hungary's foreign minister minister there's another thing that has happened recently that the european court for justice ruled that germany is authorized to deport failed asylum seekers and the legals to two other states and that means that they would send those people back to the. states that they originally entered absolute that's your country as well but it's not in the yard. answer is physically excellent. so they both injury you with your hunger but that was not the case because no one could physically it was impossible to have funky as a first entry point because the people who ended up in germany and then through hungary came to hungary either croatia which is in the u. member state either from serbia but to serbia they got from us or don't you know and too must have known and they got from greece so everybody everybody all the four hundred falls in the illegal migrants washroom the country of ours back in twenty fifteen came through at least one or two remember states before entering to hungary either greece or greece and now the reason why the why the germans wanted to send them back to us abou

british citizens could take the uk government government to the european court of justice government government to the european court ofjustice for itself in. there are no exits which are easy from this terrible box of a problem that it's got itself into. we shall watch this space. yep, going to be fascinating. outside westminster throughout the week. i'll be watching with great interest. maybe for the next few months — you never know! i'll be camping...! gulf for the next few months — you never know! i'll be camping. . .! gulf news looks at the high—stakes poll battle to begin from april 11 — this is the general election in india. the bbc has got this sort of — "11 things you need to know about this election." no. 1 — "it's mind—bogglingly big." election." no. 1 — "it's mind-bogglingly big." this is the world's biggestdry. it's staggering. 900 million voters this time. just the logistics of that alone is incredible. six weeks of elections. you can't get it done in one day, as you can in many countries. the final count won't begin until the end o—may. it is absolutely stunning. some other great facts, actually, about this electio

of the laws in our country, for the first time ever, are being given to us and controlled by a foreign power over whom we have no influence, and the european court of justicecourt, would supersede our courts. for me, that is not taking back control, and that could be in perpetuity. guy: sir, thank you very much indeed for your time. vonnie. well, fromnk you, as the best side of things. , weking u.s. markets now are seeing some individual , helpingday lululemon the s&p 500 to a 4/10 of 1% gain. the nasdaq up 0.5%. sterling weakness very evident. the dollar index is above 97, and yields are back towards the 240 mark. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ vonnie: it is time now for our bloomberg quick, where we provide context on areas of interest. when times are good in financial markets, bankers get colossal bonuses. bonus often reach several times base salary and take annual compensation well above $1 billion for the battle performances -- for the better performers. years later, they remain a prickly topic for banks and politicians. bonuses on wall street have been climbing, but still shy of their 2008 peak. haves around the globe changed pay structures to reward long-te

the european court ofjustice after take the case to the european court of justice after having take the case to the european court ofjustice after having his democratic rights taken away from him. fornow deal brexit would affect those regions badly and they are regions where the populace might seek to prey upon this. it is in the eu's interest not to have no deal outcome before they have had the european elections. so many questions about where we go from here. i want to bring you breaking news before we focus on brexit. donald trump has said the us federal aviation authority will ground the seven 337 max8. they had said previously there had been no problem and they held that while other countries had banned it flying over their airspace. donald trump was speaking from the white house in the last few minutes. we had a more detailed group of people working on 737 max eight and the 737 max nine airlines. we will have a prohibition to ground the 737 max eight and the nine and plains associated with that line. the white house are leaning on the faa, some concern the faa was too close to boeing. the civil aviation authority in the uk and aviation authorities within europe had banned the

produced and spread thank you very much for talking with us this morning yulia while a director of the ngo innocence in danger my pleasure. the european court of justice is set to rule on whether e.u. law makers should be allowed access to studies on glyphosate to controversial pesticides the e.u. commission has classified lies for sate as safe based on scientific studies presented by private companies but when lawmakers demanded access to those studies the request was denied on the basis that it could harm those companies interests well before we speak to an e.u. law maker but here is get a close look at what the debate is about. easy to apply cheap and effective like to say destroys ball unwanted vegetation the only things it leaves growing other crops it's meant to protect the. market and the name around up the herbicide is a bio monsanto product it's in use on forty percent of germany's farmland. it's also used in over one hundred fifty countries worldwide. since it was introduced in the one nine hundred seventy s. over ten million tonnes of life are say to have been sprayed on crops enough to fill two thousand three hundred lympics swimming pools

