it can apply to the european court of human rights, and there are several important points. this is the first, this is the temporary jurisdiction of the european court regarding human rights violations by russia, that is, before september 16, human rights violations that took place before september 16, and they are still subject to the division of the european court of human rights after september 16. that is, we cannot say that this is no longer a violation, it is a violation , the european court simply will not be able to consider these cases. it is an important point of appeal to of the european court within a four-month period, i.e. if the violation there conditionally took place on september 10, you have four months from january 10 to submit an application to the european court, the application must be made on a special form of the european court, it is available on the open e-site of the european court and it is in english, it is in ukrainian, and there are also detailed explanations of how to fill out the form. important at the first stage, when the european court cons

when the national means of legal protection have been exhausted can you apply to the european court of human rights, the only thing that is important after exhausting the national means of protection is not to miss the deadline for applying to the european court of human rights of human rights at a certain stage, a person necessarily needs a lawyer to represent his rights, i can't help but ask about our neighbors, russia is a betrayal of europe and, accordingly, the convention on human rights and officially refused to recognize the decision of the court, whether it was a vaccine of his work, russia was the state against which the most treasure was filed. accordingly, the huge resources of the court were, but in the end and are still directed to the fact that we deal with these complaints , all these states who joined the convention on human rights not because someone forced them to do so, but because they want to participate in this collective system of ensuring human rights and sincerely cooperate with the corresponding system they have given up a part of their sovereignty in order to become bette

as european court of human rights as european court of human rights regarding that responsibility of not regarding that responsibility of not regarding that responsibility of not closing uh closing the airspace but um closing uh closing the airspace but um closing uh closing the airspace but um um at one point the dutch governments um at one point the dutch governments um at one point the dutch governments researched the question researched the question researched the question that ukrainian knew or shoot ukraine that ukrainian knew or shoot ukraine that ukrainian knew or shoot ukraine have known about the possibility of have known about the possibility of have known about the possibility of civil aviation being shot down at that civil aviation being shot down at that civil aviation being shot down at that height and so there were questions asked height and so there were questions asked height and so there were questions asked in dutch parliament also because the in dutch parliament also because the in dutch parliament also because the family members asked for that they did a fami

tretyakov v essentially, at the ministry of justice, he works in the european court of human rights, there is the practice of the european court of human rights when they ask questions of security as one of the basic human rights and life on health is considered more important than other subsequent rights, in particular freedom of religion , so if there will be a huge volume of a-a criminal cases and sentences and in relation to representatives of the moscow patriarchate, then the chances of appealing - this is this law that will be adopted and actually liquidated of the moscow patriarchate and it will be minimal because the more active our law enforcement and secret services work, the more chances that the liquidation will be final, the only question is what other arguments are needed and for the actual material discovered from the kyiv-pechersk lavra after the terrible and consequences of the search in chernivtsi well , that is, in principle well, it is completely illogical now to continue the activities of this fsb branch under the guise of a religious organization thank you very m

of cases, but despite this, it still remains an effective mechanism because the european court can review how effectively the state has fulfilled its obligations in the context of observing human rights that is, the european court is not the fourth instance. that is, it will not review the verdict, but they will not say that there is something wrong there, there is some kind of flaw in the specific wording, that is, it is not about this, this institution considers the situation as a whole for a large number of people - it is, in fact, a mechanism to get this or that kind of fair decision, or to get some truth in its proceedings, that's why it is all despite the fact that many complain about the length of implementation in cases precisely in europe, the length of the review is still the same, we can see from the statistics that there are a large number of appeals and people do not ignore this mechanism ms. margarita thank you for this conversation, thank you unconquered cities of ukraine, this is cozy kherson, the pearl of the protected territories of ukraine, the city played a significant role in the creation of statehood, it became the southern the center of the ukrainian revival du

