the european court of human rights say that the link between the british courts and the european courtan rights but on human rights elsewhere. i'll government is not sincere about human rights if so. there's also the 1951 geneva convention, again, has come into play in helping the supreme court to denounce the rwanda policy. the geneva connection, we are members of that as well and that is fundamental to the right of asylum seekers that the amount of legal thresholds of the government has failed to get over, they will have to think again the whole policy. have to think again the whole oli . ~ . , have to think again the whole oli _ ~ , , ., policy. the prime minister my mat has riven policy. the prime minister my mat has given his _ policy. the prime minister my mat has given his reaction _ policy. the prime minister my mat has given his reaction to _ policy. the prime minister my mat has given his reaction to this i has given his reaction to this judgment, saying this was on the outcome that they wanted but he remains plainly committed to stopping the boats. this is his major policy.

of human rights, the european court of human rights may consider this for years, but the veryits, what does this indicate? well, it shows that he uses all possible means, because the european union is greatly overestimated in our country, let's remember that tymoshenko was there at one time, when planted, there was even a decision of the european court of justice, it happened very, very quickly, what did it affect, we remember that it is not for nothing, theoretically this can also happen in our country. because the ecj, making a decision, can award several thousand euros there, and then it must draw the attention of the ukrainian court to what it considers to be a violation of the convention, and the ukrainian court must then review the issue and possibly eliminate the violation of the convention, or perhaps say that it is not , we believe that everything is normal here, in accordance with the legislation, that is why the ecj in our country does not condemn anyone, does not imprison anyone, does not issues, it is a subsidiary mechanism of international law, which can state th

a judge of the european court of human rights in strasbourg blocked that flight and since then, thereme asylum seekers to rwanda was unlawful. and so after that, the government then sought permission to appeal that decision here at the supreme court. there are five justices who have been considering the government�*s proposals, the rwanda plan. they sat at a hearing last month in october, over three days and very shortly, we will hear theirjudgment. there are a couple of unrelated judgment is expected to be handed down before the one related to the government�*s rwanda plan. we expect theirjudgment to be handed down between ten, 1030 this morning. there are a lot of cameras, camera crews, journalists here. clearly this is a huge significant day for the government and its difficult tojudge which day for the government and its difficult to judge which way this will go. but they have had these plans in place, as i say, since april of last year and no one has been put on a flight to rwanda since because of the legal battles. and so we are expecting thatjudgment to be handed down by five j

if the european court, court.o say that we couldn't have the rwanda migrants scheme , then a lot of migrants scheme, then a lot of people are frustrated , people are very frustrated, noted european court can noted that a european court can overrule what british parliamentarians are voting for in law . in law. >> yeah, i mean, i understand that. >> yeah, i mean, i understand that . i >> yeah, i mean, i understand that. i mean, i think there's a lot of bad things. the european court does, but there's also a lot of good things as well. there's a lot of freedoms that we all enjoy at the moment that we all enjoy at the moment that we wouldn't had if it we wouldn't have had if it wasn't the european court. wasn't for the european court. so there are good things and bad things it. think there things with it. i think there are other things that we do are other things that we can do to address asylum than to address asylum rather than running the european running out of the european courts. event, that courts. and in any e

different, the question is that after their implementation, the same russian oligarchs through the european courts other judicial institutions did not have... even the slightest chance to question the legality of these decisions , the question is why actually, formally now we will continue mr. maksym's opinion that some european states, they fear transfer these frozen assets, i.e. it is one thing to freeze and keep them, and another thing to use them to help ukraine , he fears precisely that the russian oligarchs will try to... judge this money through european courts. what else do you think exists regarding not only freezing and announcing amounts, but transferring real funds to ukraine. well, we must understand well that everything related to funds and not only is still ours, it is not our legislation, european legislation. it general european legislation, in addition, there is the legislation of individual countries. and so that there would be no precedents, the consequences that could happen, so that what you said, so that our russian oligarchs would not be sued later and get their own back, t

the european court, our attempt to appeal, was also unsuccessful, since we had to go through all the he courts, starting with the helsinki county court, who made a request to the army headquarters. regarding my claim for compensation of 7,500 euros, as paid to german prisoners of german conslagels, to which it was answered that finland did not commit war crimes, that everything was according to wartime laws. in january 1944, manerheim ordered the burning of all documents relating to the ethnic cleansing of the russian population in karelia. the finnish occupiers failed. after germany's victory over the soviet union, the finnish authorities planned to completely get rid of the entire russian population in the territories annexed to greater finland. as part of the preparation for this large-scale ethnic cleansing, at the end of 1941, a representative of the military command of east korea arrived on a visit to germany. various departments. issues of deportation of russian residents of karelia to the zone of german occupation. in addition, the representative of finland had to study the ex

