and those guaranteed by the european courtker. does the prime minister agree with me that no reasonable person could oppose what she‘s proposed, the only people who do never wanted us to leave in the first place, and the idea that a foreign court should rule on the rights of people living here is akin to the outdated colonial approach taken to the outdated colonial approach ta ken towards to the outdated colonial approach taken towards china in the unequal treaties of the 19th century. well, i always bow to my right honourable friend's historical knowledge and references he makes, but i think the point is a clear one — what we want to see when we leave the european union is that citizens here in the uk have their rights guaranteed by uk courts and enforced by uk courts. the honourable gentleman was present himself at the signing of the said treaties, we don‘t know, but we‘ll leave it to speculation. did the prime minister have an opportunity to speak with the president of cyprus and express support for the settlement talks bet

i know there is an idea could be the european court of justice, know there is an idea could be the europeandea. because it could be the european court ofjustice still has some sort ofjurisdiction in this country for decades, generations to come, potentially. absolutely, and this is where there is something in the dialogue of the death, because the eu set out its stall over a month ago and said very clearly that in respect of eu nationals in the uk, and uk nationals in the uk, and uk nationals in the eu, those rights would have to be enforced by the european court of justice would have to be enforced by the european court ofjustice throughout the lifetime of the eu citizen. and if that applies to babies who are born to eu migrants in 2019, life expectancy of 9100 years, european court ofjustice would have jurisdiction the entire time, but thatis jurisdiction the entire time, but that is unacceptable to the uk. the uk is talking about another court or enforcement body. but the crucial thing the eu will want is that there has got to be an easy access to the courts, and the uk would say, well,

the thing is, a couple years ago, russia's constitutional court decided that rulings from the european court of human rights would not be binding. that was reviewed last or by the head of the president of the constitutional court. in exceptional circumstances only will the rulings of the court not be accepted by the russian government. and the kremlin. when the claimants say this is a large rectory for lgbt people in russia, if they did after the ruling was announced, they may be right, but only on a moral level. they were aborted 50,000 euros -- awarded 50,000 euros for bringing in the case of a couple years ago, but really what this is for the kremlin is an embarrassment on the international stage. the kremlin is sensitive to how it is viewed in europe, a member of the council of europe, which the council on human rights and deals with. for the kremlin, that is the extent of it. they say they will appeal in the next three months. that is what the justice ministry said. they are arguing on the ground that they are protecting children, that this gay propaganda law, as it is termed, has been

they were blocked in the european court. are working, they are taking the right upon themselves to force those companies to move to the continent. how likely is that? well. they say it is an exceptional circumstance, but what they are basically saying is, they will insist these companies are regulated by them, even though they are based in london, they want the regulated by authorities in the rest of the eu. in exceptional circumstances, if they think those companies are so important that there is a systemic risk to the euro if they are not in the eurozone, they will insist on a moving. they do not say they will do that, but they are basically taking the power to do that. that is a big threat to the city. the city is the biggest financial centre in europe. it employs hundreds of thousands of people. clearing is only one small pa rt people. clearing is only one small part of that business but the city is worried that brexit means it is dominance —— its dominance in europe is under threat as places like frankfurt and paris tri

ofjustice. our courts and not the european court of justice. and streamline the process to make it easy for eu citizens to secure the rights after brexit. the home office will have to set upa brexit. the home office will have to set up a new system, potentially dealing with millions of applications. a huge challenge and officials hope it will be up and running by next year. before that, there will be tough talks. the eu‘s brexit negotiator has already called for more ambition, clarity and guarantees from the uk. so how have theresa may‘s words gone down with eu nationals living here and with brits living in the eu? our correspondentjeremy cooke has been finding out. singing ina quiet singing in a quiet corner of london, german voices raised in song. many of the singers have been here for decades, and the government announcement todayis and the government announcement today is meant to offer them reassurance. it could just change any time, that is my feeling. so much insecurity. it is certainly the fa ct we much insecurity. it is certainly the f

