the ethics committee's decision regarding mr. uzi khadim. our issue is the time of the ethics committee's entry . our issue is that if this committee wanted to issue a vote , it would have had the opportunity before this, or if it was much more professional, the assembly would have waited for the temporary dismissal. if iranat was at such a level that the ethics committee would come in at the same time, even the day after his re-appointment, the ethics committee could also come in and make the same decision. the members of the ethics committee of the federation should vote from the assembly. yes, the fifa statutes are now members judicial organs. they get their opinion from the congress, which means that they are actually assigned to the congress in a certain way. this helps the independence of the judicial organs in the federation. this is foreseen in the constitution of our federation, although it has not yet been implemented. in any case, the judicial organs have so much independence compared to the board of directors that it

according to the ethics committee's decision, yes , the person who was banned by the ethics committee is still in football. they are touching this in the daily newspaper. the person whom the ethics committee will find out from the moment the verdict is issued is possible. it is being implemented, so from that moment on, he will be removed from all football arenas based on what was voted, mr. az on the day the assembly was formed and they were invited to defend themselves by the assembly. he was faced with the fact that they are banned. when they were banned, they could no longer enter the assembly , because the assembly is a football institution, when it is a football institution, and the person who is banned from all football institutions, including futsal, soccer and beach soccer he should appear there to defend himself, that's why this happened legally. the statute was fully implemented in this regard and completely according to the statute. you say that it was in accordance with the statute and legal. let us hear mr. faradchiran's speech. that is the end of the final discussion. y

forward slash ethics live for public comment. members of the public may attend in person or may participate by phone or on the webex platform, as explained in our agenda document . mr. clerk, would you please explain how remote public comment will be handled? public comment will be available on each item on this agenda. each member of the public will be allowed three minutes to speak for those attending in person. opportunities to speak during the public comment period will be made available here in room 400, city hall for those attending remotely. public comment can also be provided via phone call by. calling 14156550001. access code is 26643680498, followed by a pound sign, then press pound again to join as an attendee. when your item of interest comes up, press star three to raise your hand to be added to the public. comment line. public comment is also available via the webex client application. use the webex link on the agenda to connect and press the raise hand button to be added to the public comment line for detailed inst

i mean, i can speak from the ethics commission side.legislation hasn't been introduced at the board, which it certainly could at any time, and we would engage with you, as we always do. but but i would like to hear your i mean, i understand it's supposed to have been adjusted for inflation over a period of time. and i think if you did that, i think the contribution would be around 8 or $900. an individual. so we'd just like to hear that. so if you're saying that we can do that and it's legislative and that's something that your office would support, i just want to hear what your thoughts are on it. i can't say that the office would support i can't speak for the five members of the commission. right. like the commission would vote on this. i could certainly we would study it. michael would study it, we would write reports to them, and ultimately it would be their decision whether or not the ethics commission supports it. i could tell you that i would engage with you in a wholesome way and, you know, study it, i can't say that we have a p

to expand ethics.he bill now, bret, is because i would lose jurisdiction. oversight committee has jurisdiction over the executive branch. we'll don't have jurisdiction over the legislative branch. there are opportunities once this bill makes it to the house floor to expand it to include other areas of our government which could include representative porter's bill. >> bret: okay. that's a possibility. i want to just mention. this because somehow quilting has become a unifying figure thing between the two of you. your mom, a big quilter taught people how to quilt. and representative porter, her mom also made a quilt together. featured in the quilter's hall of fame in paducah, kentucky. the national quilt museum is in congressman comer's district and there is a shared love of quilts. that's a unique common ground. >> that's true. we also were both ffa members and so when i went to mr. comer's office when he became chairman to talk about what i wanted the oversight committee to accomplish, i noticed two t

university has courses in quranic and hadith education, theoretical foundations of islam, islamic ethicslamic revolution, and history. and accepts islamic culture and civilization. candidates have the opportunity to register and get more information on the website of this university at maarif.ac.yar until the end of khordad. the university of islamic studies, affiliated to the representative body of the supreme leader in universities , is responsible for the education and training of professors of islamic studies courses in higher education centers. thank you for your support , dear viewers. have a nice day and god bless you. greetings and good time to you, dear viewers , thank you for being with khabar network , we are at your service with another special program. we are at the service of dr. niksad, deputy speaker of the 12th parliament, mr. dr. barash . hello and have a good time. and my condolences and thanks for accepting the trouble in the name of allah, the most merciful , the most merciful, mr. sanam, at the service of his highness, the honorable people of islamic iran, as well a