there will be challenges on an individual basis and maybe even a challenge that goes to the european courtbe that rishi sunak and certainly people like suella braverman and others, will say this also demonstrates why britain should leave the convention. mark easton, for the moment, _ leave the convention. mark easton, for the moment, thank _ leave the convention. mark easton, for the moment, thank you - leave the convention. mark easton, for the moment, thank you very - leave the convention. mark easton, . for the moment, thank you very much, and i think it's going to be a busy week for mark. we are still in downing street, and as well as lots of movements within the conservative party we have been getting reaction from other parties. let's listen to pat mcfadden from the labour party and who is the labour party's campaign manager. the prime minister promised to change and one thing this reshuffle isn't as change. it will not change the fundamental problems of the country, it won't do anything to fix the cost of living or nhs waiting lists, and the only way to get real change is to get rid

welcome in that news conference, in the last few minutes, rishi sunak warrant european courts not to ock the flights and he also stressed that the court had confirmed sending migrants to a safe third country was lawful. ., , migrants to a safe third country was lawful. ., ._ ,, , ., ., , lawful. today the supreme court has 'udued lawful. today the supreme court has 'ud . ed that lawful. today the supreme court has judged that the _ lawful. today the supreme court has judged that the rwanda _ lawful. today the supreme court has judged that the rwanda policy - judged that the rwanda policy requires a set of changes in order to be lawful. i do not agree with this decision but i respected and accepted. the rule of law is fundamental to our democracy. we are prepared for all outcomes of this case. and so, we have been working on a new international treaty, with four under. this will provide a guarantee, in law, that those who have relocated from the uk to rwanda will be protected against removal from rwanda. and it will make clear that we will bring back anyone if ordered to do so by a cou

now, in terms of the european court, of the the european court, one of the things that people asked men i made that speech and was about january when i made that speech and 39 was about january when i made that speech and 39 seconds, was about january when i made that speech and 39 seconds, theseas about january when i made that speech and 39 seconds, these are bout january when i made that speech and 39 seconds, these are these rule 39 seconds, these are these judgements that come from the european have blocked european court that have blocked us doing things the us from doing things in the past. that were past. i said then that we were going engage a process going to engage in a process with european court with the european court to have reform, how they do that. reform, um, of how they do that. and on monday you may have seen that they concluded that they are going to make significant changes to that process. they are going to make significant cha goingo that process. they are going to make significant cha going 0 thaverocess. they are going to make significant cha goingo thave name

she said there was an agreement that the european court of human rights and international law would be laws to stop the boats. in other words, to make it easier to stop those channel crossings and remove people who have come to the uk through those routes. and she said that was all part of an agreement that was drawn up that rishi sunak hasn't stuck to that agreement. but i think what's particularly telling are the paragraphs in her letter, this venomous letter to rishi sunak, what's particularly telling are the paragraphs about the rwanda deal. we're expecting a ruling from the supreme court about ten o'clock tomorrow morning, we don't, no, and apart from the supreme court justices on the staff there nobody knows which way this ruling is going to go. she's saying that even if the government wins that ruling it's not going to go very well. this is the most damaging section really for the government, because if tomorrow the government, because if tomorrow the government wins that ruling in the supreme court, you would expect them to be absolutely triumphant about this. but suella braver

in a press conference moments ago, rishi sunak warned european courts not to block the flights. nfirmed sending migrants to a safe third country was lawful. today, the supreme court has judged that the rwanda policy requires a set of changes in order to be lawful. i do not agree with this decision, but i respect it and accept it. the rule of law is fundamental to our democracy. we have prepared for all outcomes of this case, and so we have been working on a new international treaty with rwanda. this will provide a guarantee in law that those who are relocated from the uk to rwanda will be protected against removal from rwanda. and it will make clear that we will bring back anyone if ordered to do so by a court. we will finalise the treaty in light of today's judgement and ratify it without delay, but we need to end the merry—go—round. i said i was going to fundamentally change our country and i meant it. so i'm also announcing today that we will take the extraordinary step of introducing emergency legislation. this will enable parliament to confirm that, with our new treaty, rwan

