they said maybe the nafta is important enough, maybe our existential questions will attract an audience, and then we came up on bright idea of asking

but i think also, it was time to share because i really had an existential crisis in regards to ralizing how far i had come and

it's very existential. not being able to breathe, it's why waterboarding is a form of torture. you think it's -- but, of course, you don't, right? unless you have a severe condition, it doesn't kill you. tear gas cans shot at you may, but the tear gas yourself, very few such incidents. so you get over it. and then you get really annoyed, and your eyes are hurting. and what you find is all these people who are with you and people will pick you up, they will wash your face, and you just went through all of this together. and that kind of feeling of, like, people you don't know will come make sure you're okay and you're with people who kind of believe in something, you're part of something bigger than yourself, it is a form of -- this is why i think protesters are empowering partly because you find people like that, and you go through somewhat stressful, but it's existentially very rewarding. people protest because it's joyous to protest. but as you say, that itself doesn't lend itself without any structure to how do you decide what's next. >> right -- [inaudible] once said i revo

being we to get the conversation started in a culture because i really do believe there is the existential threat everything will look the same but i think it is something we have to take seriously my publisher has graciously offered to give a number of copies to congress and another person i will not name. i would love to get a letter from me to say what do you think? this is written for every american as fundamental ideas rebutted to them over 200 years now we are ignorant of them now we have to be patriotic to teach our children rubbly stand for so then i can shame the congressman into reading it people say what can i do? contact your congressmen and basket he got the book and has read it if the people will hold the leaders to recount something can be done not to say it is paid over or hopeless god forbid i am not committed to lose hope travel even at that we have a few minutes for q&a. [applause] >> i would love now if you don't mind my daughter and i have prepared a duet she didn't know i was going to do this i'm kidding. i would love to have a few minutes for your questions i asked y

that's why it is not existential. they know if they were to attack south in any blatant way, or anyone else in the region, they would disappear from the earth. it would be fire and fury. no american president could escape that. we had this same crisis in 1994. i was on the peninsula in 1994. i was there with the commander. i was there with bill perry. we negotiated and it led to the agreed framework and we froze their most dangerous nuclear program at the time. that's what we need to do again. we need to talk and we need to be able as bill perry has appointed out, and willing to offer something. like the exercises in august. we can offer that we would cancel those exercises or postpone them in exchange for a cancellation of ballistic missile testing or missile testing or both. both sides need to calm down and we need to talk. >> interesting you say that about negotiations, success in the negotiation. i feel images projected, every approach, that you can't get anywhere negotiating with north korea. it sounds like you'r

it is a real existential threat to the country. i'm not sure the president is making things better. what history teaches us, is that every leader believes they can control events. but most leaders he are controlled by events. and when leaders are controlled by events, and they begin to lose control of the trajectory of them, and those events spiral, leaders miscalculate. they misjudge adversaries. right at this point in history where the last of the survivors of the death camps, the last of the men who landed on the normandy beaches are coming to the end of their very long lives, it seems to me we're losing that human memory, that capacity to imagine what a tragedy on a global scale could look like. >> how bad it can be. >> i think we have a lack of imagination in this country. we've been at war for 17 years. more americans would be killed in the first five minutes of the second korean war than have lost their lives in the totality of these wars in iraq and afghanistan. the last korean war, a million and a half koreans died. and korea is one of the poorest countries in the world. to

if we said this is an existential threat. millions of american lives are at stake.lives are at stake. millions of north korean lives are at stake, to be fair. we should be moving with an intensity, developing a series of steps. that enables us to say to north korea we don't need to continue diplomatically. if you decide to behave in a stupid way, we are surrounding you with mechanisms which will coarse you and make you harmless and ultimately crush you. the ball is in your court. you want to be eliminated? we will have the assets to do it. in fact, we would like to negotiate but it's your call, not our call. we cannot do is have another decade of piously helping that sanctions and diplomacy and talk are going to be a substitute for very profound change in north korea. there is zero evidence we are going to see profound change. >> sean: i love what you are saying, especially about the missile technology to take out -- we do have some gvpá antiballistic missile technology available to us but when you talk about -- i've always said that i think president reagan's great

