because _ the european court of human rights because it _ the european court of human rightserm, _ inconveniences for us in the short term, that — inconveniences for us in the short term, that there are short—term gains _ term, that there are short—term gains we — term, that there are short—term gains we would like to make an the law gets _ gains we would like to make an the law gets in — gains we would like to make an the law gets in the way. that puts us in the same _ law gets in the way. that puts us in the same territory as russia disrepair— the same territory as russia disrepair disobey its international treaties _ disrepair disobey its international treaties and rip up loss. so this may— treaties and rip up loss. so this may not— treaties and rip up loss. so this may not be _ treaties and rip up loss. so this may not be over. there is going to be a _ may not be over. there is going to be a lot— may not be over. there is going to be a lot of— may not be over. there is going to be a lot of clambering on the conservative backbenchers for us to withdraw _ conservative backb

of june in the pride month dedicated to awareness of the protection of the rights of lgbt plus communities , the european court of humanrights recognized that ukraine violates the rights of same-sex couples, but activists say that it is registered in the supreme to the council, the draft law can change the situation about what a civil partnership is and whether it is now about the legalization of same-sex marriages in ukraine in the story of maria ulyanovska hello my name is logo pavlo i am an anti-aircraft gunner of the 406th artillery brigade i support bill 9103 because i am gay i want the state to protect my rights as i protect the state pavlu 21 he has been fighting in the ranks of the armed forces since the time of the full-scale invasion from the beginning of the war the guy defended the country near odesa mykolaiv kherson and in donetsk region and automatically, somehow, somehow, something flooded like this, but a wave of such and such well, let's say, i stood by the trench and began to pray that the lord would give me that person who , at least once, and someone at least during the war, i had those problems fro

mom, help said that they would appeal the decision to ban the european court of human rights and continue activities. the voice of reason from hollywood in the discussions of the ukrainian conflict in one of the american tv programs was attended by the actor jim quizil, who called a spade a spade, namely a quote. azov are nazi ukrainians with russians of the same blood. if you figure it out, if you figure it out the same way, then the azov battalion is nazis, as it turns out, and we have been told for 2 years that there are no nazis there. and here they are hello or this is another conspiracy theory. i studied the materiel on the topic and it dawned on me. wait a minute. or maybe putin is just defending himself, who are nato, he is the european center bank, who are they all? the actor takes an active political stance to protect children from human traffickers. he has also been publicly involved in the judgment and follow-up of stem cells on embryonic material from the crisis of three foster children. they all come from china the next victims of european democracy in poland, near the borde

have there been reports that you plan to appeal to the european court of human rights? e. lawsuit to the european court of human rights we are waiting for a reasoned decision of the constitutional court, which, unfortunately, is not yet available, and we understand that it is being written in the offices. my sando, right after uh we're going to sue the european human rights agency and hope uh the european judiciary isn't taken over like the others bodies, uh, that govern europe today . and i'm counting on a positive outcome. we unequivocally understand that the shor party will return its parental status and, er, immediately become a full-fledged member of the political electoral bloc. what a serious blow this was to your political strength. were there those who decided to leave the party after its ban? of course not. elected measures a-a people who were elected on party lists. shore didn't just express support. on the contrary, uh, they had maximum confidence and hmm let's just say they asked us to go all the way because we made a promise to the people, and we're famous

and but that's because of the european court of eereee— because of the european court of eereee beefe— because of the european court of human rights't got the stomach to do it. i mean, there's— we haven't got the stomach to do it. i mean, there's a— we haven't got the stomach to do it. i mean, there's a very ebrebbe— it. i mean, there's a very ebebbe wey— it. i mean, there's a very simple way to- it. i mean, there's a very simple way to deal with this rrebbere— simple way to deal with this problem, jacob— simple way to deal with this problem, jacob is not problem, jacob and that is not to problem, jacob and that is not fe-bb— problem, jacob and that is not be-bf breede— problem, jacob and that is not to-it through a— problem, jacob and that is not to it through a humanitarian to see it through a humanitarian beere— to see it through a humanitarian brbre .— to see it through a humanitarian brbre .fe— to see it through a humanitarian prism , to understand and accept prism, to understand and accept feeb— prism, to understand and accept beef fbeee— prism, to understand and accept that these people— prism, to understand and accept that

help the party said they would appeal the decision to ban to the european court of human rights and continuee. regular victims of european democracy in poland, near the border with belarus, the bodies of two refugees were found in the river, this is reported by the publication in bursha, citing the police near lysya, a few months ago, polish activists reported to the local police about the disappearance of two foreigners in the area, but people, so and found no official comments from the polish border guard . the eu continues to promise assistance to kiev , this time 50 billion euros until 2027, in addition, ursula vonderlein said that european countries are ready to repay half the amount of ukraine's tax deficit is up to 30 billion euros with regular promises to feed the kiev regime and germany to restore the country. berlin intends to give kiev 381 million euros. already this year, the head of the foreign ministry at a conference on the restoration of ukraine in london recalled that germany had already allocated almost 17 billion euros to ukraine, a list of solid sponsors. tries to get stu