the head of the constitutional court valery zorkin, speaking at the congress, touched upon the issue of russia's withdrawal from european court of human rights. he noted that this structure played a positive role in the formation of the protection of rights and freedoms in our country. well, according to zorkin, the russian judicial system will cope without an espch. the russian federation withdrew its signature, er, the document on the establishment of an international criminal court, and withdrew from the european court of human rights. there was a lot of noise about this. how can it not cope in russia, but the caravan what is called is coming and we must think that, of course, we will not forget about put the european court, which he played in the formation and development. uh, protecting rights and freedom in our country. but i think that only this conclusion does not boil down to this, because it is no secret that in recent years there have been peculiarities. noticeably, the politicization of this body has intensified, unfortunately. it was reported that russian troops were conducting offensives in the donetsk direction. and also in tw

of the constitutional court valery zorkin. the russian federation withdrew its signature under the e-document on the establishment of an international criminal court and withdrew from the european court of human rights, there was a lot of very noise about this . how can it not be done in russia, but the caravan what is called is moving on and we must think that, of course, we will not forget about the positive role of the european court, which it played in the development of weight and protection of rights and freedoms in our country. but i think that only this conclusion does not boil down to this, because it is no secret that in recent years the politicization of this body has noticeably increased, unfortunately. russian troops advancing in the donetsk direction reported today in the ministry of defense, the military department said that the attacks of the armed forces in the kharkov region and the lc were repelled. but in the donetsk direction, russian troops continue offensive operations in a day in this direction, more than 100 ukrainian servicemen were destroyed one tank, five armored combat vehicles and five vehicles of operational-tactical army aviation, missiles, troops and artillery hit te

of courts and not that of european _ supremacy of courts and not that of european courts and the european court _ european courts and the european court of— european courts and the european court of human rights human rights and so, you have this _ court of human rights and so, you have this policy of taking people to rwanda _ have this policy of taking people to rwanda and that is the dream of braverman if you want to talk about his speech — braverman if you want to talk about his speech at the conference and what _ his speech at the conference and what is _ his speech at the conference and what is claimed is that this will then— what is claimed is that this will then for— what is claimed is that this will then for her also make it easier for foreign government to deport foreign criminals _ foreign government to deport foreign criminals from this country and this is a person— criminals from this country and this is a person who has championed it and particularly now, it is one domihic— and particularly now, it is one dominic raab who has had his political— dominic raab who has had his political revival after several weeks — political revival after several weeks of the back benches and the go

court explained russia's decision to stop cooperation with western judicial organizations. the russian federation withdrew its signature. uh, under the document on the creation of an international criminal court, and withdrew from the european court of human rightsuse it is no secret that in the last few years , the politicization of this body has noticeably increased. unfortunately, the president thanked the judge for their hard work and professionalism and called on those who are on the olympus of the legal system to keep the bar depends on you and your colleagues, how the law is applied and, ultimately, how it affects all spheres of the life of the state and each individual person individually, and i beg you to correspond to this high olympic status, like those who are known ancient traditions live mean olympic gods please, this is extremely important vladimir putin also noted the great importance of the work to recognize the facts of the genocide. peacefully citizens during the great patriotic war evidence atrocities and crimes of the nazis continues, each such fact will need to be given a legal assessment. and you prozorov channel one. now, about how the special operation is going on, the main news today comes from the donetsk direction, wh

wikilex portal leaks, the scandal flared up even more when, despite the information of the european court of human rightspresident of lithuania, adamkus, categorically denied everything later, he even tried to pretend that he was led by the nose by local special services. also the senate. the united states also admitted that there was this prison in lithuania, where, uh , people were brought, uh, which means that because of the arab countries from afghanistan in boxes in boxes they were kept naked there, they were tormented by insomnia, they were tormented insect bites were tortured by insects. uh, it means that lily poured water in her nose into her mouth. they were tormented by the sound. dreamers were tormented by hunger and tormented, which means, uh, this is a prison, it was opened in 2004 right after they removed the president of lithuania bucks from office and appointed adams as the new president. i say they were appointed because there were actually no democratic elections. human rights activists, of course, criticized the united states for impunity in the case of torture, un experts in the field