laid, ihor kolomoisky , asked his agent, did he tell his lawyer, not his agent, to appeal to the european courtthe fact that his rights are being violated in ukraine, what might be the consequences, i understand that there is a european court of human rights. it may take years to consider, but the very fact that he submits, what does this indicate? well, it shows that he uses all possible means, because the ecthr is greatly overestimated in our country, come on let's remember that at one time there was tymoshenko, when they were imprisoning, there even the decision of the ecthr happened very, very quickly, what did it affect, we remember that nothing, theoretically this can also happen in our country, because the ecthr, making a decision, he can award how many thousands of euros there. next, he must draw the attention of the ukrainian court to what he considers to be a violation of the convention, and the ukrainian court must then review the issue and possibly eliminate the violation of the convention, or perhaps say that no, we think that everything is fine here, in accordance with the law, so

irish government we need to we need to say to them about an interstate case that goes to the european court there are some families who are working with their lawyers in where the law firms where there are going to be challenges that go through the domestic courts, this won't go away, you know, it will just mean that the parents will all be dead, most of the spouses will be dead, it will be the children and grandchildren of those killed, and we are sentencing our two countries to perpetual trauma if we don't resolve this, just moving on slightly, andre, you spoke recently about censorship in the media now we're seeing a changing landscape obviously with proliferation of digital and social media, but just for the audience say just to give them in awareness of high draconian legislation was here for margin lase voices and i'm thinking sax and 31 in particular, can you give the audience a sense of what that what that was like? it was so much more than just a piece of legislation, it was a way of thinking. section 31 had always been part of the broadcasting act in the south, but in the early 19

of former juvenile prisoners of finnish concentration camps, she filed a formal claim with the european courtbefore this, they had already addressed the issue of compensation to the president of finland , martti ahtis, 7,500 euros, as they paid to german prisoners, german conslagels, to which it was answered that finland. in january 1944, manarguey ordered to burn everything documents concerning ethnic cleansing of the russian population in karelia. they planned to completely get rid of the entire russian population in the territories annexed to great finland. in preparation for this massive ethnic cleansing at the end. the main purpose of his trip was to discuss with various departments issues of deportation ; one of the main victims of finnish racial policy were soviet prisoners of war, they were kept in unbearable conditions, used in the most difficult labor, starved and beaten for the red army, found themselves in finnish captivity from hunger and abuse, died in captivity, in finnish captivity, a soviet prisoner of war, our prisoners made such boxes, cigarettes, boxes in order to exchange

irish government, we need to "we need to say to them about an interstate case that goes to the european court, there are some families who are working with their lawyers and collectively where the law firms where there are going to be challenges that go through the domestic courts, this won't go away, you know, it will just mean that the parents will all be dead, most of the spouses will be dead, it will be the children and grandchildren of those killed, and we are sentencing our two countries to perpetual trauma if we don't resolve this. just moving on slightly uh andre, you spoke uh recently about uh censorship in the media, now we're seeing the changing landscape obviously with proliferation of digital and social media, but just for the audience say just to give them a awareness of high draconian legislation was here for marginal ays voices and and thinking saxs and 31 in particular, can you give the audience a sense of what that what that was like? it was so much more than just a piece of legislation, it was was a way of thinking, section 31 had always been part of the broadcasting act in

that. the european court for that.in the uk and people that here can go to our that are here can go to our court to rely on the european rights. and that made it a lot easier people access easier for people to access those types of rights. and, you know, some might well, open know, some might say, well, open the for human rights the floodgates for human rights claims. haven't claims. other countries haven't done that. some some have. done that. some have. some have. and that might be one of the reasons all reasons i think there's all sorts reasons sorts of other reasons as well. but them. >> david, thank you very much. you haven't really cheered up you haven't really cheered me up . hey there. . that's david. hey there. international human rights . that's david. hey there. internatthankiuman rights . that's david. hey there. internatthank youan rights . that's david. hey there. internatthank you veryihts . that's david. hey there. internatthank you very much lawyer. thank you very much for joining us afternoon. also jo

