one of those sites belongs to exxon, correct? a simple yes or no will do. >> i'm not familiar with that report but we do have a facility in the u.s., yes. >> in wyoming? >> yes. >> 12 of those sites, including the one exxon owns, the captured carbon is used for what is called enhanced oil recovery, pressurizing co2. is that correct? >> yes. >> in fact, 95% of the carbon being captured at these u.s. sites is used for extracting more oil. to be clear exxon and others are using captured co2 to extract more oil and calling this a climate mitigation strategy. when exxon promotes climate capture as a solution, does this include carbon capture use? >> you are confusing the technology with its uses. capture is a proven technology to concentrate co2. the question is what you do with that concentration, we can store it. our houston hub is to capture that co2 and store it offshore. it would not be used for enhanced oil recovery. so there's a difference between the technology and what you use the technology for -- >> mr. woods, i do have oth

well, they also received money from exxon mobil. they, the oil industry was a main bank roller and cheerleader for opposition to climate action. their financial support of the climate skeptics in the scientific community ensured that we had the references and the citations that we needed to make the credible argument. one is the earth getting warmer and there's a lot of discussion about that? is it? oh, i think in it the answer to that is in some places. yes. and, and others know, patrick, michael's doesn't want to comment on the critique that he has received money from the oil industry, climate, skeptical scientist willie soon didn't respond to the critique that he's been paid by the industry. fred sing as lawyer has been presented with the critique of singer, but hasn't replied steve. malloy dropped an interview at short notice and has declined to comment on the critique. many of them have previously said that their research isn't influenced by money from. for instance, the oil industry. this is all about deflection. it's all abou

we'd like to ask exxon mobil. wyatt funded climate skeptics and an add some statements as cost bouts on climate science. but exxon did not answer these questions and declined an interview. we'd also like to ask a p, i about the critique that it spreads doubts about climate science. but api i hasn't replied nor agreed to an interview. exxonmobil and api, i writes that they are working on technologies that may reduce climate change. they've also said this in commercials, plans capture c o 2. what if other kinds of plans captured it to if reduced carbon emission levels to the lowest generation? let's make tomorrow better together. ah. beyond dogs, light beyond petroleum. b, b. but our green ah, the oil companies, actually today we asked the wells 5 largest oil companies, how much they invest in green technology and how much they invest in extracting fossil fuels. chances that it now spends 5 percent of investments on green technologies. the french oil company total says it spends 10 percent b, p, chevron, and exxon m

b, p, chevron, and exxon mobil did not answer. so we asked influence map an organization who analyzes key climate issue figures to review their investments. the figures show that all 3 oil companies are at the low end. and chevron. is it less than one percent? 2 combined figures show that the wells 5 largest oil companies, fossil fuel investments are at 95 percent on average. wow. oh, i think it's fair to say that the climate change deniers have why? that in 1988 jim hanson tells us the climate change is underway. so if it had not been for the denial campaigns, i think it's pretty clear the political momentum was there with the political will, was there. they have succeeded in preventing climate action for several decades where it would have occurred earlier, had it not been for their efforts. today, we could be living in a world where $6080.00 maybe even 90 percent of our energy would be from renewable energy. we've had 30 years, that's a lot of time to make technological change. and we'd also be living in a different world polit

exxon in november 12th, 1982, management of environmental affairs program sent a memo to exxon management on the c02 release is the most likely source of inadvertent climate modification and the prevailing opinion attribute co2 to fossil fuel come combustion. did you disclose that to your shareholders? something that would be relevant to your assets? >> my understanding of those reports was publicly available information -- >> i didn't ask that. did you disclose that to your shareholders in your report? that's my question. >> my understanding is it was a summarized -- >> seriously. i'm not asking what it is. i'm asking whether that information was disclosed in your shareholder report? >> i'm not familiar with the report at that time. >> in february 22, 1989, a report was presented to the board of directors. he stated, quote, data confirm that greenhouse gases are increasing in the atmosphere and fossil fuels contribute most of the co2. to your knowledge, did exxon disclose that to its share how olders? >> we made all of our research publicly available. >> did you disclose it to shareholde