reform, and even if there's ethics reform, they're not losing their jobs.re does that put us going forward? >> no, i mean, they're not. they have the choice to decide how they comply with ethics, and other than, other than impeachment, which is a rather extreme remedy, there's nothing really that any other branch of the government can do about it. what's fascinating is what justice alito is talking about in today's decision about keeping the court out of what are essentially political decisions. he said the districting decisions are political decisions by political bodies and courts don't really have much of a role in it. yet, the problem obvious is the appearance of politics on the courts. the 6-3 decision today was broken down very clearly along party lines, if you want to look at it that way. the six justices appointed by republicans voted in the majority. the three appointed by democrats voted in the minority. and increasingly you see polls showing public sense that justices and judges in the lower courts are themselves partisan actors, not neutral arbi

judicial experts said that the flag was a clear violation of ethics rules which seeks to avoid even the appearance of bias and could sow doubt about the justices possible bias in cases related to the election. for his part, this is how samuel alito responded. he said "i had no involvement whatsoever in the flying of the flag. it was briefly placed by my wife in response to a neighbor's use of objectionable and personally insulting language on yard signs." of course, you probably noticed missing from that is any sort of denial that the flag was flown in solidarity with insurrectionist or any attempts by a sitting u.s. supreme court justice to disavow the insurrectionist lie that the 2020 election was stolen. this story is about much more than an inverted flag because we are still living in the shadow of the 2020 election and the violent insurrection that followed. this report is coming to light now and we are still waiting to see if donald trump will ever be held accountable for what he did. the threat the ex-president and his acolytes post our democracy is hardly in the past. from the s

so given his track record, given that he's campaigning on ethics, i expect him to be enthusiastic abouthe bell. >> what about mr. drain, the swamp? president trump, do you think he'll support it? i would be shocked if he wouldn't. >> i mean, this is this is part of draining the swamp. this has been an issue that both parties have complained about for the last three or four administration. they're both parties have accused the the other of conflicts of interests of potential ethics violations the truth of the matter. and one thing we've learned through our investigation, there are a lot of loopholes. there are a lot of gray areas, and this legislation is a sincere, credible evidence to try to define what exactly constitutes influence, peddling and prevent it from happening in the future. >> do you think that members of congress and members of the judiciary especially supreme court justices, should be held to the same standard. is that something that you might also consider well, there's definitely a number of ethics reforms, whether it's been in congressional stock trading. >> i support,

any situation where there might be an ethical question raised. and don't just comply with ethics rules, i go above and beyond. you can see the woman silting behind samuel alito in an aquamarine top with a ruffled collar. that is martha anne alito, the person who 18 years later is a at the center of justice alito's ethics scandal. two years ago the story broke the alito had a symbol of the january 6th insurrection flying over their home days after january 6th. justice alito responded by pointing their fingers at his wife. then another flag flying at justice alito's vacation home. alito did not immediately offer an explanation. now today justice alito has broken his silence on that second flag once again pointing to his wife and declaring he will not recuse himself from any january 6th related cases. in two letters to democrats in congress justice alito writes my wife is fond of flying flags, i am not. a reasonable person who is not motivated by political or ideological considerations or a desire to effect the outcome of supreme court cases would c