of justice. jurisdiction of the european court ofjustice. —— jurisdiction of the european courton of the european court ofjustice. —— not prepared. we want to govern our ofjustice. —— not prepared. we want to govern oui’ own ofjustice. —— not prepared. we want to govern our own affairs and take control, and that is brexit. you can call it hard, you can call it soft, you can call it hard baked ash macca fake, at brexit is brexit. —— you can call it hard baked, at brexit is brexit. so we should get to the table. we have sent out the first position paper of the european union. let's be clear. we are ready to negotiate, and we are ready to negotiate any type of deal that the united kingdom wants. we have received a letter that says we want to divorce. if one of the partners says they want to divorce, well, thatis says they want to divorce, well, that is something that we should accept. now, what is a problem today is that we get a letter saying we wa nt to is that we get a letter saying we want to divorce and that the same time we hear that actually we want to remarry, because we wa

of justice arbitrator instead of having the european court ofjustice involved. n with the european commission, that wants to have the european court of justice involved. this other key issue around eu citizens. labour has criticised theresa may's, the other day, where she was talking about the plans for eu citizens, that basically you would have to be here five years in order to qualify for the government is talking about in terms of getting those equal rights to british citizens, but the reality is, as david davis said today, those people would not be allowed to vote. there certainly seems to be a disparity between what european citizens living here and british citizens living here and british citizens would actually get. david davis making the point today that as far as he is concerned, those european citizens would not be second—class citizens here in britain. we have said explicitly will not be any earlier than the triggering of article 50, because i think that is fair. you could have said june 23 last year when the referendum decision was taken, but there we

they are seeking the help of the european court of human rights. ey confirmed previous court that may be right decision. now it is being taken outside of ourjurisdiction to strasbourg and is focusing on the human rights of the parties to see whether there is any legal argument that can be made to allow charlie's pa rents to that can be made to allow charlie's parents to take him over to the us for the treatment they want him to have. explain if you can, this is such a difficult case. what are they considering? the human rights of charlie? everyone has human rights. we are all protected by the european convention on human rights within our jurisdiction. convention on human rights within ourjurisdiction. that is what can apply to both charlie and the pa rents. apply to both charlie and the parents. what is likely to be looked at isa parents. what is likely to be looked at is a right to private and family life. what is difficult is the pa rents life. what is difficult is the parents have that bright and so does charlie. —— right. the court has to balan

which is that if we remain under the european court's jurisdiction, if we are subject to free movementct to laws and regulations made in brussels, in what way will we have left the european union? well, for example, over the last 20 years, nigel farage and others have toured the country telling us, "let's be more like norway." what are norway? in the single market, out of the european union. all i am saying to you... norway is subject to free movement — it's subject, in effect, to the european court. all i'm saying to you is that different options are available. all right. and the prime minister has made that extreme choice, and here's why it does matter — i want to just get to this point, because you asked me why this matters. let's go back to 2001, during another general election, during the foot—and—mouth crisis. now, you will remember that the french could not exclude british exports of beef and lamb to france quickly enough because they had the excuse of that disease. they will not wait a second to bring in similar tariffs and barriers if we're outside the single market. and that

the eu wants the european court ofjustice involved, the uk doesn't.versight be part of a compromise? and then there's the future status of the border between northern ireland and the republic — which after brexit will also be a land border between the eu and the uk. how do you keep the border as open as it is now, but have some sort of customs checks carried out? the hope is that enough progress will have been made on these issues by about october, to start talking then about the future economic relationship with the uk. the government's position is still — we leave the single market, we leave the customs union, and we end free movement of people from the eu. but has the election changed the calculation? the general election result was not what i or any conservative would have wanted. but during the course of the general election, with the conservatives and labour, we argued that we should leave the european union and no longer be subject to what is called the single market, effectively the jurisdiction of the european court of human justice. so let's

now by a majority verdict, the european court has done the same. eticulous and thorough and supported their view that it was most likely charlie was being exposed to continued pain, suffering and distress. and that undergoing experimental treatment with no prospects of success would offer no benefit. there is now a question of what will happen to the £1.3 million that charlie's parents crowdfunded through 83,000 donations. so why has every court and every medical experts decided that ending charlie's life is in his best interests? it was said by the courts today that he is likely to be suffering and if any treatment were to continue or he was taken to the us for experimental treatment, there is going to be a very limited benefit and he is going to be at risk of suffering significant harm. great ormand street says there is no rush to change charlie's care and their priority is to support his parents at this distressing time, but at some point in the near future, medical staff on the intensive care unit will switch off the mechanical ventilator that k

