donated them to a later expedition by mossen, a great expedition by an australian, by mossen. so he brought some back. >> host: edward larson, how many miles was it from the winter camp to -- >> guest: about 500. >> host: how many days? >> guest: out and back it took him 99 days. out and back. that included several days staying at the pole because you want to know you're actually there. of course, the pole there's no -- unfortunately, there's no barbershop at the pole. it's a high plateau. you're two miles high, over two miles high because it's behind mountains, and it's two miles think of ice. you're at high altitude at the south pole and the whole polar plateau, and you have to use devices. back then they didn't have a gps system, so they had to watch the sun, and the sun -- they got there in late december, so it was right near for them the summer solstice. so the sun was going around there almost directly in a circle, and you would have to take measurements from the sun to figure out where you are. so they went to where they thought was the pole based on their dead reckonin

he got himself assigned picked up as an officer and on the expedition and. and was captain of the ship. but the idea was to do magnetic research moseley also a geographical mapping and geological research and biological research but the main goal was to study those magnetic fields steadying the magnetic forces like time and electricity and magnetism were of great interest and ships still use them to navigate so we needed to know the lines of the polar exploration and for travel in the lowe's southern latitudes when new zealand was booming with gold rush to develop part of the british empire may be to have the better magnetic reading. so he thought that would be more fun than working with the merchant marine. he went along. he so while the scientists were out doing research coming he thought they would go down then during the next year the scientist one-out to do research with the ada to sail back at the end of the summer or they could not get out the following which they did they would winter during the two winters. so scott have a plan all along to try to m

. >> my understanding of expedited removal it's immediate. virtually immediate for people that come in. >> if there's 20% that are basically mexican which is expedited procedures, 20% of 57,000 is roughly 10,000, right? >> yeah. 10 to 11,000. why we only deported 1700. >> the number of 11,000 the border patrol executed from an experiod dited removal standpoint. under the expedited removal rosees you have to determine a couple of things. >> so how long does that take to determine a couple of things. >> under expedited removal it's very quick. kit be the same day. >> so, again, if 20% of the 57,000 unaccompanied children are mexican, subject to those expedited procedures it could be the same day how come we only deported what is it senator mccain, 1700? when the number is closer to 10 or 11,000. >> i think the number that i was quoting was from the south central american countries. to include mexico. try to break them into different buckets here. >> mr. winkowski. >> senator, the vast majority of immigrants that are here illegally that are appr

. >> my understanding of expedited removal it's immediate. virtually immediate for people that come in. >> if there's 20% that are basically mexican which is expedited procedures, 20% of 57,000 is roughly 10,000, right? >> yeah. 10 to 11,000. why we only deported 1700. >> the number of 11,000 the border patrol executed from an experiod dited removal standpoint. under the expedited removal rosees you have to determine a couple of things. >> so how long does that take to determine a couple of things. >> under expedited removal it's very quick. kit be the same day. >> so, again, if 20% of the 57,000 unaccompanied children are mexican, subject to those expedited procedures it could be the same day how come we only deported what is it senator mccain, 1700? when the number is closer to 10 or 11,000. >> i think the number that i was quoting was from the south central american countries. to include mexico. try to break them into different buckets here. >> mr. winkowski. >> senator, the vast majority of immigrants that are here illegally that are appr

ukraine government have assured us of a save corridor to enter the site so to expedite. i hope i can assist and expedite the matter. [ speaking in foreign language ] we haven't got access to the accident site so we are asking the authorities there to clear the site and we need the support of the world to ensure that the site not tampered. we must have the full access to the site and we must ensure that those evidence at the site are not tampered and we also hope that we can ensure that justice can prevail. [ speaking in foreign language ] >> the black box, can you confirm if the black box is now with -- and crash site what are facing the investigation there? thank you. >> there is no confirmation on the black box. we have to check on the details. so as of today, we have to come to check this detail. we hope we can assist the search at the site as soon as possible. that's why our team are there and i bring there so we can quickly retrieve the remains of human body. >> thank you very much. [ speaking in foreign language ] mh17 followed a flight plan. do you know why it was