>> so, again, it's a rocky relationship based in large part on judge cannon's ethics.question now is either is she biased in favor of trump, or is she just incompetent in the sense that she doesn't run an orderly courtroom. this case was scheduled to go to trial on monday. the judge, oh, well, it's so complicated. there's all these like classified documents issues. other judges would have resolved these issues. she has hearings this week on things that other judges would just decide based on the records. i think that there are legitimate concerns. at the same time, probably not enough to get the judge ruled by an appellate court. when push comes to shove, she often decides motions in favor of the prosecution because she has to. that's what the law provides. >> i want to get your thoughts on that as well, paul callan, in addition to the fact that donald trump's legal team has to juggle these different cases. todd blanche is a lawyer representing him in at least three of the four criminal cases. what kind of challenge is that? >> well, it's an enormous challenge, and ima

did they violate ethics rules? our investigation is next. e to severe plaque psoriasis symptoms define me. emerge as you. with tremfya®, most people saw 90% clearer skin at 4 months and the majority stayed clearer, at 5 years. serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. emerge as you. emerge tremfyant®. ask you doctor about tremfya®. ( ♪♪ ) feeling ughh from a backed up gut? ughh. miralax works naturally with the water in your body to help you go. free your gut and your mood will follow. for 8 grams of fiber, try mirafiber gummies. when it comes to your wellness routine, the details are the difference. dove men body wash, with plant based moisturizers in harmony with our bodies for healthier feeling skin. all these details add up to something greater. new dove men plant powered body wash. >>> terrifying moments today aboard a jetliner skidding off a

apparently the code of ethics at the supreme court is just different. it works differently and it is not doing anything for public confidence in the supreme court which is at an all-time low. any decision they come out within the next month or so will be received in a way that justice kavanaugh described in the 1950s and 1960s. that is where we are at this point. >> is it reasonable? is it a reasonable ask for democrats to demand recusal from the january 6 cases? how common is it for justices to take themselves off the case? >> a currently it is not. we become so divisive in our country now more than ever. we have not really had to address this issue as much as we are now. and i think that democrats need. this is a need if they're listening to the public, for them to demand that there is more oversight and that there needs to be a strong code of ethics at the supreme court because they have the power to really change the landscape of the country legally and politically. they are about to decide very key issues in the next month or so. they have a job to

, with ethics while respecting ethics .we have reached haft news, but there is too much to talk about mr. amir abdullahian, the martyr of amir abdullahian. i would like to ask you to be with us for a few minutes after haft news, so we can talk more about this noble martyr. we will come back to see haft news. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. hello, good morning, body ayatollah raisi, the president's servant , was transferred to birjand airport. the funeral ceremony of the martyred president khadimreza will begin at 7:30 today in birjand, the capital of south khorasan province. the route of this ceremony starts from jhanbazan square and is at the intersection of army and pasdaran.

ethics council. thoroughly studied his biography and recognized him as unscrupulous. ethics council, which was engaged in the reform of the supreme council of justice, which, together with international experts, admitted that, more precisely, it did not give a recommendation on the criterion integrity, recognized the judge as unscrupulous in fact. the higher commission of judges at the qualification evaluation says: everything is great, great judge, you can continue to work until the end of your days, in the updated, reformed judicial system of ukraine. often higher qualification. the judges' mission turns a blind eye to judges' smearing of drunk drivers. themis officials use a common scheme of prolonging the case, and then simply closing it because the time limit has expired. this is a known evasion scheme to avoid responsibility for drunk driving, as a result, we have accidents, fatal, including, literally not so long ago, there was a story about an 18-year-old girl who was killed by a drunk scumbag, sorry for driving. which before that, six months before, the judge

there are no ethical standards.aw this exercise of them putting together some ethics plan as a joke. it is not enforceable. it has no teeth. it means nothing. what does this mean for justice roberts to have all of this happening with at least two members of the court who are egregiously flaunting finance roles and showing obvious political bias and sitting on cases and ruling on those cases with no apparent recourse? >> i'm glad you went to justice roberts. this is the roberts court. he has clearly shown that he has no capacity to lead the court. he is unwilling to hold his own justices accountable. he is unwilling to make sure that his court has legitimacy with the american people. we are at the lowest levels of trust ever in the highest court of the land. that is a stunning situation and it has tremendous implications for our democracy and the justice system and justice roberts is doing nothing about it . and i thought that he would be somebody who would have some skin in the game in terms of wanting to have legit