commander, then from his own, from his own, and so on, putin himself, the un international court of human rights or the european court of human rights are able to prove only the responsibility of russia as a state. however, they will not punish specific people, that is why ukraine insists on the creation of a special tribunal that would directly try putin and his supporters, not specific war crimes, but the fact of military aggression which is the highest international crime according to the quote from the decision of the international tribunal in nuremberg, the closest analogue we can talk about is this normer tribunal on nazi criminals who took place after the victory in the second world war and obviously, this is one of the options that can be considered under the important victory over russia when the highest leadership appears before the international tribunal, but the nuremberg trials in the sixth year of the court of the victorious countries over the capitulator countries was the first example in the history of mankind, when such a process took place in a civilized, legally established form, experts say

we also see cases against russia as estate at the european court of human rights and the internationalf justice that revolves around the question of the involvement of russia. there's many types of responsibility that is important. in terms of criminal accountability, it relies on evidence and what we see in the last 10 years or so is a huge revolution in the types of evidence that are being collected. this case, as well as other cases, you see social media, user generated information is being used and is entering the court rooms. this court yesterday that indeed, even though it my not be perfect in terms of chain of custody or other types, you can test the reliability sufficiently that it can be used, especially cooperated with other types of as that in -- other types of as that it -- other types of evidence, that is difficult to get to the crime scene by former investigators that this type of evidence is usable in proving them. >> isn't it difficult with that type of evidence to establish the chain of command in cases like this? >> it could be. what is interesting in this cases, you

and that the role of specific people in what happened in july 2014 in donbas and in other courts in particular the international court of the un and the european court of human rights consider the role of the russian state and the political military leadership, respectively, and of course these conclusions of the dutch district court of the hague, which ended today, will be used there. but will they become some kind of game changer that will completely change the situation or will there a determining factor in what other courts will accept, well, we cannot say that now. thank you, bbc correspondent sviatoslav khomenko for the court's verdict in the case a colleague of malaysian boeing thank you and poland told the first results of the investigation into the fall of the rocket, the investigators collected evidence that indicates the sequence of events, the head of the international policy bureau under the president of poland stated this as a bluff, according to him, the investigators are studying the remains of the rocket, the depth of the crater, calculating the direction from which it came and the amount of used of fuel , ukrainian experts were also admitted to th

of the rights of citizens. the russian federation withdrew its signature from the document on the establishment of an international criminal court and withdrew from the european court of human rights. there was a lot of noise about this. how can it not be done in russia , but the caravan what is called is coming and we must think that, of course, we will not forget about the positive role of the european court, which he played in the formation and development. uh, protecting rights and freedoms in our country. but i think that only this conclusion does not boil down to this, because it is no secret that in recent years the politicization of this body has noticeably increased, unfortunately. in addition, valery zorkin said that the withdrawal of russia and the council of europe and the tense historical times, of course, are no reason to return the death penalty. a recurring issue comes up. let's introduce the death penalty. i do not presume to speak instead of politicians instead of sociologists from philosophers legislators, because it is their prerogative, but there are legal prerogatives, including the constitutional court. nevertheless, one must carefully read the decisi

some symbolic things, it's not just about legal practice and not about future courts of the european court of human rights understand that those people are heard not only in kyiv , not only in ukraine as such, because people ask how long as they say, but they do not listen to them in washington and in brussels. well, i think that the shortcomings of the russian world at various levels are quite strong, and i see that today in the parliament there is a sufficiently serious front that deals with issues of interests and about russian parties rather, even sooner, the future of russian-style parties and the church of the moscow patriarchate. well, i will give one example today. mr. andriy osadchuk spoke about voting in unison with the former opzj with the ruling party. that's true. and in fact, our monitoring also shows that the percentage of coincidences is very, very large. i don't want to talk about conversations, i don't rule out that this is a banal issue of survival, but today, according to information agencies, there was a meeting of a specialized committee that considered the government bill that allow