what impact does it have on the victims' families to say they're not an existential threat?evastating, the most tone deaf moment of his presidency, particularly right after the press conference he held in france of november 2015 when he was in turkey and held a press conference to say that's not that big a deal. it was devastating. he was totally out of sync with the way the american people felt and the families of the victims. liz: andrew peek, love having you on. maxine waters saying on the view saying once the president is pushed out, the vice president is next. my next guest says this investigation was supposed to be about stopping russia, not about pushing out the administration. we're going to show you the clip after this. poor mouth breather. allergies? stuffy nose? can't sleep? take that. a breathe right nasal strip instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than allergy medicine alone. shut your mouth and say goodnight, mouthbreathers. breathe right. . liz: democrat congressman maxine waters leading the charge to impeach president trump, no matter what. saying on abc'

but i don't think the ability of the north koreans to launch a existential threat attack of that magnitudeeral clapper, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you, wolf. >> let's keep counting on you for your expertise in this area. >>> just ahead, we are following the breaking news as president trump finally speaks out against hate groups after the charlottesville, virginia violence. >> racism is evil. and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the kkk, neo-nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as americans. speak now. (coughs) so sorry. oh no... it's just that your friend daryl here is supposed to be live streaming the wedding and he's not getting any service. i missed, like, the whole thing. what? and i just got an unlimited plan. it's the right plan, wrong network. you see, verizon has the largest, most reliable 4g lte network in america. it's built to work better in cities. tell you what, just use mine. thanks. no problem. all right, let's go live. say hi to everybody who wasn't invited! (vo) wh

existential dread i met 28.t stuff as i used to be or i would've done i hate these people. existential dread is at 28 which is pretty good. it's a charge that was done by pugh and rasmussen. >> kimberly: that was compelling and also made up. one. >> juan: today, august 1st but not just any august 1st, it's the fifth birthday for two very special girls, the twins pepper and wesley, my granddaughters. over the weekend they had extremely wild and wet party with 2,000 neighbors in the school friends, they neighbors, the theme of the party? superheroes. check out this cake that my daughter made for them. happy birthday, grand dad's is known as pop-up. >> kimberly: i remember last year they had gorgeous cakes too. that was fun, thank you for tha that. >> chris: every parent will know this feeling, especially parents of young men. i want you to meet charlie edwards. he's from britain and his parents arranged a sleepover party for him at the natural history museum. he was having a really good tim time. he noticed that i

pakistan views afghanistan as a place where it's an existential fight with india. client state, the proxy state, the taliban will eventually be in control, and that will give us greater strategic depth in dealing with india. this is was they care about. and that's a conflict of nuclear weapons. when we say we are going to pressure pakistan there will be is only so much we can do. kennedy: why are we giving them billions of dollars? >> usama bin laden was hiding in a compound there. so there are clearly huge issues in trying to get pakistan to be helpful here. the taliban is in control of more territory than any time since 2001. i now it's bad news, but it's the truth. ken very, very good analysis. secretary of state rex tillerson suggested our goal is not actually victory. >> this entire effort is intended to put pressure on the taliban to have the taliban understand you will not win a battle thefield victory. we may not win one, but neither will you. at some point we have to come to the negotiating table and find a way to bring this to an end. kennedy: we have to

the room was completely silent but for two decades the program constituted the existential threat. that no solution in could be found with that o in richmond objective. and actually did not have fitted the to do with israel beyond. and then to see a sweeping attitude change that iran was questioning the legitimacy that the united states would strike a deal with iran that it midway's that would leave israel abandoned beyond hostility of its own. israel could not allow the betting states without coming to terms and if they ever going to go with this direction israel could not accept this tuesday and in though way at the moment of tremendous honesty and to better understand why they're making this argument we have to go back another two decades. the soviet union had collapsed and defeated in the persian gulf war this was a new geopolitical situation and that the global level rissole super power of the world without previous balance of power had changed but it isn't quite clear. with iraq defeated now emerging as to of the most powerful centers of the region. behind-the-scenes collabor