they are protecting the chaos and the ethical collapse of the supreme court. we are going to have to try to deal with this through elections and the assertion of popular power because we have a completely corrupt governing class going right up to the supreme court. >> okay, congress men jamie raskin, we have to talk about the chaos that erupted on thursday that you were in the middle of, as we saw in the opening at the house oversight and accountability, the markup on the resolution to hold attorney general merrick garland in contempt. let's watch another piece of it. watch this. >> do you know what we are here for, you know why we are here? >> out of order. >> us-1 talking about. >> i think your fake eyelashes are missing up. >> order. >> must determine. >> that is beneath even you. that is beneath even you. >> i have a point of order and i would like to move to take down marjorie taylor greene's words. that is absolutely unacceptable. how dare you attack the physical appearance of another person. >> are your feelings hurt? >> move her words down. >> girl, ba

but in the end, as all the judicial experts who follow this say, the point of these ethical codes, the things that apply to every federal judge is to avoid the appearance of impropriety or bias. if you are flying a flag with a big message doesn't help and flying a treason flag over your house on the inauguration of joe biden telegraphs the appearance of some bias, wouldn't you say? as congressional democrats have pointed out, there is someone in charge of policing those. that would be the chief justice of the court. john roberts. who crucially still has yet to say anything. so where is he hing. so where is he what is cirkul? cirkul is the fuel you need to take flight. cirkul is the energy that gets you to the next level. cirkul is what you hope for when life tosses lemons your way. cirkul, available at walmart and drinkcirkul.com. hi, i'm jason. i've lost 228 pounds on golo. ♪ changing your habits is the only way that gets you to lose the weight. and golo is the plan that's going to help you do that. just take the first step, go to golo.com. >>> today, we finally heard from supreme cou

they are protecting the chaos and ethical collapse of the supreme court. we are going to try to have to deal with this through elections and assertion of popular power because we have a completely corrupt governing class going right up to the supreme court. >> we have to talk about the chaos that erupted on thursday that you were smack in the middle of as we saw in the opening at the house oversight and accountability committee markup on the resolution to hold in contempt. let's watch another piece. >> do you know what we are here for? >> i don't think you know what you're here for. i think your fake eyelashes are messing up. >> called on. >> order. order. order. >> i do have a point of order and i would like to move to take down the screen's words. that is absolutely an expectable. how dare you attack the physical appearance of another person. move her words down. girl, baby girl. don't even play. >> okay, for folks who don't know when you hear a woman of color proceed anything with baby girl you better run. congressman raskin, you said in that clip that'

this violates every notion of judicial ethics prosecutorial ethics, legal ethics generally, federal jurisdictionet's talk about this case in manhattan. and it went to say this to perhaps a fiv the five supreme t justices you may have an open mind you had judge kagan, judge jackson the three left-wing musketeers who all came up with these horrendous hypothetical examples. what if we allow immunity for a former president, what will happen? what if he sends off nuclear bombs wha would be a seal team x we do not need hypotheticals. we have a reality that is taking place right now in the united states of america. an eight manhattan courtroom were a state judge who was conflicted, his family is conflicted he is not over his head he is a hack a state sanction district attorney prosecutor who is eight radical leftists. we have a case for the crimes are not known the witnesses are hidden. you have witnesses testifying with collateral evidence to character assassinate the defendant. we have a judge who gags the defendant not because the defendant is dangerous he doesn't want the defendant criticizing was

she's 18 years later at the center of justice alito's current ethics scandal.he alitos had an upside down american flag a symbol of the january 6th insurrection, flying over their home in the days after january 6th. justice alito responded by pointing the finger at his wife, martha anne, saying she flew the flag as part of a dispute with neighbors. then "the new york times" found another flag flying at his vacation home. alito did not immediately offer an explanation. now today justice alito has broken his silence on that second flag once again pointing to his wife and declaring that he will not recuse himself from any january 6th-related cases. in two letters to democrats in congress, justice alito writes, my wife is fond of flying flags. i am not. a reasonable person who is not motivated by political or eid logical considerations or a desire to affect the outcome of supreme court cases would conclude that this i event does not meet the applicable standard for recusal. it should be noted here that many reasonable people, including ethics experts and a sitting

