. >> in 2022 were all about our needs, we don't see any more room for evaluation expansion, we thinkn but it will be learning double-digit that drives market higher. if inflation spirals out of control that would be an issue, the key factor for us on inflation is what do we just do next year. we don't think wages will pick up dramatically in the shift to spending from goods to services should offset inflation. that'll be the positive that allows economic growth to win out and if the fed needs increased interest rates a couple times it'll be okay because earnings growth will carry the baton. >> this is karlton, just curious what your take on this spending conductor and what you find attractive there. >> were positive on semi conductors, one trend is a lecture mobility this is the combination of electric vehicles and digital intelligence in cars, the main input for that it's him i do, cars are basically becoming smart phones on wheels. complex safety system, entertainment, electric vehicle the semi conductors and ev's and a dollar basis is double that than traditional cars, electric ve

authority to expand there is profound disagreements on the court expansion at this moment in time would be wise. we do not seek to evaluate or judge the weight of the arguments into the commission takes no position on the wisdom of expansion. profound disagreement, explain. >> expanding the number of the justices in the court is one of the easiest things that can be accomplished. it's one of the least agreed-upon things and then we take the flip side of that for the conservatives and progressives and that's one of the hardest things to do and one of the things that emerged from the report. what do we do if we are looking from a progressive standpoint when a conservative is in office is it going to get to the point we have the justices on the supreme court and what is good to be the long-term implication of the court. >> what proposals were given on term limits? the principal proposal that has the purchase having staggered 18 year terms where he there's two appointments per term. but whether or not that can be done by a legislation or if it's going to take a constitutional amendment. as well as action by the supreme court

court size, there is profound disagreement overr whether cour expansion at this moment in time would a be wise. we do not seek to evaluate or judge the weight of any of these arguments, and the commission takes no positionai on the wisd of expansion. profound disagreement, kimberly robinson. explain. >> that's right. so i think onee of the things that really emerged from this report is that kindnd of the mo controversial changes that could be made,, this idea of expandin the number of justices on the court, is really one of the easiest thingsha that can be accomplished. it's somethingng that as we hea the report says congress has the authority to do and has done in the past. but it's one of the least agreed upon things, and then we take the flipside of that, something like term limits, which has reallyat broad purchase from conservatives and progressives, but that's actually one of the h hardest things to do. and so that's one of the things that really emerged from this report with regard to expanding the court, w i think the cons tt the report really lists is what do we do if you're looking at it from a progressive stan

and enhancing our network and strategic expansion, expanding and filling gaps in transportation networks and opportunities to reconnect communities. we'll evaluate our transportation needs and the impact they have on our goals to create draft packages that will be brought to the public for feedback and input. this is the work made of us -- ahead of us in 2022. so s.f.t.p. will address key policy topics, including areas of work, such as those on this screen. and next slide. and a quick overview of the schedule. so the effort will continue into next year with outreach in february and march and a final plan at the end of the year -- towards the end of the year. and then final slide. another aspect of phase 3 of connectsf is the transportation element which is led by the planning department. this will also build off the outreach and engagement that has been done for connectsf. and the transportation element will update the city's general plan consistent with the city charter and state law. the work will update the general plan and the planning code consistent with the policies that we adopt. this will enable the city to continue to implement policie

and enhancing our network and strategic expansion, expanding and filling gaps in transportation networks and opportunities to reconnect communities. we'll evaluate our transportation needs and the impact they have on our goals to create draft packages that will be brought to the public for feedback and input. this is the work made of us -- ahead of us in 2022. so s.f.t.p. will address key policy topics, including areas of work, such as those on this screen. and next slide. and a quick overview of the schedule. so the effort will continue into next year with outreach in february and march and a final plan at the end of the year -- towards the end of the year. and then final slide. another aspect of phase 3 of connectsf is the transportation element which is led by the planning department. this will also build off the outreach and engagement that has been done for connectsf. and the transportation element will update the city's general plan consistent with the city charter and state law. the work will update the general plan and the planning code consistent with the policies that we adopt. this will enable the city to continue to implement policie

the court's size, there is profound disagreement at whether court expansion at this moment in time would be wise. we do not seek to evaluatee weight of any of these arguments. profound disagreement, kimberly robinson, explain. guest: one of the things that emerge from this report is some of the most controversial changes that could be made, the idea of expanding the number of justices on the court, is one of the easiest things that can be accomplished. the report said congress has the authority to do it. it has done it in the past. one of the least agreed-upon things, we take the flip side of that, something like term limits , that is one of the hardest things to do. that is something that emerged from the report. i think the cons say what do we do if you are looking at it from a progressive standpoint, what do you do when a conservative is in office? are we just going to get to a point where we have 40 justices on the supreme court? what will be the long-term implications? host: what types of proposals were given on term limits? guest: there are many different ways you can accomplish term limits. the one principal proposa

and enhancing our network and strategic expansion, expanding and filling gaps in transportation networks and opportunities to reconnect communities. we'll evaluatethe impact they have on our goals to create draft packages that will be brought to the public for feedback and input. this is the work made of us -- ahead of us in 2022. so s.f.t.p. will address key policy topics, including areas of work, such as those on this screen. and next slide. and a quick overview of the schedule. so the effort will continue into next year with outreach in february and march and a final plan at the end of the year -- towards the end of the year. and then final slide. another aspect of phase 3 of connectsf is the transportation element which is led by the planning department. this will also build off the outreach and engagement that has been done for connectsf. and the transportation element will update the city's general plan consistent with the city charter and state law. the work will update the general plan and the planning code consistent with the policies that we adopt. this will enable the city to continue to implement policies and projects consistent with