and i think getting the kinds of evaluations that nick is talking about can be very difficult, too. there is a tendency, when we talk about, quote, incapacitated, unquote, to link to diagnoses. some are static diagnoses. you're not going to have an intellectual disability, for example. nick has a history of a traumatic brain injury. those are things that exist. some people have certain kinds of iq scores, and these evaluations don't really look at the options for less restrictive alternatives to guardianship or the functional abilities of someone to manage their own lives. i've been involved, for example, jenny hatch you heard today. that is when we got involved. we were preparing for months, we had a host of experts that we had to retain to show that a person with down's syndrome didn't need to be under permanent plenary guardianship. we had six days of trial. very kind of resource-intensive. it can be very difficult to terminate a guardianship, and it's why we have to rethink why people get into guardianship in the first place. it's much easier to establish a guardianship than it

could you talk a little more about the evaluation of this document and is there evaluation criteria build in. i know there was a tiny section on evaluation at the end of the plan. i know that it was a lot of community involvement that went into the creation of this plan and drafting of it. maybe some assurances as to how the community will stay engaged as we move forward to implementing the quick build and address some of the recommendations. >> in regards to the evaluation process mtcbtb program recommends we evaluate the program to make sure any future efforts incorporate them in addition to doing out reach and engagement. we have a safe streets evaluation program where we review safety treatments that were incorp.ed to ensure that they are working effectively. did you want to add anything in addition to those two items. >> i'll mention that we -- the safety evaluation program conducts before and after evaluations. we take a look at the things the project is trying to achieve. less conflict. we do a number of counts and observations both before and after implementation to understand how

if better monitoring and evaluation processes had been in place to evaluate programs, to combat corruption, develop the economy, build the afghan security forces, many of the problems that contributed to the rapid collapse of the afghan state could have been corrected. measuring success by focusing on dollars and cents is no substantive for common sense. thirdly and probably more importantly, the u.s. government did not understand the afghan political and cultural context. thereby leading to empowering corrupt power brokers and politicians, forcing inappropriate western technocratic models on afghan institutions, imposing formal western rule of law on a country that addressed most disputes through informal means, and struggling to understand and mitigate cultural barriers to supporting women and girls. this failure meant projects intended to mitigate conflict often exacerbated it. to be sure, state and aid had successes. but their sustainability of those gains is obviously now in grave doubt. now, the book on afghanistan is not yet closed. questions remain unanswered. questions that sigar

again, i urge the members to read are monitoring and evaluation. there was the risk of doing the wrong thing perfectly. we would get contractors. and they did everything to the letter of the contract. why did accomplish nothing but that is not the contractors fault. that's the fault of whoever wrote the contract. >> let me drill down. you are saying that, i guess military leaders, or the administration's arm, whether it's the d.o.d., the state department, that they alone came up with that mission? were they lobbying for them to do certain things in afghanistan? win or you absolving this contractors of any role -- >> i am not absolving some of the contractors. we just had a plea from somebody today. that is the bigger problem to me. contractors doing everything to meet the contract but it didn't accomplish anything at the end. so that to me is a bigger waste. now there were contractors that did substandard work. they were mainly a lot of subs that came in, and the contracts were being sold from sub to sub to sub. there were a lot of sole source cont

are used to evaluate people. and one is a question of capacity, or regaining of capacity are raised our the working jurisdictions where it's about an agreement between the parties. and in the evaluator, and often when i'm involved in restoration, we as a non profit go out and we want to pick who are evaluator is. we want to make sure they have the right values, and think about disability the same way we think about it. and really look for the kind of core of a person to person, and the alternatives to guardianship. but you can expect that latter approach, can be -- but an effective approach to try to seek restoration. >> let me ask you miss brennan-krohn. when an individual becomes aware or someone in conservatorship, to see conversation, or they push for less restrictive alternatives. what is the most likely outcome? and the reason i raise this is because the standard key, but that is clear and convincing evidence to overturn a conservatorship. or in other words the burden of proof, is a pretty high threshold. a