your committee has been investigating ethical concerns of the court.irman durbin wants alito to recuse himself from 2020 and january 6 cases. do you agree? >> yes. >> is there movement on the committee? >> we have to do more to make it clear to the american people that we see this repeated public expression of a political opinion at the home of a sitting supreme court justice as completely inappropriate. i think what we should do is to put on the floor of the senate the supreme court ethics and recusal act and make the members of the senate vote so the public is clear where we stand on this. i have encouraged our chairman to do more on the committee to hold a hearing, to press the chief justice for an answer. this has been a long and difficult few years for the supreme court for their ethical standards. i think it's unfortunate that the justice chose to blame this on his wife. at the end of the day, plys cal displays at the hopes of federal judges and justices are simply not appropriate. >> you won't get -- do you think you can get a majority of votes

the ethics council thoroughly studied his biography and found him unscrupulous.thical council, which was involved in the reform of the supreme council of justice, which, together with international experts, admitted that, more precisely , it did not give a recommendation on the criterion of integrity, and in fact, the judge was recognized as unscrupulous. higher kolyvkom commission of judges on qualification assessment says. everything is great, great judge, you can continue to work until the end of your days, in the updated, reformed judicial system of ukraine. often, the higher qualification commission of judges turns a blind eye to the judges' removal of drunken drivers. the servants of themis use a common scheme of prolonging the term of consideration of a case, and then simply closing it because the terms have expired. this is a well-known evasion scheme to avoid responsibility for drunk driving. as a result we have there were accidents, including fatal ones, literally not so long ago a story about an 18-year-old girl who was killed by a drunk pokidyok, sorr

the ethics council thoroughly studied his biography and recognized as unscrupulous.ical council, which was engaged in the reform of the higher education. you are a justice who, together with international experts, admitted that, more precisely, she did not give a recommendation on the criterion of integrity, she recognized as unscrupulous in fact, the judge, the higher commission of judges at the qualification evaluation says: everything is great, great judge, you can continue to work until the end of your days, in updated, reformed judicial system of ukraine. often, the higher qualification commission of judges turns a blind eye to the judges' removal of drunken drivers. servants of themis use. extended scheme with by prolonging the term of consideration of the case, and then they simply close it due to the expiration of the terms. this is a well-known evasion scheme to avoid responsibility for drunk driving, the result is accidents, fatal, including literally not so long ago there was a story about an 18-year-old girl who was killed by a drunken scumbag, sorry, beh

i think he is as competitive, _ starmer's work ethic?ompetitive, anyone who i starmer's work ethic? i think he is as competitive, anyone who has . as competitive, anyone who has played football that would know how competitive he is. kate doesn't need to do somersaults to prove he is fit for office. this is no drama starmer he is not going to get involved. he's a fit man, he plays football, he is absolutely relentless and from what i understand, he's really enjoying his campaign so far and the chance to find a get out and do it. rather than around. nearly six weeks ago, tom baldwin and he will speak again but was thank you very much for your time today.— let's turn to the israel—gaza war and there's growing international condemnation of an air strike near rafah, in which palestinian officials say at least 45 people, including women and children, were killed at a refugee camp. israel's top military prosecutor has described the strike as very grave and says an investigation has been launched. the israeli army said its forces targeted a hama

committee of the football federation, a vote was issued by the ethics committee saying that he cannot work in football, and based on this vote, the possibility of his presence, which he should have been present according to the statutes, and he should have defended himself in the assembly. he was deciding on the temporary dismissal based on the ethics committee's decision , we took this possibility from him. this is actually the place where the discussion is compared with the spirit of the statute. some believe that all these cases have been approved by the representative of the asian football confederation. the presence of afc representatives in the assembly necessarily means that everything it was right in the assembly. not everything we did was right. he has a specific mission , he comes to the assembly, he supervises the elections , he approves the elections, and as we can see , we are now with afc about who is the president of the federation. mehdi taj will be the president of the football federation until march of this year. mustafa gohari , sed and sima news agency, see a repor

