it's calling for the european court of justice judgement to be fully implemented. a delegation from several of the european organizations met the e.u. commission or. as we stand here all these millions of animals are being transported across europe but sorry europe and the game else today was that the commissioner promised that because of this up with this he's able to keep this topic hard on the european union is it john. the animal rights activists are under no illusions some of what missed the transportation of the animals and their final destinations for themselves. in our work we have witnessed things beyond imagination anyone we have seen european any mars being. having their eyes that having their attendance lesh. while transport conditions within the e.u. have steadily improved things apparently have not changed much for the animals after they arrive abroad. there's a reason why prying eyes here are unwelcome. to the show this hidden footage to the e.u. commissioner. we brought the is attention what is happening with european and he marched off toward their

court also. ruled on the issue. of member states and the european union must fully take into account the welfare needs of animals as sentience beings. but the buyers of the animals probably know nothing about any of this. in any event these german sheep have a torturous journey behind them. the people here have their own time tested methods of loading and transporting animals. once they've been exploited the animals are completely without protection. animals international did not see tortures such as i go during every horrid levanon but that does not make it any better for the animals involved. back in germany we want to find out what a college life looks like from beginning to end. this is a dairy farm so called because cows are constantly being born here because without scabs there would be no milk. all the cows here are known by name. and this is a cow hole have her first calf in about a month her name is rosalie and i just know that. the animals are doing fine and every effort is made to keep things that way as i'm sitting here our animals are n

how does my friend reconcile repeal ofent with the the 1972 act and the european court of justice and the government in this country? we ensure that we are taken to the u.k. law and the european union law such that we see the orderly brexit. the european court of justice will not have jurisdiction over the 90 kingdom and this parliament will make sovereign decisions. theill make decisions with withdrawal and implementation bills as to whether they accept and itl being negotiated is up to the parliament to decide if there is any changes. back control of the laws and that is what people want and what we will do. >> the prime minister effectively killed off the trade retain regulatory convergence. this to say that she has lost the support of the fundamentalists and now is the time for a national consensus because a majority in the house support retention of a single market and the original common market or whatever name she wants to attach to it. referred toeman staying in the single market and the customs union and we will not stay in the single market or the customs union and doing tha

parliament, end thejurisdiction of restore sovereignty of parliament, end the jurisdiction of european courtse united kingdom, but it will also offer a deep, enduring partnership on economic matters, on trade, with our european neighbours. but among those who will be sitting around this table, there is deep division. shut away in here for more than 12 hours, they will thrash out their views with no phones allowed. the question is whether they can find middle ground. in westminster, details of what the prime minister's proposing have trickled out in recent days. a key part is that the uk would have common rules with the eu for buying and selling goods. that is to keep trade flowing, especially across the irish border. but brexiteers have warned that sticking too closely to eu regulation could limit the uk's ability to do trade deals with other countries. it does sound, this corn law rule but, whatever we're hearing, to ci’oss but, whatever we're hearing, to cross the line on two accounts. another one, you are not making your own rules in your own country, you're doing what the eu tells you, th

the european court of justice will not have jurisdiction over the united kingdom. and this parliament will make sovereign decisions make a decision when the withdrawal and implementation bills are brought before this house as to whether this parliament is willing to accept the deal that is been negotiated and thereof, it will be up to this parliament to decide whether it agrees with any changes in rules or any laws that this parliament wants to pass. taking back control of our laws and that is what the people want and what we will do. >> esktsively killing off the trade agreement by agreeing to retain eu regulatory convergence, which of course the americans cannot accept. could i also echo the call she just heard to say now she's lost the support of her brexit fundamentalist and now is the time to have a national consensus, majority in the house who do support our retaining membership of the customs union single market, the original common market, whatever name or label she wants to attach. >> can i say to the right honorable gentlemen, staying in the single market