ubliminal messages about stemming the tide and expediting don't work. progressive th the caucus and the hispanic caucus positions.similar children first as you indicated and the other position is when re you going to move on with your executive order since doing nothing in the house. part of this that we're seeing border with the kids is what we created around this congress, nothing. and so with nothing the blanks filled for us. this r we like it or not is part of the root cause of not fixing the system which is shot fede4rally finding yourself 'eminent deal with one another.fter the president has been going in congress.cans by all accounts they'll still together ears to work if the republicans keep control of the house. is anything going to change in terms of the relationship speaker and the president in getting things through the house of representatives? >> i think the only way it's change is going to have public public -- sincere outcry to fix this problem. think the american people support reform and the polling indicates that. there's a great deal

subliminal messages about stemming the tide, expediting, do not work. the congressional caucus and the hispanic caucus take a position, when are you going to move on executive orders when doing nothing in the house? part of what we are seeing on is theder with the kids apathy we have created around this issue in congress. with nothing, the blanks are filled for us and whether we like it or not, this is part of the root cause of not fixing a system that is shot and suddenly finding yourself having to deal with one imminent crisis after another and often contributes to the argument on the other side we should not do anything about immigration because the border is not secure. to theget -- which gets core of the argument on this issue. the present has been going after republicans in congress, by all accounts, they will have 2.5 years to work together with republican still in control of the house. >> the only way it will change will have to be a sincere public outcry to fix this problem. i think the american people support reform and the polling indicates t

this is going to be expedited and the supplemental helps to expedite that because it has the resourcesin it to do it. so any question the people have about they should go back, i want this to go faster, the answer to all of the questions is the supplemental about i care about the children, the supplemental. i care about them going home, they should have due process, it's in the bill. i care about securing our border, it's in the bill. so it's about the department of homeland security, and by the h% way, the border patrol is doing an excellent job. they deserve great kudos for what they have done to deal with this maybe three times more than last year, 29,000 last year, probably over 90,000, more than three times this year of these children. so it's department of homeland security of which the border patrol is a part. it's the department of health and human services which has a responsibility under the wilberforce law to take these children in 72 hours, more or less. unfortunately, in some cases more. and the law is the 72 hours, and it's the department of justice to do the -- have more

that was an example -- >> we are hearing a lot about the various expedited drug review process is atese pathways more quickly. and i share the goal. i think we need to be cognizant of the risks that can accompany that speed and we need to be concerned about those risk if we are ultimately thinking about somehow requiring more frequent use of these expedited pathways through legislation but i know you share that concern. it has been mentioned the health risk that could result from a proven therapies based on early data that needs more rigorous studies. you describe the possibly these kinds of recruits could be major progress towards the development of other treatments. can you just elaborate on both of those concerns, if you would? >> well certainly come when other things when you're dealing with a small population, and then we're talking a personalized medicine we may only have 25 patients with a certain genotype that may be approachable, therapeutic opportunities for that particular drug. if those patients were introduced a drug that was less than effective, what happens when the ne

that expedition or one of the people who saved it when it got trapped in the ice to. he was, his hero to was manson the great arctic explorer of norway, and he had a passion for exploring. and his plan was to be the first to the north pole. but when robert perry claimed to have made it to the north pole, he -- without telling anyone -- shifted his expedition toward the south pole. he was already packed to go to the north and sailed south and managed to steal a march on robert scott who was a brit heading that way. and with superb, superb dog handling is and superb planning, he became first person to reach the south pole. >> host: roald amendson. what year was that? >> guest: late in december of 199. the seasons are reversed, of course, in the south pole -- 1919. what is our winter, the northern hemisphere's winter is their summer. so the only time it's possible to travel overland, over the polar icecap, as it were a eau lahr plateau as it is,

expedite it what could be wrong with that? >> nothing. i got a way in which until i drove it?> did you it okay. so fact of life it was an error. it was a mistake. had all his households effects i think every marine at camp pendleton t t at the recruit depo ought to immediately stop going to tiawainna. the merchants down there count on their dollars. number two. >> that's easy. >> i'm urging awful of us in america boycott mexican produce let it rot on the shelves in american supermarkets and think will learn. they are the people who pull the strings to pena. the president. he knows that third, the next time one of the cartel its cartelistas we ought to send somebody over to get them. pick up some of those guys and bringing them to the united states and putting them on trial. because they will spend the rest of. >> what's the cartelistas. >> the guys who run the cartels. we are honoring their side of the border, right? we are being very cooperative with them. and finally, i would suggest we all become recruiters. we are going to talk about recruiting here in a minute. we become