fact that once parliament has changed the law at home, we could still face challenges from the european court that i'm prepared to change laws and revisit international relationships to remove the obstacles in our way. let me tell everybody now that i will not allow a foreign court to block these flights. if the strasbourg court chooses to intervene against the express wishes of parliament, i'm prepared to do what is necessary to get flights off. i will not take the easy way out. because i fundamentally do not believe that anyone that the founding aims of the european convention on human rights was to stop a sovereign parliament removing illegal migrants to a country deemed to be safe in parliamentary statute and binding international law. and i do not believe we are alone in that interpretation. across europe, other governments are following our lead. italy, germany, austria, are all exploring models like ours. indeed, the un hcr operates its own refugee scheme in rwanda. and unlike the uk, they don't have a treaty for any of this. we are a reasonable government and this is a reasonable coun

european union . so if we're to make rwanda work, we must amend those domestic laws. and in doing so, override international obugafions override international obligations which anyway, don't have courtsy, that can interpret them . the european can interpret them. the european convention on human rights does, but international treaties don't necessarily , as the prime necessarily, as the prime minister said, he will not allow foreign to block foreign court to block deportations, this isn't deportations, but this isn't particularly relevant because it's by domestic it's been blocked by domestic court. historically, we've ignored the echr as we did on prisoner voting rights, when for ten years or more we didn't do what they wanted us to do. we could do the same for the question rwanda, but there is question of rwanda, but there is something quite telling about this ruling . suella braverman this ruling. suella braverman scathing to the prime scathing letter to the prime minister alleged that in exchange for her support during the leadership contest, prime minister promised to include notwith standing clauses to small boats , legislation that small boats, legislation that would block the

he added he was willing to confront the european court of human rights. urt to block these flights. if the strasbourg court chooses to intervene against the express wishes of parliament, i am prepared to do what is necessary to get flights off. labour are scathing, but face tough questions themselves. he was warned many times about the problems and yet he still pushed ahead, still made it the central part of his plan. clearly dealing with this is difficult and would be difficult for you if you were in government. what in precise terms would you do? we need a major plan to go after the criminal gangs who have been allowed to take hold along the channel. they are undermining our border security. clear skies at westminster today, but there was a sulphurous mood among some conservative mps while they waited to hear from rishi sunak. delivering the policy of stopping the boats is a confidence issue of the boats is a confidence issue of the british people in this government. a confidence issue for my voters and me by extension therefore it is a confidence issue

european court of human rights in strasbourg.stly, neither the prime _ pull out of the echr? firstly, neither the prime minister i pull out of the echr? firstly, | neither the prime minister nor i pull out of the echr? firstly, - neither the prime minister nor i can go into the details of the bill because we are in the final stages of drafting it right now and that is for an understandable reason and not because we have been sitting on our hands, but we had to wait for the supreme courtjudgment and the exact issues that they raised with our policy so that we could craft the bill appropriately. policy so that we could craft the billappropriately. i policy so that we could craft the bill appropriately. i am policy so that we could craft the bill appropriately. iam not policy so that we could craft the bill appropriately. i am not going to speculate on exactly the contents of the bill, but let me say this. the prime minister and i have said for a long time that we will do whatever it takes to get the flights off to rwanda and we bot

and then at the last minute, the european court intervened. en it's been mired in the court system in this country ever since . and in this country ever since. and of course, the end the crunch day was supposed to be today and it was ruled unlawful . but where it was ruled unlawful. but where are we now? we are going back effectively to square one, because even though rishi sunak says he is introducing emergency legislation , even though he says legislation, even though he says there is going to be a treaty in which the rwanda government is going to enshrine in in that treaty that they will not deport anyone from rwanda, even if they are turned down for asylum in that country , it will still have that country, it will still have to be tested in the courts here. so it will still go back to the high court and then whoever loses will no doubt appeal. it'll go to the court of appeal . it'll go to the court of appeal. it'll go to the court of appeal. it will go to the supreme court. we will be stuck, it seems, in this continued cycle for many months

european court, our attempt appeal also did not bring success, since we had to go through all the stagesrting with the helsinki district court, which... made a request to the main headquarters of the finnish army regarding my claim for compensation of 7,500 euros as payment. in january 1944 , manargeem ordered the burning of all documents relating to the ethnic cleansing of the russian population in karelia. but the finnish occupiers failed to completely destroy traces of their crimes. after germany's victory over the soviet union, the finnish authorities planned to completely get rid of everything russian, in as part of the preparation for this large-scale ethnic cleansing, at the end of 1941, a representative of the military command of eastern karelia arrived on a visit to germany. the main purpose of his trip was to discuss with various departments of the third rich the issues of deportation of russian residents of karelia to the german zone. occupation. in addition, the representative of finland had to study the territories. in particular, finnish officials were interested in hitler'