with those two evaluations to be found pharmaceutically comparable.ost is the active ingredient in the particle is completely unchanged the only changes in the formulation and then there is no change. >> . >> thank you so the question is starting to come up to be authorized children who are 11 years old f they should be asking should we just wait until they are 12 on the larger dose so did you break down with that ten through 11 j-year-old and with those thate despite getting vaccinated what were their ages quick. >> so let me address the first question about the nature of the antibody responses based on age please bring up slide number o one and then we can address the ages of the notes on the individuals but as represented here these are the titers by the subgroup and on the left-hand side you will see the the group and then the individual groups by a very narrow age breakdown and it's easy to appreciate that is pre- immunization the white bars is a one-month post dose but it is a comparable response and confident that the dose works well across the

evaluations to me at diagnosis. static. you are not going to have an intellectual disability for example. has a history of the tbi. that exist. some have certain iq scores and they don't look at the options for less restrictive alternatives or those functional abilities to direct their own life or someone else to manage their own life. i have been involved. we were preparing for months. we had a host of experts to show a person with down syndrome did not need to be under permanent guardianship. six days of trial. resource intensive. it can be very difficult to germany and why we really need to rethink how people get under guardianship in the first place. it's much easier to establish than to terminate. >> i went echo what was said. just the strength to get into guardianship is just as strong against you when you try to get out. people have no idea what they are getting into when they start. then the even if you are in a guardianship just like the spears surveillance. if you are in one you cannot have a phone. that i

and in some courts they have a panel of examiners or evaluators that are used to evaluate people if ition of capacity. i have also worked in jurisdictions where three minutes between the party. frequently in the cases i am involved in with restoration, we want to pick the evaluator to make sure they have the same values in the way we think about disability beyond iq score or diagnosis to look at the core of the person who spendshe alternative to guardianship. you can that that approach can be costly but and effective approach to seek restoration. >> let me ask you when an individual becomes aware of their right to seek for restoration, or ty push for less restrictive alternatives what is theost likely outcome so that standard is clear a convincing evidence to overturn a conservatorship and then the burden of proof is a pretty high threshold of clr and convincing evidence is notroof beyond reasonable doubt that it is a lot more difficult and a preponderance of the evidence. soaybe you can talk about an effect how the legal deck is stacked against somebody seeking restoraon or less restr

bryant, put your health at issue, we should really be able to evaluate that.estion, don't think it's an appropriate ask to make. the basis of that is those are jury questions. the lawyer is saying for the county, how do we know your mental stress is associated with your husband's death in a helicopter and not necessarily the leaked photos? i think that's splitting too many hairs, but if a jury can make a determination that if someone dies in that way and there are people with a protocol. the last point i'll make now is that how would a psychiatrist or another mental health professional say you were 80% stressed as a result of the helicopter crash, and you're 20% stressed as a result of the leaked photos. you can't split hairs like that. again, i get that's what lawyers do, but i don't think it's appropriate in this particular case. >> that's what i was going to ask you, how do you determine it was the crash or the pictures? there will be a bond hearing in sk st south carolina this week of distressed moisurdaugh. he is facing crisis at all corners. this is just

a model scenario used to evaluate the impact. one of the keys uncertainty is the future of dynamics of the pandemic. so, covid-19 has great influence on the vaccines. the higher the instance, the greater -- vice versa. we used the first instance to have future pandemic with a caveat that instance may, but less likely [ inaudible ] another issue is inconsistency in covid death rate. compared to covid. we [ inaudible ] inconsistencies. in data scenario, we use vaccine efficacy of 70% against cases and 80% against hospitalizations. based on keeping vaccines. and the efficacy announcer. 97.7% efficacy against covid-19. amount age, 5 to 11 years. we use the higher efficacy in scenario form. last, uncertainty and instance of assessed mild cases. the age, 5 to 11 years. there are two layers of uncertainty. first, no data available for age 5 to 11 years old. we used to the rate 5 to 15 years. however, the rate amount is 5 to 11 years may be lower than 12 to 17 years. in addition, it's a proposed age of 5 to 11 years of age. and observed.

