together with the children, that is, this proportionality will again be evaluated by the european court of human rights, that is, when they say that the european court of human rights will not be able to evaluate us. and we will save money so that people will not be able to complain to ukraine that ukraine has violated rights, and this is actually because of the war, and we are talking about it warned in the derogation, no, it will still be evaluated, because ukraine has signed the european convention on human rights and proportionality, and this is also a certain task of the delegation. oleksandr, stay in touch, because serhiy demchenko, people's deputy from servant of the people and representative of the legal policy committee, is also joining our broadcast. i greet you, good evening. good evening, but oleksandr has another question for you, and then serhiy and i will continue, and are there any risks here, that in ukraine, i don't know, they will, for example, abuse these norms, and because what people are interested in what if they allowed, it means seizing property, then maybe whoever needs it, he

he european court of human rights. hrs. says he european court of human rights. he says he doesn't need to. i think - says he doesn't need to. i think riaht says he doesn't need to. i think right now _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is a _ says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is a much - says he doesn't need to. i think right now there is a much more| right now there is a much more attentive trying to keep both camps happy in the sense we might cross that bridge when we come to it but equally there is a step forward we can ignore echr rulings which will keep us in the echr so i don't think were at stage of leaving it. whenever the next tory leadership contest is, that will be a thing? i contest is, that will be a thing? i suspect it will be a theme and contest is, that will be a thing? i suspect it will be a theme and in 2022 suella braverman did want it, it did not stop her telling a ligament committed to it and she said we shoul

withdrawal, they're also coming up does government and action on climate change while of human rights. the european court of human rights is issuing a verdict on 2 cases that could have historic impact. and a spectacular total eclipse leaves north america in all, tens of millions of people watch the moon block the sun over mexico, the us and canada. the nicole for at least welcome to the show. israel's prime minister benjamin netanyahu says, a date has been set for sending ground forces into rough um, but he has not specified when this will happen. the us opposes the assault on gaza southern most city saying that it would have a devastating impact on civilians and israel's own security. that you know statement comes days after israel's army withdrew troops from nearby upon eunice. some guidance of already started to return to the rubble and gaza 2nd largest city . over a 1000000 are still sheltering and rough on most of gauze. this population has been displaced by the is really offensive, which was launched after the october 7th terror attacks. by how much a, a lieutenant colonel peter learner is a spoke

you did talk about the european court of human rights. out where that challenge may come. is he still serious about pulling the u.k. out of the echr if it comes to that? chris: interesting to hear, slightly evasive answer to that question. on the one hand, he thought the infrastructure the government is assembling will be sufficient to make this policy work. on the other hand, constantly labeling european court of human rights a foreign court, plenty of critics in the house of lords tonight arguing it is an international court which the u.k. has become a signatory. not ruling out that as a conservative party, you could withdraw as a distinctive marker of difference from the labour party going into the election. there are a good number of individuals who do think logical conclusion of all of this, not just this policy but a number of others, is likely to be withdrawal from the echr, or at least the beginnings of a discussion of rewriting the convention that critics believe belongs in a different era, was not designed for the challenge of t

please, can the adopted law contribute to the mass appeal of ukrainians abroad to the european court of human rightsthe simple short answer is no, because... in order for a citizen of ukraine to apply to the european court of human rights, he must use all national remedies to protect his rights if he believes that his rights have been violated, or are being violated, created , or obstacles are created in the realization of his constitutional rights. liberties, he must apply to the court of first instance, then to appeal, if his decision was not satisfied in the appeal procedure, and only after the decision entered into legal force, gained legal force, he has the right to appeal to the european court of human rights, and the practice of the european court shows that the courts, the european the court refuses if a person has not used these national means of protection of the violated right, so i am not worried and i am not afraid that there will be any mass appeals to the european court from the point of view of the procedure, but from the point of view of the essence of the violation. rights, i do no