european court of justice is in any way involved in this -- arbitration? if the european court of justice is anyway involved in this, that would probably not fly with brexit-eers. should we go forinteresting to see geoffrey cox pushing back against reports that say it's suggested he hasn't shifted his stance -- he has shifted his stance. thanks to maria tadeo. let's return to one of our top stories this morning. we are covering the china growth story, also very linked, the auto space. carlos ghosn, a big force within this sector, has finally won b in after more than 100 days prison but with tokyo prosecutors appealing the decision, it's unclear if he will walk free. in as ghosn must reside japanese address and agree to have cameras in his home. he must not leave the country. joining us is dave. when will we know if carlos ghosn will be getting out and under which conditions precisely? >> the prosecutors have not told us, have not given us a time for that. we know that they are going through the appeal now. there is some speculation that it could be tomorrow. some news agencies are reporting that could happen. we do have the case of carlos ghosn's colleague, greg kelly, who was

for my country. it means we regain control of our laws by ending the jurisdiction of the european court of justice inregain control of our borders by ending free movement. regain control over money. the end of the common agricultural policy and fishery policy for british farmers and fishermen. and, the deal sets us on course for a good future relationship with our friends and allies in the eu. a close economic partnership that is good for business, ongoing security cooperation to keep our people safe. the deal honors the referendum result and is good for both the u.k. and the eu. but, there is clear concern in parliament over one issue in particular, the northern ireland backstop. toing an insurance policy guarantee there will never be a hard border in northern ireland is absolutely right. it honors the u.k.'s solemn commitment in the belfast agreement. if we ever have to use that insurance policy, it cannot become a permanent arrangement and it is not the template for our future relationship. in deal that m.p.'s voted on january was not strong enough to make that clear. legally binding changes were

nojurisdiction of the european court ofjustice other is nojurisdiction of the european court of justice other than is nojurisdiction of the european court ofjustice other than forcourt ofjustice in this area. she just said that if she manages to get her withdrawal agreement approved by this house, she doesn't want the next stage of serious negotiations about a long—term future to proceed in the same way and she is giving a greater role to parliament. i strongly endorse that, we can't have another arrangement where she just reaches a perfectly satisfactory agreement on the three points she did and then we defend —— we descended to a parliamentary farce as people argue about what changes they would like. isn't the best way, if she gets her withdrawal agreement through, to have some indicative votes in the house of commons before the serious negotiation starts, so the serious negotiation starts, so the government can go into those negotiations knowing what the broad mass of parliament is likely to support and to back up if she achieve it? actually, i think there area number of achieve it? actually, i think there are a number of ways in which you can ascertain the

to accept eu migrants and for the country to remain in the european courts of justice. acceptable thing would be to remain in the customs union. of course, if you remain in the customs union, you cannot redesign free trade agreements with other parties. this april 10 summit, will there be room to negotiate even further? that havesome points been sticking for both sides when it comes to the current brexit agreement. >> it is interesting because the eu has not really changed its position over the past two years. for them, the integrity of the single market has to be protected. the irish border has to remain open. basically, the eu is telling the u.k., you will have more time if you ask for it, but you need to come back with a credible plan on what to do next. pick onely you should of the existing options, customs union, single market, free trade agreement. but the eu will not tolerate an ad hoc agreement. there: you do not think is any scenario which the irish border could be negotiated with the eu? that doesn't seem to be a nonnegotiable point on the u.k. side? is backin

