giving the uka expanding in europe ijust giving the uk a wide berth at the moment.g? of course. we have already seen decisions to relocate or shut down factories, relocate them elsewhere. many, many businesses are put in place contingency plans are moved to staff and officers overseas. that has already happened to a large degree. the other thing is the damage to the political process is palpable. gnabry has any faith in politicians anymore. all rise, ann francke, thank you for coming —— nobody has any. thank you for coming in and giving us your take on all of this. we will have more on that in oui’ this. we will have more on that in our news briefing. let's go to the us now where the crisis facing planemaker boeing is deepening. it has grounded its entire global fleet of 737 max aircraft — 371 planes — after investigators uncovered new evidence at the scene of sunday's ethiopian airlines crash— which killed 157 people. it was the second fatal accident involving the jet in five months — after a lion air 737 max crashed in indonesia in october, claiming 189 lives. sam

forgive me, ijust wonder whether you are reading europe in the right way.emmanuel macron, he came away from the last summit and he said this, "in the case of anno0ther negative vote on theresa may's deal, we will be going to no deal", he said. we all know that. it is absolutely essential to be clear because it is a matter of good functioning of the eu. we cannot have what i would call an excessive new extension. perfectly reasonable position for him to take up before one of the councils. what the last council agreed was if teresa's deal is rejected again — i do not think it is likely to be brought back before the house of commons — but if it is rejected again, then we go back before may, with an arrangement which we suggest what would they do, she could go back and sue for an extension and say let us start on an outline of where we're going and, of course, eventually, you have to expect the withdrawal agreement and see where you're going, i cannot see how anyone maintains the slightest direction to the little agreement, which is quite harmless. you say you

ijust want to come back to what you were saying about no—deal. i spoke to some in europewould be no—deal unless the commons votes for her dealm she can get her deal through, she will push for no—deal and i asked the question that if we end up, and lam quite the question that if we end up, and i am quite prepared to move to revoke motion if we are looking at no—deal as the option that is in front of us, i think we have got a responsibility to stop that because it is so damaging. to see a prime minister that seems to be prepared to do that, ijust find quite shocking, reprehensible, to be honest, because at the end of the day, the government was economic analysis published by the treasury la st analysis published by the treasury last november talks about a potential cost to the economy of 10% of gdp. that is five times the impact of the financial crisis. that is quite a statistic. even if that doesn't prove to be correct, we know that there is going to be a substantial hit to the economy. what is the prime minister doing? because of ideology, because of what is happening in

rotterdam is europe is like a biggest port, it doesn't stop here. if ijustto give us an idea of the challenges involved so that they can help. the dutch government has invested a huge amount in making sure that they are ready. yes, fascinating to see all that. compliment to our cameraman. isn't it amazing that we can broadcast from a life, moving ship in a busy port like rotterdam ? from a life, moving ship in a busy port like rotterdam? anna, thank you. we are waiting for the press conferences that were meant to be at 12 o'clock. the whole agenda has been pushed back. they have turned to discussing european union's a relationship with china. there is a row going on with the european union and the italians. they are signing a deal with the chinese on a road project and infrastructure in italy and they are one of the only european country to do that. meanwhile, the french and german side are pushing for the chinese to be locked out of some of the public procurements. you've got two approaches to china, and maybe that argument is going on around the table, som

europe. here is the guardian‘s brussels correspondent quoting mark. she said voting for no deal is like the titanic ready for the iceberg. most of a dutch think tank that said ijustg because sometimes a perception that europeans are put up with anything to have the hope that brexit may not happen. clearly not the case for all of them. this also came up in the european parliament. are you willing to pay that price i asked the brexiteers in this side? are you willing to pay that price? sacrifice all of those jobs willing to pay that price? sacrifice all of thosejobs for your willing to pay that price? sacrifice all of those jobs for your pipe dream of so—called sovereignty? what is that sovereignty going to bring to you if you live that pipe dream? just to remind you if you are just joining us earlier. a tumultuous hour and house of commons were first of all mp5 voted in support of an amendment that rolled out a no—deal brexit on any given day but stronger language from the other movement. extra new situation of the government withing its mp5 to vote against the motion it introduced in the government lost because mp5 then supported the motion which does seek to rul