he represents a living, breathing, texas special -- existential threat to political speech. >> therehing to do as president. i think he does a lot of things to mess with people. >> is a good way to be president? to max of people?>> yes. when you come in specifically to mess with people. >> he was elected to be a thorn

about things like we would other issues, like taxes and other things, we talk about it in these existentialr bear terms, and as a consequent, it turns away from what it really is, and economic issue, it becomes a social issue. we all know when it becomes a social issue, people turn their brains off, and they deal with their hearts, and that is not sufficient for an issue like this. >> juan: i put this in question to you. if someone had a debate, and the facts on the table, is anybody going to change their minds at this point? >> kimberly: i think that people might. people who want to be open-minded. to pick up on what greg is saying, the zealots, they are so prone to hyperbole and exaggeration, that it defeats honest discussion and analysis of the facts. so, that is basically the problem i have with it. i feel like i'm watching groundhog day when i see al gor al gore. and then malaga will still be there. you want to have the facts, you want to debate it, but when people are so close-minded as to one direction or the other, there is too big of a space in between to try and bridget. >> juan:

that these were not existential moments, that this was an existential epic. and in fact when they came to write the reports in the official records, that is what they called the sections of -- epics. not battles but epics and i think that the partnership getting very specific about it, if you look at it from the perspective of both grant and meade, both of them are in very difficult situations as manager and subordinate. we are one or the other in our lives and sometimes both. and put yourself in the situation of a meade. whose boss is going to sit and take his chair and sit next to you at your desk all day every day. that is a hard situation, whose boss is going to spend a pretty fair amount of energy kind of subtly communicating to you that culture of the organization in a you have managed now for nine months in meade's case isn't quite what he wants to to be and he wants it to change and he will make it change if he has to. and he does. the story of the battle of the wilderness, the first day, the first couple of days of the battle, is yes, it is a story o

>> i think if you're looking for an existential crisis for the trump presidency, it would be getting rid of robert mueller. it wouldn't just be democrats like diane feinstein. you would have republican senators like lindsey graham who sometimes has the president's ear saying that would be unacceptable. it would dav what happened. >> if you are the president and you hear that, you say it's a bad couple of weeks. he really does get the dirt on me. going all the way back to my business dealings. more time for you next time. thank you for your expertise. >>> coming up, the effort is case rt, a republican is putting his political future on the line. nobody in the republican house has been as tough as this guy on this president. conservatives stood idly by with the nativism and demagoguery. senator flake joins us next. he you know the romanovs, they're all around still. >>> eric trump wants the party to stand up for his dad. but after months of attacking john mccain, lisa murkowski, why would they be nice to him? finally, trump watch. you have this time it's his turn. you have 4.3 minutes

and they have the existential question of protecting the homeland.he third grade issue is, after the war -- and i want to put a dash here. we talked about this last time, that is the empire. in the american way of thinking, one of the great evils in the american liberal conscience of the 1930's, 1940's, early 1940's is the british empire. especially because we did not want to be part of it. we look at the united states and say, see what can happen when you are free of britain. we do not really appreciate british institutions, culture, unique. everybody from john locke to edmund burke. but there is a resentment of the british empire. there is a lot of continental immigrants, especially german speaking families that do not how that works, as men of the left, the roosevelt administration is very suspicious. how does that work out? it reflects all of these issues we talked about, world war i, left, right, dichotomy especially russia. there will be another great debate. i am skipping ahead a little bit. i want to get to the second front. what do you do wi

and i don't mean like in an existential sense. like what have we done to bring this upon us. no. i mean specifically. what exactly happened to spark this huge change in fpolicy, these unprecedented thoughts in the last few days, this huge change in america's stamp toward north korea and its potential as a military threat. what started this. in the immediate specific sense. why is the president now threatening war against north korea. where did this come from? i mean north korea first tested a nuclear weapon 11 years ago, in 2006. in the ensuing decade they have had another four nuclear tests after their first one. so there have been five nuclear tests in total over the last 11 years. last year north korea did 24 different missile tests. this year they've done 18 or 19 different missile tests already. so you know whether or not any of that is particularly terrifying, none of it is new. i mean, the missiles they're testing are getting longer and longer range which does mean their ability to hit farther flung targets could potentially at least be advancing if these longer range miss