of justice market and give any leeway for the european court ofjustice will trigger an overnights this? is thisjournalism? actually, it is pure comment. what it is, i‘m sorry, not being a card—carrying tory myself, this is a thoroughly divided party. i know that your party, rachel, is looking at the story that the big companies the observer is looking at that don‘t wa nt observer is looking at that don‘t want this hard brexit. the eu citizens living here, largely living and working in london, there are trading restrictions, financial services passport in, all of that. the unifying factor, both with the eurosceptic and people within the conservative party and with business, is that they want theresa may to listen. she hasn't been very good at that. she has her advisers should listens to but she keeps her cards close to her chest. whoever they are. they ask clearly still having an effect of her. it is that mentality of battling down the hatches —— battening down the hatches. they need negotiation with the rest of europe, you need somebody who is listening to concerns. people that c

applies to babies who are born to eu migrants in 2019, with a life expectancy of 99 or 100 years, european courtable to the uk. the uk is talking about another court or enforcement body. but the crucial thing the eu will want is that there has got to be an easy access to the courts, and the uk would say, well, actually, there is nothing to stop eu nationals going to the british courts or the british courts, which are independent, and they will enforce the right. but even still, the eu will say, we still need to have overview and the overview being done by the european court ofjustice in luxembourg and the european commission in brussels. thank you, professor catherine barnard, at cambridge university, an expert on the european union. the stakes in the diplomatic stand off between saudi arabia and its allies and neighbouring qatar have risen dramatically. the saudis backed by bahrain, the uae and egypt have issued a list of 13 demands they say qatar must meet within the next ten days. this includes closing the broadcaster aljazeera, closing a turkish military base, and ending support for the musl

citizens living here in the uk, we believe that should be done through our courts and not the european courtn court ofjustice. theresa may is promising a smooth and streamlined process to make it as easy as possible is for citizens to secure their rights after breakfast. they will have to set up a whole new system, potentially dealing with leaves of applications will stop a huge challenge. —— after racks that. —— brexit. the eu‘s brexit negotiator has already called for more ambition, clarity and guarantees from the uk. that‘s it from me tonight. now it‘s time for newsnight. tonight, we reveal how the organisations who we trust to maintain standards in the construction industry have been making them weaker. the reason why so making them weaker. the reason why so many high—rises have failed to pass safety checks if they have been writing wills for themselves. is that a

the answer now lies with the european court.'d think it was a big—budget film premiere — we're in la where they're unveiling the next generation of video games. coming up in sportsday later in the hour on bbc news: 11 days before the first test against the all blacks, the lions fall short in new zealand once again. good evening and welcome to the bbc news at six. negotiations between theresa may and northern ireland's democratic unionist party are still continuing with both sides confident tonight of a deal tomorrow. the dup leader, arlene foster, has outlined her priorities — among them brexit and counter—terrorism. today the former conservative prime ministerjohn majorjoined others who've voiced their concerns over the implications of a deal with the dup. all of which gave labour leader jeremy corbyn some of his best lines in the commons. our political editor laura kuenssberg reports. they are all here, with new mps parliament returning to its business. the commons speaker elected, well dragged by tradition to his grand chair

to withdraw from the european court of justice jurisdiction. withdraw from the european court of justicejurisdictionrangement post brexit have to become more flexible if she wa nts to have to become more flexible if she wants to get a good deal and it is suggested it will determine the course. also perhaps, not desperately complimentary towards the people leading the negotiations because he also suggests there is more talent in the backbenchers than the front benches. in new york, several people — including at least three doctors — are believed to have been wounded after shots were fired inside a hospital. police say the suspect barricaded himself inside new york city's bronx lebanon hospital with a rifle. they swarmed the building in search of him, and say he's now dead. at approximately 2:55pm and fire in a garden on the 15th floor on bronx lebanon hospital. responding patrol units quickly determined that several people had been shot on the 16th and 17th floor. i learned —— by a lone gunman. different units and commands responded and began our active shoot up protocol including a search for the su