court has ruled, but weak climate policies can violate human rights. and that is a huge thing. the court even went as far as the state, but european convention of human rights encompasses protection by the state for serious adverse effects of climate change on lives, health wellbeing, a quality of life. so it's really holding governments responsible for the quality of life, of their citizens when it comes to climate change. this is, this is ruling, it's the voice, the authority here is more of a more a one, isn't it? i mean, we're not talking about the court being able to force the risk government to do anything. but what exactly will happen now that this ruling has been handed down? so bear with me expectations that the source government will re examine its climate goals. and it said that it would do that. the court said that they were worsley, inadequate as they are. um, there are no limits that have been set by the switch government, for example, in terms of the amount of emissions that it wants to reduce. and it has failed to meet some targets in the past as well. so the european court a few months. right. so it's really saying that the, th

a group of swiss women have won their first ever climate case victory in the european court of human rightsy are. the court found switzerland violated have violated them of their human rights by not taking sufficient action on climate change. switzerland's efforts were called woefully inadequate. this ruling includes the law in 46 other european countries including the u.k. it comes after last month was officially declared the warmest march on record. we will get onto that in a moment. let's start with this report from our climate editor justin donald. >> the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight. >> there has been a violation of article eight of the convention. >> and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland's failure to do enough to cut planet warming in missions could create heat waves that could threaten the lives of older people. >> i am so, well, shocked, positively shocked. so happy to contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. >> today's ruling is not open to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will set the legal c

well, boy, it did this morning because the european court of human rights has decided that under articlef the convention, which is the right to life, that actually governments have a duty to protect people from climate change and most significantly , change and most significantly, this ruling is binding and will trickle down to influence the law. in all, 46 countries that are signed up to echr, including the united kingdom . yep, the the united kingdom. yep, the right to respect for private and family life has been used to say that governments have a duty to fight climate change, to meet their net zero obligations. now, to me , this just says what i've to me, this just says what i've been saying for years anyway , been saying for years anyway, that we should have no part of this thing whatsoever. i think the implications for not just national sovereignty , but for national sovereignty, but for general elections are very, very serious indeed. well, somebody who may have a slightly different point of view is tim crosland , who joins me here, crosland, who joins me here, director of plan b,

a group of swiss women have won their first ever climate case victory in the european court of human rightsy are. the court found switzerland violated have violated them of their human rights by not taking sufficient action on climate change. switzerland's efforts were called woefully inadequate. this ruling includes the law in 46 other european countries including the u.k. it comes after last month was officially declared the warmest march on record. we will get onto that in a moment. let's start with this report from our climate editor justin donald. >> the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight. >> there has been a violation of article eight of the convention. >> and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland's failure to do enough to cut planet warming in missions could create heat waves that could threaten the lives of older people. >> i am so, well, shocked, positively shocked. so happy to contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. >> today's ruling is not open to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will set the legal c

so the european court of humans, right? so it's really saying that the, the switch government needs to do something about that. but more importantly, this case also opens doors to other cases, a mix of a countries vulnerable to, to the kind of cases that we've just seen in white, switzerland under. there were other cases that were were what thrown outright portugal, france of most people don't think of the switzerland it as being the place where you have i, i guess the, the least being done to save the alarm. i mean, this is how to my wife switzerland. uh, got through was the case. i mean that was 2 other cases, a court as well once again, one against portugal and 52 other european nations. the other one against, from those 2 folks thrown out perhaps because switzerland is so small and this was such a detailed look at what they've been doing and pops because these women could also prove that there was, you know, an impact on their life. as a result of the climate change and the adverse effects that were things through that f

berlin tonight, a landmark court ruling in favor of swiss and senior citizens accusing their government of not doing enough to stop climate change. european court of human rights today, he said that switzerland's failure to act against global warming is a violation of human rights also coming up at the wins top port. lawyers today argued that german support of israel does not violate international law. iraq was easy, differently. it's suing germany, claiming proline is helping is real, commit a leg genocide in garza and violent crime and germany rising sharply with many of the suspects coming from other countries. the increase fueling a debate on company immigration wall and the father of the god particle as died at the age of $94.00. tonight we'll look at the legacy of businesses, peter higgs and how his discovery re shaped our understanding of the world. the library going to our viewers watching on cbs in the united states and to all of you around the world. welcome. it is the 1st court ruling of its kind. today, europe's top human rights court ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who had argued their governments in action on climate change has put

