we want evidence. evidence tells you the truth.lls you what happened. >> reporter: cloudt felt he had a powerful piece of new evidence for this second one. he played recordings for jurors of mysterious jailhouse phone calls made between jason and his mother. >> i'm talking about these tapes, and there was one that was, uh, me and nichole. were made about three months after jason's second trial was granted in 2013. jason asked his mother to find tapes, stored at her home. >> i want you to, uh, just tear those up. >> you don't want them anymore? okay, i can do that. >> like, pull the insides out, and then throw them on the leaves and just burn it or something. >> okay. >> do you know what was on them? >> no, no. i never heard them. >> reporter: his mother, faye payne says she never did find those tapes. but to the prosecutors, it didn't matter. because they wanted to leave jurors with the impression jason was trying to destroy evidence. >> whatever was on those tapes was obviously something that the defendant did not want anyone to k

to support evidence of politically motivated behavior and no evidence to support evidence that commissioner john koskinen misled congress or attempted to obstruct the committee. beach of these investigations are no evidence whatsoever that the commissioner had acted in bad faith. under his direction the irs spent $20 million and has devoted more than 160,000 hours to collect, review and produce 1.3 million pages of documents to investigated committees including over 70000 e-mails sent or received by lois lerner including over 24000 e-mails that were affected by ms. lerner's hard drive crash. hard to challenge this as an attempt to stonewall-- sorry, hard to characterize it as an attempt to stonewall-- stonewall a congressional investigation. the overall record of multiple investigations failed to support the allegations leveled in this hearing and i regret we are not addressing many of the issues that the irs that were raised by the gentle lady from washington that would have a real impact on the services provided to our constituents and i also regret there was no time today to hold a heari

>> well, i heard the summation of the evidence by judge williams and i didn't hear the evidence at trial, so i'm not prepared to answer that question. >> but, based on what the judge said in summation, did he say that the officer did anything but retrieve the bicycle and help with the inhaler? >> i think judge williams' ruling will be available in total, i hope. he wrote it out before he gave it that will educate us much more than i could do on the entire basis for his ruling. >> i know, you were listening. >> ask me a question. >> you are a lawyer in the courtroom. you are listening to the judge tell the decision. you represent the family. i'm sure you are concentrating on the facts of the judge's ruling. did the judge say anything at all that said that the officer did anything but fetch the bicycle and get the inhaler or try to help with the inhaler? did he say anything? >> i think he said he was at the scene where the van was emptied the first time one block away. and he also mentioned that he had some role in putting freddie gray into the van. i believe he said something about that.

the evidence shows you were there. the evidence shows it. about the evidence. >> and not only was that false -- there was no d.n.a. found in this case. but, the officer then goes on to say, "i can't lie to you about this, robert," and so in fact he's lying about lying. >> reporter: officer snead tells robert he faces what snead calls the, "ultimate punishment." he also says, falsely, that he's been talking to robert's mother on the phone. >> i told your mom that i would sit here and try to keep you from the most ultimate punishment you can get, and i'm trying to do that. and you're not even helping me to help you. i can't do no more. >> what was going on in there? >> there you see, the police officer suggesting to robert that he's gonna face death. and you also see the officer very cleverly using robert's relationship with his mother. >> reporter: and that's when robert's resolve begins to weaken. >> what can i say that i did to get me out of this? >> reporter: just before 7:00am, five hours in, robert begins to bargain. >> how many years is

of evidence. they tried to hide the evidence but they didn't destroy it because the supreme court was able to figure it out and was able to tell the nixon administration to bring this evidence forward. but what i want to focus on today is these e-mails, which to me are like the nixon tapes. much like the 18 1/2 minute gap of the nixon tapes, sheer convenience of hard drive crash, of multiple other high-level officials experiencing system crashes and subsequent erasing of back-up data is highly disturbing. as many of these e-mails were subject to congressional subpoenas, the potential of a true cover-up and the the undermining of democracy and democratic process becomes more apparent in what we're talking about today. this committee, in my opinion, has a critical responsibility. i hope that members from both sides of the aisle will give this matter the attention it deserves. it actually saddens me that there's only one democrat right now on the other side. the reason we got to the bottom of waterga