european of a one. so in the european court human rights, foot court of human rights, one foot out approach certain they where certain they would things they would follow certain things they wouldn't would follow certain things they wouithen also , as we know, boris and then also, as we know, boris left another prime minister came in and everything the in and everything changed. the bill stuck . so it's bill rights got stuck. so it's this very uncertain from a legal perspective at the moment because the problems that we're getting of mostly getting all because of mostly because of human rights act, which force obviously, and which is in force obviously, and as said , in terms of the as stephen said, in terms of the european court of human rights. well, now the of the tories well, but now the of the tories , with the two years left to go it's clear that none of that is to change my . it's clear that none of that is to change my. i'm it's clear that none of that is to change my . i'm we've got to to change my. i'm we've got to leave it there, gentlemen. again, this is subject we could talk all afternoon a

now 98 of those were given were were pulled off the plane and allowed to stay by the plane and allowed to stay by the uk courts . the european the uk courts. the european court of human rightsr of the european court of human rights or not, i don't think it will make that much difference to the small boat crisis and the rwanda plan . i'm crisis and the rwanda plan. i'm not even sure that suella believes in the rwanda plan any more because i'm not sure where we are with it. what the latest development is on it. then i think everybody will agree we need do something . and need to do something. and everybody's a critic. everyone this is wrong. that's wrong. this is wrong. that's wrong. this is wrong. nobody is saying this what we need to do now. this is what we need to do now. we need solutions. but i think we leave the. h—how i feel we must leave the. h—how i feel really strongly it? but really strongly about it? but where stand this small where do you stand on this small boats it was boats crisis? because it was interestingly anderson, earlier interestingly, anderson, earlier saying actually outside of the westminster bubble, outside of the media village , this is the the med

now 98 of those were given were were pulled off the plane and allowed to stay by the plane and allowed to stay by the uk courts . the european the uk courts. the european court of human rightsr of the european court of human rights or not, i don't think it will make that much difference to the small boat crisis and the rwanda plan . i'm crisis and the rwanda plan. i'm not even sure that suella believes in the rwanda plan any more because i'm not sure where we are with it. what the latest development is on it. then i think everybody will agree we need do something . and need to do something. and everybody's a critic. everyone this is wrong. that's wrong. this is wrong. that's wrong. this is wrong. nobody is saying this what we need to do now. this is what we need to do now. we need solutions. but i think we leave the. h—how i feel we must leave the. h—how i feel really strongly it? but really strongly about it? but where stand this small where do you stand on this small boats it was boats crisis? because it was interestingly anderson, earlier interestingly, anderson, earlier saying actually outside of the westminster bubble, outside of the media village , this is the the med

for example, russia withdrew from the council of europe. under the jurisdiction of the european court of human rightsquired overtly political overtones national justice does not need import substitution, emphasizes valery zorkin and touches on the resonant issue of a moratorium on the death penalty. only a change in the constitution , since it is the interpretation of the official houses by the constitutional court in these conditions, can serve as the basis for the resumption of the death penalty, but let me remind you that this article twenty refers to chapter two of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and the fact is that the constitution is structured in such a way that change this one. and introduce traitors a different meaning, you need to practically accept a new one therefore, if those authors who advocate it are ready, well , humanization is one of the key tasks of the russian legal system, the alternative punishment that is not associated with imprisonment in 2016 to 2021 is increasingly being used. those who received a real term became less by almost 20%. the president of russia co

fundamental human rights, in particular to life and makes it impossible ensuring other rights that form the basis of european values, whether they can be protected and how the european courtf human rights can help in this, we asked the court that represents ukraine in the case of mykola gnatovskyi

