but the extension of the preventive measure is taking place under the circumstances that the european courttice has repeatedly indicated in ukraine as a violation in business, here is such a spoiler, literally yesterday... to the supreme court, the chairman of the supreme court delivered a report on taking into account the practice of the european court, where he cited cases where the european court ruled against ukraine, this is the third, fifth, sixth article, and these are all violations in specific cases where they were established, they are simply listed in the chervinskyi case, yes, that is, stupidly, on the one hand, the supreme court points to the obligation of compliance. those unequivocal ones, yes, it's not, not now, this practice is not new, it has happened more than once, in relation to ukraine such decisions were made, yes, they are a systemic, general problem, this was emphasized by the supreme court, and in view of this, well, prosecutors should react in some way, this is discredit, no matter what they prove, this case will be discredited precisely their actions. at the stag

he european court of human rights. hrs. says he european court of human rights.. he says he doesn't need to. i think - says he doesn't need to. i think riaht says he doesn't need to. i think right now _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is a _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is a much - says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is a much more| right now there is a much more attentive trying to keep both camps happy in the sense we might cross that bridge when we come to it but equally there is a step forward we can ignore echr rulings which will keep us in the echr so i don't think were at stage of leaving it. whenever the next tory leadership contest is, that will be a thing? i contest is, that will be a thing? i suspect it will be a theme and contest is, that will be a thing? i suspect it will be a theme and in 2022 suella braverman did want it, it did not stop her telling a ligament committed to it and she said we shou

of human rights, that is, when they say that the european court of human rights will not be able to evaluate us. and we will save money so that people will not be able to complain to ukraine that ukraine has violated rights, and this is actually because of the war, and we are talking about it warned in the derogation, no, it will still be evaluated, because ukraine has signed the european convention on human rights and proportionality, and this is also a certain task of the delegation. oleksandr, stay in touch, because serhiy demchenko, people's deputy from servant of the people and representative of the legal policy committee, is also joining our broadcast. i greet you, good evening. good evening, but oleksandr has another question for you, and then serhiy and i will continue, and are there any risks here, that in ukraine, i don't know, they will, for example, abuse these norms, and because what people are interested in what if they allowed, it means seizing property, then maybe whoever needs it, he will seize it and not necessarily for the benefit of the war or, if it is really

favor of swift senior citizens accusing their government not doing enough to stop climate change. european court in human rights today said that switzerland's failure to act against global warming is a violation of human rights. also coming up that the un top court for years today argued that german support for is realty, does not violate international law. the garage was easy, differently assuming germany claiming berlin is helping is real. commit a legend, genocide in gulf. the brit golf is good to have you with this on this tuesday. it is the 1st court ruling of its kind. today, europe's top of human rights court ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who had argued their governments in action on climate change has put their lives in danger. it's a landmark decision that could influence legislation all across europe. and you could give a boost to activists who say their governments are failing to tackle global warming . of these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners suit their own government because it's handling of the claimant crisis, put their health at risk. th

convention or european courts , but it also european courts, but it also says in the human rights act that the uk court can only issue a certificate of incompatibility vie it can't overrule parliament. the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is maintained within the human rights act, and has been firmly reasserted in the rwanda act. >> this is where you and i differ because i believe in what's called the universality of human rights laws. no, no, parliament can say it's okay to convict someone without a fair trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act , it trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act, it would be unlawful. so parliament's only sovereign insofar it its laws comply with fundamental human rights. the issue there is who is the right judge of that? >> because as i don't want parliament to sentence people to death by bill of attainder, as it used to be able to do, but that won't happen because the british people wouldn't vote for that to happen, whereas the human rights that we're getting from the convention, and we saw this very s

of human rights, and the practice of the european court shows that the courts, the european the refuses if a person has not used these national means of protection of the violated right, so i am not worried and i am not afraid that there will be any mass appeals to the european court from the point of view of the procedure, but from the point of view of the essence of the violation. rights, i do not see what right is violated, no one, i emphasize once again, refuses to provide consular services, we have specifically written in the law in such a way that consular services are provided simultaneously with the updating of passports, we can just assume now that men will not want to update these military registration documents, and accordingly, if they do not have these documents updated, they will no longer be able to receive consular services, that's right, well , look, if a person needs consular services. looks like it is, first, we we are talking about the fact that consular services, there is a list of those consular services that are provided regardless of whether a person has