we accepted the jurisdiction of the european court over key aspects of the withdrawal agreement. and worst of all, we allowed the question of the northern border which had hitherto had been assumed on all sides to become so politically charged as to dominate the debate. :: >> two different jurisdictions. in fact, there already are. there can be checks away from the border and technical solutions as the prime minister rightly described at mansion house. in fact, there already are. but when i and other colleagues -- and i single out my right honorable friend bryson how howden -- proposed regulatory checks remotely. those proposals were never even properly examined as if such solutions had become intellectually undesirable in the context of the argument. and somehow after the december joint report whose backstop arrangement we were all told was entirely provisional, never to be invoked, it became a taboo even to discuss technical fixes. so, mr. speaker, after 18 months of stealthy retreat, we have come from the bright certainties of lancaster house to the agreement. you put them sid

we accepted the jurisdiction of european court over key aspects of the withdrawal agreement. and worst of all, we allowed the question of the northern irish board cher had hitherto been asumed on all sides to be readily solid, to become so politically charged as to dominate the debate. statement by the right honorable gentleman must be heard and by long standing convention it is heard with courtesy and without heckling. mr. boris johnson. >> in one on either side wants a hard border, you couldn't construct one if you tried. but there certainly can be different rules north and south of the boarder to reflect the fact that there are two different jurisdictions. in fact, there already are. there can be checks away from the border and technical solutions as the prime minister rightly described at manchin house. in fact, there already are. but when i and other colleagues , and i see my right honorable friend proposed further technical solutions to make customs and regulatory checks remotely those proposals were never even properly examined as if such solutions had become intellect

to in thejurisdiction of and it will end, they wanted to in the jurisdiction of the court of european courtourt ofjustice. and they wa nt european court ofjustice. and they want us to stop sending vast sums of money to the eu as we do today. and thatis money to the eu as we do today. and that is exactly what we will do. it will be in a way that protects jobs and enhance the economy for the future. for many brexiteer is, the commitment for following the commitment for following the commitment to share so much with them sounds like we are not really leaving in the way they believed, it does not sound very dramatic and on the other side, if we're going to be so the other side, if we're going to be so closely tied, even if it makes sense, whiteley that all? we are leaving so we can ensure that we bring an end to free movement, we bring an end to free movement, we bring an end to free movement, we bring an end to the jurisdiction of the european court ofjustice, we are in control of our money, borders and laws into the future and we have the freedom to strike our country deals with the rest of t

of justice. of that eu rules would be the european court ofjustice. oubt in due course. i suspect sir william you andi course. i suspect sir william you and i may have some fairly lengthy discussions on some of these! chuckling we will have to be one to the next section, so the next chair is sir bernard dinkins, chair of the public administration and constitutional affairs committee. thank you very much, good afternoon, prime minister. good afternoon. the white paper talks about stepping up plans from no deal. so far there appears to have been some reticence about making announcements on the basis of no deal. what is the basis of when to announce for what is being done in preparation for no deal? there are two aspects we have looked at, the first is obviously the work that needs to be done by the government in determining the operations, and the second is the point at which it is important to ensure that others outside government who would need to be involved are able to have the information they need. i was going to... we're not yet on the debate late

the outcome of a referendum, restore sovereignty of parliament within thejurisdiction of the european court kingdom, but it will also offer a deep, enduring partnership on economic matters and trade with our european neighbours. but among those who will be sitting around this table, there is deep division. shut away in here for more than 12 hours, they will thrash out their views, with no phones allowed. the question is whether they can find middle ground. in westminster, details of what the prime minister's proposing have trickled out in recent days. a key part is that the uk would have common rules with the eu for buying and selling goods. that's to keep trade flowing, especially across the irish border, but brexiteers have warned that sticking too closely to eu legislation could limit the uk's ability to do trade deals with other countries. it does sound, what is it, common rulebook, whatever we are hearing, that does seem to cross the line on two accounts, one you are not making the rules in the own country you are accepting what the eu believes, and the other is the european court ofju

as regards to the european court of justice it is not the case of the european court justice will have jurisdiction in the united kingdom. it will not. this is individuals in the united kingdom will not be able to take cases to the european court of justice be matters in the uk will be settled by the uk court. >> the prime ministers plan is still -- on immigration, justice and customs patella stated arrangement which no one understands what it is. she kept trying to have different parts of the conservative party and today shows it just isn't working. which he instead put a plan for negotiation to the whole house for approval and when she is in such a mess, she cannot keep standing there saying nothing has changed, nothing has changed. it has. >> i didn't say nothing has changed. i said opposition has evolved. we have set up more details in our position and i believe this is the position that is absolutely right for the united kingdom. the brexit deal may ensure that we can have an orderly brexit -- >> the prime minister is not dealing with the theory of leaving the european union. she'