strasbourg court, here we have taken on even under such a system that each of the member states of the council of europe undertook to follow the guidelines and decisions of the european court of human rightstrasbourg court , conflicts constantly arise. e.e. the right to apply the right of understanding between the german constitutional court and the strasbourg court, that is, the european constitutional service for human rights. i understood that it would be very difficult for us to need a lot of specialists , of whom there are not a lot of legal journalists there are also not many who will explain all these problems, you see, you and i have been talking for 15 minutes, and there are already 150 million problems, they just showed us , no, no, yes, so we will meet again. he was with us on the third convocation, and we are moving to friendly kazakhstan. for some , he is very friendly and for others, not very friendly, but still friendly , at least not so much, not quite so friendly, and how let's say the same poland that you just mentioned, but it is more friendly than the same russia, obviously dimash alzhanov, a kazakh political scientist , is in touch with us, and i understand that i nee

discussed, the issue of article 33 of the refugee rights commission and we have a case law in this case, the issue of the case law is not ours, talia in the european court of humanl , now the issue and the responsibility of the greek government is completely clear. from the discussion of non-compliance with the human rights of refugees and the next discussion failure to comply with maritime safety, one person was not saved by a life jacket, unfortunately, the mediterranean sea has been a place of killing refugees for years, and we see that this government has come to the aid of these refugees too late, and as a rule, warnings of attacks have been given to the government, which is good for safety. seafaring, the core of the ports, the aid of the rights of the sea, 1982, the elimination of the commission of the hour, and without a doubt the responsibility of the greek government, as we have in the russian case, the responsibility of the italian government and the products of the greek government. on the agenda i didn't put it myself, but now we have to wait until some families of immigrants, who were far from losing their lives in the past , complained to the euro

scandal against judge kravchenko in 2008, the judge made a decision with a violation of human rights that the european courts found, however, about this fact of his biography, stanislav kravchenko simply lied in the declaration of integrity, he was a panel that reviewed the population on appeal , looked dislocated and referred to the confessional statements of individuals in china, such recognition was taken from them by law enforcement agencies without of the defender, that is, in violation of the right to defense , it looks like he tried to hide this fact. and when the judges go to the competition, they build a declaration of integrity, in general , they have the opportunity to openly state if they have this was in the biography of the nature of the plenum for the election of the new head of the supreme court stanislav kravchenko used the prohibited technique of manipulative hidden bribery of voters promised judges free apartments the head of the supreme court must also understand the importance of this appointment he is not only a er conditionally a leader among the judges themselves and he is also for b

ama— european court of human rights. right. and some— european court of human rights. right. onalise one of the country's largest— in to renationalise one of the country's largest water ebbbbbere— country's largest water suppliers, thames water, as it me— suppliers, thames water, as it brbee be— suppliers, thames water, as it tries to reach— suppliers, thames water, as it tries to reach fill— suppliers, thames water, as it tries to reach fill its coffers? veab. — tries to reach fill its coffers? veab. we— tries to reach fill its coffers? yeah, we will— tries to reach fill its coffers? yeah, we will have— tries to reach fill its coffers? yeah, we will have more- tries to reach fill its coffers? yeah, we will have more on that very shortly . but first, here is very shortly. but first, here is that very important weather forecast. good that very important weather forecast . good afternoon. forecast. good afternoon. webeeme— forecast. good afternoon. welcome to _ forecast. good afternoon. welcome to your- t good afternoon. welcome to your latest gb news weabber— welcome to your la

status of a full member of the eu. of the constitutional court to domestic legislation, as well as international law and judicial practice of the european court of human rights addition to its conclusions, the venice commission formulated on the basis of a misreading of ukrainian laws, in particular the law on the legal regime of martial law, and therefore decided that national minorities are discriminated against in our country. this is not true . tonight there was an explosion in a 16th-floor building in kyiv. we currently know about two dead people. our correspondent valeriya pashko will tell you more. she is with us. live valery i congratulate you, i am waiting for new details about the tragedy good day, it is indeed known that two people unfortunately died , four were injured, three of them were hospitalized, and only 19 people survived 18 people were rescued from this building, and then at 9:30 they received information that one more woman was under the rubble and fortunately she was also rescued, and psychological help was provided to five people. there are many people who work here: rescuers, doctors, psychologists , as well as services kyivgas and n