convention or european courts , but it also european courts, but it alsoays in the human rights act that the uk court can only issue a certificate of incompatibility vie it can't overrule parliament. the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is maintained within the human rights act, and has been firmly reasserted in the rwanda act. >> this is where you and i differ because i believe in what's called the universality of human rights laws. no, no, parliament can say it's okay to convict someone without a fair trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act , it trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act, it would be unlawful. so parliament's only sovereign insofar it its laws comply with fundamental human rights. the issue there is who is the right judge of that? >> because as i don't want parliament to sentence people to death by bill of attainder, as it used to be able to do, but that won't happen because the british people wouldn't vote for that to happen, whereas the human rights that we're getting from the convention, and we saw this very str

a group of swiss women have won their first ever climate case victory in the european court of human re they are. the court found switzerland violated have violated them of their human rights by not taking sufficient action on climate change. switzerland's efforts were called woefully inadequate. this ruling includes the law in 46 other european countries including the u.k. it comes after last month was officially declared the warmest march on record. we will get onto that in a moment. let's start with this report from our climate editor justin donald. >> the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight. >> there has been a violation of article eight of the convention. >> and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland's failure to do enough to cut planet warming in missions could create heat waves that could threaten the lives of older people. >> i am so, well, shocked, positively shocked. so happy to contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. >> today's ruling is not open to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will set the l

a group of swiss women have won their first ever climate case victory in the european court of human re they are. the court found switzerland violated have violated them of their human rights by not taking sufficient action on climate change. switzerland's efforts were called woefully inadequate. this ruling includes the law in 46 other european countries including the u.k. it comes after last month was officially declared the warmest march on record. we will get onto that in a moment. let's start with this report from our climate editor justin donald. >> the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight. >> there has been a violation of article eight of the convention. >> and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland's failure to do enough to cut planet warming in missions could create heat waves that could threaten the lives of older people. >> i am so, well, shocked, positively shocked. so happy to contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. >> today's ruling is not open to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will set the l

on the other hand, constantly labeling european court of human rights a foreign court, plenty of criticsuse of lords tonight arguing it is an international court which the u.k. has become a signatory. not ruling out that as a conservative party, you could withdraw as a distinctive marker of difference from the labour party going into the election. there are a good number of individuals who do think logical conclusion of all of this, not just this policy but a number of others, is likely to be withdrawal from the echr, or at least the beginnings of a discussion of rewriting the convention that critics believe belongs in a different era, was not designed for the challenge of the mid-2020's. christian: have a coffee. it could be a late one. thank you for your contributions. around the world and across the u.k., this is bbc news. for our u.k. viewers, let's take a quick look at the stories making headlines today. hugh edwards has resigned from the bbc, says he is leaving on the medical advice of his doctors. there were reports that he paid a young person for sexually explicit images. the u.k

the european court of human rights is issuing a verdict on 2 cases that could have historic impact. and a spectacular total eclipse leaves north america in all, tens of millions of people watch the moon block the sun over mexico, the us and canada. the nicole for at least welcome to the show. israel's prime minister benjamin netanyahu says, a date has been set for sending ground forces into rough um, but he has not specified when this will happen. the us opposes the assault on gaza southern most city saying that it would have a devastating impact on civilians and israel's own security. that you know statement comes days after israel's army withdrew troops from nearby upon eunice. some guidance of already started to return to the rubble and gaza 2nd largest city . over a 1000000 are still sheltering and rough on most of gauze. this population has been displaced by the is really offensive, which was launched after the october 7th terror attacks. by how much a, a lieutenant colonel peter learner is a spokesman for israel's military. and he told us why israel considers rough ought to be