understand that they grind the journals of european justice carefully, but believe me a little. in your opinion, if the whole thing came to of the european court of human rightsong could it be considered there, taking into account, so to speak, the volume of this process, and how much weight would the decision of the european court of human rights have for our bodies, well, we understand that usually they file a case for compensation to the victim, your question is short, but very complex with many of the... components, firstly, regarding the term, if we are talking about a violation, then it is not, not conditionally , not a case like a criminal proceeding, taking measures of a criminal process, yes reaction, in particular, with regard to detention, extension of the term and ensuring the right to a fair trial, these violations have already been ascertained by lawyers, as far as i understand, and a lawyer of any... yes level of qualification, he already has, without waiting for a conditional sentence in this case, i.e. admissibility the criterion of admissibility for submitting an application has already been reached, i think they will apply at this stage, wi

from berlin, a landmark court ruling in favor of swift senior citizens who are saying their government is not doing enough to stop climate change. the european court of human rights said that's what the ends in action is putting their health at risk. also coming up where is that? the un stop court argue that trimming support for israel does not violate international law. nicaragua accuse is germany of helping israel committed a legend, genocide in gaza. and the father of the so called god particle dies at age. 94 will look at the legacy of his peter higgs and how his discovery re shaped our understanding of the universe. the, i'm here until berlin, thank you very much for joining us. your p. europe's top human rights court has ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who argue that their governments in action on climate change has put their lives at risk. as a landmark decision that could influence the legislation across europe and give a boost to activists who say their governments are feeling to tackle global warming . of these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners through their own government because its handling of the climate crisis

relentless russian bombing campaign against the city of harkins and does government inaction on climate change violate human rights. the european court of human rights is due to issue a verdict on 2 cases that could have a storage impact. the welcome to the w. i'm nicole for lease is really prime minister benjamin netanyahu says, be, is really military is set a date for sending ground forces into rough up but has not specified. when this will happen, the us opposes the plan saying that it would have a devastating impact on civilians and israel's own security. that yahoo statement comes days after israel's army withdrew troops from con units. some gardens have already started to return to the rubble and gaza 2nd largest city. over a 1000000 are still sheltering in rough or most of gauze, this population has been displaced. 5 is really offensive, which was launched after the october 7th terror attacks by i'm a lieutenant colonel peter learner is a spokesman for israel's military and he told us why is real considers rafa to be so crucial to the free time us. we do know that in the gaza strip there are still at least 6 operational battal

a group of swiss women have won the first—ever climate case victory in the european court of human rightsare. the court found switzerland had violated some of their human rights by not taking sufficient action on climate change. switzerland's efforts were called "woefully inadequate". this ruling could influence the law in 46 other europen countries, including the uk. it comes after last month was officially declared the world's warmest march on record. we start with this report from climate editorjustin rowlatt. the swiss women arrived at the european court ready to fight... there has been a violation of article 8 of the convention. ..and they won, persuading the judges that switzerland's failure to do enough to cut planet warming emissions could help create heat waves that could threaten the lives of older people. i am so, well, shocked, positively shocked, so happy we could contribute to the future, to a better future for our children. today's ruling is not only to challenge. experts say it sets an important precedent and will support the legal case for climate action in european count

human rights act is potentially a massive problem, isn't it? >> absolutely. i mean, we were members of the strasbourg court, the europeanights, long before we had the human rights act. yeah. now, interestingly, if you look at the number of cases issued against the uk by the strasbourg court , they've gone down year court, they've gone down year after year since the introduction of the human rights act. now ask yourself, why is that ? that's because domestic that? that's because domestic courts are just as zealous. yeah, we don't need the mention . yeah, we don't need the mention. >> we don't need strasbourg anymore because our own judges are working off the same rulebook effectively. >> absolutely. and it's the thing is, constitutionally, you can ignore the judgements of international courts because the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, you cannot ignore domestic courts because then the home secretary would be in contempt of court. so is the human rights act. >> in a sense, the absolute nub of this problem when it comes to deporting people, it's the root cause. >> yeah. i mean, there are issues with the strasbourg