but on this existential issue of nuclear weapons, i believe that we can be. understand some people might not agree with that. >> but mr. ambassador, if you say that this is something that they have been working on for years and years and years, and we talk about this, you know, miniaturized nuclear warhead and the capability and the icbms and all the tests we've been seeing, why would they not want to show it off? >> well, i think they do want to show it off, which is why they've been testing it. it's why they've been communicating it. they want to deter what they see as an existential threat from us to their regime. and so they believe, to the extent that we understand their thinking, that they live in a hostile neighborhood and they need these weapons in order to survive. they look at saddam hussein, at qaddafi and they say, that's not going to be us. we're going to survive for another day. >> mr. reiss, thank you so much for spending the time with me. to be continued. we'll have more conversations on north korea, i'm sure. >>> let's continue on. >> thank y

are going through a similar struggle happened to be pro-life what do you think about that kind of existential crisis that they are having? if you have a party that wins the election and governance but it is tough to be pure on everything and use every issue as a litmus test then certainly the republican party hopes he can provide a big tent and we have to if we are going to survive in the future and assume that everyone has the same constituency or the same belie beliefs. people that we look to recognize the need to compromise to get to going in the right direction and i think certainly we are finding that on healthcare would have been nice to be able to do it exactly in the image tha the imd to but that isn't where we are. he's not an ideological purist by any means for someone who makes decisions based on the situation without political philosophy behind it. >> guest: the leader of the party there are times. the principles that drive the instincts to be moving in the right direction. it is a even-tempered and it matters and the political opponents make it difficult to work with in the futur

theseaid, all of differences are fundamental and existential and will play out here. why should europe the first for the united states? .e were not attacked by germany we were attacked by the japanese on december 7. the japanese are close to the pacific coast. they are in the waters of hawaii. they have attacked american held soil. they are trying to take over the philippines. they will attacked wake island. they have taken over the marianas. they are encroaching on american fears of influence. america will never be attacked a germany. japanese will -- and one case. they will send balloons with bombs. in america's way of thinking, japan is a problem. it is somewhat of a racial element. the japanese look different than we do. isre is not of dust there not a lot of japanese in the united states except on the west coast. there are a lot of germans and a .ot of people here there are a lot of people in the 1930's, amidst the depression, germany was just trying to find an ideology. it is not nazi's them, it is not that bad -- nazism. other people create autobahns, dams, giv

really bad at supporting governments going in. >> absolutely. >> except of course abstract and existential are two things that do not resonate with president trump. >> they don't want on capitol hill and it's hard with the american public. >> thank you so much for that. >> well, we're talking all about the president in a few minutes you'll see him. he's going to be heading -- tonight actually to a campaign style rally in west virginia. facing the crowd where the job approval rating is at a new low, we're going to dig through those numbers. this is a coal state, an industry the president has said we'll bring back. >> west virginia has coal problems and opioid problems. a new poll, 33% approve of the job the president is doing, down 7 points from the last time quinnipiac took the poll. 61% disapprove. republicans however, still are sticking with donald trump. he gets a 76% approval rate among republicans, only 17% of republicans disapprove of the job that donald trump is doing. let's dig deeper, white men, 47% of white men approve of the job donald trump is doing and 48% disapproval. white v

and i think a lot of people look at this as an existential threat like doug said.eminds you why has trump tried to change the topic from a war of words with russia to really focusing on our real global threat, the number one global threat which is china. if you listen to what the general and the other people have been saying on your show, china's fingerprints are all over this nuclear program in north korea. and so we have got to get serious about those. >> harris: you caught that i asked general keene about that. aren't they oppositional that you see their fingerprints on it, yet you need to lean on them. isn't that almost exactly where we are with russia right now, doug? they were a huge component in this 15-0 vote to put more sanctions on north korea inside the united nations. our ambassador, nikki haley thanked russia and china for their participation in that. >> well, i thanked them, too. but they have been working with and doing business with the north koreans on an almost unabated basis for the last 20 or 30 years. obviously we need these sanctions. but we n