tonight, the european court of human rights has ruled that human rights can be violated by not acting power grab, turning a court into a politically motivated legal relative. we must leave urgently. otherwise we can expect human rights violations for not building enough wind turbines or solar panels. as the vatican declares , transgender vatican declares, transgender surgery should never be attempted as it interferes with the will of god. leaked documents from the cass review have suggested young people who believe they are trans may be suffering from mental health problems, but can we be surprised by that? the foreign secretary, lord cameron, has met the former us president donald trump at his florida resort. the former us president donald trump at his florida resort . as trump at his florida resort. as my fellow gb news presenter nigel farage suggests , he could nigel farage suggests, he could be the link between a starmer trump leadership . but did you trump leadership. but did you see mr trump's latest eclipsing new campaign video, plus this year's town hall rich list has been rev

so the, the european court a few minutes, right? so it's really saying that the switch government needs to do something about that. but more importantly, this case also opens doors to other cases and makes other countries vulnerable to, to the kind of cases that we've just seen in white, switzerland. and there were other cases that were, were what, thrown outright portugal, france, and most people don't think of the switzerland, it as being the place where you have i, i guess the, the least being done to save the environment. i mean, this is how to my wife switzerland. uh, got through was the case. i mean, but with 2 other cases, a court as well once again, one against portugal and 52 other european nations. the other one against, from those 2 folks thrown out perhaps because switzerland is so small and this was such a detailed look at what they've been doing. and perhaps because these women could also prove that there was, you know, an impact on their life. as a result of the climate change and the adverse effects that we're seeing

it is not, let's say, a guarantee that if a person, for example, if we are talking about the european court, he will file an individual complaint, then this delegation, which is there, it will protect the state from those violations that a person will complain about, because everything is very individual there. and questions will be considered, to what extent this delegation is justified, legal and so on. look, if we take, for example, if we talk about ratings, for example, in the human freedom index rating for the 23rd year, ukraine is in 83rd place, and we are neighbors with such a country as. doras, they have the same number of points as us 83, if you take another in the world famous index of democracy, which is made by the british edition of the economist, then we appear there 91, if i am not mistaken, our neighbors are kenya, african, and we asked very much in this index, we were, and now we are there marked as a transitional regime, the question is that if in the 20th year we were actually at the very, very, very top of this list and moving, as it were, in the direction of its inferio

control. and whether, in this context, citizens of ukraine can file complaints there with the european court of human rights, given that the country is in a state of martial law and in state of war this procedure has not been stopped, and of course, all possibilities of appeal to the european court remain in the case when there are reasons to believe that the state does not observe the rights defined in the convention. i would like to remind you that the main and most... by category, widespread violations of rights relate primarily to four articles, this is the right to freedom and personal integrity, the right to a fair trial, these are respectively the fifth and sixth articles of the convention, the third article is the right not to be subjected to torture inhumane, cruel, degrading treatment or punishment, and the first article of the first protocol of property rights, by the way, it was also limited, so to speak, in this derogation. submissions, that is, the state made a concession with reference to the fact that in certain cases there may be, for example, seizure, expropriation of some

so the european court a few minutes, right? so it's really saying that the, the switch government needs to do something about that. but more importantly, this case also opens doors to other cases and makes other countries vulnerable to, to the kind of cases that we've just seen in white, switzerland. and there were other cases that were, were what, thrown outright portugal, france, and most people don't think of the switzerland, it as being the place where you have i, i guess the, the least being done to save the environment. we. this is how to know why switzerland uh got through was the case. i mean, but with 2 other cases a court as well once again, one against portugal and 52 other european nations. the other one against, from those 2 folks thrown out perhaps because switzerland is so small. and this was such a detailed look at what they've been doing and pumps because these women could also prove that there was, you know, an impact on their life. as a result of the climate change and the adverse effects that we're seeing th

the european court of human rights said that's what the ends in action is putting their health at risk. also coming up where is that? the un stop court argue that trimming support for israel does not violate international law. nicaragua accuse is germany of helping israel committed a legend, genocide in gaza. and the father of the so called god particle dies at age. 94 will look at the legacy of his peter higgs and how his discovery re shaped our understanding of the universe. the, i'm here until berlin, thank you very much for joining us. your p. europe's top human rights court has ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who argue that their governments in action on climate change has put their lives at risk. as a landmark decision that could influence the legislation across europe and give a boost to activists who say their governments are feeling to tackle global warming . of these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners through their own government because its handling of the climate crisis put their health at risk . the european human rights courts and str