in april, there was a ruling by the european court of more.ean court 0fjustice about wildcat strikes and they said, if your airline has been hit by a wildcat strike... if they suddenly downed tools and work out? you know what i mean. you will get compensation. there is still no certainty, rather, there was not, bowed official strikes, what these are. this one will have been notified over a certain period. exactly. air france has had lots of strikes the last few months, cabin crew in britain were on strike. they we re crew in britain were on strike. they were not paying compensation. for the official body which looks after consumer rights to come out and say, claim your money, it was really unprecedented. i have never seen anything like that, and immediately i co nta cted anything like that, and immediately i contacted rya nair who anything like that, and immediately i contacted ryanair who said, no, it is extraordinary circumstances, the behaviour of the unions is outrageous and we are not paying any 1p. you apply for compensation as passenger

the checkers statement with the recent repeal of the 1972 withdrawal act and also including the european court of justice and with democratic self-government in this country. >> can i say to my honorable friend that we have indeed repealed the european communities act, but we have also insured we will take into u.k. law at the point we leave that european union, e.u. law, such that we see a smooth and orderly brexit. in the future, the european court of justice will not have jurisdiction over the united income and this parliament will make sovereign decisions. they will first of all makers a sovereign decision when the meaning will implementation bills are brought before this house as to whether it is able to accept the deal being negotiated. after that it would be up to the parliament to decide whether it will have changes in rules or any law this parliament once to pass. this is the sovereignty taking back control. that is what i believe people want and that is what we will do. congratulate the prime minister for effectively killing u.k. tradeted states agreement by agreeing to retain a you

of justice throughout that the impact of european court ofjustice decisions cannot be entirelyur country's jurisprudence. cannot be entirely eliminated from our country'sjurisprudence. i cannot be entirely eliminated from our country's jurisprudence. i am pleased they have acknowledged that, but i also recognise that something which makes some of my colleagues who wanted brexit very upset. again, i think they have been utterly unrealistic about the reality of how international relationships are conducted. you may regard their view as unrealistic in that area specifically, but would you now worry about those with a more pro—brexit view within your party then you have, and what they might do now? well, i always worry. i like party cohesion to be maintained at possible. but cabinet has collective responsibility now and this will undoubtedly help achieve that, and i am pleased the cabinet has collectively signed up to this position. when you get beyond that, imean, i position. when you get beyond that, i mean, iwould position. when you get beyond that, i mean, i would simply ask co

of justice on the european court of role and likewise there wasn't enough consideration for what the brings it is with feel as to reason may affect the round the meeting for fourth fern's making various frets about losing ministerial privileges such as cars if they were to disagree and they were ordered to leave the premises mediately if they disagreed and she would consider it a resignation i want to talk about brags it a little bit more in a moment but let's talk about the possibility of a leadership challenge for theresa may how strong or weak is she at the moment. so right now my personal opinion is that she has quite a strength in the south quite a bit so if we look at her recent appointments it's effectively stacked the cabinets in her favor i mean effectively now the majority of the cabinet will remain as as the two print and raise it is a sort of lead up portion of the party last however if big issue is what is happening behind the scenes now so now that forest johnson and david davis no longer have a role in

but, as a matter of fact, there isn‘t much that the european union or the court can do except a slap convention on human rights. just how many roma live in italy and what is public opinion of them like generally? this is one of those cases where the numbers in reality are very different. people have seen it as if there is a nation of roma people there, coming to italy to commit crimes, steal into houses, break into cars, for instance. there are plenty of prejudices. they say roma people kidnap children and stuff like that. as a matter of fact, if you see the numbers of the last census of 2008, the population is between 90,000 and 140,000. of these, 70,000 are italian citizens who have been in italy for a very long period of time and, of the whole number, only about 12,000 live in illegal camps like this one in rome, so we are talking of less than one in ten roma people. but still the public perception is very much against it, for his own political gain. what do we think is going to happen to the people who are cleared from this camp today? where do they go? so some people have accepte

