theory military ethics especially the ethics of remote and autonomous weapons. he's a senior pilot with more than 1400 pilot and instructor pilot hours and many flown in of major u.s. combat humanitarian operations. he currently serves on the air force staff, so staffs, artificial intelligence, cross functional team. but, you know, the more we see u.s. military involved in other parts of the world, the more we see the use of drones and other remote weapons. and so now a good time to discuss whether that is moral or. so please join me in welcoming joseph chapter. thank you, tony, for the kind introduction. thank you for being here. this is really a privilege. i would be lying if i told you that i expected someday to write a book and to be able to talk to folks like you about it. i never thought that was going to be the case. this is really exciting. and to do so at this historic place is something special for me. also i would be remiss if i didn't mention that president carter wrote a new york times op ed in 2012, in which made it very cle

and this idea of ethical eating. who in fact, is growing organic vegetables? what does that mean if we say that it is sort of fair or good farming? what do we expect in our local farming? and she really sort of criticizes and critiques this idea that it is only about the quality of vegetable or animal, and it is not about the working conditions. and so today, i want to be looking at agricultural labor and the pollan michael pollan has said, look, we should eat more plants. well, then we should know, well, where do those plants come from as well? there's actually a very long history of industrial agriculture in america and with very difficult labor conditions and also a long history of labor organizing as well. related to agricultural work. i'm going to be looking both at the history of the bracero program, which is in califor nia as well as the rise of the united farm workers and cesar chavez in the 1960s. then we're going to turn from just think about agriculture to thinking, well, okay, fine. professor levin knew it would big scale agriculture. how about tho

more analysis on that sto over human ethics. more analysis on that story over on _ human ethics.site -- . story over on the bbc website —— failing of protocol. o nto onto formula 1. max verstappen's been utterly dominant this season. the formula 1 championship's been in his hands for some time, and this weekend at the singapore grand prix, he could potentially clinch what'll be his second world title. but last season's controversial win over lewis hamilton is back in the spotlight again after claims red bull breached last season's budget cap. team boss christian horner says it's all speculation. i've been talking to our f1 reporterjennie gow. she started by telling me what verstappen stands to achieve this weekend. hat verstappen stands to achieve this weekend. ., ., , , , weekend. not only is it his 25th birthday this — weekend. not only is it his 25th birthday this weekend - weekend. not only is it his 25th birthday this weekend but - weekend. not only is it his 25th birthday this weekend but it - weekend. not only is it his 25th birthday this weekend but it is i weekend. not o

state, it should be transformed to azov, it will be transformed in general, understanding in general ethicaler principles, simply others in general should be because now we are looking at an ordinary middle russian citizen and - and we are very sad to watch when he is arguing about this war about ukraine, he thinks about external fears about some things, say, uh, future well, that's normal, people don't talk at all, they talk , by the way, in connection with this, i have here it's time interactively. i want to discuss something on my own. they discussed a question that was asked of me here. the middle of russia so that the population could feel missile strikes. do you think that the fsb is still looking for ways to carry out terrorist attacks in the country in russia itself ? of this terror, they themselves will ask to do something about it, for example, to take advantage of the possibility of a tactical nuclear attack on us. well, this is an interesting discussion, because the generals are really talking about the fact that the war really can be a stoppage, and the population of russia will

of them. >> no. >> not all of them, but there ia percentage there that have walked away from the ethical ung of who and what they are. in ouy and our community. thereby, we have mario woods and eric garnea garner emma it is just -- >> you are speaking from experi. not a critic outside, from inside and that makes a difference. >> yeah. and they are not happy, are not happy, some of them are not happy, but the truth is thet that they have to get back to ethics. >> that's right. the truth setss free. >> mario woods, 5'6", 120 pound, homeless with a penknife and nine officers. they are all shog all shooting. terrible. >> we are going to come back to brothers to brothers. i'm glad e had this introduction of what yu do and who you are. thank you fr being with us but please join un our next segment with reginald . brothers to brothers and some oe work he is doing. will is what you will so which s years ago i was will will will of the you you will just is your cv is powered by of >> [ music ] [ music ] >> welcome back to mosaic. we he been speaking to reginald lilesu have heard some of his great