or office fundraisers), adopted by the ethics commission on april 12, 2024.les committee). >> supervisor ronen colleagues thank you. i'm the one that called for this motion to veto those resolutions and a hearing at rules. last week or this week? last week. >> the times lead into another - when this if you look at the plain language of those rules that was confusing because crossed reference another log that looks like for the first time that forever in san francisco that we were going to consider people holding a house party in their living room a contribution the pro-rated rates of a living room anyone is owned or rented by a business and providing for the first time would be subject to a campaign contribution that was really worrisome to me. um, as you can see there is millions of dollars being thrown into local raise races and oftentimes this money comes from bill narrows hide behind expenditures and acquit all of the the, you know, unfortunate rules created by the citizens united to buy candidates in observation. one way that candidates still represent t

it may not be ethical to tell us privately now. i will say it here.aid that we are waiting for mr. tash's order. nothing has happened in the last two months, mr. jalili. well, right now in the confederation. there are those names that you mentioned as a suggestion of the technical committee of their meetings. it has been confirmed and the administrative process for introduction is being done. it has reached the 3000th presidency and in the process of issuing the order , it is in the service of the secretary general of the federation, god willing. when they return from the meeting in which they are currently present, these names i will make a joke with you, caesar, you were our colleague in seda and vesima, we are in seda and vesima, which is so big, just a little bit of work for the federation of four passes, sir, let it be signed quickly , the problem is, of course, the bureaucratic processes that also exist in seda and vesima. spaces are usually dynamic , john, but sooner than that, thank you very much , dear mr. ali, for the communication that you

>> the messaging right now, we should enact an enforceable code of ethics. alito and thomas, who are involved in one way or another, at least in the appearance in the stop the steal movement should recuse himself for all cases involving january 6 involving donald trump. you have the immunity case where they both should recuse themselves. they should have recuse themselves on the colorado 14th amendment case, but they didn't. i think it is also very interesting that they turned around the colorado case to the advantage of donald trump very quickly, whereas the immunity case which should be an open and shut case, they refused, special prosecutor smith's request that they skip the court of appeals and then when they did take it up, instead of doing it quickly come the scheduled arguments for the last day of the argument term, april 25 and they will probably knock together a ruling for the end of june and beginning of july and and from the questions the justices were asking, it should be an open and shut case. if the president of the united states -- they seem t

now fifa itself and fifa's ethics committee have actually dealt with it . here, exactly the same regulation does not make much difference. fifa insists that interference in football did not happen in the management of football. there is no obstacle to applying the penal regulations of countries, mr. hosni, only for 30 seconds. that fifa has a clause in its code of ethics that if something happens, it is liable to be charged it happened that they were suspended, is this true or not? yes. in the fifa regulations, we have a monitoring committee and we have an emphatic emphasis on the president of the federation and on the federations and confederations that the candidates must not have a criminal background and even went further saying that they must have a good reputation, that is they should not be accused or defamed because fifa should always emphasize on the health of football and on football being a means of happiness and health. thank you very much, mr. raisi kia. football legal expert. i beg your service lt is. afc's support for palestine and the propos

we should investigate justice thomas's violations of basic standards of ethics. i think that justice alito has committed very similar actions and his latest is one more that cries out for accountability. remember, the supreme court consists of nine members of the judicial branch that is seemingly above the law. the highest court in the land has the lowest or no real enforceable standards of ethics. the only way to hold them accountable is to have a hearing in the judiciary. it is the judiciary committee i will be doing it. >> anyone that cares about democracy ought to care about this institution. i appreciate and understand that this can seem a little esoteric to some folks in the context of the decisions that the court is going to be making in just the next few weeks and months. can you explain to american voters why this matters? >> why it matters, the united states is slow walking a decision that is critical to the prosecution of donald trump in federal court. second, it will soon decide cases that are critical legally to the key questions and stake in the pro

and mr. trump also throughout his entire career, wasn't very interested in ethics. he always wanted to see when he could get away with. and he's always gotten away with a great deal. and even now, as we see in these 2 other federal trials have been delayed and delayed in the late . and that is really not the same justice that, that other people get. and if you're not a wealthy defendant, you would definitely been convicted by now in that florida case. florida is known for running a very quick docket, but i lean cannon down there and the documents case has deleted repeatedly, clearly for trump's benefit. so he has benefit it, he's, he's far from being the victim. he is the person who has benefited the most in american society and today it stopped and he was held accountable. and that's going to be a great day. whatever else happens, even if he were to it and he's going to be running as a convicted felon, and that's not going away. really just if i know you have to run, but just before i let you go, i wanted your thoughts on one thing that donald trump said that caugh