court of justice and jurisdiction of the european court ofjustice and we. more in the steel and we need to be part of the internal market? —— will the prime minister say when she will go further and accept that we need to include more in the deal. we will not be part of the single market because of the free movement aspect. we have safeguarded 1400 jobs in luton and there have been other positive announcements from the automotive sector but we have recognised the integrated supply chains and we have recognised the need for that frictionless trade across the board and that is what this plan delivers. —— the border. and that is what this plan delivers. -- the border. may i give the prime minister a message from mid sussex, to this end, despite the slings and arrows inevitable, will she stick to her guns to deliver a brexit that is in line with the aims of the people and their prosperity and their security? can i say that that is exactly the aim of myself and this government, to deliver a brexit that is smooth and orderly and that maintains the prosperity of th

on the outcome of a referendum, restore solvency of parliament within the jurisdiction of the european courtbut it will also offer a deep, injuring partnership on economic matters and trade with our european neighbours. but among those who will be sitting around this table, there was deep division. shut away in here for more than 12 hours, they will thrash out their views, with no phones allowed. the question is whether they can find middle ground. in westminster, details of what the prime minister's proposing have trickled out in recent days. a key part is that the uk would have common rules with the eu for buying and selling goods. that's to keep trade flowing, especially across the irish border, but brexiteers have warned that sticking to closely to eu legislation could limit the uk's ability to do trade deals with other countries. it does sound, what is it, common rule but, whatever we are hearing, that a sin to cross the line on two accounts, one you are not making the rules in the own country you are accepting what the eu believes, and the other is the european court of justice. eu bel

the european court won't have the final say, but will interpret the rules.government will end unlimited immigration from the eu, its citizens will be able to come without visas to do paid work in some circumstances — not yet defined. for those who like dramatic breaks with the established order — guess who? — it is not as much of a separation as brexit might have been. before ministers had a chance to explain their plan, president trump tried to do it for them. i've been reading a lot about brexit over the last couple of days, and it seems to be turning a little bit differently, where they're getting at least partially involved back with the european union. i don't know if that's what they voted for. awkward, given that the prime minister was leaving for home to welcome the american president on his visit to the uk. they voted for us to take back control of our money, our law and our borders, and that's exactly what we will do. we will stop sending vast subscriptions, vast contributions to the eu every year. we will ensure that the european court ofjustice d

because this breakthrough, with the support of the uk and the european court of human rights, means thatthe uk and us, whilst protecting the fundamental rights of citizens. so this opens up the possibility of us extending our offer on internal security cooperation in particular. as to the future economic partnership, the white paper has raised the series of issues —— three series of issues which i put forward, and we have questions we have put to the uk and we await answers. firstly, the white paper proposals, we need to see if they are compatible with the principles set out by the 27 heads of government and state at the european council meeting in march. in fact, even before march, when the negotiations began in june in fact, even before march, when the negotiations began injune 2016, these were principles reiterated by these were principles reiterated by the foreign minister. integrity of the foreign minister. integrity of the single market and a customs union, the indivisibility of the four freedoms, and the respective economy of the 27 member states... these are the key elements that

of justice trade policy, the role of the european court ofjustice within britain's laws.shed out at chequers. this policy document was drawn up. there is some interesting wording, things like a common rule book for goods going across the border, facilitated movement of eu citizens across britain's borders. also things likejoint citizens across britain's borders. also things like joint institutional framework for the courts. i think a lot of people look at language and thought this doesn't really extricate britain from the eu laws in the way that people wanted. david davis has released a statement now, but some of the land which he has usedis but some of the land which he has used is interesting. said he thought the general direction of policy would leave the uk at best in a week negotiating position and also said that the inevitable consequence of the policy would be to make control by parliament look illusory rather than real. he says it doesn't go farther and off and it wouldn't give britain control back of its own laws. where does this leave theresa may's prime ministe