we had several discussions of ethical moments, for example on at the beginning of the war or when ms. denisova began to talk quite naturally about the rape episodes, many journalists from television stations rushed to quote and all these things and try to record some interviews there, and a whole discussion about ethics began, about what should not be done like that it is possible to quote on the air such terrible things that happened to people with such details , so you see. probably, the cinema simply has not had time to go through this ethical discussion, so the journalists have already been able to a little, but i wanted to clarify with you about the festivals again to find out your real plans without manipulation, as far as i understand correctly, you want to make the premiere of your film by the time of the anniversary of the liberation of buchi, that's right, it will be in april. no, that's the maximum plan because it's very fast magpies and well , we won't be able to start filming before december, it's very fast when they asked the nearest time when it could be released, then

some cases a more ethical issues, for i cases a more ethical issues, for instance, the father kicks theg. it is lost. or dramas like the neighbour ate my dog. suddenly, a breakthrough. _ neighbour ate my dog. suddenly, a breakthrough, cat _ neighbour ate my dog. suddenly, a breakthrough, cat has _ neighbour ate my dog. suddenly, a breakthrough, cat has been - neighbour ate my dog. suddenly, a| breakthrough, cat has been spotted under some decking, the pet detective takes a picture of the frightened animal. i5 detective takes a picture of the frightened animal. is it dee-dee? that's him, _ frightened animal. is it dee-dee? that's him, that's _ frightened animal. is it dee-dee? that's him, that's him, _ frightened animal. is it dee-dee? that's him, that's him, confirms l frightened animal. is it dee-dee? that's him, that's him, confirms a visibly— that's him, that's him, confirms a visibly relieved owner. i feel much happier. _ visibly relieved owner. i feel much happier. as — visibly relieved owner. i feel much happier, as a mother. but visibly relieved owner. i feel much happier, as a m

not all of them. >> but, there is a percentage. >> that have walked away from the ethical understanding of who who and what they are in our society and community. thereby we have mario woods and, eric gardner and philander castillo. it is, it is wrong. >> you are speaking from experience. not a critic outsid. critic outside. that makes a difference. >> they are not happy, some of m of them are not happy. but, the truth is the light. they had to get back to ethics. >> the truth sets us free. >> mario woods,-6, 120 pounds, homeless with a penknife. and nine officers stop him? they all all shoot him? terrible. >> we are going to come back to brothers to brothers but i am glad we have this introduction about what you do and who you are. thank you for being with u. with us. please join us in our next segment. brothers to brothers. >> welcome back to mosaic. we have been speaking to reginald . reginald house. you have heard some of his great ground and ex. and experience. one of the reasons -- talk about brothers to brothers. >> brothers to brothers has been going on for 20+ years. it emanate

>> supervisors, i spoke at the ethic's commission. and i strategyly feel that the language in prop e is very clear. and at this commission iy stated with supervisor who was present day is muddying it is waters. i want to bring to your attention that the general manager of the san francisco public utility's commission provided one supervisor with talking points. i don't know why we are so interested in this type of behested model with a very, very convoluted language. i really cannot understand -- you think, even that we participate in public combhenlt. the supervisors [inaudible] and now you have 5 or 6 supervisos who are allowing the one supervisor in order to pass some behested language -- that is detriment to transparency. and accountability. thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> good morning. supervisors i'm lola cot a retired city employee and in an anticorruption status's group i'm speaking of one of 70 p.s. of san francisco voter who is supported prospect e and who's vote, i believe, meant we want the regulations on the

well known here in town in the ethics and public policy center. it's an essay he wrote in the book in 1991, defining piece and how to think about peace when confronting saddam hussein, and the disintegration of the cold piece of the cold war. i would like to reach you just a couple of excerpts from 1948. this is by martin white in an essay called church, russia, and the west. now martin white is really the father of modern international relations theory and what we call the english school. the primary way that we teach this in british universities, it's a very influential. his two textbooks which were published after his death are still bestsellers today in international relations theory. and he is writing in 1948 about the jumbo of international relations after 1945. the soviet union doesn't leave iran, they leave their troops in eastern europe. there is communist infiltration all around the world. there is now atomic weapons. china seems to be teetering. he lays this all out in the first pages of the chapter. and then he steps back and says, how

the senate or the house ethics committee has to approve it. it is somewhat time consuming. it can be quite expensive and perhaps not surprisingly, there's only been a very limited number of members of congressed including we just mentioned tom, he also went this route after he had run into some trouble. and othersth who have gone ahead and have taken this step. but the vast majority of members of congress owned. and so, the question of do members of congress have to play by a different set of rules than just average americans, they do. the stock act is a different set of rules that members of congress are subject to, and i should also note to some extent there are federal walls for congressional candidates that have to at least record annual financial transactions disclosures that some of them have as we have reported as well not been very good about disclosing in that application with really no penalty coming to bear as well. >> host: question on twitter's is why the constant reference to nancy pelosi, has speaker pelosi actually violated any law? >> guest: speaker pelosi,