just as important, we must ensure that the expedited approval products are appropriately safe. effective. and accessible to patients. the goal of the 21st of new medical treatments. there are few other areas that can match the field of development activity in the field of cancer. the fda's office of hematology and oncology products have aggressively used the tools provided be congress to speed products to patients. in the past eight months three cancer drugs have been approved. one approval was based on a trial of 111 patients an example of research and approvals happening faster and with smaller clinical trials than in the past. it does have drawbacks. they may not include a diverse population which may yield an incomplete picture of how a drug might work. small trials tend to be seen in deadlier cancers where there are no other good therapeutic options and the risk benefit tolerance of a cancer patient facing a poor prognosis may be much different than those with other available treatment options and the same acceptance of reduced day they may not be appropriate in other fiel

that's why there is an expedited procedure already in law, passed in map 21, that deals with this issue. the senator talks about using the proper legislative process. we did that. the committee of jurisdiction debated it, and we had difficult compromises, but we reached those compromises. let the process work because the process is working. let me just point out. i was one of those that wasn't excited about giving up any of our environmental protections on replacement facilities because i pointed out to the fact that when we had a bridge collapse in minnesota, that bridge was replaced within a matter of a very short period of time before we did our compromise that expedites the process. my point is in emergencies, we seem to work things out, but in order to deal with the concerns that the senator has raised, we have put into the law this expedited procedure for replacement facilities. it's in map 21. it's the law. what this amendment what do, it would open it up to significant abuse. it is very conceivable that when you give this type of an exemption, that you basically are exempting a

we do it in an expedited manner. it may bes it harder. when you talk about asylum you have to evaluate whether the claims are legitimate. these are people who have been through traumatic situations. there's language difficulties. some of the kids don't speak spanish. you try to rush that with children. and it's really a no win situation i would say for the obama administration in the short term and the gop in long run. there's a new polling from the washington post that shows 58 percent of americans disapprove of how the obama administration has handled it and 60% of americans disapprove of how the gop handled it. there's no good options for either side. >> let me play what was said on morning joe when asked how quickly congress can work together and get the legislation passed that essentially sends the kids back quicker. let's play it. >> on the house side, we're going to try to do our best to move it quickly. we have to do it before july 31 st, when we take off for our districts. it's important that we work at this. what sort of funding

certainly you support his expediting, sending the children back it their home countries?well, sure, it sounds good on paper. the problem here, bill, is the president's credibility. nobody believes him now on anything. >> let's not do that speculative stuff. >> you have to because if you want to support what is he doing here you have got to be able to believe him. >> between you and powers i have such a massive headache when i get through with this five minute segment. will you just stay on what the man said? if he doesn't deal with it we will deal with it it, okay? do you agree with what the man said? >> i agree with the premise, yes. >> okay, thank you. now, we will advance the conversation. okay, so you want these expedited immigration courts. you are willing to spend the 2 billion. you want the border secured. national guard okay with you? >> yes. i want the military on the border, absolutely. >> athletic mexico can trade sanctions okay with you. >> yes, be a shrewdly. >> do you cede that mexico is the cause of the problem here? >> it's a huge problem with illegal immi

but have a so-called expedited repatriation process. what is expedited? how long does it take for one of these people who comes in to be sent home. >> let's talk about that in a second. let me answer your first question, where are they from? about 59% are from mexico. when crow move further down to el salvador, the percentages are lower, 6%. if you go down to guatemala, it's 5% and honduras, 3%. these areas are driving this latest rush as people are convinced if they can just get here or get their kids here, they can stay. and if you talk about this processing system to get them out, to a degree they're right because it has been clogged up. the average amount of time for processing someone has gone to around 500 days or more. that's a long time to be here. the idea of expediting it and get people out much, much quicker, is clearly, erin, about sending a message with them. if they can get more of those people to go home to those places and say it doesn't work, that might take some of the pressure off the border. >> tom, thank you very much. and this is obv

clinics "medical expeditions."all comers, but just for the weekend. >> when you set up the first expedition in the united states, were you surprised at the number of people who came? >> yes. yes, i was. and the numbers are getting higher, and i don't know if it's because we're getting better known, or that the health care in this country is getting worse. who's got number one? come on down. number one. number two? >> on saturday at 6:00 a.m., they entered by the numbers. >> number three? >> inside, 276 volunteers from 11 states were waiting. >> are you here for medical, dental, or vision? >> when was the last time you had a breast exam by a nurse or a doctor? never? >> 20 years ago. >> 20 years. >> 25 years ago. >> for those who were diagnosed with cancer today or diabetes or heart disease, r.a.m. will try to find a volunteer doctor who will follow up. ross isaacs is one of the doctors. >> who are these patients? >> it's the working poor, middle of their lives, most with families, most not substance abusers, and em

