that telegraph headline, "rwanda deportation blocked by europeanjudges" — it is technically out of— europeanjudgeses" — it is technically out of date because almost all the papers _ out of date because almost all the papers that have splashed on this were _ papers that have splashed on this were reporting before the latest news _ were reporting before the latest news that you've just reported to your viewers, which seems to be that the flight _ your viewers, which seems to be that the flight won't take off at all. as callum _ the flight won't take off at all. as callum was explaining, although triggered in part by a european court _ triggered in part by a european court of— triggered in part by a european court of human rights, the final blow_ court of human rights, the final blow was— court of human rights, the final blow was struck in london at the court _ blow was struck in london at the court of— blow was struck in london at the court of appeal, a british court. but that— court of appeal, a british court. but that headline, "rwanda deportation blocked by european judges," — deportation blocked

it's worth europeanjudges intervened. judicial review is on the way over the policy itself which is due injuly. at this point is not a ruling over whether the policy of deporting people to rwanda is legal or illegal, it's simply that european courts have said we need to wait for thatjudicial review, and wait for that judicial review, and in wait for thatjudicial review, and in the interim nobody should be sent to rwanda at this point. find in the interim nobody should be sent to rwanda at this point.— to rwanda at this point. and we've heard from — to rwanda at this point. and we've heard from the _ to rwanda at this point. and we've heard from the home _ to rwanda at this point. and we've heard from the home secretary . heard from the home secretary tonight saying if they are not on this plane, they'll be on the next one — but that may be a little more difficult than she would have us believe right now. sticking with the daily mail, it's clear that it's embarrassing for the government, but they talk about the european cou

whole thing is to use the home secretary's phrase about the home secretary's phrase about the europeanjudges ~ ., the european 'udges, it's a bit onaaue. ., ., " ., ., opaque. yeah, and i think one of the problems here _ opaque. yeah, and i think one of the problems here is _ opaque. yeah, and i think one of the problems here is number _ opaque. yeah, and i think one of the problems here is number ten - opaque. yeah, and i think one of the problems here is number ten has a i problems here is number ten has a great briefing operation, it's what they do — great briefing operation, it's what they do. lord geidt is not yet. this is a letter— they do. lord geidt is not yet. this is a letter to — they do. lord geidt is not yet. this is a letter to mps that he has written — is a letter to mps that he has written but we have not really heard his story _ written but we have not really heard his story adequately. of course it is in the — his story adequately. of course it is in the government's interests to make _ is in the government's interests to make there — is in the government's interests to mak

had overruled _ wondering why europeanjudges had overruled the decision is made in the british— overruledlot of tory— steps. one of the question is a lot of tory mps — steps. one of the question is a lot of tory mps i have been speaking to this morning have been asking though. — this morning have been asking though, is whether the government needs— though, is whether the government needs to _ though, is whether the government needs to rethink the uk's relationship with the european court of human _ relationship with the european court of human rights. it is something a lot of— of human rights. it is something a lot of tory— of human rights. it is something a lot of tory mps have been questioning for a while, whether there _ questioning for a while, whether there needs to be a change to some of the _ there needs to be a change to some of the legislation. but one of those i was _ of the legislation. but one of those i was chatting to earlier, said he thinks _ i was chatting to earlier, said he thinks this— i was chatting to earlier, said he thinks this could be a catalyst, a chance _ thinks