we still need better evidence, but the evidence is strongly suggestive. for example, there was a program in michigan that effectively cut the recidivism rate in half among people who have those kinds of issues. one of the -- i'll just put in a quick plug for the affordable care act, one of the benefits of the expanded medicaid programs in many states is that those people are qualifying for the type of help that they need and in terms of making sure that we don't waste lives, there's probably no better intervention than making sure someone who's already started to go down the wrong path doesn't repeat the mistake in the future. >> thank you. the entire business sector on this panel, it's a heavyweight -- valerie jarrett in her introduction made the point, business is clearly -- think about this a lot, but it's been hard sometimes for them to speak out. what are the hidden impacts of the criminal justice system on the business world and why does a business leader like you feel the need to speak out? >> so i'm going to entirely dodge that question because i

our position is when you look tell new evidence with all the other evidence at trial, that all relevant circumstances considered together, considering it a lot of these reasons we now know from the notes, well now know from the notes there were misrepresents with regard to these ropes. the georgia supreme court, just as an example, justice scalia, upheld the strike of miss garrett on two bases 'she was a social worker, and that her cousin had been arrested for drugs. she was not a social worker. and secondly, the prosecutor didn't find out until after trial about her cousin's arrest. so it cooperate have possibly been a reason for the strike. >> and you are saying in answer to justice scalia, when you hand the notes, those notes cast doubt on some of the prosecutor's justifications in the first round. >> they do that, and they show misrepresentations to the court and they show an overarching goal of separating out the african-american citizens, treating them differently, and then putting them on this list of definite nos. >> mr. bridget, just to make sure i understand, all the notes in

our position is when you look tell new evidence with all the other evidence at trial, that all relevant circumstances considered together, considering it a lot of these reasons we now know from the notes, well now know from the notes there were misrepresents with regard to these ropes. the georgia supreme court, just as an example, justice scalia, upheld the strike of miss garrett on two bases 'she was a social worker, and that her cousin had been arrested for drugs. she was not a social worker. and secondly, the prosecutor didn't find out until after trial about her cousin's arrest. so it cooperate have possibly been a reason for the strike. >> and you are saying in answer to justice scalia, when you hand the notes, those notes cast doubt on some of the prosecutor's justifications in the first round. >> they do that, and they show misrepresentations to the court and they show an overarching goal of separating out the african-american citizens, treating them differently, and then putting them on this list of definite nos. >> mr. bridget, just to make sure i understand, all the notes in

they try to hide the evidence.y didn't destroy it because the supreme court able to figure it out i was able to tell the president to bring the tapes forward. these e-mails are like the watergate tapes. much like the 18 and a half minute gap, the shear speed of the hard drive crash experiencing system crashes on the subsequent erasing of backup data is highly disturbing. many of these e-mails were subject to congressional subpoena. the potential for true cover-up of the undermining of democracy becomes even more apparent. this committee is a critical responsibility. i hope the members from both sides of the i will give this matter the attention it deserves. eight days after the latter sking for that information. o you believe that the irs followed the proper procedures when addressing this crashed hard drive in 2011? >> no i don't think so. how many of these sources were identified and examined by the irs? >> the inspector general indicated that five of the six were not sought or otherwise investigated area >> is t

do in a circumstance with no direct evidence but you have a circumstantial evidence maybe it did maybe it didn't? one way to tease out of it was partisanship or race to save show me the map we have no case to do that. >> the with a greater degree of confidence if they wanted partisanship that is a pretty high priority for politicians there would have done this. but instead they did the sparkle -- this. then how do you analyze and 80 percent say nothing at all? >> in this case the person who's sponsored the bill and you drew the map. >> he was not in the legislature? >> i believe he was at the time the map was approved to was the sponsor of the bill. >> i thought the person who drafted the plan was not? arabia have that mixed up. >> he says i believe that he did say he drafted the state house plan versus the congressional plan but the fact is if you look at what mr. raphael pointed to the was a very important calculation of the voters than ever added in those that were taken out and he found the voters added had a higher percentage of black voters than democratic so he found the blackes

you have the antidotal evidence.tell you there is an element of i'm going to be tagged, filmed and ruined. then, you have statistics that seem to back it up. baltimore is where they have the highest homicide rate, ever. the sense of authority has been disip pated and when you lose that sense of authority, somebody in charge, this is what you get. >> you know, the administration says there is no evidence. there is no evidence tieing this spike in the murder rate to anything they have done in cracking down on police departments. they say as a second point, the police departments say they deserved it. >> deserving it is a second argument. but when they say there is no evidence, they're imp plying it's a coincidence you get these spikes in cities like baltimore, where we know we have had the mayor telling the police to stand down in the middel of a riot? that, i think has an effect on the first, on the bad guys in the city who want to do damage, a sense this is nobody in charge and second, why do you want to risk everyth