i wanted him to accomplish one main thing, he represents the living, breathing existential threat to political correctness just by breathing. he drives people insane and i love him for that.>> i think trump does things to mess with people. >> reporter: is that a good way to be president? >> yes. when you come in specifically to break up the system, he was elected to mess with the people and to be the thorn in the side of the establishment on the left and the right. i think he is fantastic and annoys the liberals. >> reporter: he blames liberals for many things but mostly for the double standard when it comes to free speech. he says he wants more free speech and especially for the right wing rallies planned for the bay area. >> i want as many protests as possible and for people to demonstrate peacefully on all sides. i don't think there are only two sides of any question and i want everybody on the streets. i wanted peaceful and respectful. the problem is the way that the police operate in this town because they do not police properly. they let people smashed the place up and do nothi

there is a huge existential threat, we shortly cease to exist, everything will look the same, it doesn't work that way. something we take seriously, my publisher graciously offered to give a number of copies to members of congress and another person i will not name. every member of congress to get a letter from me asking what do you think of this? this is not written for democrats or republicans, secular, religious, doesn't matter, these are fundamental ideas, we used to bind to them for 200 years, we have to teach our children what we stand for. i hope those books, i can get on my radio program and shame congressman into reading it got a letter from so and so, have you read it? i hope everyone here, you can contact your congressman and ask if he got the book and read it. the people will be of people and we will hold our leaders to account, something can be done. i don't say it is game over or hopeless. god for bid, not for bid -- our job is to do what we can do. i have a few minutes for q and a. that concludes this portion, thank you very much. [applause] >> i am going to -- come on. i

not how real estate investment should work and our team did the same thing that i think it's an existentialinue to innovate. there's a ton of talent here in the u.s. that i believe we still can bring into the. >> brit makes a point. half of the population are women and 55% of college graduates are women and 30% of our population are hispanic. you can believe what you want to believe that if you can't innovate and relate and communicate to these folks you aren't going to have a successful business. maria: do you all expect to be private in the next couple of years or are you looking for a public offering sooner rather than later? >> we are planning to stay private. we have probably raised 45 million total because we don't want to raise that much more. mary ann -- maria: this is a decision you made. >> up one day we want to go public that's great otherwise we can stay small meaning like having raise a lot of money. who knows what's going to happen? i want to be in control of destiny and second thing is 1999 it took four years for a company to go public. now the average time is 11 years we are

he represents a living, breathing, texas special -- existential threat to political speech. >> there plenty of thing to do as president. i think he does a lot of things to mess with people. >> is a good way to be president? to max of people?>> yes. when you come in specifically to mess with people. >> he was elected to be a thorn in the side of establishment, both left and right. >> on your facebook page, you have been in 2020. >> i do. >> he blames liberals for many things, but mainly for the double standard for free speech. he says he wants more free speech, specially for the rallies plant here in the bay area. >> i want as many protesters as possible. i want people to protests in the streets. peacefully on all sides. i want everybody in the streets. i wanted peaceful, i wanted respectful, it would be nice if, the problem is that the way the police operate in this kind of town. they don't police properly. they let antifa smashed the place up. >> he sends -- it says he plans to return to berkeley at the end of september. >> we will be exploding -- explaining on uc berkeley's own cam

so the companies were at kind of an existential crossroads because they were about to lose their work force. they knew these drivers could $100,000 brand-new, trucks. it was up to the companies to figure out a way to keep her drivers in business and what they turned to was this lease to own model. it became pervasive across the industry with these 15,000 drivers, where the company bought the trucks and passed through all the cost right to the drivers. normally an independent contractor can work for anybody he wants to, but with these trucks that are provided by the company, they could not do that. they cannot go in work for somebody else. they had to do everything the dispatcher says and move the load. they cannot negotiate anything. that became the center of the whole thing, the fact that these guys cannot leave. every week they put more and more into this truck. week for the a lease payment and there told after five or seven years, you will own it, the truck will be yours. that's why so me guys cannot leave. when you ask why they don't leave if conditions are so bad, they say of alr

