i was pretty naÏve at that time evolutionary biology.t what i observed was that on average the males were status of test and relatively aggressive in the futurear was very clear of course the males could also be peaceful and nurturing and the females could be aggressive but on average just like in humans when there is overlap there was a novel a lot of overlap these were his mistake a boy could not be explained by culture. so that solidified my interest to understand the origins of human sex differences in came out that from observing while jimson interested in the role of testosterone is one of the biggest differences between male and females. that testosterone evolution into shapes who we are and how those biological forces interact with our human environment and our culture and how we explain who we are in our culture and expression of sex differences with the expression of thect human nature so that's an explanation how i got to harvard focusing on a phd so that is my trajectory here. >> oneo the things you can do so well is that sci

the dock of work of doctor carol hooven, a director of graduatestudies in the department of evolutionary biology at arbor university . she learned studying sex th differences and has taught at emerson. she's received numerous teaching awards and her book was named one of harvard princeton's top 10 tried-and-true. i trust you are as excited to dig into this work as i am but first it's important to frame tonight's conversation for our audience . as a amnesty institution carroll's values to stay in hard and complex conversations, to assume best intent and seek to provide clear information so that we can make informed choices aboutour body . tells a story about who shapes narratives and the procedures that shape our lives. we are living in an era when science is being recruited as a weapon that affects people especially children as well as the doctorsparents and teachers who are trying to help them . we have gone through other times when science was regraded and one can argue still is . we've lived through times when science has been regretted to justify white supremacy and justice advocates teach u

she's a lecture and codirector of undergraduate studies in the department of human evolutionary biology at harvard university. she earned her phd from harvard and studying testosterone and taught there ever since. she has received numerous teaching awards and was named one of the top ten tried-and-true. we are in sd and company this evening and i trust you're excited to dig into this book as i am. conversation. feminist institution is to stay in heart and complex conversation. to assume and seek to provide clear information of choices about our bodies and our communities. the most marginalized among us. who possesses the power to shape narratives and therefore to shape the policies. we are living in an era of being actively recruited especially children, doctors, parents, teachers are trying to help them. this other times when science was recruited and often still is. justify further supremacy. the advocates teach us often a double edge sword for people who try to deviate from the standard line on the bell curve. talk about power and human desire. she argues in her book is useful for al

dr michael worobey who heads the ecology and evolutionary biology department at the university of arizonao me that he's found what he believes is the first known case of the virus, but that he believes there were earlier cases yet to be discovered. there were probably patients even earlier than her because only about 7% of people who get the virus end up in the hospital and she was one of those. ok, so we'll get to that. but let's just work out what you did. so, how did you work that out? well, i had known about a discrepancy between the who reports december 8 on this individual and a scientific paper that suggested his symptoms began on december 16, and i pointed that out in my article, which then went out to anonymous peer reviewers and one of the peer reviewers was obviously someone who spoke and read chinese and passed along this figure that actually —— video that actually showed medical and dental records from this individual which showed that on december 8, what he actually had was a dental issue with retained baby teeth that needed to be pulled, and in his own voice, he says in the

that expert is dr michael worobey, who heads the ecology and evolutionary biology department at the universityank you forjoining us. a second pair of eyes is always useful. in looking at the world health organization report you have found what is a crucial fact they have wrong and that, if i am correct, is that mr chan, the accountant who was the first known case, was not in fact showing symptoms under the eighth of december by the 16th of december which means mrs white, a seafood vendor was in fact patient zero. is that what you have found? i would not say cheese _ what you have found? i would not say cheese patient - what you have found? i would not say cheese patient zero, i not say cheese patient zero, she is the first known patient. 0nly she is the first known patient. only about 7% of people who get the virus and up in the hospital and she is one of those. ., hospital and she is one of those. . i. hospital and she is one of those. ., , ., ., ~' hospital and she is one of those. ., ., ~ ., those. how did you work that out? i had — those. how did you work that out? i had known _ those. how