constitution of ukraine, the decision of the constitutional court, as well as domestic legislation and acts of international law and the case law of the european court of human rights mr. andrii what should we do to listen to the venice commission or act in the interests of the state? these two things can be combined. national others, to a certain extent it closes some issues that were absent in the previous legislation, in particular , a lot of this law is devoted to the topic of relations with the russian language, russian culture, and so on and so on and should we we should be friends with the russian language and culture today, restore its place that it once occupied of course not, why don't we then adopt a separate law or addendum to the law on military about martial law in which to write during martial law, we do not do this, but after the war when we are enemies we will beat him and he may change his mind and change his mind, then we will develop but this is not the topic of the law about national minorities or national tires will remain in ukraine relations with them and we will have relations with them in ukraine after 3 years after the end of the war and

in 2008, the judge made a decision with a violation of human rights, which was stated by the european courthts, however , stanislav kravchenko simply lied to the board about this fact of his biography in the declaration of integrity which appellately reviewed the population of the aviary package and referred to the confessional statements of individuals in china, such recognition was taken from them by law enforcement agencies without a defender, that is, in violation of the right to defense it looks like he tried to hide this fact. and when judges go to the competition, they build a declaration of integrity, they generally have the opportunity to openly declare if they had such a thing in their biography. natural plenums for the election of the new head of the supreme court stanislav kravchenko used the prohibited technique of manipulative hidden bribery of voters, he promised judges free apartment , the head of the supreme court must also understand the importance of this appointment, he is not only the leader among the judges themselves, but he is also his position is a member of the sup

including he european court of human rights, other international courts and organizations and practicallym remained unanswered. so for the period from 2014 to december twenty the second investigative committee of russia initiated 2,287 criminal cases against 650 persons, including representatives of the military political leadership of ukraine, members of radical nationalist associations, as well as representatives of ukrainian law enforcement agencies, according to official data, more than 5,000 civilians died as a result of the armed conflict. including over 130 children, at least nine and a half thousand civilians were injured, of which more than 400 were children. i will give two more figures from the report of anna kuznetsova, they really terrible victims of me, since 2014, more than 26,000 people are considered, of which 24,000 are just children, and now, as soon as it became known about the organization of this commission to investigate the crimes of the kiev regime. uh, from the new russian regions , human rights activists began to receive new facts. some of them were voiced by th

a-a and a legal e-e legal step that e-e now helps, including at the level of the e-e european court of human rightsnational court of the united nations, dear panel scandals would like to ask you what news is currently in chongara, something recently arrived there, there is information that the enemy has now installed a pontoon crossing, so indeed they talked about the fact that they will install a pontoon pontoon crossing there, and they said that they will install from two to six such at the crossing points in order to ensure logistics to uh, let's say mine to the kherson region in melitopol, this means beijing animal, and then to melitopol in the zaporizhia direction, and ah, i think that they will install pontoons because this route is really logistically very important, very important , in order to transfer military equipment, personnel, and personnel from henichesky district and melitopol to the direction of genichest side, towards melitopol; equipment, that is, that is why they are trying to do everything in one way or another to repair this city as quickly as possible, but according to our c

short also said that he intends to appeal to the european court of human rights regarding the recent of the constitutional court to declare his party illegal, not the first security service ukraine detained a russian agent who collected data on the defense of the southern ukrainian npp, this is the second traitor recruited by the russian special services , the enemy politician turned out to be a resident yuzhnoukrainska. he collected and passed on information to the enemy about the locations of bases and the number of units of the defense forces guarding the nuclear power plant. the information was needed by the russians for the preparation of targeted missile strikes. currently, the attacker is in custody , the grain harvest in ukraine will decrease by 5-7%. compared to last year, predicts first deputy minister of agrarian policy and food taras vysotskyi, it is expected that about 46 million tons of grain will be collected, at the same time vysotskyi clarified that the internal consumption of grains is 18 million tons, even if we collect 46 million tons, it is still 2.5 times more t

in addition, documents are being prepared to be submitted to the european court of human rights for thecudetto owner, rudi garcia has taken over the italian napoli, the details of the agreement are not disclosed, the french specialist has already worked for the apennines. leading roma also garcia coached a number of french teams garcia's last club was saudi al azar from where he was recently released i think earlier napoli said goodbye to luciano from paleti, who led the team to the first student in 33 years, the italian specialist may not have agreed on further cooperation with the owner of the club, aurelio dala orentisos. well, we are supporting the national team today. although, of course, the main thing is to support the armed forces of ukraine and i, for all ukrainians who lead this war visibly and invisibly against the enemy on the territory of our state and outside its borders, but now, how will the weather in ukraine be this weekend natalka didenko mrs. natalya will tell us good evening please, very diverse plans i hope for work and for recreation, so of course the weather is a