he companies were at existential point, knew the $100,000couldn't afford clean trucks the ports are mandating. to as up to the companies figure out way to keep their drivers in business and what turned to was lease to own model. it became pervasive across the with the 15 or 16,000 companies. the companies bought the trucks nd passed the expenses to the driver. with the trucks, provided by the ompany, they couldn't do that, they couldn't go price compare, go work for somebody else, they to do everything the dispatchers say, work when the dispatchers say and move the load. they can't negotiate anything. that kind of became the center thing, the fact these guys can't leave, every week they pay more into the truck, right? week and 50 to 500 a are told, you own the thing, that ruck will be yours, is why so many guys can't leave. i ask them, why didn't you leave so bad.tions were they say, i paid three year intoes this thing, four, five it.s into we found a lot of companies were anything fthey were -- if they attended a got sick, broke down and couldn't afford repairs on the truck, the company woul

this is an existential threat to our gusto-grabbing lifestyle. but, in fact, very soon hay weren't heating their homes with coal anymore. that whole problem went away. so i'm not going to, you know, speculate on problems of moment, but try and look into what's, first, what's going to happen in this century while you're in charge, and then what does that mean for the 22nd century. okay. there are, like, four things that i think are really important in this century. the first is we're finding, finally understanding biology. right? we're finally understanding. and biology's very complicated. it's because it's a bottom-up engineered system, right? what do i mean by that. you know, biology, you just get a whole bunch of critters, plants, whatever, and then you look a hundred years later and see what's left, and then they propagate themselves, and you see what's left. small changes at the dma level, a little -- dna level, a little mutation here and there, bottom-up. come prosecution the bottom. and that means it's complicated, it's messy, and mostly it

it was an existential question. are we going to run out of groundwater at some point? and there won't be any growth or economic activity here. we're gonna find an alternative. with groundwater drying up, much of the western united states turned to the nearly 1,500-mile-long colorado river, which flows from the rocky mountains all the way to mexico. the colorado supplies water for 30 million people. but getting the water to the people in arizona took an astounding level of engineering. >> we have this huge canal system that transports it 336 miles uphill to deliver it to communities, farmers, industries. >> the central arizona project was constructed in the 1970s and '80s. the massive system brings the water to the population centers of phoenix and tucson. >> it cost over $4 billion to build. there was a 300-mile- long excavation, several tunnels bored through mountains, siphons going under rivers. it's an engineering marvel. and you can see it from outer space. >> on average, more than 5 trillion gallons flow through the canal every year. >> what we're looking at behin

it is a perfect part in far better get out of your pool and those who ignore these elements all existential facts democrats or republicans are triggers to this country apparently alex jones then made his breakfast salad. i think repeating flat out lies while defending the corporate interests that have gone into our nation and destroyed the lives of millions allowing a fascist corporate takeover while pointing a finger at russians or bertie voters rather than our own corporatocracy that makes you a traitor to this country thank you thank you very good thank you. before theism was a very dark time and our so-called left wing media used to ridicule politicians who seem to be going down that mccarthyist path yet again now our media have become the exact thing they claim to despise most mr alderman you are today's worst president. in case you're new to the game this is how it works not the economy is built around call. for a show from washington to washington media the media. voters elect. to run this country business because. you must it's not business as usual it's business like it's never bee

it is not existential to the economy and, but it is corrosive on the economy. higher deficit and debt results in higher interest rates. those higher interest rates in less business investment, less compete -- consumer spending and the long run. no, he is not right. downloadits in the matter a lot. -- and the debt load matter a lot. i know well intentioned lawmakers on both -- in both parties. a role inlays everything, but there are many republicans who believe there are deficits that do matter and they are working hard to make sure our situation is put on sounder ground. i think that is bipartisan in h thinking about deficits and debts. host: mitch mcconnell had a s zeroent that there i chance we will not raise the debt ceiling. we will get the job done and can junction -- in conjunction with the secretary. steve mnuchin said we will get the debt ceiling past. this is not a republican or democrat issue. we need to be able to pay our debts. are these the right things you are hearing from this administration? do you believe this administration is on the same pres