he said, "the court is in an ethical crisis of its own making ." he calls for congress to pass a bill for ethical conduct. how serious is this? >> i think it is absolutely serious. when we look at their numbers, approval ratings, what we think about the way in which the american public, american public opinion had a deep sense of doubt and skepticism about the court. look, we are facing a legitimacy crisis across three branches of government. we just talked about the house of her percentages, the congress . lowest approval ratings in its history almost, right? we already know what has happened with the presidency. the executive branch. we are facing the first time a president has ever been hauled into court in the way donald trump has been hauled into court. now we see this in relation to the highest court in the land, the supreme court. it gives us a sense, a window into the crisis our democracy fixes. we also know that samuel alito and clarence thomas, they don't care. they are sitting in their positions not with any regard for the standing of th

isn't it in republicans' interest to want to rehabilitate the court's recent ethics problems? >> it's a good question. i don't think it's in their interests at all. i think that this is part of a much larger project of discrediting institutions, discrediting, you know, federal prosecutors and the trump immunity case, discrediting government agencies. i mean, this is all of a piece, and so even though you would think, right, that it would be in republican senators and congress people's interests to prop up the authority of a court that has no army and no budget and no person, no sword, but i think it's part of a larger sort of seeding of the notion that there really is no law anymore, everything's corrupt, you know, so flying a maga flag or a stop the steal flag, there's no rules anymore, and i think that is very much in keeping with the way donald trump views the world and the way, you know, he's going to create a world if he wins in november. >> if the situation were reversed, if a liberal justice had flown say a blm flag, you can imagine the republican outrage over that. joy

the supreme court has no code of ethics.gues who have just appeared saying it's harassment or trivial, ought to be supporting a code of ethics. they also should be supporting an effort to have justice alito offer an explanation. he owes it to the congress and the american people to explain whether he had anything to do or any knowledge about these flags which are political statements in support of trump. and the insurrection and clearly require that he recuse himself. that is step aside in any judgments of the supreme court involving donald trump or the insurrection. justice alito is proving himself to be unfit for the supreme court. >> as i mentioned, senator, justice alito blamed the first flag on his wife, the second one, some republicans have pointed out there's no problem because it was george washington's flag. in fact, speaker mike johnson currently has that flag displayed outside of his office. so what do you say to that argument? >> i think that argument is blatantly disingenuous. any photographs of the insurrection

the main thing is that fifa has a clause in its code of ethics that if there is a suspicious accusation , they will be suspended. or not ? yes, in the fifa regulations, we have a supervisory committee, and we have certain emphases regarding the presidency of the federation and the presidency of fifa. about the federation and the confederations state that candidates must not have a criminal record and even go further and say that they must be of good reputation, that is , they must not be accused or defamed, because it is important for the health of football and for football to be a means of happiness and health. fifa has always emphasized. thank you very much, mr. raisi, who is a football legal expert. please, good luck with your service . saud saud sepahan gol gohar aluminum football cup and eliminating the tractor at home. the quarter-final games of this competition were held today, during which arak aluminum won the league one team with a single goal in the 119th minute by reza jubireh. chadorremeloi defeated ardakan and benefited niman in the final. he was not defeated the second ti

louis and specializes in government ethics.nks for being with us especially as you are traveling. kathleen: thank you. geoff: the new york times reported there was this upside down american flag displayed at alito's virginia home in the days before president biden's inauguration and in the letter that he issued today, the justice said he had nothing whatsoever to do with the flag, he was not aware of it. when he became aware of it, he asked his wife to take it down but she refused for several days and he says, "my wife and i own our virginia home jointly. she has the legal right to use the property as she sees fit." is that an adequate explanation from an ethics perspective? kathleen: no, it is not. justice alito is accurate in saying that his wife has a legal right to display a flag in front of the house that she co-owns with him. no one is questioning her legal rights. the issue is whether he needs to recuse once it has become clear that his, you know, this flag associated with the january 6 insurrection was displayed in fron