council, he did not declare part of the property and made a decision in the case, which the european court of human rightsnd illegal the national anti-corruption bureau and the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office are in contact with the former first deputy head of yanukovych's administration andriy portnovy completed the investigation of the case in the court of the kyiv district court of odesa against lyudmila saltan, who is suspected of extorting and receiving four thousand dollars in bribes. nabu will open the case materials for perusal by the defense party, after which the indictment will be sent to the court. we will remind you that on march 29 , 2023, rounds of ammunition hit odesa judge lyudmila saltan on receipt of four thousand dollars from a citizen for passing a decision in a civil case in his favor, the higher anti-corruption court refused to accept in saltan under arrest and released on personal recognizance with bail of 2 million uah, judges of the bershad district court in vinnytsia region are abusing the right to self -recusal, they are being removed from the case en masse, the

struggle with the russian federation does not end with the decision of the un ic or the european court of human rightsinternational criminal court, no, the work will continue and we will need everyone possible ways to put pressure on the russian federation so that every time the russian federation takes the floor in the un security council, it excuses itself for not fulfilling the decision of the un international court of justice so that every time putin declares that they are acting in accordance with international law, we can say that if you wish international law , then fulfill the decision of the un international court of justice, your direct obligation under this international law, so that every time leaders of states that continue diplomatic relations with the russian federation come to ukraine and who say that let's conclude a peace treaty, we could say that the mandatory condition of a moderate treaty will be the fulfillment of all international legal obligations of the russian federation, including all decisions of international courts and the withdrawal of all compensations , mr. roman, i ha

because the un human rights council has criticized funds for increase police finance. the european court of human rights has also condemned france on 5 separate occasions for leisure abuses committed by the police. what needs to be done in your view to address this issue? what needs to change our district and the question, because you have different levels to levels to that you should use see me seeing you've taken. yes it does. there is an issue of control external control of the supposed to say audio. it should be waiting for, but you cannot re from the police against pretty soapy sales. and this is tony issue. you have to wean those 2 weeks on the details of the pretty soap you so, so you up to train pretty soap sales. and in any short planning and, and vocational training to this candidate, which is the, the use of deadly false is something technical, but it's also something relational. is that how you use your gun in we situations? and these question is a question of how you all have had a system at brain as a police officer in the shop recruitment to how you chose the good ones, how t

this was, the factors involved, and you have got the i involved, and you have got the european court of human rights separate issues _ important, rob? so i guess you have a two separate issues here, - important, rob? so i guess you have a two separate issues here, you i important, rob? so i guess you have a two separate issues here, you have got domestic uk politics, and polling suggests that certainly amongst conservative voters, it is popular, the idea of deporting people to rwanda. so one imagines that elements of the government site, you know, this shows you what we are up against, the lefty lawyers, maybe we need to leave the european convention on human rights so we could enable this policy to go on in a way that our courts would consider to be lawful. the other international dimension, and in some ways this is more a satiric, is the extent to which, you know, the government, while knowing it may be popular at home to take a tougher line on people coming in boats, it might be worried that you have got yet another legaljudgment in a uk court that sort of implies that britain is sort of packing

that was after intervention from the european court of human rights, but sex was later in december 2022he high court ruled it was lawful —— but six months later. however, thejudges gave the go—ahead to several individual asylum seekers and a charity to challenge their decision, this is whyjudges at the court of appeal had been looking into the issue. in march the home secretary was in rwanda's capital and was given a tour of potential migrant housing. it said it could have 1000 asylum seekers during a trial period, but it would potentially have capacity for more. earlier this week the home office published an economic assessment of the plan. let's take a look at the figures. sending each asylum figure would cost on average 100 city £9,000, including a payment to rwanda —— £69,000. the british government argues the policy would also have a deterrent effect which would possibly lead to savings. but first, jeremy brier kc is a barrister and legal commentator. thank you forjoining us. can you take us through the legals of this, why the appeal courtjudges decided in the way they did? this wa

court. so the briti three times the european ly won three times the european court of human rights. won threegovernment— would you have advised the government not— would you have advised the government not simply to proceed and government not simply to proceed ent eent— government not simply to proceed and send those— government not simply to proceed and send those planes to rwanda 7 and send those planes to rwanda a wet.— and send those planes to rwanda a wet we— and send those planes to rwanda a wet we en— and send those planes to rwanda ? well, we can follow- ? well, we can follow injunctions on on the basis that the court has jurisdiction to give them or we could actually follow them while reserving our position on the jurisdictional issue . so there are two issues, issue. so there are two issues, aren't there? there's a legal issue and a political issue whether one actually wants to follow the injunction raises both of those issues. if i'd have been attorney general, the one thing i would done was one thing i would have done was to put down a clear marker that although the practise this