a group of swiss women have won the first—ever climate case victory in the european court of human rightsare. the court found switzerland had violated some of their human rights by not taking sufficient action on climate change. switzerland's efforts were called "woefully inadequate". this ruling could influence the law in 46 other europen countries, including the uk. it comes after last month was officially declared the world's warmest march on record. we start with this report from climate editorjustin rowlatt. the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight... there has been a violation of article 8 of the convention. ..and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland's failure to do enough to cut planet warming emissions could help create heat waves that could threaten the lives of older people. i am so, well, shocked, positively shocked, so happy we could contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. today's ruling is not only to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will support the legal case for climate action in european count

switch and senior citizens accusing their government of not doing enough to stop climate change. european court of human rights today said that switzerland's failure to act against global warming is a violation of human rights. also coming up tonight at the union's top court. lawyers today argue that german support for is real does not violate international law. the garage sees it differently, it's suing germany, claim you get berlin, it's helping is real commit alleged genocide in gossip and violent crime on the rise here in germany with many of the suspects from other countries in that one statistic is fueling a debate on company immigration laws, the library golf is good to have you with this. it is the 1st court ruling of its kind . today, europe's top human rights court ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who had argued that their governments, in action on climate change has put their lives at risk. the landmark decision that could influence legislation across europe a could get a boost activists who say that their governments are failing to tackle global warming. of these women

in an interview with sunry, shunok said that london is ready to withdraw from the european court of human rights if this is the case. will help stop the flow of illegal migrants into the country. i believe that our plans are consistent with all our international obligations, including interaction with the cap. but i also believe that border security and the fight against illegal migration are more important than our membership in any foreign court. the reason for such statements was the decision of the european court of justice, which in 2009 prevented the deportation of illegal immigrants from britain to rwanda under an agreement with the african republic. london’s tough position on migration policy, and therefore membership in the echr, is also supported by rome. last year, both countries entered into agreements to fund the voluntary return of illegal immigrants to north africa and the middle east. sunak's statement today dutch mep marcel de graavk also supported this. he said the echr had become a playground for far-left marxists and called for the judicial body to be abolished altoget

and our warming climate is at the center of a landmark ruling. expect it from the european court of human rights today. the court will decide whether a government in action on climate change violates human rights. one ruling will decide several cases before the courts, among them young practitioners from 4 to gall or suing $32.00 european countries, arguing that an adequate climate policies are threatening their future. separately . a group of elderly women from switzerland, it's a global warming, puts them at risk of dying from extreme heat. the verdict cannot be appealed and could force and european governments to sticks to their climate commitments. let's go straight to strasbourg. worthy w, corresponded band to the god is reporting for us from the european court of human rights been explained to us in, in more detail with judges are deciding on today, sped zipcode. combined the 3 cases because they are quite similar as 6 views from part to go off. the wide fires and popular go claimed that the government in ponti goal is not doing enough of to hendo to prevent climate change . and the

, should not be accepted as such by these european courts, because russia itself has violatedll possible international and domestic laws of these countries, so it has no right to sue, sometimes they say that, you know, it will create a bad precedent and... some countries, let's say , there china, the countries of the middle east, will be able to think about the fact that it is necessary to withdraw their funds, take their funds from europe, well, here the logic is absolutely not clear, if the europeans declare that no country that has not committed any international crimes, aggressions can feel free and easy, if you broke these rules, well... then what then will you have to pay for it, and thus no normal country that does not want to have problems with international law and sanctions, never in its life. he will not do any such things and will calmly keep his funds in the same european depository. in a word, there is a lot to work on, but here again, the political will of these western politicians is needed, which, unfortunately, is not enough. meanwhile, they are already croak