we are re- evaluating the title 42 order as a public health order. we do so every 60 days and continue to re- evaluate that. in the meantime, c.d.c. is providing technical assistance at border areas to ensure and work towards decreeing public health and covid transmission in these areas. thank you. jeff: next question. kevin: miller, a.p. reporter: thanks. i was hoping you might explain a little bit why you think cases and hospitalizations right now are coming down. does it say something -- what does that say about the rest of the fall and winter? more broadly, a number of surveys have come out showing the fully vaccinated people are still significantly altering their lives. hearing they may get the virus. should people who are fully vaccinated continue to harbor doubts about the efficacy of the vaccines? change their lives? should they continue to postpone travel and stop -- not dining indoors or get back to normal? jeff: first question over to you, dr. walensky. if you have anything to add, dr. fauci. dr. walensky: we have seen this with all of our

agreed with pfizer comparability strategy for evaluation and authorization it's a good formulation. in the eua submitted the required manufacturing of the formulation to the current formulation. product and ongoing studies were d submitted. inconsistency was established. after the fda there will be two presentations the epidemiologists in children, and other lessons followed by from pfizer after the presentation. after that there'll be three presentations followed by who is going to present federal of covid-19 vaccine. [inaudible] twenty-five minutes followed by open public hearing. for the presentation followed by committee discussions. this is the question for the committee. based on the scientific evidence they benefit of the vaccine when administered as a two dose series, 10-microgram each three weeks apart outweigh its risks for youth in children five -- 11. please vote yes or no? that is the end of this, thank you. >> thank you. we do have several minutes of time for the committee to question the fda representatives about any of the items they had presented already. we do not

bryant's attorneys say an 8 hour psychiatric evaluation is unreasonable.rial in february. >> former president donald trump has filed a lawsuit to block the release of documents to the congressional committee investigating the january 6 attack on the capitol. trump is claiming the request for those documents is almost limitless and scope saying many of them have no reasonable connection to the day the committee is looking into how a mob of trump supporters stormed the capitol building in an effort to halt the certification of joe biden's presidential win. >> and now kron 4 sports from the 18 t fiber sports desk. >> the warriors had one final practice before the real thing begins on tuesday stephan company had a scrimmage before boarding a plane from los angeles this see steph fresh air cook of on looney right there. they will take on the lakers tomorrow. they went 5. during the pre season and they have a number of new faces who played really well during that pre season, steve kerr said he's excited for what this new group can accomplish. >> just really exci

the jury would have evaluated this evidence that way it would evaluate any hearsay evidence. it would put the statement to the corroborating evidence and decide what it thought. we are talking about corroborating documentary evidence, dzhokhar's own statement that tamerlan did this. the jury could have evaluated all of that. i don't think we are talking about a mini trial, because we are talking about a fairly limited universe of evidence. this goes to a central aspect of the penalty phase. this was the mitigation case. i don't think this can be an improper mini trial. it is the trial. this is whether -- whether he was indoctrinated and tamerlan was the instigator. that is the only argument the defense had. the idea that it would be an improper mini trial to put on some hearsay evidence when many other pieces of hearsay evidence came in throughout the penalty phase and half the jury evaluate that in the context of corroborating evidence, i just do not think that can be a mini trial. >> what is your argument about the standard under the federal death penalty statute? you argue

that is an approach that has gained traction as a tool purports to evaluate whether a map treats parties fairly. this is a complex process with interlocking trade-offs and considerations. it is often confusing for people. the thing to keep in mind about redistricting is that political trends can overtake some of the best laid plans of cartographers over the course of a decade. >> western states are gaining a member of congress and the congressional redistricting battle. to -- two won by biden and one by trump. >> democrats have a four to one advantage in the delegation, they want to extend that to five to one. republicans want to draw additional competitive districts in the state, perhaps draw a map that is 2/6 democrat, when sixth republican and the other three competitive. ultimately, we cannot be sure how this fight will play out yet. it is possible that the state supreme court will have to step in and appoint a special panel to draw this map. colorado is a new commission state. it is gaining an eighth district. currently there are four democrats and three republicans in the delegatio