of justice have to get across the fact that the european court ofjustice is not the master, that hase want some reciprocity from the european union, from michel barnier, but they are not going to go without like that, we don't like that, we don't like that. we think the prime minister has gone in probably as low as she can. and when you say we think, who do you mean by that? we know you are a strong brexiteer. when i say we, we mean the country. the time to be tough was 18 months ago. water has gone under the bridge now. the government has no real power, no real majority, to get tough with the european union when you are six months down the line from agreeing. collective responsibility, it has got to be done, and it has got to be done fairly. and david will be back in about half an hour to review the main stories being covered by the global media. we will discuss that further, as the media is across the brexit story, it has been quite a week yet again. the 12 thai boys and their football coach who spent more than two weeks trapped in a cave have woken up in their own homes for the fi

the jurisdiction of have the european court ofjustice to decide. she says no longer applies to the uk but she has said we will pay regard tojudgments. the uk but she has said we will pay regard to judgments. is that way of signalling affectively courts would be expected to reflect thinking of the ec] in the work they did on these cases? i think it is deliberately opaque at this point. they could be that that would be a key point because there are brexiteers who would find it very difficult to stomach. although this is the first step in process towards trying to get a deal with the european union and an important first step, there are elements to be ironed still. that is a lovely image. the process has required people to be reassured and move forward , people to be reassured and move forward, do you get the impression this is a serious package of proposals the government thinks could be made to work, if brussels is willing to be flexible? is it in a sense a kind of figleaf of respectability. we have offered something, they rejected and we then walk

european union will be judged by the european court ofjustice. ow it we risk being penalised, which is of that same position in today. parliament could pass an act but following a european union rule. i don't think lines have been respected. some of what she said was very interesting. andrew marr pushed her on when this decision about the common rule book was made. and they decided to do you's. the uk and it seems it came into discussion along time ago but david davis was not told and that is a very strange way to be running government. jacob rees mogg speaking to the sunday politics a little earlier. the ministerfor small business, andrew griffiths, has resigned from government after sending text messages of a sexual nature to two female constituents. mr griffiths, mp for burton, and theresa may's chief of staff in opposition between 200a and 2006, told the mirror he was "deeply ashamed". he said his behaviour had caused "untold distress" to his wife and family to whom he "owed everything". president trump heads to helsinki later today where he's

it has culminated with the european court ofjustice, they culminated with the european court of justice it fail, their attempt to trademark the four finger bar shape? it is all what we call in the trade distinctiveness, and whether on its own without the packaging, the name kit kat, the mere shape of that four finger chocolate bar can tell you you are looking at a kit kat. in this case nestle failed to convince the court that was the case. what happens next? this is obviously something nestle want, they want the trademark for this shape, have they come to the end of their options? this is the final court, the supreme court of europe, there is no way to appeal this ruling, but they have got quite close to showing that the public recognise the kit kat bar just from the shape. there are only a few countries where they failed to prove that, so if they start all overagain, as it prove that, so if they start all over again, as it were, prove that, so if they start all overagain, as it were, they prove that, so if they start all over again, as it were, they may well have a chance of getting th

the european union is launching legal action against poland over the country's supreme court reforms the government is moving to force judges to retire at the age of sixty five instead of seventy the e.u. says undermines judicial independence. maybe as national oil corporation is suspending exports from the country's eastern ports the move follows the capture of two oil terminals last month by forces loyal to the warlord honey for half ton his forces have prevented shipments from being loaded at several ports it is un backed government has warned international companies against dealing with her after some handy is the editor in chief at instructional interest as an online current affairs magazine he joins us now from london good to have you with us so we're looking at a huge drop of barrels produced barrels of oil produced today eight hundred fifty thousand some eighty percent of libya's production was of economic impact does that have on a country. i think first of all it depends on what you mean by the economy i mean the libyan people are not exactly feeling the benefits of this oi