court has ruled, but weak climate policies can violate human rights. and that is a huge thing. the court even went as far to state, but european convention of human rights encompasses protection by the state for serious adverse effects of climate change on lives, health wellbeing, a quality of life. so it's really holding governments responsible for the quality of life, of their citizens when it comes to climate change. this is ruling, it's the voice of the authority. here is more of a more a one, isn't it? i mean, we're not talking about the court being able to force to switch government to do anything. but what exactly will happen now that this ruling has been handed down? so bear with me expectations, the swift government will re examine its climate goals. and it said that it would do that. the court said that they were woefully inadequate, as they are. um, there are no limits that has been set by the switch government, for example, in terms of the amount of emissions that it wants to reduce. and it has failed to meet some targets in the past as well. so the european court a few months. right. so it's really saying that the, the switch g

also this echr issue, which is sunak saying that he would be prepared to pull out of the european court of human rightscourage, says rishi sunak has no courage, gravitas, and totally conscience and is totally useless . you like him then? useless. you like him then? peter, tell us what you really think. peter. so he would not leave deborah says leave the echr. deborah says this not about sending this is not about sending migrants home. this is another way our human way of taking more of our human rights away. sharon says rights away. and sharon says regardless of sunak electioneering, if he gets rid of the echr that would be a win. the echr have no interest in the uk having sovereignty of its laws and borders. get rid asap. it's for purpose. it's not fit for purpose. there's no starmer ward there's no chance starmer ward is absolutely not. no. he'll >> no absolutely not. no. he'll warmly embrace it. i'm afraid with absolutely. i mean, be careful what we wish for. we are going to have a labour government. it's inevitable. 14 years of the tories. people are fed up . they're not listening to fed up. they'r

the situation of people's rights in those territories under official control. and whether, in this context, citizens of ukraine can file complaints there with the european court of human rights, given that the country is in a state of martial law and in state of war this procedure has not been stopped, and of course, all possibilities of appeal to the european court remain in the case when there are reasons to believe that the state does not observe the rights defined in the convention. i would like to remind you that the main and most... by category, widespread violations of rights relate primarily to four articles, this is the right to freedom and personal integrity, the right to a fair trial, these are respectively the fifth and sixth articles of the convention, the third article is the right not to be subjected to torture inhumane, cruel, degrading treatment or punishment, and the first article of the first protocol of property rights, by the way, it was also limited, so to speak, in this derogation. submissions, that is, the state made a concession with reference to the fact that in certain cases there may be, for example, seizure, expropriation of some property

the lawsuit was filed by more than 2 thousand women, at the same time the european court of human rights rejected two similar cases, namely the case of six portuguese against 32 european governments and the case of a former french mayor against the country's government. this is just the beginning of the climate lawsuits around the world and more and more people are taking their governments to court, holding them accountable for their actions and negative rulings in no way mean we can back down, it just means we have to fight harder. changes in school education. students will study at the desk for 12 years already from 2027. this is the next step in the new ukrainian school reform. change - marks the educational process. for the ninth grade, students will be offered a choice between two academic areas. or professional. they provide for the preparation of schoolchildren for admission to a higher education institution or mastering a profession and entering the labor market. also, students will be able to independently choose educational components. our goal, first of all, for the child to h

protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, which ukraine must implement as a member of the council of europe. however , due to special circumstances, such as armed aggression, the european courthuman rights gives member states the right to declare deviations from the fulfillment of certain obligations. it all sounds. also difficult, i understand it for perception, nevertheless, in the comments under this video, write, dear viewers, how you understand this information, do you see it here any threats, what questions do you have with these news, oleksandr pavlychenko, executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union for human rights, joined our broadcast. greetings, mr. oleksandr, thank you for joining. good morning, explain what this all means, has ukraine made a rollback in human rights here, is this a curtailment of rights, what is it all for? influences, shouldn't we perceive this news so acutely and react to it so acutely? well, you have already explained, first of all , the official position, because the representative of the ministry of justice and actually they responsible for the preparation of such a document and its transfer through the ministry of foreign affairs t