the court of justice and withdrew from the european court of human rights, there was a lot of very noisebout this. how can it not be done in russia , but the caravan what is called is coming and we must think that, of course, we will not forget about the positive role of the european court, which he played, in the formation and development of, uh, the protection of rights and freedoms in our country. but i think that only this conclusion does not boil down to this, because it is no secret that in recent years the politicization of this body has noticeably intensified. unfortunately, well, it’s enough to take one work, a heartfelt one, which, i must say, came out of the pen of the deputy chairman of the european constitutional court. now she has already retired, which is dedicated to the authoritarian system in russia, where it says something like this, but that there is nothing more to expect from the constitutional court. why because he got this sunset of his since he did not support president yeltsin in what he did not support the question, and the second is well known to all of us. i'

problem of jurisdiction in the un international court he has the right to consider the case only if both states behaved to become parties to the court proceedings, theoretically the european court of humanrights could oblige the aggressor state to pay, however in september 2022, russia left the council of europe and does not comply with its decisions, so for now the only option is to seize russian money . well, if the international arbitration accepts the demands of the municipality or the state of ukraine as a whole, then the assets that are currently seized, we say, are now foreign they will be transferred to the benefit of those applicants who won these proceedings, reparations were paid , and in modern history, examples include monetary compensation to iraq for the occupation of kuwait in in 1990-91, the basis for the payments were the resolutions of the un security council. after the conflict, a compensation commission was formed and, in general, the cancer transferred 52 billion us dollars to kuwait. of school buses for ukraine, the president of the european commission , ursula von deryan, informed about this, the costs will be sent to purchase transport for transporting students

and in addition to the international criminal court, we also see cases against russia as a state of european court of human rights and in the national court of justice. that also will involve revolt about the question of the involvement of russia. it has many types of responsibility that's important here. and in terms of criminal accountability, it overlays on evidence and what we see also in the last 10 years or so, the huge revolution in the types of evidence that are being collected and this case as well as some other cases, you see the digital evidence, social media user meet user generated information is being used in entering that a courtroom. and this court yesterday confirmed that indeed, even though sometimes you know, that might not be perfect in terms of chain of custody or other types. you can test the reliability sufficiently that it can be used, especially corroborated what other types of evidence that it can be upheld and that also for crimes committed an ongoing on a conflict where it's difficult to, to get to the crime scene by formal investigators that this type of evidence is admissible and ver

this case is beyond the jurisdiction of the european court of human rights. ya did not control the events that took place in the summer of 2014 on the territory of ukraine and russia. and if she did not control, then she cannot be held responsible for them. the day before yesterday, gaga said quite clearly that the dpr was under the control of russia, and this is already a court verdict, respectively. and here is the main argument of russia, they are under jurisdiction, it loses its meaning, and more than that, now there is a review of the mourning of ukraine, and in the council and kao and there тоже сейчас бесплатное ответ России, as if why and how to deal with bail should not be done, that is, it is not created, that's what gaga's court considered only 4 physical persons and the degree of guilt. but the court answered the question: what are these four there they did and there were lines and why were we needed beech and so on ? what is the name of this conflict, the amnesia of crimea , these are all events, i don't know that this is not included, eh, how wou

court there is a problem of jurisdiction. he has the right to consider the case only if both states have agreed to become parties to the trial , theoretically the european court of humanlige the aggressor state to pay, but russia left the council of europe in september 2022 and does not comply with decisions, so for now the only option remains the seized russian money . forcibly those assets that are now arrested, we say now foreign, they will be transferred to the benefit of those applicants who won these proceedings, reparations were paid and in modern history, examples can be named monetary compensations to iraq for the occupation of kuwait in 1990-91 became the basis for the payments, the resolutions of the un security council formed a compensation commission after the conflict, and in general, cancer transferred 52 billion us dollars to kuwait dmytro didora oleksandr burlevych yehor nikitenko and andriy verstyuk espresso tv channel, i would like to thank our colleagues clearly and extremely reasonedly described an extremely difficult story, well , now we will add it to our marathon in order to put all the dots, so to speak, on her yulia klymenka, people's deputy