air, water, land incorporates environmental justice into their evaluations for any new evaluations withmunity threats? >> congress has looked at the special appropriations already and they are working with the department of defense to make sure they address the contamination problems. now they just need the funds to start the cleanup you discuss the challenges and the efforts. it includes investments to 5 billion to help the communities. the federal government should take to assist in the communities like your own with necessary remediation. >> we are trying to leverage everything we can and partnerships with other communities to secure that funding. we are lobbying a very small utility which on the great spectrum we're looking at tens of millions of dollars and so when you apply this to much larger facilities, it is an enormous amount of money andnd i think the fundinge streams that identify arelp a huge help and i also believe that having tangible limits i know the precise numbers go a long way because as we look to go towards the potential litigation have the recommendations removed.

there is a rigorous evaluation process to evaluate the bids and how they stack up with respect to therequirements in the specifications and vetting documents. i will flag to things we're doing now, maybe three, actually. we have looked at our portfolio to identify where we are supporting solar panels and where this might be an issue. secondly, as we look at our procurement systems and processes, we have mechanisms in terms of the requirements. we follow up on those and we screen. thirdly, we are looking at how we specify in the types of equipment and materials that we need sources that we believe would not encounter this issue. >> let me ask you, would people engaging in slave labor-type activities in the supply chain, would they be cut off from receiving grants, the money? >> if those systems are in place and they were, frankly speaking, yes, we would not be procuring those kinds of panels. getting into the supply chains can be challenging and labor-intensive to dig through that, but this is why were looking for a broader solution and working with the administration in that regard. >

the really next steps are being evaluated. but we do know that when it comes to humanitarian aid, the headline in the last few moments in the united states have paused that a to sedan in light of the actions taken by the military. yep. all right, thank you so much. kimberly how reported from the white house now, more than 243000000 people have been infected with corona virus since 2019, almost 5000000 of them have died. the virus has also cut a part through the world's economies. and now the world health summit is underway and burn.

is it on your mind quite a bit that evaluations are stretched?when you look at the alternatives to investing in a zero interest world it points people toward equity. i would not say they are stretched but they are at least fairly valued. it is very much going to be a sector approach going forward. i don't think anyone would say that the equity levels are cheap here, that's for sure. yousef: let's talk about one of your key point, the allocation of resources around digital bank currencies. your involvement with circle. what are some of the products in the pipe line and how does that put pressure on some of the old school ways of banking? >> if you look at the earnings that came out of the big u.s. banks recently, they were phenomenal. a lot of it was in the investment banking area. so i think we'll see more of it. it is a bit of a segue in terms of financing. the u.s. investment banks are just killing it it is almost like an ol developly. if you go away from that for a second and talk about core banking of taking deposits and making loans, it is f

altering the way claims for compensation are now evaluated, eliminating the controversial practice of race norming, which critics claim made it harder for black players to qualify for payouts. abc news reporting on this for some time now and now major changes. here's abc's janai norman tonight on what this new deal means for former players and their families. >> reporter: tonight, the nfl and its former players have reached an agreement to change the way concussion claims are evaluated. the new terms meant to be filed under seal but abc news learning that in that 46-page document, the nfl and other parties state that no race norms or demographic estimates, whether black or white, shall be used in the settlement program going forward. in june, the nfl pledging to end the use of the controversial practice of race norming, a neuropsychological tool that when used in these cases assumes black players start at a lower cognitive level than white players, often making it harder, critics claim, for black former players and their families to qualify for compensation for head injuries sustained

the nfl and its former players have reached an agreement to change the way concussion claims are evaluated. the new terms meant to be filed under seal but abc news learning that in that 46-page documen, the nfl and other parties state that no race norms or demographic estimates, whether black or white, shall be used in the settlement program going forward. in june, the nfl pledging to end the use of the controversial practice of race norming, a neuropsychological tool that when used in these cases assumes black players start at a lower cognitive level than white players, often making it harder, critics claim, for black former players and their families to qualify for compensation for head injuries sustained during their careers. today's news coming after an abc news investigation uncovered emails from several clinicians who evaluated players, saying they felt pressured to apply race-based adjustments to former players' cognitive test scores that, quote, "bottom line do discriminate against black players." the prominent attorney who negotiated the landmark settlement in 2013 later apologizi