bobrovska said, 60 days to update their data in the tsc, that's what in the current... these european courts can say if citizens of ukraine will appeal the decision of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine, that's what, regarding restrictions on their rights, of course, we can now talk about that this is true, it is the duty of every citizen of ukraine, according to the constitution, to defend his state, but it so happened that i don't know how many 600 or 700 thousand men from ukraine are currently abroad... can they question this decision through the european courts, mr. oleksiy. you know, a very interesting topic, a very interesting topic, but it seems to me that it is important here that some serious analyst, legal group analyze and find out all the risks. by the way, i am not ruling anything out, because yes, the citizen is illegal crossed the dniester through the tisza, through the tisza, he can pay his fine. a symbolic 200 €, well , this is what ukrainian legislation provides for today, and then he is honest before the law, that is, i do not rule out that the mechanism of appeal

or 700,000 men from ukraine are currently abroad, and can they be brought to justice through european courts this decision, mr. oleksiy, you know, a very interesting topic, very an interesting topic, but it seems to me that it is important here for some serious analyst, legal group to analyze and find out all the risks, by the way, i do not exclude anything, because yes, a citizen illegally crossed the dniester through the tisza, through the tisza, he can pay his symbolic fine of €200, well , that's what ukrainian legislation provides today, and then he's clean. before the law, that is, i do not rule out that the appeal mechanism through the european courts, it may work, if it does, it will just be a sentence for those who made this decision, but why, why exactly such decisions were made, that is, the decision must be made legally flawless, but if you and i were to develop a decision, we would involve the best experts, we would involve several legal groups, we would conduct focus groups. we conducted a detailed analysis there and then came up with a solution, here i get the impression that t

700 thousand men from ukraine are now abroad, and can they question this decision through the european courts. oleksiy? you know, a very interesting topic, a very interesting topic, but it seems to me that it is important here that some serious analyst, legal group analyze and find out all the risks. by the way, i do not exclude anything, because yes, a citizen illegally crossed the dniester through the tisza, through the tisza, he can pay his fine, a symbolic 200 €, well yes today ukrainian legislation provides for it, and further it is clean before the law, that is, i do not rule out that... the appeal mechanism through the european courts, it may work, if this is the case, it will simply be a sentence for those who made this decision, but why , why exactly such a decision was made, that is , the decision must be made legally flawless, well, if we were to develop a decision with you, we would involve the best experts, we would involve several legal groups, we would conduct focus groups, we would conduct a detailed analysis there . and then they made a decision. here i get the impression tha

meanwhile, the prime minister says that britain could pull out of the european court of human rights it obstructs the government's rwanda plan. rishi sunak says controlling illegal migration is more important than membership of the echr, and he would not let what he called the foreign court interfere in sovereign matters . critics, sovereign matters. critics, though from various political corners, have criticised rishi sunak suggestion, with labour calling it nothing more than a plan to appease the right wing of his party. and british farmers are calling for a guaranteed basic income after post—brexit arrangements left many worse off. at least 100 have joined a campaign group urging the government to help cover basic costs after the loss of subsidies from the european union. and it comes as suppliers are warning of higher prices and possible empty supermarket shelves due to a new post—brexit border charge, which will be introduced at the end of this month . that's the latest from month. that's the latest from the gb newsroom. more coming up at 10:00. in the meantime, you can sign up

unelected european court a must?xclusive right from the beaches of northern france. channel migrants are injured in escalating violence, with cops forced to retreat as they try stopping dinghies from launching. should we fear that violence coming to britain? i go live to a french councillor from the migrant hotspot of dunkirk. he's going to tell us what is really going on over there is patrick christys tonight we are on gb news. welcome back to patrick christys. tonight i will bring you tomorrow's front pages. hot off the press very soon. by the way, i've just had advanced signs of one of them. some lively stuff on there. but first, it's a gb news exclusive. six migrants have been injured in the wave of asylum in the latest wave of asylum seeker violence in northern france. so this latest round of attacks caught on video obtained by gb news, erupted on a beach near dunkirk and resulted in at least two of the migrants being stabbed multiple times as people smugglers tried to stop them forcing their way onto small boat