the lawyers of the ukrainian helsinki union oksana kornyeva filed a lawsuit against the european court of human rightsinst the russian federation and calls on all citizens to do the same, tell about russia's war crimes and demand punishment. in cases of war crimes we say that we need to contact the national authorities and also to that we believe that her soldiers are against us is a criminal offense according to the initiative of the tribunal for putin, the russians have committed more than 24,000 war crimes in ukraine, if you have become a witness or a victim of such, contact the office of the prosecutor general, you can write a statement online on the website, you can also be helped by human rights organizations as the helsinki group whose center of civil liberties abroad you have the right to write a statement at the police station valery pashko oleksandr burlevych tv channel espresso gorillas occupants of the resistance forces set fire to the headquarters of russian troops in the temporarily occupied village of voznesenka, zaporizhzhia region, the mayor of melitopol, ivan fedorov, said, the enemy

lyshchyna, deputy minister of justice of ukraine, commissioner for the affairs of the european court of human rights - 2016-2021. good evening. was today's verdict as expected for you and how fair was it to you and how fair was it from your point of view ? to evaluate absolutely, i am not a specialist in criminal law, but the decision is very expected, very strong , it will greatly help ukraine citizens and ukrainian companies in protecting their rights in international courts, so he was very friendly to be honest, it seems to me that the trial went even well, well, further than i expected from him, in principle, it is a lot or a little time, and only now we see the verdict , absolutely, well, for such a case, it is absolutely normal, the normal term is absolutely normal, do you think there are chances that those persons whose today they were sentenced to life imprisonment. they will actually end up in prison and will sit there for life because in fact this is arrest in absentia, this is a political issue and no one knows what will happen tomorrow or which way the events will go vinnik phase what is

court. that is, this is the second option of developing a model and creating such a tool. it can be, i would say, somewhat similar in terms of jurisdiction to the european court of of human rightsll be focused exclusively on crimes of aggression and, accordingly, the basis of the activity of this court should be actually the same rome statute with clearly defined characteristics of this crime of aggression, because the european court works with international law in the field of rights of a person, and international criminal law and international humanitarian law - this is the competence of the very same international criminal court in russian, is it not ratified, mr. oleksandr said, the question be laska sh that exactly ukraine e-e following the path of e-e creation of such e-e such a court of such a tribunal for the top leadership of the aggressor state should demonstrate not only its desire to create this tribunal a and e actually readiness e-e to support full membership in to the international criminal court and accordingly to ratify this document on the basis of which this new tribunal should actually be created, therefore the first task and the first step that should be co

helsinki union oksana kornyeva has filed a lawsuit against the russian federation at the european court of human rightss on all citizens to do the same, tell about russia's war crimes and demand the necessary punishment for that in order to go to court, it is necessary to exhaust national legal remedies in cases of war crimes . according to the initiative of the tribunal for putin, russians have committed more than 24,000 war crimes in ukraine, if you have become a witness or a victim of such crimes, contact the prosecutor general's office , you can also write a statement online on the website human rights organizations such as the helsinki group whose center for civil liberties abroad can help you have the right to write a statement at the police station valery pashko oleksandr burlevich tv channel espresso about 168 thousand russians who attacked our state have already been identified deputy head of the national police maksym tsitskyrytse said the investigators are fixing the directions namely offenses were committed on the territory temporarily not controlled by ukraine, on the de-occupied territori

the idea here is to bring back the bill of rights and broadly that would give our supreme court supremacy over the european court of humanr doing this is it would get the idea of taking asylum seekers to rwanda to be processed off the ground and at the moment, it is the european court which says no, we should not do it, and no flights have taken off and we have spent £120 million trying to get 200 asylum seekers over the so obviously in the event that we could get the bill of rights back, you could then start the programme again. but it feels very much as if the government is trying to do something, anything, to assuage public anger over what is happening at the moment. the problem is that as the — happening at the moment. the problem is that as the article _ happening at the moment. the problem is that as the article says, _ happening at the moment. the problem is that as the article says, liz _ is that as the article says, liz truss scrapped this in september because it was so completely complex and a complete mess it says here, in quotes. and a complete mess it says here, in uuotes. , and a complete mess it says here,