she's an honorary research fellow in the defense studies department center for military ethics at kings college in london. thank you so much for joining us on the program. now we've seen impressive gains by the ukranian army in the last few days. so can we expect something similar in the near future? that is correct. we have seen some really impressive offensive capabilities in moore's so in the region of resume which of c, r keep all blessed. close to russia's border. however, we're still seeing some difficulties in the south. so essentially, the reason for the success. it was a surprise whose russian forces, as they have moved their troops to the south, expecting the so called her so on offensive. however, as a couldn't hold the ground to ins, noise, and the amount of ukrainian troops deployed was a nose and offensive was outnumbering. whatever was left there of the russian horses. so the best they could do was retreat to see men our right now the question is that was a tactical game, was a ukrainian military, however they need to hold at ground. and so it is too early to tell how's t

the acres emphasized that all the ingredients, the farm uses, are vegan and ethically sourced. in other words, they guarantee that no animal testing or child labor was involved in production. one of the key raw materials they use is mike, up and some of it comes from india. the acres handpicked their supplier in india. one who assured them that their micah only comes from minds that don't use child labor. but in that industry, it's often difficult to determine where the material originated with our suppliers . it's one supplier, that's often the manufacturer that also works directly with the mines that also does the audits of the mines and has them independently audited as well. and that is where we gained that confidence with meanwhile, coma, davy is glad if she receives a $150.00 rupees a day, a little under 2 euros. that's enough to buy some vegetables and rice. but for that, everyone has to pitch in order including her 7 and 8 year old daughter's work. oh, it's called finance on one, i'd really like to go to school. all. it's gone that we need money that they will have. we

was in monterey, shes reporting from her chief earlier marina myron from the center for military ethics at king's college in london, told us how ukraine was able to push back the russian troops in the north. they have seen some really impressive offensive capabilities in the north. so in the region of resume, which is see, argue all blessed are closed through rushes water. however, we're still seeing some difficulties in the south. so essentially, the reason for the success, it was a surprise whose russian forces, as they have moved their troops to the south, expecting the so called her so on offensive. however, as a couldn't hold the ground in the north. and the amount of ukrainian troops deployed was a nose and offensive was outnumbering whatever was left there of the russian horses . so the best they could do was retreat to save men. our right now the question is that was a tactical game, was a ukrainian military. however, they need to hold at ground, and so it is too early to tell how that will turn out. that being said, they definitely undermined roches plans in, in military tactic

the modern western world is taking shape in a new ethical reich with its ideology, new ethics of traditionaln regimes suppressed freedom of thought, new non-traditional totalitarianism has gone further and wants to control emotions. you can't say anymore. i don't like i don't like. i'm afraid. you have to correlate your emotions with public opinion and public values, thanks to a combination of circumstances. we found ourselves at the tail end of a crazy train rushing towards bosch's hell, where we will be met by multicultural genders. neutral lines. you just need to unhook this car , cross yourself and start building your world anew, building our good old europe, the europe of which we dreamed of, the europe that they lost, the europe of a healthy person. information channel on the program continues to broadcast first. time will tell, we are working live and we are transferred immediately to lugansk with us on a direct line, our permanent military expert andrey vitalyevich marochka. andrey vitalyevich hello, a word of events, a lot of things happening in your areas. hello ruslan, well, first

i have a song work ethic and a fire in my belly. i go all out all the time. that's who i am. i guess you could say i wear my heart on my sleeve and, uh, i didn't wear any sleeves. woman: shouldn't you be wearing a sleeveless shirt if you're gonna say that? darren: eh, no one will notice. woman: i guess it just seems like everyone on the show has, like, a theme. they do charities, or they're veterans, or they have some kind of sad or inspiring thing. i just-- darren: well, some guys have inspirinstories. i--don't have that, all right? i wasn't in the military or whatever. i wasn't adopted by wolves. woman: raised by wolves. darren: ok. the point is i have to take my essence, regular guy, and play that up. this is the one. i feel it. announcer: and welcome back to "american champion." we're coming at you live from l.a. with the semifinals. we've got 10 all-new obstacles and 6... woman: i'm gonna head to bed. i have work early in the morning. darren: you're not gonna watch? come on.ey. woman: good night. so how'd things ake up last night? darren: on the show? woman: mm-hmm. darr