we do have it it is a puppet put in power by god of airport and those who ignore these elemental existential facts democrats or republicans are traitors to this country apparently alex jones then made his breakfast salad. i think repeating flat out lies while defending the corporate interests that have gone into our nation and destroyed the lives of millions allowing a fascist corporate takeover while pointing a finger at russians or bertie voters rather than our own corporatocracy that makes you a traitor to this country thank you thank you very good thank you. carthy is no means of clarity dark time and our so-called left wing media used to ridicule politicians who seem to be going down that mccarthyist path yet again now our media have become the exact thing they claim to despise most mr alderman you are today's worst person in the way. you would like to erase the past because it's inconvenient truth that she was a horrible candidate and made a lot of mistakes so in an attempt to erase her past she wants to race america's past so she's galvanizing and supporting the last isis of the ameri

it it is a perfect part in far better get out of your pool and those who ignore these elemental existential facts democrats or republicans are triggers to this country apparently alex jones then made his breakfast salad. i think repeating flat out lies while defending the corporate interests that have gone into our nation and destroyed the lives of millions allowing a fascist corporate takeover while pointing a finger at russians or bertie voters rather than our own corporatocracy that makes you a traitor to this country. thank you for going to years or so. before theism was a very dark time and our so-called left wing media used to ridicule politicians who seem to be going down that mccarthyist path yet again now our media have become the exact thing they claim to despise most mr alderman you are today's worst person in the what. would you have for breakfast yesterday why would you put the fantasies your wife. like to put your biggest fear of a bit of a right celeste read a book you say yes. forty. one topic so simple but. now i think you do due to question more. i've got to just if you're

it is a perfect party and far better get out of your pool and those who ignore these elemental existential facts democrats or republicans are triggers to this country apparently alex jones then made his breakfast salad. i think repeating flat out lies while defending the corporate interests that have guarded our nation and destroyed the lives of millions allowing a fascist corporate takeover while pointing a finger at russians or bertie voters rather than our own corporatocracy that makes you a traitor to this country thank you thank you very good price these are the. the first few years it was a very dark time and our so-called left wing media used to ridicule politicians who seem to be going down that mccarthyist path yet again now our media have become the exact thing they claim to despise most. mr o'brien you are today's worst president. welcome. back. but also dead to the ship between kids sure it was suggested no proof and a fairly strong one there were two thousand. in the study it's a very extensive study done by a well respected scientist. do chemicals that the advertising. really

but i think also, it was time to share because i really had an existential crisis in regards to ralizinging started in one place, and had come out of a certain lifestyle and watched a friend go into that lifestyle. an always thought, the higher power would bring him through. and that i made it and that he didn't. >> jada became tight with tupac in high schl

threat from north korea not only to the united states but to the world is very very clear this is an existential threat to the united states we were a superpower we are high powered so the message is very clear. this white house. can get thoughts now allison evans she's an asia pacific analyst and expert on north korea and joins us from london good afternoon to you allison firstly what's your view of what south korea has said does it really have so much influence on whether there will be military action on the peninsula or not. yes i think the u.s. south korea alliance is pretty clear and they work very closely together the u.s. and south korea will be starting routine joint military exercises on the twenty first and in the past looking at times of heightened tension on the korean peninsula often the u.s. south korea have both played the role of the break against one another before moving towards conflict so you believe even if america does want conflict it will be south korea that has the final say. well i think the u.s. has to balance its need to reassure its allies including japan also that i

it is a perfect party and far better get out of your pool and those who ignore these elemental existential facts democrats or republicans are triggers to this country apparently alex jones then made his breakfast salad. i think repeating flat out lies while defending the corporate interests that have brought into our nation and destroyed the lives of millions allowing a fascist corporate takeover while pointing a finger at russians or bertie voters rather than our own corporatocracy that makes you a traitor to this country thank you thank you for going to years or so. book party is always a very dark time and or so-called left wing media used to ridicule politicians who seem to be going down that mccarthyist path yet again now our media have become the exact thing they claim to despise most bitter over you are today's worst president. the two thousand and eight economic crisis turned some countries into paid these are the countries with weaker economies that needed austerity policies if you are in a situation or. even the recession. it doesn't work it makes millions of people very happy an