of evidence. they tried to hide the evidence, but they didn't destroy because the supreme court was able to figure it out and was able to tell the administration to bring the evidence forward. what i want to focus on are the emails which to me are like the nixon tapes. much like the 18 and a half minute gap of the nixon tapes, the sheer convenience of a hard drive crash with multiple other high-level officials experienced in system crashes and the subsequent erasing of data is highly disk serving. as many of these emails were subject to subpoena, the potential of a true true cover-up in the undermining of democracy and the democratic process becomes even more apparent in what we are talking about today. this committee, in my opinion has the critical responsibility, and i hope that members from both sides of the aisle will give this matter the attention it deserves. it actually saddens me that there's only one democrat right now on the other side. the reason we got to the bottom of watergate is bec

so it's no surprise that they're going to try to read in the hearsay evidence in this case.vastating and something i would argue until, you know, they threaten me to sit down because, again, this is our only opportunity as a defense attorney to get the information. unlike the civil case, you do not get an opportunity to do depositions, so this is it. your preliminary hearing is the only time that you get to see how the victim presents, cross examine them and extract information. >> and boy ty the information t we've been given and been looking through, is there anything that strikes out at you? >> well, this is the information already disclosed to the public through the indictment process and the charges being filed, so no. this is her statement. the only other statement or live witness that i would want to see is her mother, because, again, this is a preliminary hearing. this is different from a regular hearing. you need to meet all of the elements under the statute, and this is aggravated indecent sexual assault. so at the very least, a defense attorney would try very hard

it corroborates the evidence you were identifying mister congressman which is very strong evidence when someone is actually marketing for it. >> i would quickly time his excuse. >> i would also want to know what communications occurred, email and so more for the back-and-forth between those people . we would seek those items as well and of course the accounting records. >> thank you. >> ideals that. >> thegentleman yields back, mister jackowski is recognized for five minutes . >> unfortunately we have the majority of, has refused to even bring in the one party that actually could answer these questions and that is the stomp express and i want to say mr. sukhia and mister norton as lawyers, the fact that you keep referring back to these completely discredited by three congressional panels, by 12 states that looked into this, by a grand jury that ended up , you talk about the center for medical progress mr. sukhia, which is it ? mr. sukhia? and yet mister delighted and his partner were actually indicted as a consequence so that's a comment. it is not a question, it is a fact that has been

humphries believed the evidence was enough to put the kedefenda away.ld make the same case against rick's old girlfriend. >> how about bambi? she wasn't being tried in that courtroom. >> a travesty. >> her fingerprints are on this? >> figuratively. >> he said this was a story about a spoiled woman, bambi bennett, who manipulated her boyfriend, rick gagnon, into doing her murderous dirty work, get back the deed and get her mother off her back. >> he had heard from bambi how her parents were not fair to her, they have her land. my parents are horrible people and they're taking advantage of me. >> to make things right argued the prosecutor, the dutiful boyfriend and his right handman entered the house and hunted down bambi's parents in their night clothes. the jury heard a drama of southern gothic proportions dripping with greed. now time for a different story. >> none of the puzzle pieces fit. >> reporter: rick's defense team said the case was heavy on fiction, light on facts. >> they had a puzzle and neat little pieces but the pieces weren't exactly righ

but no physical evidence.n for the jury was who else could have done it. >> tom jaraczeski was the only person with the opportunity, the only person with the motive to take bryan rein out of this world. and he did it. and he committed this crime, masterfully. >> reporter: the defense, in its closing, took a swipe at ken thompson, the agent who for two decades wouldn't let the case go. >> we don't convict people because the lead investigator is retiring and wants this case resolved just so we can close the book. wasn't even in the courtroom to hear the lawyers end the case he'd carried around so long. >> i just felt a need i had to get out of there. i didn't want to listen to it. i had to get away and reflect and think about it. >> reporter: the jury went out first thing in the morning the next day. they did not return as quickly as one side, at least, expected. >> it's just the worst time when you have a jury out. every hour that went by was pretty painful. >> reporter: and then? minutes before the 5:00 whistl

