ey sd, "we're going to give them all a length of service, so that they know when it's over."ietnam, you know, the army had 12 months, the marines had 13 months. the psychiatric casualty rate dropped to something like 2%. but afterwards, the ptsd rates and all that stuff were just as rampant as they ever were. but it's because of that psychological thing. "there is a way out. all i have to do is survive this long." i think if a guy goes over there, he either can commit suicide or he can go crazy. > i was going to ask you if you thought suicide was a y out in their minds? because as you probably know the rate of suicides of our troops is now back up. it's about one a day, so far this year. and that's higher than it's been in several years. now i know every example is different. but generally, from your experience, what do you think about the rising number of suicides in our troops today? >> well, i'm with you. i mean, who am i to say? but i have my theories. and i'll be happy to tell you. first of all, i think it is because we've laid an enormous burden on a tiny percentage of

sd. thnat ey ts cikewos, thxttts ot a m the next morning at said as a safety measue, they're confiscating all the locks the pon nou ke s. tiwhs tug taealtls. we had -- [inaudible] so it's like okay you're trying to start violence. there's one guy getting upside the head wh e locks. tah t yav te aars thebi c ani g anat te ck 's esty that comes with managing a prison. is that, you know, when you push the to try to explain the u plaibluvup epona'tinesin exnihevletou an wrxpine rcanith our particular events to the system. what they were interesting in doing is having ashow of stopping the violence. when i think about why jvenes ldgopr w ad. ithathnbi ef. soee n di il ooueaiz in forever becse i told a terrible story of violence. and i'm probay tatiin yst ico't cu. ve. uluaur instances of violce i witnessed in prison. when i try to advocate for juveniles that he to go to prison with adults. 's notthat i'm ying to guat oemeh ha b so daou o pin wsn pris. wa ai i'm trying to say that -- this is what the book is about. when i'm describing the different things. in the o 'm tryin ogo rothocto f -yol

ey put mhole cerack fo. w sd, is that doesn't seem right to me. it seems like we should be talking about this. every time we talk about the cloud, but obviously the cloud is not a c. we give up some responsibility in for dinner gonna when in fact we should be having a conversation about what that s no wtinh a s abmyito to data centers which of the first round of data centers of the number one and number two must visit website, facebook and google both of whom madthe same cisi toui tirir ceer i ctrre not quite in the same place. but for most of the same reasons . if they a exchange points are anon tnrsree majorits t polls. they get there where we are or round these exchange points in places like virginia or silicon valley or go to the place where it's most efficient for them to be picilow. abt wistosewot was so striking ac the degree to which facebook sought instead to center as a showpiece. a big celebration for facebook cong inh t inat nrin ny ashtf flight but was definitely bring the spirit. it turns out apple has moved in across street. the

>>e ha't sd it repuicanare ocki it. ey d't sm toe pang a pricat a. yore aoluty rit.' doneto se degree people are aware of, but they don't always have a positive impression of those things. because he hasn'teen as fecte as hd le tbe i tellg atory abo why tse thin matr. inetro, th havgm tay d anuto dust. 's iorta formeri to ke tngs. oplenderand at. 's iortant for manufacturing jobs to be in this country and not just in china and india. people understand at. but connecting those dots is methg th policia, kn st back ama t ma poticis ha trole dng. th're ry gd atayinwhat ey d. ey'rveryad asomemes arculang w it tterto folkand y fos shld ce about it and appreciate it more. >> president obama acknowledged his oratory prowess during the 2008ampan anhow ings ve cngedincehen. wah. when ian evebodyaidou can ve a gre speech, but can you actually manage the job? in my first two years, i think the notion was, you know, he's en juggling and managing a lot of stuff. buwheris t sto tha tes usheree's ing? i thk th was legimat critism. >> r rean, ipartf th oblefor e pridenthat it's easie

at theegin'mogto sd lgat n fromy eyes. right now we're seeing a rebirth of much smaller, more ursmathngwemespaan heconomi who call the barriers to entry into our field. so if you take just f comparison in the90s la oty"'s este at tis st aba ioorsee itean n so start-up cost and the years of losses, billion dollars. it was probably the all-time highaterm tco rp.n rst y,e hetus coprlyukga and, you know, be posting . >> yeah. they do. >> and so the cost of getting almost to the ignthave ge e oftgst, o a mall backpack full of equipment and extr batteries. mmeotithst unlemented the kinds do yo etklirt yo needed the disney studios to show you that ou students do all the time. >> how is it going to get itlitrd eonocall coalpe. om,tot natural, certainly not inevitable, journalism be housed within big corporations. i thinwe can now see thatwas 'shng r ynot sa i th30erytothink it was the natural state of things. now i'm not so sure. >> two things, i wanted to get your reaction to that ieas uss. tahe onma yset jewish community center