was ruling certainly promises stronger legal pathways to achieving climate justice through the european courtis ruling establishes a really important president at the court of human rights. it certainly a landmark case with a tremendous amount of effort and momentum and climate litigation that's to the decision. and that signals that went litigation is used strategically and sensitively it can really provide the necessary protection for people where climate impacts are increasingly felt for them is a positive note to note that them is a positive note to note that the european convention of human rights can be extended to the impacts. sis. rights can be extended to the im acts. �* . rights can be extended to the imacts. . ., ,, rights can be extended to the imacts.�* ., ,, , . impacts. a legal ripple effect across the — impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest _ impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest of _ impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest of the - impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest of the world, | impacts. a legal ripple effect i across the rest of the wo

the other argument we are likely to see is going to the strasbourg court, the european court of humanremoved to rwanda will be returned to countries where they, again, could face irreparable harm like death or torture, then they could again issue another rule 39 order or an inter—measure stopping flights. let's talk about timing, then, dr joelle grogan, because rishi sunak, the prime minister here, has taken a lot of political capital on this issue, hasn't he? he has talked about planes being in the air taking people to rwanda in the spring. so how long could these legal challenges take? a considerable time, perhaps? challenges take? a considerable time. perhaps?— time, perhaps? very, very potentially- _ time, perhaps? very, very potentially. if _ time, perhaps? very, very potentially. if there - time, perhaps? very, very potentially. if there is - time, perhaps? very, very- potentially. if there is imminent risk that a flight is about to take off, then it is very likely we could see a very immediate order from the european court of human rights, these take place very quickly, but due

have a look at what he had to say about his rwanda bill and european court of bill and the european court of human rights. >> i believe that asking him, including the rwanda part of it all, our plans to tackle illegal migration. let me just answer the question, harry. i believe that our plans are compliant with all our international obligations, including the echr. but i believe but not all right. i believe that security and that border security and controlling illegal migration is more important than our membership of any foreign court. >> well, there you are. it sounded really good, didn't it.7 but did he actually mean it.7 would he seriously consider us saying to the european court of human rights, we can't put up with this. we can't have you stopping planes going to rwanda as you did a year ago. we're actually going to leave. did he actually going to leave. did he actually mean it.7 well i tell you what, i was absolutely certain as soon as i heard about this that what he was doing was telling an audience what they wanted to hear, that he didn't mean it for one little bit. well, this a

but if there is a court challenge and bear in mind that the, the european court has blocked this beforerts , as indeed have british courts, he is indicating that, yes, he would be prepared to say we need to withdraw that potentially would be a manifesto pledge for the general election. but as you say, that would be very, very divisive. first of all, within his own party, there's plenty on the right. and people like the former home secretary suella braverman, saying, well, this is obvious that we need to do this and we should have done this already. but there's plenty more, more moderate, more centrist conservative mps, especially among the one nation group, who would be absolutely horrified at this. and some cabinet ministers who potentially might resign. and in terms of voters, there'll be plenty of voters, maybe some of those toying with going to reform who will think, yes , this reform who will think, yes, this is what we have to do. this is a great idea, but there'll be many others who, again, would think that this is absolutely the wrong step to take. and they might be pushed strai

of justice the european court ofabout britain . the question is, about britain. the question is, is britain a is the uk a sovereign nation and all all rishi sunak has to do is say, you know what, screw the european court of justice , okay? european court of justice, okay? >> for ofcom reasons will make the peace sign as the opposite , the peace sign as the opposite, of that you can't you can't swear on. >> what did say? >> what did i say? >> what did i say? >> i don't want to say i'm sorry. >> i'm sorry. >> i'm sorry. >> okay. and also, the european court of human whatever court of human rights, whatever it sorry, i apologise it is, i'm sorry, i apologise for cursing. >> right. oh, didn't >> all right. oh, i didn't realise that cursed for surely realise that i cursed for surely the larger point is . the larger point here is. >> so what? in terms of the impact that switzer is going to have on reaching net zero and what impact that's going to have on the world temperature? i understand the reasons behind it in getting

participation of ala oliynyk, made a number of decisions, which were later recognized by the european courtolating international obligations and the european convention on human rights, in particular due to the excessive length of court proceedings and the imperfection of national legislation. no judge in ukraine, i think, as well as in any other country, does not bother to take part in the adoption of a decision where the european court has established a violation of certain provisions of the convention. just as it is, how they say, every judge does not want to have some disciplinary. procedure, of course, that there are such solutions. experts stated that alla oliynyk's explanations, in particular, regarding her nephew's career growth, are not very convincing. nevertheless, it is believed that the judge meets the criterion of high moral qualities. oliynyk has passed to the next stage and soon the commission will have to assess her professional competence. another candidate for the post of judge of the constitutional court of ukraine made it to the next stage. serhii riznyk, vice-rector of