but they find no evidence of a malfunction.y two years after the crash, a possible break in the case. the pilot of an eastwind airlines boeing 737 experiences a sudden roll as the jet approaches richmond, virginia. >> he quickly got on the rudder pedals. so you had two pilots shoveling with all their might on a rudder pedal. all it's doing is driving them back. it keeps pushing back at them. it doesn't go forward. we never had this report from a crew before of a pedal back forcing against them. now we're into a different scenario. >> fortunately, they were at a higher air speed than 427, which gave them more roll control. they were able to successfully land the airplane. >> after hearing the pilots' experience with the rudder pedals, investigators suspect a jam may be the problem in the airplane's rudder system. >> the pilots control the rudder on the 737 with pedals. those ped aals are connected vi cables to the muscle, if you will, that physically moves the rudder. the power control unit. like power steering in your car, it's

as to the direct evidence point, what was the direct evidence in cromartie 2? partisan and racial balance. the court said as clear as possible since he said partisanship and race it says little or nothing about the relative predominance. what do we have here? incumbency protection, politics, and race. therefore the direct evidence says little or nothing about the relative predominance. what you need to do is to show they could have accomplished their legitimate political objectives in some other way. as the standing i heard the slogan repeet 3w50eud all my opponents, voters choose representatives not vice versa. that's a lovely slogan. the relevant point here is that state legislatures choose which districts those voters go into. not the perfectly judiciary. if as you must assume the federal judiciary exceeded its proper role and created a system which hurt the incumbents who were defined -- designed to be protected, how could they not have a legally cognizable effect. justice roberts: thank you counsel. economies kase is submitted. >> congratulations fun fun -

it is now an evidence. often a perpetrator or an alleged perpetrator does not give a statement to the police, he did. and now, he's goichk ng to have deal with his own words. he signed his statement that he was asked at the end of the statement, is everything you have stated in the statement true and correct and he said yes and he signed that it was. in addition, did he have an opportunity to make any changes? and he did not. >> the defense wanted to under score emphasize many times that miss constand did make changes in her police statement suggesting that somehow there is something wrong or inappropriate about making changes. i for one glad that miss constand or any person who's the victim to make changes and making sure it is accurate. i represent many victims of criminal cases and still do and including in rape cases and still do. some of them in other jurisdiction never had to opportunity to view it before to see if it is accurate and of a reflection of what they told law enforcement. in many cases, if

>> to me, it wasn't evidence.ore the judge to decide whether or not it should go before a jury. >> reporter: besides, he said, tom already admitted he'd been around there days earlier. maybe that's what calamity jane hit on. so bob peterson got calamity jane's handler up on the witness stand at a hearing here at the courthouse. and what do you know, neither dog nor handler were properly certified. >> when i asked him for all the paperwork, he told me about how he'd put the paperwork about the dog and himself on top of his suburban and it had, unfortunately, all blown away. so he couldn't provide it. >> reporter: not quite the dog ate my homework, but close. agent thompson was also in the courtroom that day. >> what really hurt us was when they asked him on the stand, well that had happened 18 months earlier. where's your training documents since that time? and he said he didn't have any. >> reporter: right. >> i mean, i just -- it just -- i thought, oh, my god. >> reporter: so what did the judge do? he threw out t

is there any evidence of that? >> we have actually looked closely at the crop transference to see if there's anything there and i can tell you we at this time whether it's too early or doesn't exist we can't definitively stay -- say the farmers have decided to switch from one crop to another mexico. we can't say that with any degree of authority at this point. >> but that's something you'll continue to monitor? >> is something we will watch. >> to interject on that point it's my sense and you are both experts that very few people wake up in the morning and say i'm going to shoot heroin for the first time. there's a gateway to the heroin use. a lot of it is being driven by people who were prescribed prescription opiates. the prescription opiate is cut off and they are going through withdrawal and the only thing is access to treatment. absent that how does someone get dependent on heroin minus the scripture and drug gateway which we have already discussed? >> senator is a difficult question just because you are deali

there's a lot of evidence.ack the next day to hear the verdict. >> reporter: but, no. less than four hours later, a verdict. >> "we the jury find the defendant, thomas fallis, not guilty of murder in the second degree and all lesser included offenses, signed by the jury foreperson." >> reporter: not guilty. not murder. after four long years of living under a cloud of suspicion, tom fallis was acquitted of all charges. >> he stayed straight-faced. his -- his defense attorney, iris eytan, was very emotional. but ashley's parents, they -- they left the courtroom fairly quickly. >> reporter: ashley's parents declined to talk with dateline after the verdict, but their legal battles are far from over. in 2015, they filed a civil lawsuit against several employees of the evans police department and the weld county sheriff's office who they believe falsified, altered, and omitted key evidence to make ashley's death look like a suicide. and despite the verdict, they currently have no plans to drop it. the employees are c

