, that is both of my sia complaints, against pilpel illustrates that he appears to be engaging in exparta communications with you, defined in a quasi sitting raise bid pun person in the absence of and without presentation or notification to other interested parties, say the sunshine task force, and that he was here, to sway your judgment. indeed, the ethics commission's own regulations from the investigation enforcements, viii and in section 8.a, it says that once a complaint is filed, no ethics commission staff member shall engage in oral or written communications outside of a meeting and the same rule should apply to the task force members, in addition, the sunshine and ethics training video on the city attorney's website, that the pilpel effectively has reviewed numerous times, clearly, indicates that the task force has been adjudicated body, and he should not be violating the procedural rules such as bans on exparta communications. and for these reasons, i am asking the ethics commission to calendar or a discussion to resubmit the dismissal of my second sia complaint and hear both of