carry on living in britain after brexit, their rights will not be protected any longer by the european courtis the view of the prime minister at the moment. we will bring you more as soon as we get it. grizzly bears in and around yellowstone national park are to be stripped of their endangered species act protection. the us interior secretary ryan zinke made the announcement under a new rule to be published this week. president obama originally made the proposal to drop their classification last year after it was found that their numbers had gone up in recent decades. i certainly wouldn't want to be the one to break that a grizzly bear! now it's time for meet the author. another martina cole thriller, another number one bestseller. betrayal continues herjourney through the london underworld where, in martina cole's stories, it's the women who are the most dangerous. in this one it's jade who is plotting to become miss big. for 25 years, since dangerous lady, this is an author who has made that world her own. welcome. 25 years since dangerous lady, martina, and the ladies are still pretty dan

of justice. not by the european court of justice.at will have to fall away in the course of the negotiations? she went in hoping for a strong hand and ended up with a weak hand. if you fall like a lion and end up looking like a clown, people will take you for the full view appeared to be. europe is in a stronger position and she has had to give ground, even this offer is more generous than the hard breaks offer. it isa generous than the hard breaks offer. it is a slippery slope for her. they know she is squirming. the only thing they cannot do is pina lies us because that would play badly. the mail is putting the best possible gloss on it, saying this offer is made but it has to be reciprocated. if anyone is good to be grown—up about this, nobody wants countries engaged in tit—for—tat expulsions. we end up being a rogue state on the edge of europe. i heard we were going to be a buccaneers state! the independent has got an intriguing photo of donald tusk, european council president, and mrs may, and he is quoting john lennon lyrics. f

the answer now lies with the european court.wsnight: a tory minister dropped from theresa may's team yesterday, tells us why the party has to change its ways, and change its name. good evening and welcome to bbc news. talks between theresa may and the democratic unionist party to ensure the prime minister gets a working majority in the vommons to ensure the prime minister gets a working majority in the commons have not yet resulted in a deal. both sides though said the talks had gone well and an agreement is expected tomorrow. the dup leader arlene foster has outlined her priorities — among them brexit and counter—terrorism. the former conservative prime minister, john major, has added his voice to concerns about the implications of a deal with the dup and its possible repercussions on the peace process in northern ireland. our political editor laura kuenssberg reports. they're all here. with new mps, parliament returning to its business. the commons' speaker elected, well, dragged, by tradition, to his grand chair again, but a

and the european court of human rights has agreed with that.ing onto the mail. two remainiac crooks slip into britain, remain you want them to be set back —— romanian ci’ocs. them to be set back —— romanian crocs. they can't be sent back because of human rights. it plays into the kind of ukip handbook about clamping down on immigrants. although i don't think that even if we left the eu this would be subject to thejudicial system. we left the eu this would be subject to the judicial system. obviously it isa to the judicial system. obviously it is a big talking point, something that would get people excited down the pub. but there are never easy a nswe i’s the pub. but there are never easy answers in this situation, i think. these are jail cells in remainiac which are two metres by one metre square. the question is whether we should be sending people back to those conditions —— jail cells in romania. the judge has said, the minimum is three metres. i don't get the headline, beyond satire. the male is saying, —— the male is saying committed human

the jurisdiction of the european court ofjustice but this isa european court ofjustice but this is auk if british citizens are granted the same rights, those living in use member states are granted the same lights. the response the eu so far has been this is not sufficient. theresa may will give her statement to the commons later this afternoon and the details will be published and the details will be published and we will look at them alight by line. thank you. and you can see more on that on a special programme on bbc one at 8:30pm. our top story this lunchtime: after 18 days the deal is done — the dup signs an agreement with the consevatives to bolster theresa may. at its heart — money — an extra £1 billion for northern ireland over two years. and still to come: he used to dream of playing at glastonbury. last night he headlined it. ed sheeran brought this year's festival to a close on a high. coming up in sport: a week away from the start of wimbledon, qualifying is under way at roehampton and there's plenty of british interest in the warm—up event at eastbourne. an inquest has b

states for experimental procedures to see whether his very rare condition can be helped, but the european courtat application to intervene in this case. if we get a few more details on that we will bring those to you. that has just come through from the court in the last few minutes. now, companies around the world have been reporting in the last couple of hours that they've been hit by a major cyber attack. the british advertising agency wpp is among dozens of firms reporting problems. the impact has been greatest in ukraine, where the government, state power distributor and kiev‘s main airport are all affected. it's thought the computers have been infected with ra nsomwa re, with demands for payment. let's find out a little bit more about what we know and what all this might be. with me is dan raywood, contributing editor at infosecurity magazine. thanks for coming in. we think it is run somewhere but what are you hearing, what is your understanding? it is very early days. with the incident back in may, it was a very slow build, happening through the whole friday... this was the one that hit

