for example at the hamilton building for landmark no. 193.this property you received used the 803.9 provision to law for a change of use from storage use on the ground level. as part of that process, hpc provided a referral to determine whether or not the change of use would help enhance the feasibility of preserving the historic property. typically the department will work with the project sponsors to work with a historic maintenance plan which outlines certain improvements to the building that will help to enhance it's historic status and/or rectify past alterations that are incompatible with the current historic status. this provision for example is most commonly used where in the umu zoning district, you are not allowed to have office on the ground floor, for example, by using 803.9. they would allow you to have office uses on the ground floor for this sense. in across all landmarks and in article 11 buildings, planning code section 161k exempts parking and loading requirements that would typically apply to other properties. so in most of

for example landmark 29, the old firehouse, in 2009, this property received authorization for a changeof use from an element ary school to an office use. the baseline zoning would not permit either one of those uses but the department did receive a conditional use to allow this type of property. within mixed use districts, i apologize again for the

shelby county is an example of a landmark statute, passed 98-0 by the senate and something like 421-3 in the house, reauthorize in 2006 by those numbers and the supreme court struck it down. >> july activism is like gerrymandering. it depends who is doing it. >> neil made a brief reference earlier but we should mention that there is a good likelihood the supreme court will get some abortion cases, one or more this term. they have not agreed to hear any abortion cases yet. there are several variations of statutes that have been ruled on or are being ruled on in the federal appeals court. i don't know whether i would say it is a certainty but a good possibility that the court will have to decide one of these abortion cases, maybe this term, maybe next term. >> in the spirit of looking ahead since what we have is a partial supreme court docket there are many things added before the term is up. a couple things, i do think they will continue with their first amendment fatal attraction, we may see more cases that are first amendment related. one is mohammad versus united states which will b

their muscles and using the courts to strike down a lot of legislation and shelby county is example a, a landmark statute passed, you know, 9 8-0 by the senate and 421-3 in the house reauthorized in 2006 by those numbers and yet the supreme court struck it down. >> judicial activism it depends on who is doing it. steve? >> neil made a brief reference earlier. we ought to mention that there's a good likelihood that the supreme court will get some abortion cases, one or more this term. they have not agreed to hear any abortion cases yet. there are several variations of statutes that have been ruled on or being ruled on in the federal appeals courts. i don't know whether i would say it's a certainty, but i think there's at least a good possibility that the court will have to decide one of these abortion cases, maybe this term, maybe next term. >>lessly? >> i wanted in the spirit of looking ahead since what we have is a partial supreme court docket, there will be more things added before the term is up, so just a couple things to flag. i do think they will continue with their first aemtd fatal attrac

. >> and for example, in the soi, district, it is not permitted unless it is in the landmark. >> and the proposed from each of the sections and 663rd street and they are located on the outside of the office and the sso, and the zoning district and as proposed by the project sponsor, the project includes the change in use of 80,000 of the feed to office use, currently it is used for office use and as outlined. >> the project sponsor created, and the maintenance plan. >> and just identify the conversion to the office use and to further support the preservation, the hnp for the regular, and main nens and the window and the roof inspection and the signage, and the interpretive exhibit, and several individuals expressed opposition to the project, they existent use, and for the department and just found out that the existing building has been used in the office since 2008 as of september, 11, 2014, the department has not received any written correspondence in support or opposition to the proposed project. since the publication of the support, on may first, 2014, the department has changed

. >> and for example, in the soi, district, it is not permitted unless it is in the landmark. >> and the proposed from each

conservatives flexing muscles and using the courts to strike down legislation in shelby county has example eight. a landmarkpassed 98 to zero by the senate and some mx 421 to three in the house preauthorized in 2006 by those numbers in at the supreme court struck it down. >> judicial activism is like gerrymandering. >> deal made a brief reference that we have to mention there's a good likelihood the supreme court will get some abortion cases one or more this term. they have not agreed to hear any cases yet. there are several variations of statute that has been ruled on or been ruled on or be ruled on in the federal appeals court. i don't know whether everything is a certainty, but at least a good possibility the court will have to decide one of these abortion cases, maybe this term, maybe next room. >> i want in the spirit of looking ahead, since what we have is the partial supreme court docket, there'll be more things added before the term is up here just a couple things. i think they will continue with the first amendment fatal attraction. we may see more cases being granted that her first amendment relat

their muscles and using the courts to strike down a lot of legislation in shelby county is example a., a landmark statute passed 98 to zero by the senate and something like 421- 3 in the house, reauthorize in the house by those numbers. yet the supreme court struck it down. >> judicial activism is like gerrymandering. it depends on who's doing it. >> i think we had to mention a good likelihood the supreme court will get some abortion cases, one or more this term. they have not agreed to any abortion cases yet. there are several variations of statutes that have been ruled on or are being rolled on in the federal appeals courts. i don't know whether i would say it's a certainty but i think there's a least a good possibility that the court will have to decide one of these abortion cases maybe this term, maybe next term. >> in the spirit of looking ahead, since what we have is a partial supreme court docket, there will be more things added before the term is up. just a couple things. i think they will continue with the first amendment the attraction but we might see more cases been granted that are t

>> for example, in the case of 2 -henry adams, they are located in the pdr 1d so typically an office would not be permitted at all but in the case of a landmark, they are taking advantage of this provision so they are allowed a use. currently it is permitted and in designated landmarks offices is allowed as a right. in supervisor cohen's provision she has introduced a change in the planning code to equal qualify for conditional use authorizations for the findings. >> are you saying this doesn't apply and 3.9 applies or that this actually applies. >> thank you. members of the commission, scott sanchez, zoning administrator. per section 219, it's different and very distinct from the process currently at 83.9. if you are in a pdr one district in 1st district in a landmark building it's permitted without any further review or evaluation. that's one of the things that may have been confusing for people because in the eastern neighborhoods mixed use districts we have brought projects for your review and consideration to help advise me as zoning administrator to determine whether or not the change of use would address and as mr. sue krey in his memo