as far as they are concerned that is no brexit at all for the they also have concerns about the level of intervention of the european court of justicete clear that when we take our grievances as a country to the panel created to see whether the eu and uk are both negotiating in good faith, if we cannot reach a trade deal and therefore cannot come out of the backstop who will decide that and it seems the european court ofjustice would have a strong influence on that decision. that is also uncomfortable for some brexiteers in the erg so all these passions at play and some people in the erg would also feel responsible if brexitjust became would also feel responsible if brexit just became a would also feel responsible if brexitjust became a complete mess. so they are also trying to do their best to get the best deal. that lack of faith on both sides, that is demonstrated by michel barnier, we had a message from him saying this seems to be a misconception in the house that you can get an extension. he says that that comes from the withdrawal agreement. brussels always say there is going to be no more talking but given the package theresa

for something else. let's work through some of our questions here. @itsrickyb, can uk revoke a50 unilaterally during the extension period? yes is the answer to that. the european court of justice, the european council have been saying all along that it would be a unanimous ruling within the 27 leaders. and noticed along the withdrawal agreement has not been ratified we are still within the uk plus my power and with the extension it will not be ratified or approved. jeremy corbyn when speaking to michel barnier today and the secretary—general of the european commission and said revoking article that he was still an option and he still wa nts that he was still an option and he still wants to get his deal through the first of all but it is still there on the table. thank you. from sean, no matter what extension the eu offer, am i right in thinking we will need a change in law in uk to stop us dropping out on march 29th? yes is the answer to that and what will happen on monday is the government will bring forward a motion which will have a instrument for proudman to set a new date. the interesting thing is what if there is not a date and what they decide here this evening, if they

for the court of justice. francine: the law in the u.k. is very different from loss outside the u.k. and other european countries.ther we have lost half of our international audience. it is crazy that we are discussing amendments and how they would be interpreted when this should be a political decision. ctheatherine: this is where it s interesting. the attorney general said on the law, we have not got what we wanted. the politicians said no. that is what goes back to your original point about the lawyers. this is where you have a dovetailing of law and politics and it is missing. francine: thank you so much for joining us today. tom: it is a very fluid story today, and of course that vote later today at westminster. in strasburg, mr. barnier speaks. it will be very important. we will have headlines coming up as well. mr. barnier driving the brussels story forward as we heard from maria tadeo. exceptionally important discussion with the chairman of strategic advisory form, global council and a former u.k. trade commissioner in the 6:00 hour. this is bloomberg. stay with us. ♪ >> discussions between the eu and the

for 21 months up until the end of december 2020. some say that's not possible that taking part in european elections, others disagree. the senior british legal person in the european court of justicea legal challenge from people saying that they were not representative by meps and they have a right to be, at that point, national mps could be appointed for a short period of time. but if you have a long extension, that would be buying time for those who want to hold another referendum and stop brexit. let see if we have any clear idea of the direction of travel after the votes later on. i was mentioning comments from arlene foster, who's in washington. she is basically saying, get the dup to sign up to any deal from theresa may, that deal must show the constitutional integrity of the uk is the same. we are speaking to the government and the attorney general, we have always said we wanted a deal and we are talking to them around all of that. we hope that can be the case, because nobody wants to leave without a deal. we know that is bad for the whole of the united kingdom and we want to make sure we get there. is about the attorney general changing his legal advice or adding to it? no

means the european court of justice can and it still means the european court ofjustice can find us, we remain in the customs union and it is hard to get out with a backstop. i want better ford to visit me may come back and the eu have agreed a lengthy delay to brexit, are you willing to see that as the alternative? a lengthy delay or eu backed her deal, thatis lengthy delay or eu backed her deal, that is what some in her party are saying is the choice. the prime minister has said we will leave on the 29th. the you still think we will? she has that gift, she can ensure we do. she keeps bringing the same deal back time and time again, and it is a failure to listen. we have got the added element of looking at the eu. they said they would not bail greece out time and time again but they bailed them out at the 11th hour. it would not surprise me to see the eu give concession. many people said eu bailed out greece because they were staying in, not leaving. esther mcvey says she will now back it. she says clinging onto the choices we had before it last week's vote will not get as brexit and see us remaining in the eu, are you willing to risk that by not backing the deal? i unders