first relocation flight was unfortunately frustrated by last—minute measures from the european court of human rightsf causing flights while a domestic legal proceedings are ongoing. in december, the divisional court of the high court comprehensively upheld the lawfulness of the partnership, confirming that rwanda was a safe country. thatjudgment was a safe country. thatjudgment was appealed to the court of appeal, which heard the appeal in april of this year, and handed down its judgment earlier today. mr speaker, i respect the court, and welcomed the fact that had unanimously found in the government's favour on the vast majority of the appeal is brought against the policy. unanimously, the court of appeal confirmed that removing asylum seekers to a safe country is entirely consistent with the refugee convention, including article 31. indeed, the court of appeal found that it indeed, the court of appeal found thatitis indeed, the court of appeal found that it is lawful, in principle, for the government to relocate to people who come to the uk illegally to a safe third country. that the government ca

court. so the briti three times the european ly won three times the european court of human rights. won threenment— would you have advised the government not— would you have advised the government not simply to proceed and government not simply to proceed eht eeht— government not simply to proceed and send those— government not simply to proceed and send those planes to rwanda 7 and send those planes to rwanda e wett— and send those planes to rwanda e wett. we— and send those planes to rwanda e wett. we eh— and send those planes to rwanda ? well, we can follow- ? well, we can follow injunctions on on the basis that the court has jurisdiction to give them or we could actually follow them while reserving our position on the jurisdictional issue . so there are two issues, issue. so there are two issues, aren't there? there's a legal issue and a political issue whether one actually wants to follow the injunction raises both of those issues. if i'd have been attorney general, the one thing i would done was one thing i would have done was to put down a clear marker that although the practise this a

problems, not just domestically, but a european court but also with a european court of but also with a european court ei hanan— but also with a european court of human rightstees to _ deportees, rather, sorry, deportees to kigali, you know, all deportees to kigali, you know, aii i— deportees to kigali, you know, aii i ininw— deportees to kigali, you know, all i think 199— deportees to kigali, you know, all i think 199 of— deportees to kigali, you know, all i think 199 of them, bar one:— all i think 199 of them, bar one, were removed by british eewns— one, were removed by british eewns ane— one, were removed by british courts and then— one, were removed by british courts and then the last one was renewed— courts and then the last one was ennewee ew— courts and then the last one was ernewee by a— courts and then the last one was removed by a european court of human— removed by a european court of human ieignrs— removed by a european court of human rights ruling. but it's arse— human rights ruling. but it's also extreme— human rights ruling. but it's also extreme expensive. we eiseeweree— also extreme expensive. we discovered that— also extreme expensive. we

coun— judgements from the european coun oi— judgements from the european court of human— judgements from the european court of human rightsstatus stands today. but of refugee status stands today. but oi ii— refugee status stands today. but of course it was— refugee status stands today. but of course it was designed in very— of course it was designed in very different— of course it was designed in very different times. but the nriiisn— very different times. but the british judiciary, the british nouse— british judiciary, the british house or— british judiciary, the british house of lords— british judiciary, the british house of lords , who are doing house of lords, who are doing incin— house of lords, who are doing ineir pest— house of lords, who are doing ineir pesi io— house of lords, who are doing their best to block legislation igni— their best to block legislation rigni now— their best to block legislation right now, seem— their best to block legislation right now, seem to be huge barriers— right now, seem to be huge barriers for— right now, seem to be huge barriers for the— right now, seem to be huge barriers for the

cewrf— judgements from the european cewrf ef— judgements from the european court of human— judgements from the european court of human rightss today. but ef ff— refugee status stands today. but of course it was— refugee status stands today. but of course it was designed in werw— of course it was designed in very different— of course it was designed in very different times. but the hrfffeh— very different times. but the british judiciary, the british were— british judiciary, the british hewee ef— british judiciary, the british house of lords— british judiciary, the british house of lords , who are doing house of lords, who are doing her— house of lords, who are doing fhefr eeer— house of lords, who are doing fhefr heef fe— house of lords, who are doing their best to block legislation rfehf— their best to block legislation rfehf new— their best to block legislation right now, seem— their best to block legislation right now, seem to be huge herrfere— right now, seem to be huge barriers for— right now, seem to be huge barriers for the— right now, seem to be huge barriers for the government. tony— barriers for the government. re

but european court of human rights. eat new— european court of human rights. e— but now germany reportedly wants the eu to copy the uk s policy. wnat— the eu to copy the uk s policy. wnat tnew-te— the eu to copy the uk s policy. what they're doing is pretending to what they're doing is pretending te wteette— what they're doing is pretending to wrestle with— what they're doing is pretending to wrestle with this idea long ant— to wrestle with this idea long ant natt— to wrestle with this idea long and hard and— to wrestle with this idea long and hard and say, oh, it's such and hard and say, oh, it's such a tttttewtt— and hard and say, oh, it's such a difficult decision— and hard and say, oh, it's such a difficult decision for germany . tnte— a difficult decision for germany . tnte te— a difficult decision for germany . this is such— a difficult decision for germany . this is such a— a difficult decision for germany . this is such a difficult thing . we-we— . this is such a difficult thing . we-we teen— . this is such a difficult thing . we've been racking our con