>> guest: listen i think his initial request for $2 million expedited -- billion, i'm sorry expediter repatriation and additional lawyers to prosecute those claims was good. all of a sudden we have gone from two to almost $4 billion including with it a relief for wildfires in california. so we started piling stuff on this and we have gotten away from addressing the problem into something much bigger. >> host: the "associated press" breaks down that funding request that $3.7 billion funding request noting that 1.8 billion of it would be for care for unaccompanied children. 1.1 billion for transportation for detention and removal. $433 million for border agent pay an additional facilities and $64 million for hiring of additional immigration judges. so what do you see as the track for this funding measure? >> guest: my concern with all thing is that we are trying to address the symptom of the problem and not the problem in the first place. we have got a situation where if you are other than mexican you have a much more, much longer course to go through before we can reunite you with your

you need more than a fishing expedition. you do not have a right to know everything in a separation of powers government, my friend. that is the difference between a parliamentary government and a separation of powers government. this is an immediate advisor to the president. if you want separation of powers respected so deeply that you are about to file suit against the president, it seems to me that at the very least you ought to be willing to continue in this process until you have exhausted all other remedies still available to you to find out as much as you can about this office before doing a showcase fishing expedition subpoena designed clearly more to get the attention of the press than to get the attention of the president. i yield -- >> will the gentlelady yield? >> i yield to the ranking member. >> i want to thank the gentlelady. one thing i want to add, so the public will be clear, the office of special counsel has reviewed various communications. both sides have been given information showing that the report fro

and then there's the issue of for the permit expediteers the permit requirement going into effect january one of 2015 and getting that online will obviously you been a cost because we have to amend our contract with net file, etc. >> what about the cost of of the audit? >> well, yeah that's correct. well, right now the costs for the audit fee they're obviously staff time dedicated to quiet frankly getting up to speed with the lobbying requirement but we don't know how many we're going to audit immediately which is for the first year but that will be staff time >> so they're saying at least one and hopefully to do more. >> that's correct. >> and the idea is what that how will we determine how many are feasible. >> well, we'll look at the number of registered lobbyists i don't know off the top of my head we'll look at the capacity and the workload we're trying to get through the number of audits we have for the campaign financed we're optimistic so a lot of it will be making sure we're looking at it and take into account our staffing and our workload. >> any questions? public comment? >> co

i think it's a good idea to have more judges and to expedite the process. i believe, unfortunately, most -- every one of those children and adults that have arrived here are being put in removal proceedings. i believe that most of them will lose their cases. but you know what? the law is the law. and children have to be given their time before a judge and in court. and i don't want to quickly judge because what if they have a credible fear? what if they should have received asylum? i don't want to undermine. i want to quicken the process without undermining the rights of those children. i think fundamentally this is america and we treat children differently. >> and you know, wendy, the other issue here is because of the situation that's happening in the countries where these children mainly come from, in guatemala, in nicaragua and other countries, the united nations is already starting to look at it and say these children should be treated as refugees. the u.s. and mexico should recognize this is a refugee situation, that they're leaving for some reason sa

/mexico border to expedite processing of unaccompanied children. the president spoke to mexican president enrique penneto in june about mexican efforts to improve the security at its southern border. we are working with mexico to accelerate its southern border strategy that will increase mexican inspection and intradiction capacities and reduce human smuggling across mexico's borders. as part of the broader interagency effort, we are also working to increase immediately the migrant repatriation capacity for el salvador, guatemala, and honduras, so that these governments can accept more migrants from the united states each week. finally, the department continues to focus on a longer term approach to address the systemic issues central american countries face, and that are creating the push factors behind this phenomenon. we're applying a more balanced regional approach to integrate prosperity, security, and governance assistance in order to reduce the root causes that are driving migrants to the united states. however, we must be realistic. in order

we have issued guidance, final guidance on expedited programs. probably the biggest change that the legislation brought about was its focus on intermediate clinical end points. we had to have quite an internal discussion about what that means. i think you will see us approving more products under accelerated approval based on these intermediate clinical end points. >> well, thanks. it's clear to me that this is an extremely complicated area and one that's not conducive to further legislation. but i wanted to ask last about the master protocol. at the hearing on wednesday, some panelists describe some of the inefficiencies that exist in the way that clinical trials are currently conducted and one of the suggestions for addressing those inefficiencies is to create a master protocol. i wanted to ask first can you tell us more about this? what's the master protocol? how would it improve? has fda been involved in the development of a master protocol and are there dezs that the protocol is more appropriate for than others? are there other areas it migh