that's propensity evidence and introducing evidence to establish that you have a propensity to do something did it now is problematic. so, if there's a conviction here, big if, long way from that, ripe for an appealable issue. so i'm one that believes, i get the 50 women out there and the judge has to limit very, very carefully what that judge allows these other women to come in and say if the judge allows any other women to come in at all but in the event a judge does that, it's damming evidence. the jury looking saying, really? he did that and that? it's all the same. of course he did this here. >> yeah. you know, joey -- >> quickly, laura. >> in terms of damning evidence, the deposition much ado about, the evidence he gives in a deposition testimony may or may not come in and if it does not just the portions that hurt bill cosby come in and all of his overwhelming denials and the other evidence comes in. this is not a slam dunk case for the prosecution even though they were able to make enough evidence now to overcome the probable cause standard. they have a long way to go to prove ultim

no concrete evidence yet. that is based on circumstantial findings, the evidence that's laid out there right now. a lot more to discuss. this is cnn special coverage. we'll be right back. k you. as our business is growing, and you're on the road all day long, it's exhausting. holiday inn has been a part of the team. you're on the fourth floor. it makes life on the road much easier. book your next journey at holidayinn.com once i left the hospital after a dvt blood clot. it makes life on the road much easier. breaking news coming in. this is cnn special coverage. ...and could this happen again? i was given warfarin in the hospital, but wondered, was this the best treatment for me? i spoke to my doctor and she told me about eliquis. eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots and reduces the risk of them happening again. not only does eliquis treat dvt and pe blood clots. but eliquis also had significantly less major bleeding than the standard treatment. knowing eliquis had both... ...turned around my thinking. don't

tell us what they found their . >> they found evidence of her clothing.had information from multiple sources that these two men earned what he clothing in that burn pit the day after michelle disappeared and so rather than ignoring the evidence like police did, we investigated it. we dug up the burn pit with a forensic anthropologist who found a knife lady, a button, a key, fabric that matched michelle's clothing in terms of the color and a broth along with other items indicating that the clothing was burn in the spirit. we found the truck that one of the men drove in 2001 and we did a forensic search of that truck in louisiana and found staining blood but not sufficient dna to match michelle's. there was a lot of work by a lot of people that went into this case from cows perspectives starting with joseph cawley, his first attorney all the way through till now and thankfully, thanks to judge mott for doing the right thing and thankfully cal has been exonerated and won't have to worry for the first time in 15 years about going to prison for something someo

is we don't have evidence. that's the reason why authorities are leaning toward terrorism is the top issue because of airport security and the heightened intensity with which terrorists want to attract airlines and this flight was cruising at 37,000 feet. the part of the flight where something is least likely to happen. there is no evidence yet. >> correct. i wrote an op-ed piece in cnn.com today. i said slow down and think about this. one theory i wrote out was a hypoxia situation. the radar evidence may not prove it. we have almost a 40-minute span between the last communication and when there was another attempt and the airplane fell out of the sky. if we had an insidious situation where oxygen was leaking out of the cabin, hypoxia people react strangely. they cannot do simple math. did the crew react after getting not knowing in you can get euphoric in a hypoxic situation. did they react to a situation mechanically that was a check list and did not do it appropriately and lost control of the airplane becaus

now, any service changes that needs to be made by the local and needs to be based on clear evidence that they'll deliver better outcome for patients. it's right that decisions are made by local rather than politicians. but they do need to meet the four key tests that have been set up to demonstrate an have support from commissioners and bees based on clinical evidence and consider patient choice and i would suggest to consider options in any decision they reach. >> thank you. thank you mr. speaker. common library sthaiments 4.9 million u.k. citizens led or worked in other countries yet week in and week out that will constituents from overseas who can't get visas raised it in citizenship here and scotland is outraged for deportation of the family. is the chancellor tell us and what is difference between an economic migrant and ex-pass. >> i think all of the honorable gentleman is demonstrating is that we have border controls in this country and we do have immigration rule its the need te complied with and that is a very important part of the european union that we are not part of and part