some cases might go to the european court of human rights which will take _ european court of human rightse some weeks to play out, and we are likely to see systemwide challenges from a specialist expert bodies _ challenges from a specialist expert bodies like refugee charities, looking — bodies like refugee charities, looking at the bigger picture, and there's_ looking at the bigger picture, and there's another one which we are not sure about _ there's another one which we are not sure about yet, this is a tough call, _ sure about yet, this is a tough call, but — sure about yet, this is a tough call, but the organisation representing senior civil servants may itself — representing senior civil servants may itself take legal action. they are considering their options because _ are considering their options because they are concerned about the position— because they are concerned about the position of— because they are concerned about the position of the people who run the government and whether or not they will he _ government and whether or not they will he left _ government and whether o

the european court of human rights has ruled in favor of swiss pensioners that there governments failure to act on climate change, violated their human rights, is the 1st time the court has accepted such an argument. but it wasn't all wins for active as the judges in strasbourg, throughout the case brought by young portuguese climate campaigners on similar grounds. another case brought by a french former mayor, was also ruled in missile. and we can go straight to strasbourg, where the w for spawn and bend regan is standing by for us band, 2 cases dismissed. and a wind of sorts for the swift. how the decisions been received by people there and the cord. what are you hearing is of course the french and the portuguese applicants disappointed because the court said that they did not prove that the individual individually and a pump by a climate change and have not exhausted all the good policies in the whole countries. but this is ladies, this with the pension, if they have cause of cheering and celebrating here because they got at least a half when because of the code for, for the 1st time

of powers between the courts and the parliament. —— that segregation of powers between the courts and parliament. the other argument we are likely to see is going to the strasbourg court, the european court of human rights to rwanda will be returned to countries where they, again, could face irreparable harm like death or torture, then they could again issue another rule 39 order or an inter—measure stopping flights. let's talk about timing, then, dr joelle grogan, because rishi sunak, the prime minister here, has taken a lot of political capital on this issue, hasn't he? he has talked about planes being in the air taking people to rwanda in the spring. so how long could these legal challenges take? a considerable time, perhaps? challenges take? a considerable time. perhaps?— time, perhaps? very, very potentially- _ time, perhaps? very, very potentially. if _ time, perhaps? very, very potentially. if there - time, perhaps? very, very potentially. if there is - time, perhaps? very, very- potentially. if there is imminent risk that a flight is about to take off, then it is very likely we could see a very immediate order from the european court of human rights, these take place very quickly, but due to som

they could become claims that the european court of human rights. so there are many legal challenges expected to be a head, bolts of their practical challenges because people to try and evade those deportations they could go on the ground, not that many people actually in detention centers in the u. k. suit. so that's really a practical concern for the u. k. also it is really soon, i guess that that in 10 to 12 weeks he hopes that these planes are going to take off. he's also said that in order for this to be a deterrent that they need to be read you the flights and he's hoping that these regular flights will then stalled in the summer. but will it really come to that? will that be regular flights? or will it be a plane here and that is taking off to run the old is really we can judge at the moment. it really is depending on, on the quotes logically, whether this what kind of actually take off or not. so, but given the legal, given the pluck, a practical challenge is that you've just told us about the when soon that pledges that these flights will le

this is the views lot from bell in a group of pension is from switzerland's, wins a key court ruling against their own governments. the european court of human rights. a pulse that complaints that failure to act of climate change puts them at risk, but it's throws out similar claims from portugal and from also coming up. lawyers tell that you ends top quote that german support for israel does not pretend to national. they strongly reject the claim by nicaragua, and that berlin as healthy as well commit alleged genocide and gauze and violent crime in germany rises shop. the with many suspects from overseas increase is fueling a debate on toughening immigration. the says, welcome to the program in europe stops, human rights court has ruled in favor of the group of swiss pensioners who argue that governments put them at risk by not doing enough to prevent the climate change . it's a landmark decision that could influence legislation across europe. and give a boost to active as to say that governments are failing to tackle global. these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners through their own government because it's handling of the