we can do an expedited removal, we can do expedite the removal of adults into central america where there's no immigration judge, but in terms of an expedited removal for an unaccompanied child, my understanding of the law is that that's not available. >> and as much as you heard today, that we should just either turn them around or expeditiously remove them, do you know of any legislation introduced that someone put their name on to repeal the william removal force act? >> not to my knowledge. >> we also talked a little bit about -- i heard you mention a little bit about mexico, and the fact that you have -- the vice president has met and the president has had telephone conversations. has the of mexico started taking any affirmative steps to help us with this issue? >> we have over the last several years been in discussions with them about our shared border security interests, and we've increased that engagement in light of this current situation, and i believe we'll continue to have productive conversations. >> well, specifically on this iss issue, and the fact you just mentioned we're lo

i just say look, expedite the judicial system but don't shirk circuit justice for children. that would be wrong and that would be unmay i respectfully. >> congressman luis gutierrez of illinois, thanks for being with us. >> thank you, joie. >> tomorrow on the program we'll follow the crisis on the border with the voices of the young people at the heart of it. correspondent lori jane gliha sits down for a one on one conversation with the children that came across the border alone and after their hard journey found themselves in limbo. >>> after the break tonight, hidden in the walls of their dream home, a toxic threat. >> we didn't pass up anything. we did water. we did inside termite, lead, radon. we did everything. >> correspondent sarah hoye visits an indiana family forced to flee the toxic legacy in their house and how millions of americans might be exposed to the same risk. >> they've been found in some of the priciest real estate in the country and in far more humble abodes. either way the growth of home cooking meth labs poses unseen risks to millions of home buyers. o

to south texas to help expedite repatriation to its country. tenth, dhs, together with doj, has added personnel and resources to the investigation, prosecution and dismantling of the smuggling organizations that are facilitating border crossings into the rio grande valley. 11th, we are intensifying our public affairs campaigns. in spanish, with radio, print and tv post to communicate the dangers of sending unaccompanied children on the long journey from central america to the united states and the dangers of putting children into the hands of smuggling organizations. as the chairman noted i have personally issued an open letter to the parents of those who are sending their children from central america to the u.s., which has been distributed broadly in spanish and english to highlight the dangers of the journey and to emphasize there are no free passes or permissos at the other end. we are stressing the deferred action of childhood arrivals does not apply to children who arrive now or in the future in the united states, and that to be considere

and again we will do our best to expedite that to the extent possible. >> and tell me more about that process and, how that review process would be triggered based on your new review? >> so the neighborhood notification, under section... >> no, no, no. i understand that. let's say, that when you take, you have heard new information tonight for the first time. and you go back to your office, tomorrow. work with the appellant to understand what it is that they came forward with on their permit application, and come to an understanding that in fact this does not require a neighborhood notification and it fits in one of those categories on your table? >> is that possible? >> no. >> i mean... >> it is not possible. >> and any use, given that this was a vacant lot, any use. >> any use, requires neighborhood notification. >> and okay. >> my concern today is it hearing that the appellant's argument that this is a use, that does not essentially fit in any of the definitions, in the use controls for this district, which would mean then that the use is not allowed, because you can only have thos

interest inpublic the prompt resolution of the matter and that is why they expedited it in this way. to thate come back point, the point of executive privilege. around 1973 by president richard nixon created we know how the court decided it was a unanimous decision. explain that point. >> part of the working executive calledge is sometimes the liver to process privilege. while the president is having conversations with advisers, deciding what to do and not to do, there has to be some scope of confidentiality in order to be candid and not fear that publication of their advice is going to cause them a problem. that is the notion behind executive glitch. the court is considering that is a valid notion. scope and how would it outweigh? >> william rehnquist served in the nixon administration and then went on to serve at the supreme court. >> it is common practice of the justice that have worked on a matter prior to joining the court and rehnquist was in the office of the attorney general. he had worked on this matter. under nobe common circumstances where a lawyer would work on a matter f