the european court ofjustice in the uk and that will end.'s rules, to share so much still with them sounds like we're not really leaving in the way they believed. this is a deal that delivers on brexit, but it does so ina way delivers on brexit, but it does so in a way that ensures that we can build that bright future for britain. in the agreement, you make a commitment to ending unlimited eu immigration. but are you ruling out giving some form of preferential treatment to eu citizens after we leave ? treatment to eu citizens after we leave? free movement from the european union will end. but that wasn't my question. free movement from the european union will end. what i've said before and will continue to say is that we recognise that people will still want to carry on travelling to europe and europeans travelling to the uk. so it's possible they may still get some preferential treatment? we are going to decide. downing street's whole package would tie at more closely to the eu than brexiteers desired. we had a great start. we all have had

the overall deal will be policed by a new governing body, the european court won't have the final sayhe final say, but will interpret the rules. while the government will end unlimited immigration from the eu, its citizens will be able to come without visas to do unpaid work in some circumstances. not yet defined. for those who like dramatic brea ks defined. for those who like dramatic breaks with the established order, guess who? it's not as much of a separation as brexit might have been. before ministers had chance to explain their plan, president trump tried to do it for them. i've been reading a lot about brexit over the last couple of days and it seems to be turning a little bit differently, where they are getting at least partially involved back with the eu european union. i do know if that's what they voted for. awkward. given that the prime minister was leaving for home to welcome the american president on his visit to the uk. they voted for us to take control of oui’ they voted for us to take control of our money law and borders and that is what we will do. we will stop sendi

the european court won't have the final say but will interpret the rules.ited immigration from the eu, its citizens will be able to come without visas to do paid work in some circumstances — not yet defined. for those who like dramatic breaks with the established order — guess who? — it's not as much of a separation as brexit might have been. before ministers had a chance to explain their plan, president trump tried to do it for them. i've been reading a lot about brexit over the last couple of days, and it seems to be turning a little bit differently, where they're getting at least partially involved back with the european union. i don't know if that's what they voted for. awkward, given that the prime minister was leaving for home to welcome the president on his visit to the uk. they voted for us to take back control of our money, our law and our borders, and that's exactly what we will do. we will stop sending vast contributions, vast contributions, to the eu every year. we will ensure that the european court ofjustice doesn't have jurisdiction in the uk

and if it looks like a kit kat and tastes like a kit kat it might not be the european court of justice has ruled that nestlé has no claim to the shape of the iconic chocolate ball so it can no longer trade make trademark the shape of the fourth to go wife and chocolates not main rivals can now use the same shape the case was brought by the north by a norwegian maker of assuming the shape that ball so next time you fancy a break watch out for a copycat kit kats so you're up to date with the latest from the world of business i'll be back tomorrow same time same place. you. sarno just couldn't get this song out of his head. musicologist began searching for the source of this captivating sound. and found that deep in the rain forest in central africa and the little village was a big lesson with the anyone still. living costs he was so fascinated by their culture that he stayed. only a promise to his son made son only the jungle and return to the concrete and glass jungle but. the result reverse culture shock. the prize winning documentary from the forest starts aug ninth w. climate change.

repeal of the nine hundred seventy two act on the withdrawal and also with the including the european court of justice and the democratic self-government in this country. and i say to my honorable friend that we have indeed as he said in the withdrawal act with repealed the european communities act but we have also ensured that we will take into u.k. your the point at which we leave the european union laws such that we see a smooth and orderly exit in the future the european court of justice will not have jurisdiction over the united kingdom and this parliament will make sovereign decisions this parliament will first of all make a sovereign decision when the withdrawal of the meaningful vote in the withdrawal and implementation bills are bought before this house as to whether this parliament is willing to accept the deal that has been negotiated and thereafter it will be up to this parliament to decide whether it agrees with any changes in rules or any laws that this parliament wants to pass that is the sovereignty taking by taking back control of our laws that is what i believe people want

you could end up in the dock at the european court of justice how do you answer those worries that the e.u. saying that you will not align the independence of judiciary and that is essential part of the founding charter of the european union itself. whether we'd discuss this matter regarding. reforms of judicial really. i think more of an one year and. we try to communicate with them we tried to find. a common come on the explanation what is going call on the but still they are afraid that we infringe independence of judiciary we deny this and we explained in a very detailed way why we cannot we cannot say that those accusations are true oh. well it's european commission is political but there is sometimes. a very of a very they take part. in the kind of political action and of course. in our position in. some european commission officials are rubber left the room to vedanta like idea of conservative government reforming something so. we treat that as a kind of punishment because. people in poland decide that to vote for for conservative party and that party. is doing what i promised d