because leaving the european court would take forever.etime? what would you do differently? >> very simple . i would i've >> very simple. i would i've said it time and time again using existing treaties , i would using existing treaties, i would pick up and safely take back to france every single one. just this weekend , the french this weekend, the french authorities, they rescued seven boats with 200 people. they took them back to france. the belgian authorities are picking them up, taking them back to france. so, look, we could do that. it requires courage. it requires leadership. there's none of that within this government, within number 10. and the prime minister and until there is nothing will change. don't we all? the key point, richard, don't we also need to have some safe and legal routes for people who want to seek asylum where they apply, but they apply onune? >>i onune? >> i mean , not far be it from me >> i mean, not far be it from me to normally promote technology. they apply online. we can look at it. we can decide how many

union court has expressed its disagreement about this, i.e. there is no appeal from the decision of the european union court, but everything after all, president duda decided that he is a court , taking into account the fact that if the supreme court as an independent judicial body is restrained, then it will be easier to change the situation in the entire judiciary system, which has been criticized by the european union, and poland does not receive funds from the post-kovid fund precisely because of the fact that the judicial system, the judicial system will lose its independence from the executive power, until the independence of the judicial system, the whole judicial system, and here... the supreme court plays a key role, until poland will not receive funds from the post-kovid fund, and here it must be said that by the end of this year, poland can receive 5 billion euros in advance, that is, there is something to fight for. leader of the law and justice party yaroslav kaczyński, just speaking on the occasion of today's union, poland will simply lose its independence, and that independence is

a lot of legal challenges on an individual basis, and maybe even a challenge that goes to the european courthich point, despite winning, it may be that rishi sunak and people like suella braverman and others will say, well, this also demonstrates why britain should leave the convention. mark easton, and home affairs chris pond. we have some reaction from steve barclay who has moved from the health brief, he is no longer secretary of state for health, he has moved to be environment secretary. he has said he is delighted to be appointed in that role and he will be working to back british farming and fishing, champion rural communities, protect the environment. as an mp for a rural area he says i know how important these issues aren't too many people up—and—down the country. as we said earlier david cameron has been getting down to work in his new role as foreign secretary. he met india's foreign minister sj schenker who was due to meetjames india's foreign minister sj schenker who was due to meet james cleverly until earlier today. we are joined by our diplomatic correspondent james landale to

the european court ofjustice's top legal advisor has recommended scrapping a previous apple victory againstn a long—running legal saga. brussels have alleged that apple recieved illegal "state aid" by ireland. the advocate general�*s opinion is not binding on the court, but it will be influential and taken as a sign of the direction the case is taking. the oil giant shell is suing greenpeace for damages after the group's activists boarded the company's oil production vessel in transit at sea this year. greenpeace say shell is demanding $2.1 million in damages. greenpeace activists boarded the vessel injanuary near the canary islands off the atlantic coast of northern africa to protest against oil drilling, and travelled on it as far as norway. don't forget you can get in touch with me on social media — i'm @benthompsontv see you soon, goodbye. hello from the bbc sport centre. new zealand have beaten sri lanka by five wickets, greatly boosting their chances of gettting to the cricket world cup semifinals. new zealand won the toss and elected to bowl. kusal perera top—scored for sri lanka wit

sunok hopes to reassure the english court that there will be no re-deportation, but as for the european courtn rights, let me say right away, i will not allow foreign court to block these flights, prime minister of italy miloni writes off usunok, she concluded with the prime minister of albania the same agreement as britain with rwanda, not far from the port of the popular albanian resort of shengini, on the territory of 500 km of a former military airfield, the first in europe will be opened, surrounded by barbed wire migration center for refugees for 3,000 people. albanians will guard him and deport him if italy refuses to accept them too, so for albania, not being a member of the european union, this agreement is like surrender land for rent on favorable terms, plus jobs for guards. the agreement is that albania will provide italy with the opportunity to use some areas of albanian territory, in which italy will be able, at its own expense and... in its jurisdiction, to create centers for the management of illegal migrants. critics of the idea say that it smells of a colonial smell: the cou