comments on our youtube, i want to say that an appeal has already been filed with the european court of human rights regarding roman chervinsky, his lawyers actually filed an appeal with the page of the international association people's advocate, they write that in connection with the illegal deprivation of liberty after april 19, 2024 and the illegal ... hiding of colonel roman chervinskyi, lawyer viktor vasylyuk, partner of the law firm katerynchuk mor and partners urgently submitted an appeal to the european court of human rights in accordance with rule 39. this procedure allows the court to respond to the appeal immediately, we will monitor the situation, but we are currently adding oleksandr skoryk, a deputy of the kharkiv regional council, to the airwaves. mr. oleksandr, we congratulate you. greetings, good day, glory to ukraine. what, mr. oleksandr, let's first of all ask about the situation at the front, in particular, when we talk about the kupinsky direction, we understand that it is very difficult there, yes, but the question of intensity and how actively the enemy is currently shelling

good news and bad for climate active is after key judgments from the european court of human rights. the stress for court upholds are complained by 2000 swiss women that government in action on climate change puts them at risk of the core throughout planes from portugal and friends. also coming up as palestinians return to the ruins of gaza, 2nd largest cities hun eunice, following is rarely withdrawal. benjamin netanyahu says israel's military and set a date for the ground invasion of nearby rough.

and remember, article two and three of the human rights act says that british courts courts must apply the law and jurisprudence of the europeanonvention or european courts , but it also european courts, but it also says in the human rights act that the uk court can only issue a certificate of incompatibility vie it can't overrule parliament. the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is maintained within the human rights act, and has been firmly reasserted in the rwanda act. >> this is where you and i differ because i believe in what's called the universality of human rights laws. no, no, parliament can say it's okay to convict someone without a fair trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act , it trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act, it would be unlawful. so parliament's only sovereign insofar it its laws comply with fundamental human rights. the issue there is who is the right judge of that? >> because as i don't want parliament to sentence people to death by bill of attainder, as it used to be able to do, but that won't happen because the british people wouldn't vote for that to happen, whereas the huma

and remember, article two and three of the human rights act says that british courts courts must apply the law and jurisprudence of the european convention or european courts , but it also european courts, but it also says in the human rights act that the uk court can only issue a certificate of incompatibility vie it can't overrule parliament. the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is maintained within the human rights act, and has been firmly reasserted in the rwanda act. >> this is where you and i differ because i believe in what's called the universality of human rights laws. no, no, parliament can say it's okay to convict someone without a fair trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act , it trial. and even if parliament enacted such an act, it would be unlawful. so parliament's only sovereign insofar it its laws comply with fundamental human rights. the issue there is who is the right judge of that? >> because as i don't want parliament to sentence people to death by bill of attainder, as it used to be able to do, but that won't happen because the british people wouldn't vote for that to happen, whereas the hu

business dw, do live from bell, and a group of pensioners from switzerland. when's a key court ruling against their own government? that's the european court of human rights. a pulse that complaints that failure to act on climate change puts them at risk, but it's throws out similar claims from portugal and from also coming up. lawyers tell that you n's top court that german support for israel does not pretend to national. they strongly reject the claim by nicaragua on the prelim as healthy as well commit alleged genocide involves.

a recent landmark ruling at the european court of human rights could set a new precedent in the fight against climate change. judges rule that switzerland has violated human rights by not doing enough to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. the case was brought forward by a group of more than 2000 women. extreme weather events are becoming more frequent in europe as the deadline to meet the parish climate degree. me.