looks like it can't and tastes like a kit kat it might not be the european court of justice has ruled that nestle has no claim to the shape of the iconic chocolate ball so it can no longer trade make the trademark the shape of the four figure waist and chocolates not main rivals can now use the same shape the case was brought by the north by a norwegian maker of assume a shape that ball so next time you fancy a break watch out for a copycat kit kats you're up to date with the latest from the world of business i'll be back tomorrow same time same place i'll buy. you. nothing fun beethoven. his works contest for turning out. the maestro and famous. beethoven insist upon twenty teams. fifteen units like the small you. see a good lead coming up and so from stuff that has been below n'sewham stick behind those big movies feet in front of them and they keep a pro ball as an oil bond. film shot from a sonnet it. was good to me to be yes he couldn't flog me dumb enough to get in the queue but just to get into the coolness of a chuck to foretell the fall of. the phoenix part via pick up a piec

has carried out a large bond germany is now asked the european court of justice to decide whether the measure would. is intended to stimulate the economy of eurozone states breached the city's monetary policy mandate has purchased government bonds worth two point three trillion euros. the european union representatives have been meeting with foreign ministers of six balkan states in london to discuss their prospects of joining the e.u. the countries include bosnia and herzegovina serbia kosovo and macedonia albania and montenegro by joining the e.u. they hope to generate greater wealth before the western balkans can hope to benefit from europe's economic strength they've got some homework to do. all in all the west balkans are quite a way along the path to membership according to sources in brussels they've made progress on the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary the legislative process is also being brought in line with the european union. but even membership also means integration in the common market business must be competitive and in many cases that's a long way off

we are leaving so we bring an end to free movement, bring an end to the jurisdiction of the european courters and are lost in the future. and we have the freedom to strike our entr e deals with the rest of the world would rather than the trade deals struck in the interest of brussels. that would give us the freedom to protect jobs of brussels. that would give us the freedom to protectjobs and enhance the economy for the future and bring morejobs into the uk. this is a deal that delivers on brexit but also in awake injuries we can build the bright future for britain. making a commitment to and unlimited eu migration but are you ruling out giving some form of preferential treatment to eu citizens after we leave ? treatment to eu citizens after we leave? free movement well and. that was not my question. it will and and what i said before and will continue to say is that we reckon eyes that people will want to continue travelling on to europe and europeans travelling to the uk and people will still want opportunities in other countries as we have from people around the rest of the world. but w

after looks like a kit kat and tastes like a kit kat it might not be the european court of justice has ruled that nestlé has no claim to the shape of the iconic chocolate ball so it can no longer trade make the trademark the shape of the force to go away said chocolate not main rivals can now use the same shape the case was brought by the north by a norwegian maker of a simile shaped chocolate bar so next time if that's your break watch out for a copycat kit kats you're up to date with the latest from the world of business i'll be back tomorrow same time same place. cut. him so must still fall heavy but the fucking open air festival in northern germany. fucking metal battle will showcase dozens of newcomers on the. c.w. and club exports are going to the budget. bucket opener two thousand and ten starts the results are going to dominate the mind. time for an upgrade. funded church grows all buying. a house with no room. for design highlights you can make yourself. trends tips and tricks that will turn your home to something special. upgrade yourself with g.w. interior design channel on

has carried out a lobster tail bone purchases germany as the european court of justice to decide whether the measure which was intended to stimulate the economy of eurozone states breached. on a matter of policy not that. that's all from a child of an update for you in the next hour and watching about. climate change. environmental projects. globalization. biodiversity species conservation exploitation. human rights displacement. the global and current local are. global three thousand next on d w. climate change. waist length. isn't it time for good. eco africa people and projects that are changing no one fireman for the better is up to us to make a difference let's inspire each other. going to be environment magazine. on d w. a who do you think is going to be no joke. who matches the scores. in eighteen soccer world cup on t w news. neko case in germany to learn german. published in the. why not learn with him online on the mobile and free to suffer from the w e learning course nikos fic. this week on global three thousand we head to the forests of said b.m. where happy pigs enjoy a hea