the european court of human rights. a pulse that complaints that failure to act of climate change puts them at risk, but it's throws out similar claims from portugal and from also coming up. lawyers tell that you ends top quote that german support for israel does not pretend to national. they strongly reject the claim by nicaragua, and that berlin as healthy as well commit alleged genocide and gauze and violent crime in germany rises shop. the with many suspects from overseas increase is fueling a debate on toughening immigration. the says, welcome to the program in europe stops, human rights court has ruled in favor of the group of swiss pensioners who argue that governments put them at risk by not doing enough to prevent the climate change . it's a landmark decision that could influence legislation across europe. and give a boost to active as to say that governments are failing to tackle global. these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners through their own government because it's handling of the c

i mean, we were members of the strasbourg court, the european court of human rights, long before we had act. yeah. now, interestingly, if you look at the number of cases issued against the uk by the strasbourg court , they've gone down year court, they've gone down year after year since the introduction of the human rights act. now ask yourself, why is that ? that's because domestic that? that's because domestic courts are just as zealous. yeah, we don't need the mention . yeah, we don't need the mention. >> we don't need strasbourg anymore because our own judges are working off the same rulebook effectively. >> absolutely. and it's the thing is, constitutionally, you can ignore the judgements of international courts because the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, you cannot ignore domestic courts because then the home secretary would be in contempt of court. so is the human rights act. >> in a sense, the absolute nub of this problem when it comes to deporting people, it's the root cause. >> yeah. i mean, there are issues with the strasbourg court. don't get me wrong . there court.

a group of women from switzerland, have won the first ever climate case, brought before the european courtts to meet its emission reduction targets, had been woefully inadequate. the judgment could influence the law in 46 other european countries, including the uk, which is subject to the court�*s jurisdiction. with more, here�*s justin rowlatt. the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight... there has been a violation of article 8 of the convention. ..and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland�*s failure to do enough to cut planet—warming emissions could help create heatwaves that could threaten the lives of older people. i am so happy we could contribute to the future, to a betterfuture for our children. today�*s ruling is not open to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will support the legal case for climate action in european countries, including the uk. the decision comes as new figures show this march was 1.68 degrees celsius above preindustrial levels and the hottest march on record globally. sea surface temperatures were even more dra

as well as in any other country, wants to participate in the adoption of a decision where the european court has established a violation of certain provisions of the convention, just as it is said that every judge does not want to have any disciples. of course, there are such solutions. experts stated that alla oliynyk's explanations, in particular, regarding her nephew's career growth, are not very convincing. nevertheless, it is believed that the judge meets the criterion of high moral qualities. oliynyk has passed to the next stage, and soon the commission will have to assess her professional competence. another candidate for the post of judge of the constitutional court of ukraine made it to the next stage. serhii riznyk, vice-rector of lviv ivan national university. professor of constitutional law. he collects executive proceedings, in particular for violations of traffic rules. both a judge and a candidate for the position of judge of the constitutional court must treat traffic rules with great respect. over the past two years, serhiy riznyk has accumulated as many as 18 fines for traf

the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight...tively shocked, so happy we could contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. today's ruling is not only to challenge. —— not open to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will support the legal case for climate action in european countries, including the uk. the decision comes as new figures show this march was 1.68 degrees celsius above preindustrial levels and the hottest march on record globally. sea surface temperatures were even more dramatic, at 21.07 celsius in march — the highest ever recorded at any time. let's bring our panel back in. kim, let's start with you if we can because there two big stories in the climate change arena today — one, another record temperatures in march, and this legal victory, potentially legally quite significant.— potentially legally quite significant. potentially legally quite si . nificant. , ., , potentially legally quite siunificant. , ., ,, significant. yes, i mean this is the ri . ht to significant. yes,