exxon had grave warnings from exxon's scientists over and over and over again. do you believe it was ethical for exxon to run an advertisement that downplayed the risks and instead highlighted the potential positive impacts of climate change? >> chairwoman, again, i would say that in the full context of the memos you're referencing, the message that came across in the full article was consistent with what the general consensus of the community was, and our mention concluded that there was enough knowledge to know that we should be taking action, that people, government and companies should respond and take practical legal action. that was consistent with the science community at the time, and as time as progressed, we continue to maintain a position involved with science and one that's consistent with science. >> our witnesses today would like you to think that their actions that i have laid out and put in the record are ancient history. but they are not. just this year, an exxon senior lobbyist, chief mccoy, was caught on a video boasting about these efforts, e

exxon, november 12th, 1982, m.b. glazer, manager of environmental affairs program sent a memo to the exxon management on the co 2 greenhouse effect saying co 2 releases the most likely source of inadvertent climate modification, and the prevailing opinion attributes co 2 increase to fossil fuel combustion, and finally, it says that mitigations of the greenhouse effect would require major reductions in fossil fuel combustion. did you disclose that to your shareholders, something that would be relevant to the value of your assets? >> my understanding of those reports were a synthesis of publicly available information. >> i didn't ask that, i asked did you disclose that to your shareholders in your report, that's my question. >> my understanding is it was summarized. >> seriously, i'm not asking what it is, i'm asking whether that information was disclosed in your shareholder reports. >> i'm not familiar with my reports 30 years ago. >> in february 22, 1989, duane levine presented a report to the board of directors, he

>> for when exxon does? yes i am. >> thank you for the answer. -- [inaudible] toxic waste combined with fossil fuels -- in a predominantly black neighborhood used to regularly be filled with radioactive waste and then it would be made -- [inaudible] mr. wood, would you send your children to one of the schools? yes or no? >> i'm sorry, could you repeat the question, please? >> would you send your children to one of the schools with radioactive waste where we had flooding? >> no. i would not. >> thank you. >> i don't want to either. neither does our communities. >> our communities are more likely to flood. you have known this flooding was coming for years. a shell report from 1988 cents large, low line areas like bangladesh may need to be abandoned. your company sees a country of 98 million brown people that are expendable -- yes or no? >> yes or no. >> congresswoman, we have been open and engaging with communities. i feel what you are saying, and we are very active in the communities in which we operate, and

one former exxon scientist, dr. martin hofert testified, exxon was publically promoting views that its own scientists knew were wrong and we know that because we were the major group working on this, quote, and the disinformation from exxon did not end there. in 2000, exxon ran an advertisement in "the new york times" entitled, unsettled science. it said, and i quote, even less is known about the potential positive or negative impacts of climate change. in fact, many academic studies and field experiments from demonstrated that increased levels of carbon dioxide can promote crop and forest growth. was this the statement that climate change could actually be positive for our planet consistent with the private views of exxon's scientists? >> if you read the full article that was advertised that you referenced there, it concludes with the statement that says we know enough now that governments, people and companies should be taking reasonable action to address the risk of climate change. i would come back and say that

you haven't even divested from exxon.- many years. you haven't even divested from exxon. we own stakes _ divested from exxon. well, we own stakes in _ divested from exxon. well, we own stakes in 9,000 - divested from exxon. well, we i own stakes in 9,000 companies. i understand that. and we have a dialogue with these companies in a constructive manner. where we solve... in what cases an ethical advance or close up we are very ethical investor. we have very strong expectations to the companies we invest in and along the lines of the comments side, we have four expectation documents, we have expectations when it comes to corruption, child labour, tax and transparency and so on. we think we have the most coherent set of expectation of any investor in the world. does it embarrass — investor in the world. does it embarrass you _ investor in the world. does it embarrass you that - investor in the world. does it embarrass you that the - investor in the world. does it embarrass you that the total| embarrass you that the total emissions of the companies in your pond far exceed the