think this is a really important battle to fight, and that's why we're taking it to the european court of human rights or is this in ccmhcc— with science, or is this in conflict with _ with science, or is this in conflict with another set of much— conflict with another set of beliefs which _ conflict with another set of beliefs which you have called the—weill beliefs which you have called. chc—wen. h-wc the gender ideology? well, i've reh— the gender ideology? well, i've never felt that _ the gender ideology? well, i've never felt that my— the gender ideology? well, i've never felt that my christian fchh — never felt that my christian fchh-h— never felt that my christian faith .in conflict- faith was in conflict with science i all. - faith was in conflict with science all. :ritr faith was in conflict with- sciencelall. butl do i do science at all. but i do i do believe that science and theology combined when they say that it's impossible for a human being to change sex. so um, and i think that the medical profession has a duty to say that to its patients . sound that to its patients. sound medical car

think this is a really important battle to fight, and that's why we're taking it to the european court of human rightsnce, or is this in ccmhcc— with science, or is this in conflict with _ with science, or is this in conflict with another set of much— conflict with another set of beliefs which _ conflict with another set of beliefs which you have called the—weill beliefs which you have called. chc—wen. h-wc the gender ideology? well, i've reh— the gender ideology? well, i've never felt that _ the gender ideology? well, i've never felt that my— the gender ideology? well, i've never felt that my christian fchh — never felt that my christian fchh-h— never felt that my christian faith .in conflict- faith was in conflict with science i all. - faith was in conflict with science all. :ritr faith was in conflict with- sciencelall. butl do i do science at all. but i do i do believe that science and theology combined when they say that it's impossible for a human being to change sex. so um, and i think that the medical profession has a duty to say that to its patients . sound that to its patients. sound medical

both in this country and potentially, of course, we saw an interjection already from the european court of human rightsrt. so we'll have to see how that— uk supreme court. so we'll have to see how that pans out and wbebber— to see how that pans out and wbebber bbe— to see how that pans out and whether the government can get meme— whether the government can get biiebbe ebb— whether the government can get riigbbe ebb im— whether the government can get flights off in the _ whether the government can get flights off in the meantime. um, i bereemeiiy— flights off in the meantime. um, i personally don't— flights off in the meantime. um, i personally don't like the iewemee— i personally don't like the rwanda deal.— i personally don't like the rwanda deal. i— i personally don't like the rwanda deal. i don't like it at all rwanda deal. i don't like it at eii mem— rwanda deal. i don't like it at eii brem e— rwanda deal. i don't like it at all from a moral— rwanda deal. i don't like it at all from a moral standpoint , i all from a moral standpoint, i bbbmb— all from a moral standpoint, i bbbmb ibe— all from a mor

both in this country and potentially, of course, we saw an interjection already from the european court of human rightse to see how that— uk supreme court. so we'll have to see how that pans out and wnebneb— to see how that pans out and wnebneb bne— to see how that pans out and whether the government can get bbbenbe— whether the government can get bbbenbe ebb— whether the government can get bbbenbe ebb m— whether the government can get flights off in the _ whether the government can get flights off in the meantime. um, flights off in the meantime. uin, i flights off in the meantime. um, b beneenebby— flights off in the meantime. um, i personally don't— flights off in the meantime. um, i personally don't like the bwenee— i personally don't like the rwanda deal.— i personally don't like the rwanda deal. i— i personally don't like the rwanda deal. i don't like it at all rwanda deal. i don't like it at ebb bem— rwanda deal. i don't like it at ebb bbem e— rwanda deal. i don't like it at all from a moral— rwanda deal. i don't like it at all from a moral standpoint , i all from a moral standpoint, i bnbnb— al

june 1 in the month of pride dedicated to awareness on the protection of the rights of lgbt plus community european court of human that ukraine violates the rights of same-sex parking. hi my name is pavel i anti-aircraft gunner of the 406th artillery brigade. i support bill 9.1.03. i want the state to protect my rights in the same way that i protect the state. paul 21, he fights in the ranks of the armed forces of the first full-scale invasion. at the beginning of the war , the guy defended the country near odessa with nikolaev kherson from the donetsk region and automatically flooded near odessa and automatically somehow a wave of sadness swept over me. i stood near the trench and began to pray. lord, give me that person who will support me at least in time of war, and the bitch, printed pig. pavlova pavel met vladislav , also a military guy, on social networks for more than a year, although most of this time. they fought hard, defending the country in different directions of the front. they recently got engaged to legally in front of the state couple to each other, no one i want to have a buccal roar. i want if