of justice imagine a situation where the european court ofjustice was not involved in this.u side really want there to be a role for european judges to guarantee the right of eu citizens, theresa may is not keen on that. she wants is to be british judges in british courts that guarantee that rights in britain. thanks. well, we were just outlining some of the hostility that rhyl‘s proposals have received. —— that theresa may's proposals have agreed. donald tusk has been talking about the right of eu citizens living in the uk and he says that the proposals risk worsening the situation and are below expectations. theresa may has described her plan as fair and serious, but donald tusk spelt out his concern about the ideas if you minute ago. we have made our position clear. we wa nt to we have made our position clear. we want to ensure full rights for eu and uk citizens after brexit. my first impression is that the uk's offer is below our expectations. and that it risks worsening the situation of citizens. but it will be for our negotiation team jana lies the offer line by line —

judges in the european court of human rights, have rejected a plea from the parents of the terminally—illaby charlie gard, to intervene in the case. and allow experimental treatment. google has been fined more than £2 billion by the european commission for illegally favouring its own shopping services. and in the next hour the government has set up an independent expert panel, to provide advice on fire safety in the wake of the grenfell tower tragedy. it comes as theresa may says there must be a "major national investigation" into the use of cladding on high—rise buildings. and 50 years on from the first cash machine, we take a look at the changing face of banking. good evening and welcome to bbc news. companies across the world are reporting they have been struck by a major ransomware cyber—attack with british firms among those to confirm their it systems had been targeted. what do we know so far? the attack started in the ukraine, with the country's state power company and kiev‘s main airport among the first to report issues. the confectionary manufacturer mars said part of the company'

and i am very happy about european court decisions than european court. probably is but i want to do it to me that santa and the commissioner to sponsor a problem is in better conditions and yet since this court ruling e.u. regulations are just as lax as ever. from my point of view we must be more and not just asking to change the. need for follow ups to keep. on board popular coutts but i'm just not put off it absolutely but it's but it's of course it's. time perfect that's just what the food industry wants and what it is built its strategy on for years. because when it comes to nitrite industrialists have been waiting out the clock for forty eight. years of scientific manipulation blackmail and intense lobbying so the meat business can carry on bringing home the bacon. and it all began on the other side of the atlantic. if you think we're exaggerating listen to this. in the late one nine hundred seventy s. nitrite was almost banned in the united states just after the publication of a large scale. study requested by the government. a relationship between

the role of the european court ofjustice, a 61 of the biggest differences in the uk and eu‘s positionsntral issue for both sides but there‘s still of run—ins to come. thank you. we will delve a little more into that chris morris is with me. you will have a look at the offer any little more detail. what is the prime minister padilla the table? settled status means that you would have more or less the same rates as it uk citizen and for health care and education and benefits and pensions. if you haven‘t been here for five years but already in the uk and have been here for less than five years you will be given a bit of time to make that five year period up. that seems pretty generous on the surface. eu citizens will be pretty cross about the fact that many have struggled through 85 pages of massive bureaucratic difficulty to get the permanent residence in the last couple of years only to be told you have to start again. the premise that said they will try and make this eu demand as simple as possible, not overlook obligated bureaucratic to try and get things moving. there is common groun

citizens living in the uk for five years the right to stay, but she has rejected the eu call for the european courtpolitics. the us senate has finally revealed its plan to replace obamacare. this has been largely fashioned by the republicans. let‘s begin by hearing senator mitch mcconnell. we agree on the need to free americans from obamacare‘s policies. we will repeal it so that americans are no longerforced we will repeal it so that americans are no longer forced to buy insurance that they don‘t need or can‘t afford. we will repeal the employer mandates that americans no longer see their hours and take home pay cut by employers because of it. we agree on the need to improve the affordability of health insurance and policies contained in the discussion draft will do that. we will eliminate costly obamaca re taxes that are passed onto consumers so we can put downward pressure premiums. and this is the perspective from the democrats. the senate republican bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing. we are potentially voting on it in one week. no committee hearings, no amendments in committee, no debate on t