exxon shares hit a 52-week high earlier.year ever, they reported their best quarterly profits, the multiple is out of whack with exxon trading at a 10% premium for more, let's bring in the analyst behind the call, the managing directer of truist securities this is the battleground in some ways for the economy tell me why you don't think the premium is warranted. >> thanks for having me. again, as you said earlier on a relative basis, you know, after the stock hitting kind of as you said an over a year high, number two, oil prices hitting a multi-year high, our call is based on oil prices going down 10% next year and thereafter, based on that, if you would look, we think there is going to much better names that hold up if you are looking at today, you mentioned earlier, you look at valuations and pre-cash field and ebitda or earnings or a pre-cash flow basis, we believe there are cheaper stocks. >> so your cheapest concerns is people will hold lower you think they basically have to think, we will get to higher oil prices what

then in 1981. exxon concludes a field to study and internally says in direct control measures such as energy conservation or shifting to renewable sources represent the only options that might make sense. yet even as they're saying that internally in their own goddamn offices outside, they're telling everyone else having a 5, what are you talking about? he plan it now. don't look down. no, it's not 80 degrees in february and it's called burger. i'm cold. i need, i need to find my scar. no, no, no, i'm not sweating profusely. no, those are face. i sickle, do face sickle and drippy, drippy face their goals. also in 1981 exxon's manager of strategic planning and programs, roger cohen reviews the company's long term plans until 2030 and reports that it is distinctly possible that they will indeed be catastrophic, at least for a substantial fraction of the earth population. oh, i thought you were talking about something bad happening, says catastrophic for a substantial fraction. let me, let me ask you this. will the remaining people still be able to buy gasoline? cuz that would, that woul

as much as i'm liking exxon mobile right now the future is one that we might not recognize exxon mobile keep hearing disturbing reports or ideas out there that want to hollow out exxon mobile maybe the way they're looking at how shell could become the good and bad shell. but, you know, i don't think exxon mobile is necessarily going to be staying in the refining game, in the oil and natural gas production game. sadly, just as natural gas prices have really rallied here and are going to contribute to exxon's bottom line after their ill fated purchase of xto a few years ago they could be taking a hard look at those business lines. >> based on what engine one wants to see or what the new board members there would like to see too i ask because darin wood friday said they're having good conversations with the newly formed board, constructive conversations but he did seem clear when asked about splitting things up, that would not work for exxon because you need the cash flow from the old businesses to invest in the new. it doesn't happy easily and cheaply. >> darin is a pro, if not a diplomat

exxon gets cut to a sell the target gets lowered to 50 bucks at truist. you own chevron. why have you chosen to own chevron over exxon like jim has chosen home depot over lowe's? >> well, i think they have stronger fundamentals and much better execution now it's lagged exxon year to date by 23%. i think there's an opportunity and they've done a great job in terms of asset sales and m & a and the 2022 numbers, 10% they could double the dividend next year alone not saying exxon can't, but at the discount it's trading to at exxon, chevron is the better own here all right. we'll take a quick break we'll come back and trade some of the day's biggest earnings movers including one stock that josh brown told you to buy i think more than a year ago that stock hit a new high today. we'll talk about it next >>> united nations estimates it will cost th$3 trillion of investment each year through 2050 to meet the paris agreement. to meet financial demands, companies like walmart and e quinnox yield in the range of 1.99% to 3%..2 that's your esg fast fact of the day. ar

