significant, very detailed transactions, to expect a very expedited, a very short-term decision from the f. c.c. i think would not be of long-term benefit to the american public. serb things, significant transactions take time for review. that's just the nature of that. >> from your perspective, i want to ask you, there have been a lot of criticisms lobbed at the f.c.c. from capitol hill? do you think it's politics, republicans who aren't pleased with, taking shots at a democratic administration or do you think there is a real interest in reform? >> you know, i have been in this space for about 13 years and i have never in terms of -- i have never not heard criticism of the f.c.c. regardless of who was in power at the white house or in congress or the f.c.c., the white house and f.c.c. chair, they're the same party. so you're always going to have that friction. i don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. it helps in terms of checks and balances, so to speak. it helps us in terms of taking the post of not only the consumers, but the politicians who are consumers also. so that is not necessaril