of the lawyers of the ukrainian helsinki union oksana kornyeva filed a lawsuit at the european court of human rightsthe russian federation and calls on all citizens to do the same, tell about russia's war crimes and demand punishment, what is necessary in order to go to court, you need to exhaust national means of legal protection in cases of war crimes. we say that we need to contact the national authorities, as well as to inform the russian federation in some way that we believe that its soldiers committed a crime against us, according to the initiative of the tribunal for putin, the russians committed in in ukraine, there are more than 24,000 war crimes, if you have become a witness or a victim of such, contact the sugen prosecutor, you can write a statement online on the website, you can also be helped by human rights organizations such as helsinki a group whose center for civil liberties abroad you have the right to write a statement to the police station valery pashko oleksandr burlevych espresso tv channel the security service of ukraine sent soldiers to the facilities of ukrnafta sbu employe

court of the un. it has the right to consider the case only in that case if both states behaved to become parties to the trial, theoretically the european court of humanrights could oblige the aggressor state to pay, but russia in september 2022 withdrew from the council of europe and does not implement decisions , so the only option so far is the seized russian money. well, if the international arbitration accepts the demands of the municipality or the state of ukraine as a whole, then the assets that are now seized, we say, are now foreign, will be transferred to the benefit of reparations were paid to those e-e applicants who won these proceedings, and in modern history, among the examples, we can name monetary compensations to iraq for the occupation of kuwait in 1990-91 , the basis for payments were the resolutions of the council after the conflict, the un security forces formed a compensation commission and, in general, the cancer transferred 52 billion us dollars to kuwait dmytro didora oleksandr burlevich yehor nikitenko and andriy verstyuk tv channel espresso the ministry of justice will compile this list of damages already next year and hand

for example, between the state court and ukraine, the netherlands against russia in the european court of human rightster . in the death of boeing, almost 300 people will be punished without fail. i am sure that all those guilty will be brought to criminal responsibility, mr. alexander. thank you for this conversation. thank you, despite the constant attacks on kharkiv, high-rise buildings are being restored there. crews are strengthening the structures, inserting windows and repairing the roofs in the houses that are being restored, their residents want to go back. details, what was left, it was sleeping, they celebrated сегодня рождение Новый год, see this, a child from kharkiv, alina semenko, shows her apartment, which was completely burned down after being hit by a russian shell, says i took my daughter and mother abroad, she came back herself and lives in a neighbor's room, i am sending this final sadness, yes. well, life will live on, everything will be fine and kharkiv will be restored, everything will return alyna's cream in this high-rise building on salta, only one family lives these days, r

even lie with us the steppe, which we are judging by judging by judging, was won by the european court of human rightser money from our taxes. and we convicted the tsar in the ninth year after the revolution of dignity, and that too in absentia. unfortunately, a trend happens when a-a we do nothing as a state, and then these collaborators, traitors, flee abroad or die and we say oh, let's condemn in absentia well, we condemn, but chuprits walks in the parliament boyko walks in the parliament hanna herman walks around kyiv and it's nothing years old, you know the question, what are these clan ties so strong in ukraine? because you know, when you are not incorporated here, you are not integrated into this eh . maybe you don't understand how it happens there, maybe there are some solutions for them. well, shufrych, he's on his own , let's say let him go, let him sit somewhere, let's go, grandson, people were indignant, he got out, as they say, the olympic committee is standing in the verkhovna rada is headed by the freedom committee words for a second yes, well, maybe there are some other connections tha