food fight but who nestle has now lost its legal battle to trademark the shape of kit kat the european court of justice ruled to the food giants does not own the shape of the forefinger chocolate bars the decision brings an end to the snacks protected european status and clears the way for copycats kit kats the european commission president. is meeting today with u.s. president donald trump at the white house it's a bid to head off a looming transatlantic trade war but ahead of those talks trump renewed his call for completely free trade the u.s. president fired off this tweet calling on both parties to quote drop all tariffs barriers and subsidies that would be finally be called free market and fair trade to donald trump writing their own territory. but for now washington is the threatening to expand its terrorists to cause after slapping levies on steel and on a minium the e.u. has responded in kind. matters has this look at what's at stake. it's a tweet that struck brussels like a thunderbolt trade wars are good and easy to win that's the message the american president sent over the atlan

according to some accounts and dozens of families were forced from their homes despite calls from the european court of human rights for the operation to be suspended said the site had to be cleared out because of what they called solitary problems. united states and the european union have agreed to ratchet down tensions over trade following a meeting at the white house on wednesday u.s. president donald trump and european commission president john crow do you they'd agree to pursue as zero tariff trade policy. the u.s. court set a deadline off today to reunite separated migrant children with their parents the department of homeland security it claims it's on track to comply with government figures show that out of around twenty five hundred children around thirty eight hundred remain separated and even those figures are uncertain as are unifications that take place health professionals in the u.s. are sounding the alarm about the long term damage already done to the children for . the lucky few reunited after months of not knowing whether they'd ever see their children again. and for others even t

like there will be no relate in the european court -- there would be no role in the european court of justice. so, it is a very unusual thing for him to do, and it led to an apology. he did actually apologize to her for doing that, so that was a very interesting development. host: we would like to thank our announcer: c-span's washington journal, live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. coming up tomorrow morning, discussing president trump's meeting with president putin. then, talking about russia's military presence in syria and the balkans. to watch c-span's washington journal live monday morning at 7:00 a.m. me eastern time. join the discussion. >> president trump and russian president vladimir putin are scheduled to hold a news conference following their meeting in helsinki on monday. pres. trump: tonight it is my honor and privilege to announce that i will nominate judge brett to the united states supreme court. >> mr. president, i'm grateful to you. your confidence in me. announcer: brett kavanaugh of the district court of appeals for the district of columbia

they are bound to insist on the european court having a say in that, that'll bea court having a say inll be a problem in terms of bringing back control of our laws. and our borders. and thirdly, the tactic, i'm worried about what the european union will do is simply take what we've offered and ask for more weight more. i think we have got to get a bit tougher than with them.“ you say the prime minister's proposal means that control is an illusion, in your view if we carry oi'i illusion, in your view if we carry on with this plan with those terms, is that really leaving at all? that is that really leaving at all? that is the question we argued about last week at cabinet. i don't think so, but as i said in my letter, i hope she is right and i am wrong. it will be down to define a detail, that is the thing, having been involved in this process for the last couple of yea rs, this process for the last couple of years, i worry about the finer detail and i worry it will not work out the way we would hope. the pretty devastating analysis from david davis on the cracks, the fundamental differen

cases will still be referred to the european court ofjustice to interpret eu rules.orders between the uk and eu will be treated as a "combined customs territory". the uk would apply domestic tariffs and trade policies for goods intended for the uk, but charge eu tariffs for goods heading into the eu. the plan says it will end the free movement of people "giving the uk back control over how many people enter the country". a "mobility framework" will be set up to allow uk and eu citizens to travel to each other‘s territories. that is an owl and a plan was put together by theresa may's cabinet. —— outline there. david davis announcing just after midnight that he is now going. we were hoping to go live to brussels but for technical reasons we cannot right now. hopefully we'll get some analysis from their later on. moving on to other stories are. —— to other stories. xiaomi shares, initially priced at 17 hong kong dollars per share, have dropped nearly 3% on debut on the hong kong stock exchange. the share sale values the chinese smartphone maker at below $50 billion, whi