with a number of oil companies are represented. companies like exxon. let's see exxon, c, e. o at the time. explain who they are. we are the largest private company in the world . our company sells a 1000000 barrels a day of product. that's a 1000000000 gallons every 3 dates. back to the american petroleum institute, a p, i where some of the biggest players in the oil industry meeting. one of the participants is myron able, they solicited advice because we had certain kinds of expertise that they didn't have a, it was an industry effort with some help from people like me. in documents from this meeting, you can see a clear purpose. victory will be achieved when average citizens understand uncertainties in climate science. and when these uncertainties become part of conventional wisdom, according to the documents big oil, once the public to doubt the science behind climate change in. and it wasn't scientists who invited to the meeting. i'm not an energy analyst expert and i'm not a climate expert i. i have a certain amount of experience in translating a policy into into action

i think you still have a big holding in exxon.ds accused by investigators — even by american politicians — of covering up research from within its own company about the impact of oil on man—made climate change over many years. you haven't even divested from exxon. well, we own stakes in 9,000 companies. i understand that. and we have a dialogue with these companies in a constructive manner. where we solve... so on what basis are you an ethical investor? we are an ethical investor in many ways. we have very strong expectations to the companies we invest in and along the lines of the comments side, we have four expectation documents, we have expectations when it comes to corruption, child labour, tax and transparency and so on. we think we have the most coherent set of expectation of any investor in the world. does it embarrass you that the total emissions of the companies in your fund far exceed the total emissions of your country, norway, i think by double. that's embarrassing, isn't it? particularly for a country which tells the

exxon mobil is using border security firm to do it.re very strong ties between the two industries. another, bp, working -- they're big campaigns right now about palantir because it is very much involved in ice, in surveillance operations of migrants in the u.s.. it also provides real-time drilling data to bp. so these industries are very much tied and they also share corporate executives. we found chevron has the former ceo both lockheed martin and northrop grumman on its board. there is a lot of indirect ties stuff like i said, they're both industries that can prit from a climate crisis. amy: let's bring santra denis into the conversation. nick is outside the cop in glasgow and you are inside the u.n. climate summit in glasgow just in front of that revolving globe. you are with the miami workers center. you are haitian-american. i cannot think of a country that is more affected by the climate right now. i am wondering what words you have for the biden administration, president obama just gave a speech, president biden last week, nancy

exxon mobil is incredibly cheap, a 5.8% dividend yield. microsoft is just a great story, executing on all cylinders we love the azure business we think they're taking share from amazon web services when we think about corporate america, if you're thinking about outsourcing to the cloud, microsoft is a trusted business partner. amazon is a potential competitor we can see their growth quarter by quarter they're gaining share. and ultimately walmart, which is executing incredibly well here mark talked about the supply chain dynamics clearly the big box retailers have an advantage and that's worked to the advantage of the big box guys and we think walmart is somebody who's executing very well. in stores as well as online. so they've got a lot of levers to pull to have a strong christmas selling season, which we think would be the case for them and many others in the big box space. >> thank you very much happy thanksgiving >> thanks for having us. >> still ahead, we're minutes away from the president speaking on the economy and rises prices. wh

that gives big oil comfort, because among people who own big oil, even exxon, chevron, they are focusedn keeping spending under control and maximizing returns to investors through buybacks and dividends. they are less focused on investing in the long-term, increasing production. even if they do not think those companies should be investing in new energy, they want that cash. lisa: does that mean you do not -- kailey: does that mean it will all be buybacks and dividends? >> a lot of that increase will be driven by higher costs. steel is expensive. there will be a natural uplift. will we see a change in paradigm about how management teams approach investment? maybe, but i do not think we are there yet. oil is going to have to go a lot higher before we change up. jonathan: tell jamie that we missed him today. good to see you. will kennedy at the office in london. one thing we have not talked about his late on friday goldman sachs came out with a note on the first hike of the federal reserve. the first hike for them, july of next year. the market is already there. economists are starting to