difficulties and of course , our old friend, the european cann— , our old friend, the european earn an— , our old friend, the european court of human— , our old friend, the european court of human rights, chalk, who's come in and re— , you know, chalk, who's come in and re nearing— , you know, chalk, who's come in and is dealing with— , you know, chalk, who's come in and is dealing with law within the and is dealing with law within rne earner.— and is dealing with law within the cabinet, has— and is dealing with law within the cabinet, has made it clear we wru— the cabinet, has made it clear we wru ner— the cabinet, has made it clear we will not be— the cabinet, has made it clear we will not be leaving the echr. so we will not be leaving the echr. so r— we will not be leaving the echr. so r een-r— we will not be leaving the echr. so i don't know— we will not be leaving the echr. so i don't know where we go with all so i don't know where we go with an ar— so i don't know where we go with an of ne— so i don't know where we go with all of this, but— so i don't know where we go with all of this, but i— so i don't know where we go with all of this, but i suspect i eweneer— all of this, but

and european court of human rights. who eo— european court of human rights. who eo thot— european courteen in power for longer than new-this-sol been in power for longer than. tow-ttio-so you new labour at this stage. so you can—why— new labour at this stage. so you ton—wty ooooio- new labour at this stage. so you can _why people are. can understand why people are tinting— can understand why people are ttinting- — can understand why people are thinking si~it5;.5i"iii" can understand why people are. thinking- meanwhile, you thinking change. meanwhile, you know, if are to be know, if reports are to be believed, sir keir starmer is wobbling one of his wobbling a bit on one of his policies. particularly policies. yes not particularly populist . this £28 billion net populist. this £28 billion net zero pledge because of, you know, the treasury calculations is that it could cost each household £1,000 a year. yes. so the reasoning behind— household £1,000 a year. yes. so the reasoning behind that- : mhz“ yes. so the reasoning behind that is that— the reasoning behind that is that to— the reason

difficulties and of course , our old friend, the european cewn— , our old friend, the european cewn ei— , our old friend, the european court of human— , our old friend, the european court of human rightslk, who's come in and is dealing with— , you know, chalk, who's come in and is dealing with law within the and is dealing with law within ine canines.— and is dealing with law within the cabinet, has— and is dealing with law within the cabinet, has made it clear we win— the cabinet, has made it clear we wiii nei— the cabinet, has made it clear we will not be— the cabinet, has made it clear we will not be leaving the echr. so we will not be leaving the echr. se i— we will not be leaving the echr. se i een-i— we will not be leaving the echr. so i don't know— we will not be leaving the echr. so i don't know where we go with all so i don't know where we go with aii ei— so i don't know where we go with aii ei anis— so i don't know where we go with all of this, but— so i don't know where we go with all of this, but i— so i don't know where we go with all of this, but i suspect i suspect— all of this, but i suspect i swseeei ii— all of this, but i suspect i suspect i'd be— all of this, but i

the european convention on newman rights so that we replace the supreme court on issues regarding civil rights so that european american or asian americans can then appeal to the european court of human rights if the supreme court should reinstate affirmative action? guest: that is a little outside my expertise. i would have to read up more on that. what i would say is the law that the president is relying on the heroes act. the idea was to give flex ability for student borrowers, particularly those in nila terry families if there is suddenly a need to call on service members or another national emergency. congers was clearly thinking of terrorism and that moment. you could interpret that as covid was a national emergency but the president himself was already saying it was nearly over and then said the emergency is over. at various times, president biden admitted they couldn't just give flexibility for borrowers unless there was ambiguity. congress explicitly said this is not what we meant and they passed a law to say so then president biden vetoed it. he spent hundreds of billions of dollars and congress is powerless to act unless they get a super majority of two thirds. by the cons

circling, planes circling , peeling the hulls off twenty-eight of the best bombers that last week flew right over the chinese. the european court of humanhts obliged ukraine to legally recognize same-sex couples, this was stated by the backgammon by the name of saunas, according to her, ukraine and europe should therefore adopt a law that legally recognizes same-sex couples and marriages, that is , the possibility for homosexuals to register their relationship as a family, moreover, recognition of same-sex couples is one of the conditions for accession to the european union is also the echr. he took ukraine to pay a fine for refusing to register same-sex marriages in kiev and delete it from the constitution of the family code in ukraine, all articles that say that a brother is a union between a fan and a pania or between a man, a man and a woman, that is , right now ukraine is still lagging behind western trends, the word they are glamor magazine one of the most popular glossy publications in the uk has put it on its cover. look logan called yes was a woman who had her breasts removed to become a man, but that didn't stop transgender pe