all they're looking for is evidence and data and to document that.build this -- they build a mass of this evidence and then bit by bit, that's where the decisions and conclusions can be drawn about what happened. this is by looking at the information from all of this -- the evidence. and the debris is the first part of it. once they find debris, they can start looking to see the pattern of the debris. where it is and that should get it to the wreckage itself. whether the wreckage is over a large area, which could -- would indicate the possibility that the airplane broke apart in flight or is it in the small, condensed area which means that it was -- the airplane was all in one piece, those are the kinds of questions that the investigators are going to be looking to answer. >> yeah. and that debris might not be exactly close to where the rest of the plane is. because we're talking about the mediterranean, so it could be the chance that, you know, some parts of it are just floating and then they have got to find the main portion of it. john, thank you

using dna and other evidence of innocence. we have 321 innocent people and helped past 11 laws that would help prevent or make it easier to correct wrongful convictions. is one of the high success rates in the nation, and we're doing it with a fraction of the resources we need. at a fraction of the resources is with some of our peer organizations but we are part of a larger innocence network. with, which has more than 60 separate organizations that all work to get innocent people out of prison. and together we are freeing innocent people and changing laws all over the country that are making the criminal justice system a little bit more just. since 1989 there have been 347 dna exonerations, at almost 1800 no in dna exonerations. from both network projects under the terrific lawyers all over the country. and i want to tell you the story of the innocence movement today. why it started, how it started, what it has accomplished and what we still have left to accomplish. and strength lies in the stories of the wrongfully convicted

but no solid evidence yet that this is terrorism. and there's been no claim of responsibility whatsoever from any terrorist group. the silence from isis has been deafening. when they brought down that russian airliner in october, over the sinai peninsula, they put out responsibility within a few hours. five hours. they're very trigger-happy with thes claims of the responsibility. but almost 24 hours into this event, no claim of responsibility, erin, from isis. so we really don't have anything to back up the idea that this is terrorism at this point. >> right. no, of course. although it did take them a little bit of time with the metro jet, as well. bob baer, let me ask you. your theory is a bomb is very possible, and you have an idea of, you know, in the metro jet case, as you heard miguel reporting, isis says it was basically a soda can, a home made bomb they were able to put in the luggage, checked luggage, get this put on a plane by a luggage worker. in this case, if you think it was a bomb, it was very different. how so? >> well,

when you have new evidence such as in this case and it is strong evidence that the court feels like ito go -- it has to look at that evidence. and in this case it did. then i think you are beyond the res judicata bar. >> i think that's exactly how the decision is framed, right? because the decision talks about claims that are not reviewable due to res judicata. it lists many, many, many claims. then it lists a whole bunch of claims that are procedure lally defaults. and the court is very clear. first sentence, the court finds the prosecution did not violate batson versus kentucky. last sentence, on the merits, the person -- the petitioner loses. >> as much as i would like it to be an adequate and state law independent ground -- >> what do you make of the statement on 175 as a preliminary matter, this court notes that as cited by the respondent, the following claims are not reviewable based on the doctrine of res judicata. and the first one it lists is the batson claim. does that suggest maybe the court had two reasons for what it did? it's barred by res judicata and it would fail even

>> well, the clues, again, and the evidence are in the black boxes.nd that, unfortunately, is at the bottom of the mediterranean. and we will just have to wait. in the meantime, we'll end up with lots of speculation hike we hear on all the networks. but, unfortunately, we need the facts because this is a very serious matter. the families that have lost loved ones deserve the facts. and in order to maintain a safe system of aviation safety for all of us, all of us need the facts. >> so we certainly want to hear the voice recorder and find out if there was a struggle in the cockpit. if there were three air marshals on board. there is highly specialized computerized plane a 320. one very reliable with an excellent safety record. jim, i want to thank you for your time tonight. >> continuing fox news coverage of the our vitamins contain no gluten, dairy or artificial flavors. so we invented a word that means that. shmorange. and it rhymes with the color of our bottle. hey, baby, make it your first word! sfx: baby speak not even close. reach for the orange,

no evidence of what cause the crash. >> so far we have no claims of responsibility or evidence that thatworking with our partner around world to get a better understanding of what happened. >> unpopularity contest, new poll number showing the likely presidential opponents are the least liked in history. who is qualified for president, he said not the other. >> hillary says some things and i said some things and i go back to work and i have a lot of fun. she got horrible judgment. >> i know how hard this job is and i know we need steadiness and as well as strengths and smarts in it. he's not qualified to be president of the united states. >> dying wish, a former senator apologized to muslims from his death bed for the words of donald trump's.