corporations doing this, not the administration and she tweeted a few days ago saying exxon and chevron were doubling their profits and it was their fault, those corporations but if you look at the share prices of those 2 companies exxon is down from where it was 6 months ago, chevron up a little bit, outperformed by the market. doubling their profits you expect share prices to be skyrocketing, they are not. corporate greed is what she would like to push. carley: she was pushing with the poultry industry when talking about turkey prices, she was saying the poultry industry, a few major companies should be investigated for price gouging. benjamin: surprised to see 54% of all poultry in the us is supplied by four companies with what seemed to be quite few. mom and pop one, the farm selling chickens is what you should be getting. carley: president biden played the soundbite, america is that, there's nothing we can't overcome. he is right about the fact that there is nothing americans can't overcome. but it would be easier if the federal government got out of the way, the coronavirus mandat

we know chevron and exxon mobil are the house leaders at the moment and the dow was up 159. the spring and the president of the repenting and energy group and served as energy advisor to president george w. bush. bob, your calling this a dated raid, why? >> to answer your question, it's great to be with you. this is a political emergency with the exception of bill clinton in september 2000 there has been a bipartisan agreement that we don't use the national security reserve. the oil reserves we keep for wars or major storms. we don't touch that to put down gasoline prices. today is a historic day. for the second time since 2000, president biden has done that. he's done in the biggest release ever, he's done it with five other countries. it is a fateful precedent, it's a big change in how we think about energy policy. to be fair both republicans and democrats have started drawing down the spr to pay for regular budget expenditures. both parties have plenty of blame to share for whittling down the national security asset but today to get to a new level. liz: definitely we have

if we compare bp and shell, exxon and chevron are much more about -- the skepticism is about what is strategy for bp. tom: who is leading in terms of the energy transition? will: i think the europeans are going fastest. to tell shell the question for the industry, do the investors want that, or do they want the oil majors to build low carbon businesses? that is the existential question for the oil and gas industry at the moment. tom: thank you very much executive entity for energy and commodities, will kennedy breaking down the bp earning results. the broader context more generally. up next, we go to glasgow. francine is on the ground. we will discuss finance with tina lee, ceo u.k. & ireland, deutsche bank. basic resources is dragging down the index. iron ore is off 5% on the back of concerns about the cut to steel production in china. plenty more ahead, stay with us. this is bloomberg. ♪ moving is a handful. no kidding! fortunately, xfinity makes moving easy. easy? -easy? switch your xfinity services to your new address online in about a minute. that was easy. i know, right? and ev

exxon and other companies don't want to recognize that.they want to be little the most important aspect of the discussion, which is saving lives, saving people, and making good quality lives, not just unhealthy but lives they deserve to lead as well. amy: talk about radical students organizing around the world, amid. >> yes. medical students around the world are actively working on climate change and health. we are seeing the impacts of climate change on our own patients quickly to clinics and seeing how they are being impacted by air pollution, from heatstroke, and someone. we are seeing it every single day. not only is it hard to see and sad to see where it could be prevented, it is sadly traumatic for a lot of these medical students and doctors as well. we are working as hard as we can across the globe to call on health equity, vaccine equity, to make sure the voices of those most impacted in particular are heard. alongside that, focusing on making sure there is actual justice transition. we want to create change route economic system i

plus two men convicted of killing malcolm x set to be exxon exonerated 55 years later. ould ., girl? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ (music) meet honeywell forge. analytical software that connects assets and people. to deliver a cybersecure record of your entire operation. honeywell forge industrial grade software. >>> day two of deliberations in the kyle rittenhouse trial. the jury wrapping up after 7 1/2 hours today, and there's still no verdict. the jury had more questions for the court and asked to review video evidence. joining me now, paul buccar, former district attorney for waukesha county wisconsin. and robert hirshhorn, a jury trial consultant. thank you for joining us this evening. the conversations we've been having on the subject with the two of you have been the most enlightening. so i should say -- or most enlightening. we're happy to have you back. robert, another day without a verdict. our reporters on the scene say jurors looked fatigued. what do you think is happening in that jury room? >> yeah. number one, not surprising we don't have a v