and this is in my opinion what will bob ballard heading up the expedition does best.g an audience to the site and share it, which i think is a great thing for everybody. >> it's fascinating look at the pictures and begs the question what makes ship wreck soez popular. a popular deep sea habitat. because it's beautiful like this to look at? >> it is. it gives you an idea there is a lot of life down there and a lot of garbage on the seafloor. there's a lot off marine floor. >> obviously they take it on and make it their own. it's amazing >> they do. there's also the tremendous challenge of trying to reach these depths and being able to bring to light -- we have the technology. the problem is that a lot of this technology is funded privately. so that is not really shared with the public. what this expedition is allowing is for people to see in realtime and livetime what's going on down there, what this looks like. when there's loss of life, it's a graveyard. that's also as bittersweet as that is to define that, i know i worked on discovery vr-12 with 42 men on it. it's a

so i think we've got to use this opportunity over the next couple weeks, secure our border and expedite the court system so we can return these children back to their homes, back to their residenc residences. and we really have true asylum issues, where you can prove the i.d., birth certificate, know who these kids are and what challenges they're facing at home, then this great nation, america, will provide asylum to the very neediest. >> can they really be deported? i mean, where are they in the time frame of that two years leading up to the trial, which eric just reported? >> well, it depends. we are seeing more and more retention centers across the united states that continue to open more military bases, more high schools, church gymnasiums. so these retention centers are building in different states all across the country. we have an immediate opportunity to address those very, very quickly, triage the situation. but no, those that have already been released back into the community, i.c.e. and border control are already overextended. it will be difficult to go back into different co

is that enough money to expedite, in your legal opinion -- >> absolutely not. absolutely not. jenna: how much money would you need? >> i don't know what the answer is but here's the scope of the problem, jenna. there are over 11 million illegal aliens in the united states of america today, subject to deportation. the president of the united states, on his own, has told them how to stay here, what to do, in order to avoid deportation. he told them how to get away with breaking the law. he has given them 13 things they can do. these are good things. get a job. learn english. get a high school education. but these are his things. these though es are not what is in the law. jenna: this goes to 2011 deferred deportation policy to the president. >> yes. jenna: according to administration anyone qualifying for that would have to live in this country illegally since 2007. they're saying that doesn't apply here. it is bush law of 2008 that has to make sure that these children have due process. that is the reason why their hands are tied and they can't process these children faster. >>

they are trying to expedite this process. up support for that and i think you are unlikely to see rick perry lending support no that. it is much more fun for the republicans to just say, it is really all president obama's fault. >> of course. point that finger. so conservatives don't like president obama's humanitarian crisis on the border but they aren't doing anything about immigration reform so how can they blame president obama? >> they will even blame president obama. they said oh, because of what the president did with the dream act, not recognizing that part of what is happening in central america is that you have bad actors or people smuggling these kids up here. you have, you know, trafficking going on. a lot of other factors as part of this. oh, and how about the house won't even put the bill that senate passed on the floor for an up or down vote. and why? because they know it would pass. so yeah, everything is president obama's fault. even when republicans can't get their act together, it is president obama's fault

but the braddock expedition is completely routed. just to give a sense of the level of disparity in the victory, braddock loses 400 dead and 400 wounded. there are only about a dozen on the french side killed. it is a massively lopsided victory for the french. the british are really surprised. the next year the focus of the war starts in europe and britain is not sending a lot of troops or supplies yet. the french are able to have a series of early victories. in 1757, famously they take fort william henry. it is depicted in "the last of the mohicans," if you have seen this. this is again a group of french and native allies. they go and lay siege to the fort. eventually the british surrender there. following that siege, there was an incident where there was a group of native americans who were promised that they could plunder the fort and be paid for their efforts by getting a lot of colonial trade goods. they were then told they could not plunder, because the terms of the surrender meant the british had to be respected, captives coul

i don't agree with the way he's talking about expediting it. i think needs to happen is we need to increase the number of judges. we need to increase the number of lawyers so they can process can be expedited without fundamentally changing the law. i do think that we need to think about what is going on in central american countries and why people are fleeing. it's kind of ironic because i'm from los angeles and the gang problem that exists in el salvador started in los angeles. what happened is that we deported tens of thousands of gang members who went down to el salvador and continued the criminal behavior that they had in the los angeles area. so i think that in addition to expediting the process, by increasing resources, the other thing we need to do is assess the central american countries to deal with some of the problems they're facing. >> host: senate majority leader harry reid told reporters yesterday the border is secure in california. do you agree? >> guest: you know if you look at how we have spent money or resources that have been