of justice. the system is overseen by the european court ofjustice. nged mr gove publicly over his determination or desire to ta ke over his determination or desire to take action against extremists. she seemed to suggest they weren't guilty of any criminal or terrorist offences. a long track record that mrs made came under pressure over this morning at a time when she was trying to take the lead and position herself as a strong leader in the wa ke herself as a strong leader in the wake of the london bridge attack. i have answered the question about policing, but i am very happy to repeat what we have been doing in policing, which is, we have been protecting counterterrorism policing. we provided funding for an uplift in armed policing. we have, from prydie 15, uplift in armed policing. we have, from prydie15, protected police budgets. as i said, jeremy corbyn and the labour party said police budgets could be cut by up to 10%. we said, no, we will protect those budgets. but it is also about the powers you give to police. i have been responsible through

that means we will be subject to european court of justice, and all its rulings, for that time.gh the british people voted to get out of brexit. that time. even though the british people voted to get out of brexitlj would be more optimistic than that. the first thing is that it has been said the negotiations on the new relationship can start when there is process on the first phase. they could discuss the new relationship at the end of year and have 12 or 15 months to discuss it and the second thing is we are compliant, you don't have to argue about standards, we are already compliant. that should make it easier. i think after two or three years the new trade relationship could be agreed and we would go into that. at that point it would go into that. at that point it would be out of single market no, question, out of the customs union, and out of transitional arrangements. what about the situation with the customs union? philip hammond is suggesting we are going to need some other kind of arrangements, customs union point two zero or what ever, but that means we are still subjec

around who is going to police, or see that these rights are respected, would it be uk courts or european courte, which the eu is insisting on? they want the ecj, the european court ofjustice, to oversee these rights for a long time, the uk government has said they can't accept that. so perhaps those are the objections that are behind donald tusk‘s and jean—claude juncker‘s comments. but on the face of it, this proposal does look fair. she, of course, is going to these negotiations in a much weaker position than she would have wanted. what should her strategy beat now to soften the plans that she might have had before? not specifically on eu immigrants, but generally? renegade is clear to me that she is weak. that is not a controversial statement at all. she expected a strong mandate and foster majority. soi strong mandate and foster majority. so i think that is not controversial. and clearly, because of the situation of the tories not having a majority empowerment, there may now be a need for some sort of cross— party may now be a need for some sort of cross—party anchoring of the brexit missi

and of course you also accept the authority of the european court ofjustice and the european commissionme minister, you are ignoring my question. can you imagine a bespoke, tailored deal which allows britain some. . . i don't know how one could put it, opt—out or leniency on some of those four pillars that you have just outlined? i think it is hard to do cherry picking. the european union is not a supermarket where you can go in and say, you know, this is the one ingredient i want and all the rest of it, i do not want to be part of this. being part of the single market is of course one choice that can be made, but there are certain consequences to that, of course. and if this is what the uk negotiators want to negotiate, let's get to the table and exchange views on that. there is an opposite view, which is the hard brexit, where you basically say that you do not even want a customs union. but up to now, for us europeans and for the european chief negotiator, it is unclear what the option is that will be brought to the table. let's at least be clear on what you basically want, and then w

having no control over immigration policy, and for britain to stay under thejurisdiction of the european courtpaigning, in this election, to trust the people, and we know that people voted to leave the european union lastjune. i grew up with, you know, with people who voted to leave, i completely respect those who did — obviously i hold a different view. the issue now is, how do we move forward? and we know that a deal will be negotiated between theresa may and those from brussels, and it's one that we'll have to live with, our children will have to live with for generations. so it seems to me the people should be sovereign, it should not be a deal stitched up by the politicians in brussels and london. instead, it should be a deal that we agree with, as a country, and that's what we're supporting. we think that the people should be trusted with the final deal. but you don't want to trust the british people. you still want uk laws to be made in brussels, you still want no control over immigration policy, and you want the european court to have jurisdiction in britain. how is that trusting the b