and exxon mobile reportedly launching a sale of oil and gas properties in texas.d its shale holdings that include 2,700 wells across about 182,000 acres in north texas "reuters" said the move is part of a portfolio reshuffling by exxon to focus more on profitable assets. back to you. >> thank you for that. >> you got it. >>> back to this morning's top story, president biden and china's xi jingping meeting face-to-face virtually since biden took office in january the meeting coming in the face of rising tensions between the two countries. over trade, the pandemic and rises prices >> it seems to to many as leaders of china and the united states to ensure that the competition between our two countries does not veer into conflict whether intended or unintended we need to establish some common sense guardrails, to be clear and honest where we disagree and work together where interests intersect, especially on vital global issues like climate change. >> translator: as the world's two largest economies and permanent members of the u.n. security council china and the unit

she blamed exxon mobil and chevron for price gouging. no idea what econ 101 is in supply and demand. that's what it is. gas for me here in florida has come down. probably 10, maybe 15 cents from what i was paying two weeks ago or 20 cents. so it has in fact come down. i expect it's going to shoot back up in the next couple weeks. >> charles: yeah, call off the war on oil. it's beneath our feet. let's take advantage of it as we make the trap situation. it's okay if you watch msnbc every now and then. don't make it a habit. >> i saw it on twitter. >> charles: all right. have a great thanksgiving, kenny. >> thank you. you too. >> charles: you might have to skip that extra helping at dinner this thanksgiving. why stockpiling up on turkey day staples is becoming more challenging this year. that is next. no annual fee on any discover card. (kate) at verizon, we want to put the power of 5g in the hands of every business. so come in for verizon small business days. every butcher, baker and artisanal cheese maker. schedule an appointment with our

there was that sting videotape released a couple of weeks ago where exxon's chief lobbyist reportedlytalking to every week and calling him "our kingmaker." there is a report yesterday that manchin spent part of september huddled with the leading coal barons at a golf resort someplace where they played a civil war themed golf tournament in between speeches. that sounds like a good deal, i've got to say. amy: senator manchin bank has to decide whether he wants to be a senator or a lobbyist or maybe a republican. >> clearly come our system allows you to do both at the same time, and that is the problem. credit to biden for getting the 48 senators on board with a serious progressive commitment around climate and other things. and that is because we have built movements and ready show there is a real appetite for this. of 40 is it quite enough. i think one way to say it is movements have gotten big enough and strong enough to force the question comes a call the question in congress, but not quite big enough to carry the question. that is what i think coming out of this cop, those of us, in

>> buying cautiously, you know, we just have the comment around exxon.hink the energy sector still looks promising. again, clearly over the next several months for some of the same reasons we're flying more, driving more. personally i went to a conference in person for the first time yesterday and we're seeing more and more of that we have the news on the delta variant, now we're going to begin to be able to get vaccines to some of the younger children. i think that's going to continue to feed the narrative or the possibility that more and more people will begin to join the workforce, things will continue to go back to normal but we do need to be prepared for these bits of fits and starts along the way it won't be smooth but continued improvement. >> certainly glad to see you back out before we let you go, what do you think is the biggest risk to the equity markets a wintersurge and consumers ge ju jumpy, i can't imagine lockdowns at all, especially given the election results of a couple of days ago, what might be the risk out there? >> i don't see any r

more than six billion dollars in the last quarter for exxon, nearly six billion for chevron.g consumers at the pump. so i think the president can send a strong signal that he needs business, he sent a letter to the ftc asking them to look for any at tv that indicated that they were trying to use means that we're perhaps beyond the law to jack up prices. and the chair has taken that under advisement, and he'll do a good job looking at that. but you're right in your lead in, there's only so much a president can do, because these are prices set at the global level, and that's why we need to get off the addiction. >> there are set up a global level, this is also the weirdest, the strangest global economic environment in many years. it's just never come out of it wasn't a century pandemic, and lockdowns, and supply and demand mismatch. here point about oil, there's a weird political aspect to this, this is how jan ever hat put it, biden must attack to conflict in agenda simultaneously, must address rising energy prices, you must not be seen by the progressive wing of the democrati