uk may leave from the european court of human rights to stop illegal migration. this was stated by prime minister rishi sunok. in an interview with the sun newspaper. emphasized. quote: i believe that border security and illegal immigration control are more important than our membership in any foreign court. at the same time, the newspaper's journalists note that this is a warning to judges from strasbourg, who 2 years ago blocked the first attempt to deport migrants from britain to rwanda. the crew of the soyuz ms-24 is ready to land due to their medical psychological condition. our. on april 6 , a working briefing was held in karaganda today, pilots, rescuers, doctors, meteorologists reported on the situation and the readiness of the services in order to detect the device in a timely manner to ensure the safety of the crew, specialists will be on duty in the areas of the settlements of gan and arkalyk, the weather on saturday is ... for the apparatus, and for the preparation of all crew members for evacuation, we lower the apparatus from such surfaces, and the

he did talk about the european court of human rights, and we did set out where that challenge might comecomes to that? it was interesting _ if it comes to that? it was interesting hearing - if it comes to that? it was interesting hearing his - if it comes to that? it was - interesting hearing his slightly evasive non—answer to that question. 0n the one hand saying that he thought the infrastructure that the government is assembling will be sufficient to make this policy work, but on the other hand constantly labelling the european court of human rights as a foreign court. plenty of critics, including those in the house of lords tonight, arguing it is an international court that the uk has chosen to be a signatory. and not entirely rolling out the idea that he could as a conservative party advocate to withdraw from the european convention of human rights as a distinctive marker of difference with the labour party going into the general election, and there is a growing number of conservatives who do you think the logical conclusion of all of this, not just do you think the logical conclusi

this is dw news, and these are our top stories of the european court of human rights has ruled in favor of swiss pensioners who claim their governments. failure to act on climate change, lie away to their human rights. it's the 1st time that the court has accepted this argument. lawyer say the ruling will effect climate litigation across europe. germany has presented its defense to a charge of facilitating the legend, genocide and gaza. nicaragua, number on the case of the ones top court in the hague, over german weapons exports, the israel. jeremy says it only supplies arms in line with.

berlin tonight, a landmark court ruling in favor of it, as with senior citizens, accusing the government of not doing enough to stop climate change. european court of human rights today, so that switzerland's failure to act against global warming is a violation of human rights also coming up tonight at the wins top court lawyers today argued that german support for is real, does not violate international law. the garage was these it differently, it's solely germany claiming berlin is helping is real commit alleged genocide in golf. the library golf is good to have you with us on this tuesday. it is the 1st court ruling of its kind today. europe's top human rights court ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who argued that their governments, in action on climate change has put their lives at risk. as a landmark decision that could influence legislation across europe, and they could give a boost to active as you say, their governments are failing to tackle global warming. of these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners through their own government because its handling of the claimant crisis put their health at risk. the european human

human rights was not addressed in the stroudsburg court case law. i think this was ruling certainly promises stronger legal pathways to achieving climate justice through the european court ofruling establishes a really important president at the court of human rights. it certainly a landmark case with a tremendous amount of effort and momentum and climate litigation that's to the decision. and that signals that went litigation is used strategically and sensitively it can really provide the necessary protection for people where climate impacts are increasingly felt for them is a positive note to note that them is a positive note to note that the european convention of human rights can be extended to the impacts. sis. rights can be extended to the im acts. �* . rights can be extended to the imacts. . ., ,, rights can be extended to the imacts.�* ., ,, , . impacts. a legal ripple effect across the — impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest _ impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest of _ impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest of the - impacts. a legal ripple effect across the rest of the world, | impacts. a legal ripple effect i across the rest of the world

in an interview with sunry, shunok said that london is ready to withdraw from the european court of human rights if this is the case. will help stop the flow of illegal migrants into the country. i believe that our plans are consistent with all our international obligations, including interaction with the cap. but i also believe that border security and the fight against illegal migration are more important than our membership in any foreign court. the reason for such statements was the decision of the european court of justice, which in 2009 prevented the deportation of illegal immigrants from britain to rwanda under an agreement with the african republic. london’s tough position on migration policy, and therefore membership in the echr, is also supported by rome. last year, both countries entered into agreements to fund the voluntary return of illegal immigrants to north africa and the middle east. sunak's statement today dutch mep marcel de graavk also supported this. he said the echr had become a playground for far-left marxists and called for the judicial body to be abolished altogether. wh