yesterday,g to us anything but the european court of justice.ave written down, style over substance. this is the brexit right argument. if i can rebrand this, i have won a victory. stephen: it's interesting. i'm not sure the country as a whole is as incensed about the european court of justice at some politicians. -- as some politicians. we will see what comes out of it. it is a year and a day since we voted for brexit. let's talk about markets. a bounce for four days in a row. this is the topline index. how do you look at the u.k. at the moment? fading consumer confidence. we have gone from hero to zero in terms of growth. challenging time for the u.k. in terms of markets? stephen: personally, i do not see it as challenging. revenues for companies are so much of the last month -- what is happening underneath is interesting. growth is not zero. gone from the best-performing growth in g7 to the lowest. stephen: that is true. the u.s. is still in the middle stages. the uk's facing challenges, because until the nature of our relationship with our l

the european court of human rights has ruled that doctors should continue to care for the terminallye news for charlie's parents, who maintain that they want to take him to the us for experimental treatment for his rare genetic disorder. last week, the uk supreme court had agreed with doctors at great ormond street hospital and ruled that he should be allowed to ‘die with dignity‘, as our medical correspondent fergus walsh reports. charlie gard cannot see, hear, move, cry or swallow. he is seriously brain damaged and kept alive with a mechanical ventilator. his parents, chris gard and connie yates, have raised £1.3 million through crowdfunding for experimental treatment in the united states. they say they simply want the best for their son. he hasn't got anything to lose. we know that even if it doesn't work, which i think it will, we know that we have done everything that we can for him. but doctors, including independent experts, say the treatment cannot improve his condition. one concern is that charlie may experience pain but is unable to respond to it. last week, the uk supreme

wants the european court of justice to oversee residency and education rights may said it be run exclusively by the british courts and that announcement didn't sit well with european leaders european council president donald tusk said may's plan so far was below expectations german chancellor angela merkel said there's a long way to go and even british labor leader jeremy corbyn said the offer quote doesn't go far enough but on monday may is expected to lay out a more detailed plan in london which will hopefully clear up the many questions that you leader sound. our team coverage of the bracks anniversary continues with artie's peter oliver covering the divorce bill along with the battle between the pound versus the euro and what this all means for businesses in the region we're one year old from the vote to change the face of the european union. and with the european union lead to begin under a new prime minister and i think it's right this new prime minister takes the decision about when to fifty and start the legal process over leaving. in the e.u. the united kingdom triggered article fif

judges at the european court of human rights have rejected a plea from the parents of terminally—illhis case. chris gard and connie yates lost their final legal bid to take their son to the us for treatment. the court concluded that undergoing experimental treatment with no prospects of success would continue to cause charlie significant harm. 0ur medical editor fergus walsh is with me now. a really sad case. what happens now? this is the end of the road, legally. it means at some point, possibly in the next couple of days, the medical team at great 0rmond street hospital will switch off the mechanical ventilator which keeps charlie alive. they will give him palliative care and he will be allowed to die. that will not happen until his parents have had some time to be with him. it is what all of the doctors, all of the medical team at great 0rmond street have wanted for months, and what everyjudge in the uk says should happen, and what all of the independent experts have said, including a guardian appointed to represent charlie. a lot of people will be saying to give them one more cha

superiority of the european court of justice to accept free movement. or even a deal whereby we had a can of sammy's sort of. entrance into the single market but we still had to accept. the regulations made by brussels without i'd be taking part in the discussions beforehand that would be unacceptable because that would mean the brussels could create regulations for the city of london which could be affected steroid so i don't think we'd be full for that speaking about the bill blumberg is saying bracks it could cost the u.k. sixty alien to eighty billion arus which is more than that british defense budget can do you care for it to cut this bill. if the loan of a good thing that's the bill that it's going to be presented to the stone to negotiations than negotiations will still be today because the british have no intention of paying any such bill which is a just. i don't know a try on by the. by the europeans because legally they know and we know we're not obliged to pay anything so wait so you're saying britain is not going to pay has no attention int

of justice. and should be preserved under the european court ofjustice.came in and said it would be up for the uk to decide whether they want to participate in that. there is a concise year that if theresa may's offer falls below, that could cause difficult moment. —— there is a concern here. thank you very much. tests on other tower blocks after the grenfell fire have shown some of the cladding to be combustable. downing street says that an estimated 600 tower blocks in england have cladding similar to that used on grenfell tower in west london, which caught fire with the loss of at least 79 lives. as the investigation into the grenfell tower tragedy gets underway, our reporterjim reed has been to a new tower block in north london which, the housing association has confirmed, is clad in what's thought to be the same material. he has spoken to residents and the housing association reps there. at the moment we know the government are testing samples. brought to them by councils and housing associations. that is why theresa may promised to make that stateme