during the war it won't fall apart in your opinion, and in general there is still the european court of human rights, we understand that the church topic is extremely not easy, you know, they told us all these months that it's not the right time, that we should be very careful so as not to split society it seems to me that society has long since decided, because today those who speak ukrainian and russian are united in the fight against the russian aggressor, those who go to the same church, by the way, in many christian churches, there is only one structure , the representatives of which we remember refused to bury our soldiers and it was even in the territory of lviv region, which died from the aggressor and priests or so-called priests refused. we saw how they publicly called for disobedience to the authorities, where they called not to give the aggressor-aggressor, that is, here, as far as i am concerned, from a legal point of view, everything is external, how it will be interpreted, it seems to me that the political will is already in power, in another case, when we will be witnesses, it did no

of the wikilex portal scandal flared up even more when, despite the information of the european court of human rights, the president of lithuania, adamkus, categorically denied everything later, he even tried to pretend that he was led by the nose by local special services. also the senate. the united states also admitted that there was this prison in lithuania where it means that people were brought from afghanistan, that means because of the arab countries from afghanistan in boxes in boxes they were kept naked there, they were tortured by insomnia, they were tormented by insects, they were tormented by insect bites. uh, it means that lily poured water in her nose into her mouth. they were tormented by the sound. dreamers were tormented by hunger and tormented, which means, uh, this is a prison, it was opened in 2004 right after they removed the president of lithuania bucks from office and appointed adams as the new president. i say appointed, because there were actually no democratic elections human rights activists, of course, criticized the united states for impunity in the case of attempts by u

and i hope in the beginning of next year, there also were she thinks that the european court of human rights and i cayo. so for me and a foundation wilkie busier than the coming years. thank you so much for joining us here. a life on al jazeera, we have still to hear from the prosecutor because there was one person acquitted if there will be an appeal. and also, even though they haven't attended the trial or have shown any interest in this court case, that 3 people have now been convicted, who are probably in russia, have also still a right to appeal. and we will have to hear from that from them or in the next coming weeks. all right, thank you so much. step awesome to the u. k. now of the finance minister, jeremy hunt has officially declared that his nation is an a recession. he expects the economy to shrink even further in the next fiscal year, hunter laid out his plans for a tackling raising inflation or we challenge reports. for weeks, jeremy hunt has been playing the plane, speaking medic, for the case economic malays like root canal surgery, the treatment, he's all the white be pleasan

want to talk about it if it's higher than more followers than international committee, european court of human rights court of human rights and general assuming another bodies. why do we have that? and i think that people identify to what we do because it touches them directly. social media has some negative parts, but that's a huge advantage, empowers people to be able to have empathy for the suffering of other people's that they don't know, but they have empathy for the suffering of somebody living on the other side of the world. they have no idea and no personal interest. so that's a powerful message. for some reason we have people all over the world that they follow us to see exactly what we are doing in this interview, what's going on with the serious violations of human rights all over the world. and they found as part of the system is paralyzed, and they have, one of the subsidy organization of the general assembly which is 153 subsidiary organizations has the general assembly. we are one of the 153 but we are one of the three pillars of the u.n. with peaceful the domain human rights, and 4% o

of the wikilex portal scandal flared up even more when, despite the information of the european court of human rightsent of lithuania, adamkus, categorically denied everything later, he even tried to pretend that he was led by the nose by the local special services. also the senate. the united states also admitted that there was this prison in lithuania, where people were brought from afghanistan, that means because of the arab countries from afghanistan in boxes in boxes they were kept naked there, they were tormented by insomnia, they were tormented by insects, they were tormented by insect bites. uh, means that lily in the water in the nose in the mouth. they tormented them with the sound . sleepers tormented them with hunger, and that means, uh, this is the prison, it was opened in 2004 immediately after they were removed from office president of lithuania bucks and adamkus was appointed as the new president. i say they were appointed because there were no democratic elections there. human rights activists, of course, criticized the united states for impunity in the case of attempts by un experts