chevron, who are reporting record profits, you know, more than $6 billion in the last quarter for exxon nearly $6 billion for chevron and yet they're gouging consumers at the pump. so i think the president can send a strong signal that he means business. he sent the letter to the ftc asking them to look for any activity that indicated that they were trying to use means that were perhaps beyond the law to kind of jack of prices and lina khan, the chair, will do a good job looking at that. but you're right in your lead-in. there's only so much a president can do because these are prices set at the global level and that's why we need to get off the addiction. >> yeah. they're set at the global level and, again, this is in some ways the weirdest, the strangest global economic environment in many years. it's just never come out of a once in a century pandemic and the lockdowns and the supply and demand mismatch. but to your point about oil, there's a weird political aspect to this. biden must tackle two somewhat conflicting agendas simultaneously. he must address rising energy prices. he can

exxon and chevron were on-track to double their net income, compared to 2019. and saying, i do not accept hard-working americans paying more for gas because of anti-competitor of illegal conduct. the industry pushing back, calling biden's move a distraction and saying postpandemic demand for gas is outpacing supply. the average price nationwide is $3.41 a gallon. that's up $1.29 from last year. in recent weeks, the white house has been pushed on how it plans to address soaring fuel costs. few specifics have been offered. >> we're looking at every tool in our arsenal. >> reporter: republicans have slammed green initiatives, saying the white house is waging war on emergency. the white house toured an electric vehicle factory in detroit, touting his infrastructure bill. >> we're going to kick-start batteries, materials and recycling. new loans and new tax credits. creating new purchase incentives for consumers to buy american-made, union-made clean vehicles. >> reporter: still, the administration is take heat from environmentalist, after opening more of the gulf o

. >>> two of three men convicted of assassinating civil rights leader malcolm x are expected to be exxon tomorrow. the 1966 conviction of the men are expected to be thrown out after a lengthy investigation. prosecutors say authorities with held evidence in the case, and, allen, for decades, historians have cast doubt on whether the two men were actually guilty of the shooting they each spent more than 20 years in prison. >> and one has since passed away. >>> new water conservation reports show that a is nowhere close to the governor's goal. we cut back in september, and overall have reduced usage by just 3.6%, since the governor made the 15% request in july. and water agencies say it's more difficult this time, because a lot of folks permanently reduced their usage the last drought. >> receipt. and we've had another rain over the past month and a half i think a lot of people have let their guard down a little bit saying we have all of this to rain, we're out of the woods. no, still extreme drought across the area. we'll also have more rain in the forecast. it's still offshore at this mom

i'm a 33rd, the heal asagwa exxon classwork a. it's the morality fairly how alicia lane. welcome to welcome blake to half his xander lin fella dfi decision of on it. video to appear in ramallah the ailing p l. o. lina jasa on a fat remained in his west bank headquarters on a far as close as 8th was surrounded by his ready tanks placed there by ariel sharon, who by then had become israel's prime minister. out of font left for jordan, and then paris to seek medical treatment. ah, the 11th of november, 2004 al jazeera was the 1st to report the death of yasser arafat. al jazeera differed from its competitors by covering under reported regions from its earliest days, the channel had a presence in africa and actively sought out news from the concert. from its bureau in the sudanese capital cartoon, it reported on the presence of al qaeda in east africa. it was also on the ground for the humanitarian crisis that be set down for in 2003 that december and al jazeera correspondent was arrested on charges of quote, airing news containing false information aimed at smearing sedans. i