i doing this engine, i have to specialize forensic doctors with me in a psychiatrist evaluating him for 4 hours and you know, be all independently from each other candidates conclusions. at that time, his life was in danger, and he sure enough, a few days after we left the prison, he entered the downward spiral. he was, as we all know, isolated in the health care division of prison stabilized with strong medications. and, but the thing is, you know, you can't do this and is not mentally ill. so if he has a mental issue now it's because of use that he has suffer and you cannot you cannot get someone to recover from torture by continuing, she continuing to torture him and that's exactly what they do. they isolate him, they keep him in that limbo. busy even if you, even if we assume for the purpose of the argument that yes back extradition proceeding as a did image, we have to somehow secure his presence. it can be in house arrest, green reforms, and the any surprises that some of the big questions looking to be answered. today's you asian economic form. if you day, then got us to get a va

we're evaluating the situation on the ground, we're watching very closely. we're communicating and coordinating very closely with our allies and with our partners around the world. so i don't want to get ahead of, of where we are. but suffice to say that we are willing to resort to any and all appropriate measures to hold accountable. those who me be attempting to derail the will, the aspirations of the sudanese people and those who may be responsible for violence for violence that we may yet see. the co happened just hours after the u. s. as special envoy for the horn of africa. jeffrey feltman left the country. he had been left with the impression that the process of political transition and reconciliation was still on track according to some in the state department. now, the big issue is whether or not this will affect the resolution of another regional crisis. that of the grand ethiopian renaissance dam, otherwise known as gert officials, here at the state department, say they need to deal with the political situation and cartoon 1st and worry about othe

that is no evaluation. when it comes to answering questions how you are investing our money, give yourself a failing grade. when it comes to investing because in the past 10 years you have not outperformed a passive investment on the sec500. b minus. at the september meeting a member sent you a letter to read in public comment. you refused to listen to the contents of the letter because it contained more than 150 words. it took the executive director a longer time to count the words than it was read. i hope next year i can give you a better evaluation. 46 year member. callers if you have not done so press star 3 to be added to the q. those on hold wait until you have been unmuted. do we have callers on the line? >> madam secretary. there is one caller on the line. >> thank you. police say your name. your two minutes begin when you speak. >> commissioner cassie o this the mic. san francisco police officers calling to ask for assistance on behalf every tired police sergeant joncmcmahon. he received industrial

we will evaluate on a case-by-case. this is the first documents and it is important for people to understand that the use of executive privilege, we do not entirely know what that is. we have been cooperative with congress and we will continue to be as it relates to a range of issues related to our administration and evaluate on a case-by-case basis. this was a uniquely dark day in our democracy, a day that we need to get to the bottom of and that is the important context as well. >> i wanted to come back to the incident, the protest that happened with senator sinema and whether that is something the white house or the president is thinking more about. jen: i talked to the president about this two days ago. it is all running together. in the last few days. what he conveyed very clearly, just in case there any confusion, while we all agree -- senator sinema said herself, absolutely acceptable and wrong to violate someone's personal space in the bathroom. it does not need to happen that way. we can peacefully protest with

this creates opportunity for cmb to evaluate the test cases to create set asides for this particular area. 2. it creates pilot program for the mentor offering 1% discount not to exceed $300,000 to encourage larger organizations to support growth of smaller l.b.e.s. third, as president walton mentioned, it does create a neighborhood l.b.e. program offering 0.5% to 1.5% discount depending whether the l.b.e. is headquartered in the neighborhood of where the project is occurring. this gives an opportunity for local businesses to succeed and compete for business within the neighborhood. the other element is also extending bonding assistance for local businesses. it creates opportunity for cnb to provide the goals for micro small and sba level. currently they are at the l.b.e. level no matter the micro smaller or categories. this allows for establishing that if there are eligible or l.b.e.s to fulfill that requirement. i believe that concludes the presentation i have for you to provide overview of changes here. of course, i am available for questions alongside garrett taylor, city attorney