problem is to be part of europe all, the uk would have the recognise the jurisdiction of the european courtn on. the other issue is that the only country that has so far wide agreement and access to the database, despite agreement and access to the data base, despite having agreement and access to the database, despite having opted out onjustice database, despite having opted out on justice and home database, despite having opted out onjustice and home of the issues, is denmark, and the axis they have is denmark, and the axis they have is minimal, so how will the uk have com plete is minimal, so how will the uk have complete access to the database? it will be very challenging. the uk is one of the most valuable and trusted partners when it comes to security to the eu, so maybe they will get a special deal. i am getting deja vu with some of these policies. after the paris attacks, there was talk of better cooperation, after the brussels airport attack, there was talk of better cooperation, why is it not happening already? intelligence sharing and information is still treated as a precious co

would my right honourable friend give due assurance that any pressure to allow the european court ofjusticeus of eu citizens within this country will be flatly opposed? i believe that in terms of assuring the rights of eu citizens living here in the united kingdom, we believe that should be done through our courts, and not through the european court of justice. theresa may is promising a smooth and streamlined process to make it as easy as possible for eu citizens to secure their rights after brexit. the home office will have to set up a whole new system, potentially dealing with millions of applications. it's a huge challenge, and officials hope it will be up and running by next year. but before that, there will be tough talks. the eu's brexit negotiator has already called for more ambition, clarity and guarantees from the uk. vicki young, bbc news, westminster. as we heard, there are 3.2 million eu nationals living in the uk and around a million british nationals living elsewhere in the european union. 0ur correspondentjeremy cooke has been finding out how some of them have reacted to tod

of human rights. —— ta ke european court of human rights. —— take their case. picnic for the gard family yesterday, reportedly in a rare break away from the hospital wards and court rooms. last week, the uk supreme court agreed with specialists at great ormond street hospital that he should be allowed to ‘die with dignity‘. our medical correspondent, fergus walsh, reports. charlie gard cannot see, hear, move, cry or swallow. he is seriously brain damaged and kept alive with a mechanical ventilator. his parents, chris gard and connie yates, have raised £1.3 million through crowdfunding for experimental treatment in the united states. we know that even if it doesn‘t work, which i think it will, we know that we have done everything that we can for him. but doctors, including independent experts, say the treatment cannot improve his condition. one concern is that charlie may experience pain but is unable to respond to it. lask week, the uk supreme court said while it had the utmost sympathy for his parents, it was not in charlie‘s interests to subject him to futile

she is going to have to let the european court involve itself in any concerns citizens have.to do all of those things in order to get market.o the single this is why people think the u.k. doesn't really understand the reality of the situation. >> complex stuff. thank you very much. matt miller joining us from brussels. during us in the studio, a chief investment officer. good morning. u.k. talk about where the goes. some say we will see a softer stance on brexit. is that all it takes? reporter: this is a very fine line she has to tread. deliver ae wants to brexit, appeasing the europeans. pragmatic. now we have that. toasted on the outside and soft inside. whole free this movement of people is going to bothe sticking point on sides of the channel. these discussions are going to go on. she is going to have to select her own party as well. and ocalan there are other things we could get stuck on. like the divorce bill. >> these things go hand in hand. we move on to the rest. each one will be quite a difficult series of negotiations. what about the strength of the u.k. economy at

now by a majority verdict, the european court has done the same. meticulous and thorough and supported their view that it was most likely charlie was being exposed to continue the pain, suffering and distress... there is now a question of what will happen to the £1.3 million that charlie's parents crowd funded through 83,000 donations. so why has every court and every medical experts decided that ending charlie's life is in his best interests ? charlie's life is in his best interests? it was said by the courts today that he is likely to be suffering and if any treatment were to continue or he was taken to the us for experimental treatment, there is going to be a very limited benefit and he is going to be at risk of suffering significant harm. great or and says there is no rush to change charlie's care and their priority is to support his parents at this distressing is time, but at some point in the nearfuture, medical staff in the intensive care unit will switch off the mechanical ventilator that keeps charlie alive. it is rare for disputes over tr