do you believe that it was ethical for exxon to run a new york times advertisement that down played, downplayed the riff. is it ethical to spread these lies when they all know full well that climate change is real and the science is not uncertain. and there was one study that showed that there were 5 times as many fossil fuel ads on cnn as there was climate code by vehicle, strong gas. if you look at the murdock empire room, fox news folks here focusing on president biden after transit atlantic flight, seem to close his eyes for a few minutes during one of the speeches all claim in the situation on planet earth is show dire president binary, acting by appearing to take a nap during a climate speech. crisen tom sworn such shows that by these really is seriously climate and he really knows his hoax. i mean, what can you say about that? what it means to be a journalist and put out that kind of crap ah, for a story as existentially, critical as climate change, audience interest has been oddly lacking and for too long that is change surveys and country after country indicate news. consume

moving on a lawn mosque is now worth more than exxon mobil, literally, and it looks like mr. i'm helping the environment may be getting into the oil business now. for more on this raging controversy, let's go to our very own now and the care vonny. ah . the cop 26 conference in glasgow world leaders weighed in on the state of the fight against climate change. saying we're we are, how do you say? and small nations chimed in with a know we are. meanwhile, states side, iran must fever, dreams, face sex is frequently turning to fossil fuels. in texas. ilan mosque wants to drill frack, treat pipe, and process an entire vertically integrated oil and gas operation that is required for the proposed star based facility in a wildlife refuge. yes, you la mosque, the electric car salesman and champion of green energy. but that was his day job, his real passion is fracking, must have built enough goodwill to green wash and build a fossil fuel plant pipeline and drilling operation without having to disclose any of it to the relevant government agencies. as tesla's c e o, he builds his bran

since the cooper have recalled exxon ver page in the country's history. when freedom of expression was difficult, and she will raise will comprehensively repress. ah, you as how speak. and nancy pelosi says she hopes to pause president, job biden's infrastructure bill on friday. but after months of wrangling, she expects biden's social welfare bill to only be approved by thanksgiving. the trillion dollar infrastructure bill has already passed. the senate includes the biggest upgrade of america's roads, railways, bridges, and airports in a generation. and all makers are expected to debate biden's $1.00 trillion dollar social policy climate change bill, known as billed back, better, which will expand the welfare safety net and overhaul climate and tax laws. the bill is expected to narrowly pass with a razor thin democrat majority in the house and senate. but there are ongoing divisions in the party over its price tag, investor service. moody's estimates that both bills will add some one and a half 1000000 jobs a year and grow the economy by nearly 3 trillio

since the cooper have recalled exxon ver page in the country's history. when freedom of expression were stifled, and she will raise will comprehensively repress or than a 100 people have been enchant in protest against the election results in iraq. security forces fired into the ironies, tear gas to disperse. the crowds gathered in bagdad demonstrate to say there's been low rigging and reject the outcome of the election groups aligned with iran last dozens of parliamentary seats. madame de wyatt has no from baghdad. the situation remains tense, near the dad's green zone of tar fridays clashes between the protested and security forces. now these protests have as well supporters of the political parties that lost in the legislative election say that friday was the last day for peaceful protests. they say that they are going to escalate because their part is lost in the, in the election. but they say that they're going to escalate until and unless the election commission conducts a manual recount of all the votes. on the other hand, they let the election com

groups to testify before congress and the chair woman asked, do you believe that it was ethical for exxon to run a new york times advertisement that down played down, played the risk. is it ethical to spread these lies when they all know full well, that climate change israel and the science is not uncertain. there was one study that showed that there were 5 times as many fossil fuel ads on c n, as there was climate covenant by vehicle, strong gas. if you look at the murdock empire and fox news folks here focusing on president biden after a transatlantic flight, seemed to close his eyes for a few minutes during one of the speeches all claiming the situation on planet earth is so dire. president, binary acting by appearing to take a nap during a climate speech. crisen thompson said shows that vitamins really is serious that climate and he really knows his hoax. i mean, what he say that, that group, what it means to be a journalist and put out that kind of crap ah, for a story as existentially critical as climate change, audience interest has been oddly lacking and for too long that is chang