an attempt to destroy evidence or what?ome people wondered if tom had something to do with it. others dismissed that as just plain nonsense. photographer jack elka covered the fire for the islander newspaper. >> that's when the mystery really started to, wow, another element of this puzzle that -- >> reporter: yeah. why would somebody do that? >> kind of bizarre. >> reporter: surely, it had to have something to do with whatever happened to sabina. why would that place burn down? somebody was trying to destroy some evidence or something? >> it was a theory. we weren't sure if something happened there and then she was buried somewhere. we just didn't know. >> reporter: months went by without a decent lead. though it was not for lack of trying to find one. especially where their instincts were telling them sabina might be buried. the beach. >> well, whenever we would have a break, we would come out here to this very spot. we would stand here and review the case and brainm >> reporter: detective sergeant john kenney and his par

but with the evidence be? >> to convict. >> china have actually doing something to block this from coming in the mexico and in the united states. >> of doing good. >> okay. we have seen encouraging progress. there is still plenty to do. last year the minister of public security officially control 160 new substances including several analogs of fentanyl, and they have expressed high arrest activity and are continuing to receive information on new synthetic substances to officially control them. so they are doing something. there is more that can be done. >> clearly. we have the evidence in 2015 massachusetts, and it will be worse this year. slim evidence that this thing is being slow down. .. key >> can we go to mexico? what is the level of cooperation you are getting from the mexican government in interdicting fentanyl coming into the united states? we know it is el chapo because he goes to massachusetts. >> senator, i would tell you that i personally have been down there twice and have dealt with the mexican

. >> reporter: but prosecutors said the evidence was overwhelming. >> you have dna, firearms evidence, the murder weapon. what more is there? >> reporter: next week, jurors decide if lonnie franklin jr. should be put to death. steve patterson, nbc news, los angeles. >>> now to a major warning that might send you rushing to change your e-mail password which may not be a bad idea when you hear this. cybersecurity experts recently uncovered a massive trove of stolen usernames and passwords, hundreds of millions of them. and as nbc's tom costello tells us, it involves some of the biggest e-mail providers in the world. >> reporter: they were being offered for sale on the so-called dark web, where hackers hawk their goods. 272 million stolen e-mail accounts, among them yahoo! gmail and microsoft addresses including passwords. offered for sale by a russian hacker, and discovered by a milwaukee security consultant alex holden. >> we know that he's a young man in central russia who collected this information from multiple sources. >> reporter: hackers use stolen e-mail information to lure user

we need to get the evidence. is there bomb debris. the plane break up snp any other information sitting there. and meanwhile, we haven't found debris yet. i find it remarkable. no debris is found is 24 hours. >> hold that thought. >> you disagree? >> i think julia is right most of the time. >> that is what my husband says. >> if you look back at 9/11, the taliban came out decrying the event, bin laden denied it. >> if this was, does that mean the terrorists have found ways to evade the technology? >> they may have. millions are getting on and off of airplanes, the magnitude of global travel, means there will be weak links, unfortunately, we are dependent on the weakest link. it is the challenge in the global environment. driving home the point this is a massive investigation. >> breaking news coverage continues from around the world after a short break. you are watching cnn. (ricky gervais) verizon is the number one network in america. i know what you're thinking, they all claim stuff like that. yeah, but some of them stretch the trut

it is by a preponderance of the evidence. all they have to show to the judge, not a jury in this case, is that there is enough evidence to move forward to the next step. the next step in this case being an actual trail. so the prosecutor doesn't have a very heavy burden this morning with respect to what they have to establish, and in fact, they can put forth evidence via affidavits. they don't have to put on witnesses to actually testify. i don't expect constand to be here this morning, and even if she is here, it is not likely that she will take the witness stand. it is likely that the case by the prosecution will be made via other witnesses, and via affidavits. >> and what about that deposition, joey, where he admitted to giving quaaludes to women he wanted to have sex with? how could that play into all of this today? >> could be significant, but here is what it is. and good morning to you, pamela, areva, any criminal or civil case, they're separate matters. as areva, there a low standard, is there reasonable belief that a