to the public so we've got three main issues the first is under article ten of the european convention on human rights the second issue we have is about editorial freedoms for broadcasters to report responsibly and lastly why on earth would we show such brutal horrific killings because it's exactly what terrorists and exactly what the far right who want to demonize muslims foreigners immigrants migrants that's exactly what they want to do we cannot play into their hands. right here. where. most of the responsibility of broad causes no when you have a a national broadcaster they have to be sensitive to the local population and the current events that are affecting the local population and so the rise of the right wing and what have you so little room decisions are made. from a difference review point in the sharing of something that is quite that horrific is certainly not something you'd want to see thrust upon you without any sort of warning but also the mainstream media doesn't cover these things in more graphic detail means that the content stays online and organizations like i.a.s. can cloak. these

she doesn't make a point look if you want to talk about article ten one of the european convention on human rights which is the right to free expression article tend to put limits on freedom of expression right under certain areas now if you will have a better integrated more tolerant civilised society we do put limitations on free speech or hate speech isn't free speech but the irony is this in denmark you've been trying to detach yourself from the european convention on human rights and it's a problem that europe ears a problem with this and the rest of europe has a problem because that enshrines your civil rights denmark is going hard right and the far are using these opportunities to explore we mrs. fractions in society with a trying to cause division they're trying to divide denmark into those who want to integrate those who don't for immigrants to white lawns danish people and this kind of supremacy this kind of or steer this this kind of inequality in society is taking us down the wrong road if we want to have civilizational freedoms tolerance if you want to have some kind of peace that we

european union to bosnia-herzegovina some observers believe croatia is violating the european convention on human rights. the serious issue is that the personal circumstances the individual circumstances of those affected are not being taken into account and put on before example it could be that a person is especially vulnerable and they get into a situation in bosnia where basic rights like even the right to life or the ban on torture would be violated in mass deportations are illegal under you law the videos allegedly show croatian officials escorting migrants back to bosnia. after a short while the same officials return alone. commenting on the videos the croatian interior ministry has denied that the deportations are legal but rather cause them refusals of entry which don't break european law. like to welcome now mr vinson healthy he's the director of the german office of human rights to explore some of the issues that have come to light a very warm welcome sir the creation stories we just heard there saying we are just preventing people from making an authorized entry into our country do they have

mean theresa may have just been found in breach of articulate of the year and prevent european convention on human rights of a mass of valence it's not made such a big deal of in the elite me here over there here having worked with the media being and having been a part of the media for most of my adult life i was a freelancer having been the subject of media coverage it's increasingly my belief is that a lot of this is structural a lot of it has to deal to go in the us in the us media culture with really a moral and just sort of vapid mentality that a great number of editors and producers and writers have is and even good journalists even journalists who really care about these issues they face challenges they have to have a newspaper they have to have some advance and even when that event comes you know it's reported on in a few publications well that doesn't really take doesn't doesn't really cause any any long term pressure on these institutions in the first place so unless there are sustained attention of the sort that would also rounds out other issues that brown's other important things without th

blind it applies to everybody and at the end of the day this person is subject to the european convention on human rights since really was drafted by a british home secretary said david thanks for the five and our school three is very very clear it is an absolute prohibition on sending anybody whatever they've done back to a situation in which they may face in humor or degrading treatment or torture this man has put himself in harm's way by pretending to be a christian which she apparently according to the reports seems not to be for what they have said i don't have it all it wasn't by the say he wasn't. he was just pretending to be a christian or to state so he said things that put him in harm's way as regards iraq. but quite frankly even so i do i do not think we should be keeping repress this country whatever you know just because they're the they may come to some harm home i don't see why we should we should keep them in this country i think the law needs to be changed if we start discriminating against people for reasons of their faith or their sexual propensity or whatever then we are on very serio

european constitutional courts the sort of fundamentallal charter of rights that we have. newsouth african constitution has, in fact, a and whenof that britain agreed to come into the ofopean union for purposes the european convention on human rights that was what was the britishore judges could say this act of -- the full european court could do had to go back to the british parliament. tried. have everybody can propose lots of fixes. you have other ones. have, you know -- mine are more rooted in the judicial branch because that's where i agree to somei extent that there are lots of sayps of people i would that the difference between thurgood marshall was doing with the naacp, it was those lawsto get had thethe people who votes in those situations. had no alternative, but to court. and so i would say some of the most important things are who's giving the right to vote, who's challenging it, who's keeping people from voting? and that's i think worthy of a huge other discussion and i only to judgesit to decide that. briefly going back for a moment, as you know, madison writes to spencer roan after the decision saying that if they had known in 1787 that written,ion would be there would have been no constitution. he obviously

applying is a british act of parliament which had got to the european convention but you are not only in the european you eleven on human rights act if we start discriminating against people for reasons of their faith or their sexual propensity or whatever then we are on very serious crimes britain should be setting an example around the world of actually maintaining the rights of individuals and once we start slipping from that we fall into the error of many other countries which are far less liberal and that's a very serious decline in civilization now those countries those sovereign nations beat their own decisions and i don't think it's for you to tell them what to do i deplore what they're very but it's their decision now as regards a criminal who comes here and commits a heinous crime of rape quite frankly he has no right to stay in this country and should be removed and we should make it very clear and i would remove us from that particular act so that we can make our own decisions about keeping people in the country or having them removed for as i'm concerned once he'd serve to sectors which he didn't serve by the way