she says the european court of human rights' rule 39 would mean even if the government wins tomorrow,can use interim orders to appeal the decision. some lawyers agree with the former home secretary that the government could have legislated more firmly to prevent this and make clear it would ignore rule 39 in future. but others argue this year's illegal migration act does give the government the power to ignore rule 39, meaning migrants could be deported within weeks, though it could be a breach of international law to do this. it is by no means certain that the european court would reconsider the case if the ruling is clear on human rights. even before suella braverman�*s attack tonight on the prime minister, tomorrow was already set to be a big moment for one of its flagship policies. all eyes tomorrow on courtroom one at the supreme court. in a moment, we hope to speak to conservative mp for cleepthorpes' martin vickers, but first let's talk to labour's dame diana johnson, who chairs the home affairs select committee. the government says it is not stopping here, what can it legally

eh, all our appeals to the international criminal court, to the european court of human rights, werehe ukrainian militants, despite all their crimes, continued to receive support. from the so-called west, in february 2022 , a special military operation began, settlements under the control of ukrainian military formations were liberated, local residents could finally talk about how the national battalion fighters behaved, to say that these were ordinary people , well, not to say, it felt like the nazis could easily have brought him to his knees, sent him to the theater, aka the multi-story building in which he lived, well, they shot with a mortar, of course, from a tank or with some weapon they hit this nine-story building, a fire started, a fire started from the second floor, my wife and i jumped out, well , there was a lot of smoke, running out of the burning house, viktor vasilyevich saw in front of him a man in the uniform of an azov battalion. there's a mug like that, he takes the machine gun from me with a machine gun, this azov man is running here, i ran, in short, when he shot

suitable for research. which is presented, some of these cases were related to the procedures of the european court of human rights in the field of hijab, some of these cases were in the field of intellectual property , related to clothing and products related to hijab , some were related to measures to prevent non-hijab in society, and some the articles have the aspect of criticizing the existing laws. and preparing the bodies of two prominent clerics in kerman and khoi cities. the body of hojjat al-islam and muslim min shakri, one of the professors of peshwat seminary in kerman, was exhumed and buried today. the burial ceremony of the body of hojjat al-islam wal al-muslimin shakuri , imam juma, was held on the same day. 40 years here people prayed behind him. their asceticism, strengthening and magnanimity was really time. now they have come for a glorious farewell. he was not only the imam of the mosque. the interpretation of the students was the rest of almazin. among the scholars and elders who have been a service center in kerman for the last century , what is the secret of this love and flou

understand that the indictment of any political person will call for a possible appeal to the european courtf human rights, an attempt to show this case as a political one, dubinsky, who in fact is only a member of the state government only thanks to his association with president zelensky, is already starting to position himself almost like a fighter against the authoritarian regime of yermak zelensky, at least that is his rhetoric lately is ongoing, so we as well as i agree with the fact that we should not expect the verdict in the next few months, or even months, and the verdict will actually be challenged both in the appellate instance and in the cassation instance in the supreme court, but i really hope that you and i will witness the transition to court debates, why now, it is difficult to say now, these are not public at the moment, there may be testimony of people who worked with dubinsky or crossed paths with him, there may be an appropriate level of expertise , his statements, his works, perhaps considering to the fact that he is under investigation in other cases, it was possible

for the so-called civilized world, all our appeals to the international criminal court and the european courte simply ignored , and ukrainian militants, despite all their crimes, continued to receive support from the so-called west, in february 2022 year, a special military operation began, settlements under the control of the ukrainian military... formations were liberated, local residents could finally talk without fear about how the national battalion fighters behaved, to say that these were ordinary people, well, not to say, such a feeling, well, like the fascists, they could easily bring you to your knees, they would point a gun or a machine gun at you, you didn’t die at the hands of the azov fighters. first they fired at the multi-storey building in which he lived. well, they fired with a mortar, of course, from a tank or from what kind of weapon they hit this nine-story building. a fire started, the fire started from the second floor. my wife and i jumped out, well, there was a lot of smoke. running out of the burning house, viktor vasilyevich saw in front of him a man in the uniform o

human the european court of human rights. wonders rights.d with any legislation to help support this rwanda policy . help support this rwanda policy. the processing people arriving here illegally in rwanda, of course , the supreme court rules course, the supreme court rules tomorrow morning at 10 am. and towards the end it says here that someone needs to be honest. if that's her, of course , your if that's her, of course, your plan. that's you, mr sunak's plan. that's you, mr sunak's plan is not working. we've endured the tories have endured record election defeats. she means by—election defeats all yeah means by—election defeats all year. your reset have failed. and we're running out of time. you need to change course urgently , she says. here it goes urgently, she says. here it goes on. i may not found the right words notably last week when she talked about having a tent. if you're homeless to be a lifestyle choice. and also some language about police choosing favourites when they're policing property arrests, pro—palestinian protests beca