the list. >> top of the list. >> top of the list. >> do you believe rishi sunak, when he he would leave the when he says he would leave the european court human rightseuropean court of human rights, were flights to be were the rwanda flights to be grounded? i ask you this about an hour ago. let's just say there's not a great deal of comfort out there prime comfort out there for the prime minister empty words is what it seems i will have seems to be. i will have a series of legal experts on the show over the next three hours, pointing out the echr isn't the problem. the problem is politicians lacking the guts to actually to stand up the european court of human rights. and we already could do that if we just cracked on. get in touch with that, email the usual ways gb views news. com plus, gb views at gb news. com plus, what about this two tiered sentencing? is right that sentencing? is it right that people from poor or disadvantaged and people from poor or disadvthis ged and people from poor or disadvthis those and people from poor or disadvthis those who and people from poor or disadvthis those who claim and people from poor or disadvthis those who c

is will commit alleged genocide in gov the i'm guy both as welcome to the program the european court of human rights as ruled in favor of a swiss pension. this, that the government's failure to act on climate change violates that human rights. it's the 1st time the court has accepted suction i'll give it opens the door to more legal challenges to compel the governments to do more to funds global warming . the swiss government says it is analyzing the ruling, but it wasn't all wins for act to this. the judges and stress book throughout a similar case bought by a young portuguese planet containers on procedural grounds. in other case, both by a french form and may, i was also ruled in miss this was containers. welcome, the landmark rolling off to 70 years of legal battles. as the for started, what i have understood is that switzerland has really done too. let's so to come back to climate crisis and has the full body light to, to human rights. so that's a nice victory. not the studies of the paris climate agreement was ratified with the $1.00 degree target, which is no longer achievable. so effective m

so the domestic courts can ignore both the decision and any case, previous case law of the european court of human rightscan do that. but it's worse than that because what the government has done is not only said, we're not listening to foreign courts, they're not listening to their own supreme court. what they're saying is we're going to ignore the supreme court ruling which said this policy is unlawful. we want our mps to turn a blind eye to that determination of the supreme court based on what now, lord hope and good on him for tabling that amendment late yesterday, because what he said was they should provide reasons as to why they say that rwanda is safe and have a committed to decide each individual case that would have delayed things even more for the government. but the government don't have that evidence. all they have is a hunch that is going to work. now, what if when labour gets back into power, which is very likely. yeah, we'll have to bnng likely. yeah, we'll have to bring all these people back. what is the cost of that going to be? >> well, the cost of all of it's enormous. but i want to g

the prime ministto pull out of the 1e's going to pull out of the european court human rights. opean court of human rights. if it stands in the way of his rwanda migration yes. rwanda migration scheme. yes. >> said that >> rishi sunak said that controlling immigration >> rishi sunak said that controll important immigration >> rishi sunak said that controll important than igration is more important than membership the legal body, membership of the legal body, and would let a foreign and he would not let a foreign court interfere in sovereign affairs. >> well, let's talk to our political correspondent, katherine in katherine forster who's in westminster for us this morning. it's for, it's long been called for, certainly by a significant number of tory mps. is the pm going to acquiesce ? going to acquiesce? >> well, it's sounding very much like he will, if necessary . bear like he will, if necessary. bear in mind that the safety of rwanda bill is still going through parliament. it's faced a huge battle to go through the house of lords, but when it becomes law, it's likely to be cha

actually three are really important, significant climate cases that were heard by the european court of human rights. we've got the verdict on all three this morning, two of them were were ruled inadmissible at including a major one where six young portuguese people had sued 32 government it's trying to get them to increase their climate action that was ruled in miscible because they hadn't gone through domestic courts in their home country or been able to establish that the other countries they were suing we're responsible for the human rights. but in the case of these elderly swiss women, this group called the swiss senior women >> they >> actually won their case, which means that there is now this legally so the binding decision, which may well for switzerland to increase its climate targets, they had actually already been through the swiss courts. did have their case thrown out, but the court ruled today that there had been critical gaps in the process in switzerland and putting in place the relevant domestic regulatory framework and a failure by the swiss authorities. they say to quantify their