he was very persistent it took ten yearso get coumbia to ta his ey ad idhe tzris he ol dhitagems sc sd nal nsteil andt should bear the name of the donor. pulitzer died in 18911 the building -- the school n , h i tera thcen, t jol . w t ursm o o the pulitzer privacy. various forms of speculation why that was. we just rectified that. if aw at g sad, e ysar . tz nabou or of april 24 we're the pulitzer building. >> it's about time. >>over due. gla. >>re e' nih talboeoi rathr. t d w if anybody here has seen the museum in washington, d.c. , which is a monument tothe laomws si h u ses ldh lt dthatssetle front, it's about three stories high. that kind of makes the ten commandments look lke as riwh juis what will they have in mind when they were at wrote the first amendment? what was journalism then? what was te pt e ald mpanes. intota hagootoi na. so, you know if we look at the 18th century, journalis started off in the country in 1704 asasl prve nd o enri e tewpae smculns ozen and maybe in the low hundreds. and they were really intimidated by the other institutionsin thsieelyur stndoedhe eepe

eye lec r. there's a number of things you can do to make buildings much stronger like having coils in reba there was a fematuon thopho bt sd il hpengh o rahe bt,y could have raised the building to the level that would have thophodiig hofiathqu th cthi d meli he me. another failure is that in the course of my research i found out that the ma in charge of protecting the building, tom nt, whwas e head of t deotveend doro han er eraba of security, and they were coerned for a number of reasons, because it was their job to worry about this kindf thin andhere '9 a whe t tiert me cl w eti, aoni, they made it clear that anybody who worked for the federal government was a target. in response tha hnd ne tve4-cuh arvewhn' t heunghe edwout t ceily of the outside of the building to vehicles, they also were veryoncerned that the vid cameras erected on t foeaanhnt tof thelder adston department, they asked to make these changes, and the answer was, no. oklahoma city s not considered a place that was er ing was thap, t hetd ith thhebi oha infeoy whole and really get to the core of what i'm writing about in the book is that after waco, after

sd th truth. lincoln wanted to cost 75,000 dotko leikila said no, you . neo eremha em48hu. ey eyagiv d. s as hnt in time the northern democratic party did not know how to react to the secession. they did in office or a republican problem had nothing . idbuand f e trs he ugi oe uny oehe y ain the north an the rpublicans on war polci. th, wed spor m thio ds, ht' rtas oe ii r. had there been a fit politics and the democrats not been performing, had beenbae torn reich a ste bueraiis democrat. they did what they call waving the bloody shirts remind people that jefferson dis and ery es. ca ote das adictyiedhwa meevel as republicans. so unions carried the day in large part, very selfssly in so have a liberal and conservative party with a couple other folks and we'll gt to the question answer to the moicty aty balle tilsr p geauf william jennings. this shows yo how politics can be extremely unprectable. habe t rsi 1 served twtermi knas biant work traveling the united states all the ime, giving speeches. this tiny section of at the thventstoanreoplae la roand ncinstprin brdihis and he actually b

ey pro or anti. something will be done about it. part of the problem we d't have freedom in thede d t y t sd aobch tit mi et. they have a problem. i don't want to make it personal. i could. but the'heprobm. ilvtof ig y mlete sts heex mang a lot of those studies unreliable, not serious and younow academic. and because we are all in a frnd anorof ntd w n amtsteheul iso t do too much research a lot of middle east studies departments in america are being financed by foreignmoney with the aim ofnfcngpu sttyirne ntone a lot of fake data from the arab side much less from the jewish side. we c give examples. seed ae n t io a albhoood noh hywis many so how connected with the jewish influence and all that. i don't know how many of you know that the 1945,ight ter the cat dt idnv3rec yw etis ucanatl of them jewish, to go to the concentration camps and death camps i should say, and take pictures in order re amo redak dke pss ouha whonhe, very relevant what may be the experience here. one of the points is that, sngoub h,it maov a,ka touheheef the other point may be those people bent over backwards at this time to put aside the jewish ientity