court of appeal ruling? well, it's somewhat surprising given that previously our courts had found that it was lawful at all the other levels at and it was only the european court of human rightsu can say it. this is this is a rogue— think you can say it. this is this is a rogue decision. and i teltewe— this is a rogue decision. and i teltewe tt— this is a rogue decision. and i teltewe tt ts— this is a rogue decision. and i believe it is a— this is a rogue decision. and i believe it is a rogue decision tnat— believe it is a rogue decision tnat ts— believe it is a rogue decision that is political,— believe it is a rogue decision that is political, specifically to frustrate— that is political, specifically to frustrate the _ that is political, specifically to frustrate the government's naucy— to frustrate the government's aaltcy ta — to frustrate the government's aaltcy ta stan— to frustrate the government's policy to stop the boats. but laat— policy to stop the boats. but laat. ann— policy to stop the boats. but look, ann nigel— policy to stop the boats. but look, ann nigel farage, i want look, aim nigel farage, i want to look, ann nigel farage, i want ta tall— look, ann nigel

court of appeal ruling? well, it's somewhat surprising given that previously our courts had found that it was lawful at all the other levels at and it was only the european court of human rightsu can say it. this is this is a rogue— think you can say it. this is this is a rogue decision. and i teltewe— this is a rogue decision. and i teltewe tt— this is a rogue decision. and i teltewe tt ts— this is a rogue decision. and i believe it is a— this is a rogue decision. and i believe it is a rogue decision tnat— believe it is a rogue decision tnat ts— believe it is a rogue decision that is political,— believe it is a rogue decision that is political, specifically to frustrate— that is political, specifically to frustrate the _ that is political, specifically to frustrate the government's naucy— to frustrate the government's aaltcy ta — to frustrate the government's aaltcy ta stan— to frustrate the government's policy to stop the boats. but laat— policy to stop the boats. but laat. ann— policy to stop the boats. but look, ann nigel— policy to stop the boats. but look, ann nigel farage, i want look, aim nigel farage, i want to look, ann nigel farage, i want ta tall— look, ann nigel

openly artek of ukraine such is precisely the sun that announced the good news to the european court of human rightsraine to legally recognize same-sex marriages. well, that is, all ukraine , the europeans, the whole west has already crushed under itself, but even those, in fact, are ready for the sake of joining this gay union. sorry and for the sake of being a part of the west to give all that is holy all these values ​​on which they themselves grew up a saying or a cross, did not have panties on day in the west no longer operates the french protestant church. the man actually performed a pole dance. this is considered absolutely normal and the national airline of argentina has announced the first transgender pilot in south america to be honest, i don't know how far it will fly. this plane and where it will fly, the bodybuilder changed the graviator to the floor and became the first woman pilot. horror, well, in the united states, like all over the world, in kindergartens there are bookshelves with fairy tales and coloring books, only they are not like that, what they should be, and the books are

have we ever left the echr sr european court of humm— the echr sr european court of human rights?

colonies of ukraine, in particular in the 23rd column, we have many cases in the european court that are considered specifically regarding torture under article 3 of the european convention on human rights , torture takes place in many colonies , and this is exactly the situation in the 77th colony shows that the division into so-called black and red zones are nonsense because it is precisely in many so-called red zones where the power belongs to the administration that the administration is worse than the pakhans than the criminal authorities arrange the torture of prisoners with extortion. detention without the right to bail, if we are talking about control mechanisms, for example, yes, continue, borisovich has already stated that they will not tolerate torture they imitate torture and although they say that there is a presumption of innocence , but they will not tolerate torture again and they will draw conclusions from this story. we will tolerate torture, of course everyone says that they do not tolerate the issue of establishing appropriate control mechanisms and responding to the complaints of prisoners or their relatives, because you can write 10 in the central committee, but st

of the convention rights in the decision reached between the two views expressed in the court of appeal. last week, thejustice secretary said the government remain firmly in our adherence to the european court on humano their country of origin. which, if they were claiming asylum might be a further risk. the lord chiefjustice disagreed. he said the agreement between the united kingdom and rwanda are sufficiently robust, particularly with the monitoring obligations both sides had signed up to. but obligations both sides had signed up to. �* ., , obligations both sides had signed up to. �* .., , obligations both sides had signed up to. but it was a ma'ority decision? that to. but it was a ma'ority decision? that involves — to. but it was a majority decision? that involves home _ to. but it was a majority decision? that involves home office - to. but it was a majority decision? i that involves home office personnel being stationed permanently and it involves an independent monitoring committee and its being monitored. he thought that precluded the individuals... it he thought that precluded the individuals. . ._ he thought that precluded the individuals... it was a ma'ority decision. i individuals... i