as did the european court of human rights against belgium, over 1700 times, we received a written response from the office of the belgian state sex tree in charge of asylum. according to its belgium phased a 40 percent increase in asylum requests in 2022 from 2021. with 30 full size and $500.00 places. the asylum reception network in belgium has never been so large quote. nobody can say that there is a lack of will to support the homeless men. h r t. 's have started occupying premises like this former office building and brussels. 350 men, mainly from burundi. so don eritrea, i'm g m and live here. for bruce to pre lead a 15 strong team and is having to reject around 20 new arrivals like this man. every day to day we have no no free place. so i can put the people like this relatively new into the cycle of homelessness. and waiting robin is still convinced that his family's future is here in europe. this my son kevin, this my, the book seat is me. and so he keeps waiting with more more men sleeping in the passages outside belgians, asylum office everyday lives. very tough here now. and it's

colleague, listen, i beg you, just in case, give me two letters i’ll write to someone at the un, the european courtmy girlfriend , well, your girlfriend showed herself wonderfully yesterday at a meeting with your brother, you never know why they met, look, it’s convincing, again the photo, it’s just some kind of inspiration, look , look, ah, selana, that’s enough, i won’t fall for such scams anymore, why the scams, we asked for half a yard of greenery for your head and perfectly control every step of your brother cop, the photos are authentic, well, what are they fake, you never know because of me they could meet, you naive, oh, naive! oh, well, to be honest, these photos also came as a surprise to me, but i’ve been living in the world for a long time and i know a lot of such stories, such stories about female meanness and inconstancy, one brother disappeared, had an affair with another, that’s enough, i’m this nonsense i don’t want to listen anymore, but the first one comes back, i won’t tell him anything, and if he doesn’t come back, i’ll start an affair with someone else. better. good afternoon,

residents of donbass, as if not... all our appeals to the international criminal court, to the european courtn rights, were simply ignored , and ukrainian militants, despite all their crimes, continued to receive support from the so-called west. in february 2022, a special military operation began, settlements under the control of ukrainian military forces were liberated. locals on... to say that these are ordinary people, not to say, it feels like the nazis could easily bring you to your knees, point a barrel or a machine gun at you, because they shot at the multi-story building in which he lived, well , naturally, with tank or what kind of weapon was used to hit this nine-story building, a fire started, a fire started from the second floor , my wife and i jumped out, well, there was a lot of smoke, running out of the burning house, viktor vasilyevich saw in front of him a man in the uniform of the azov battalion, standing, well, a mug, such a face, that’s what i like, well, the question is, what i like it, he takes the machine gun from me with the machine gun. azovets, this is azovets, azov

milledge sets old her whole on environmental activists who told her they would bring the case to the european court of human rights. she says, everyone here knows what's wrong, but people who oppose inspections. don't want to understand. nobody wants to close the plant, but stop the toxic waste poisoning the village. the struggle is sticking a tool on her. it's exhausting, she sense the dream is simple. this is going to be a hot dog and will be honestly, i would love to retire and spend the rest of my life with my grandchildren from y'all. so the property that is my only wish to me tell me is ready to grandchildren. rarely come, it's not safe to touch anything here or play upsides drug in a sense, a life increasingly constrained to be spent inside her for her life mostly takes place outside of her home. good is from to okay and works as a belly dancer, performing through the night and assemble the dawn. so presents a center is old tradition that is an integral part of turkish culture. but check it is in then economy cries is inflation. is that over 60 percent and going out in the evening is becomin

he added he was willing to confront the european court of human rights. ow a foreign court to block these flights. if the strasbourg court chooses to intervene against the express wishes of parliament, i am prepared to do what is necessary to get flights off. labour are scathing, but face tough questions themselves. he was warned many times about the problems and yet he still pushed ahead, still made it the central part of his plan. clearly dealing with this is difficult and would be difficult for you if you were in government. what in precise terms would you do? we need a major plan to go after the criminal gangs who have been allowed to take hold along the channel. they are undermining our border security. clear skies at westminster today, but there was a sulphurous mood among some conservative mps while they waited to hear from rishi sunak. when people around here say something is a "confidence issue", what they really mean is they're losing confidence in the prime minister. delivering the policy of stopping the boats is a confidence issue of the britis