f b, i reports, it's far from over when it comes to this investigation. this tweet showing reports that the f, b, i and capital police are resting on the average 3 people a day who were at the u. s. capital on january 6, with dozens more rest to come. also coming more and more members of the capital police department are turning in their resignations. so did this report find out exactly who was responsible for the events that day, or t correspondent, fair and friends that joins me now with the details fared steve, this $127.00 page report is the very 1st time that we're seeing an official timeline of everything that happened on january 6, from the events leading up to it, as well as what happened that day. now the biggest take away from this report or the colossal intelligence failures. you see the conversations that one out of the department of defense where there is a 37 minute period that's completely on, accounted for the report. also showing that the capitol police, which is a department of more than 1800 officers less than 10 officers, had the training in dealing with the situation like what happened on january 6. and this is the 1st by partisan review of the events of january 6 very well could be the last of the investigation of the january 6th. at the u. s. capital shows there were clear warning signs and supporters, including right when this group were planning to capture the highlights. major missteps at nearly every level of government from the military to law enforcement. the report highlighting 3 crucial problems with security. intelligence officials had a hard time pinpointing warnings online, as well as on social media, which kept the us capital police in the dark because intelligence at the capital is decentralized. however, capital police were warned about a surge of hotel bookings in the area, a surge of people most likely to attend former president donald trump's rally on january 6th. the reports specifically break down what was going on that day among the us capital police. what was discovered, the capital police chief was trying to get approved by multiple agencies or the national guard to come help. frantically calling members of the police board along with the house and senate sergeant at arms in the future. the report recommends the capital police chief be given more the police to be able to call in the national guard to declare an emergency and not be required to go through the capitol police board if you'd like to report. however, just in detail, the events of what happened before the crowd descended on the capital. nor does it address whether or not former president trump had any responsibility for what happened. it doesn't address any of those things. so that is the push for democrats of why they believe $911.00 commission is necessary to both look at again, the security failures kind of massive failures at every level of government here. that's why one democratic representative, eric swallow of california is taking matters into his own hands. slapping a lawsuit on another house member, republican congressmen, mo brooks of alabama, seeking to hold him partially accountable for the events on january 6th. why think dad, america, he does? why? because we're going to carry them to you, you say, god bless america not by begin said de brooks, who spoke at the stop, the steel rally, was nowhere to be found to be served with the law suit prompting the law suit to be served at brooks. his home, the congressman tweeting, swell. well finally did his job served a complaint on my wife. horrible swallows team committed a crime by unlawfully sneaking into my house and accosting my wife, alabama code 1st degree criminal trespass. you're in jail, find more to come. now for those law suit has a few more names and besides representative mo brooks squabble also includes former president donald trump, his personal attorney, juliani as well as trump son donald junior. now the suit specifically sites, the stop the steel rally that happened before the capital riots. trump says he holds absolute immunity and called for the last 2 to be dismissed in his own court filing for news hughes, i'm fair in front back. ok. joining us now is legal and media analysts line of line on media line or welcome just a quick follow up to a foreign excellent report there. you know the media and the democrats keep calling this. what happened on january 6th and insurrection, but that report, that bipartisan report never uses the term and that was done on purpose. and no one has been charged with all the arrest that fare and talked about. no one's been arrested and charged with insurrection, not one person. you know, steve, these, these words matter being sick and having cancer is a big difference insurrection, sedition treason, right wing, national is right when you throw these words around and after all the while they become part and partial of the story. so just to be clear, there are many of us who have been following this. we would love to see an insurrection prosecution just to see what it looks like. i don't think there's ever been one, because if you read specifically what it is, we're not sure. let me say also one thing. have you ever seen an insur when you feed insurrection? you never do normally see of the think of as many american flags in an insurrection . let's really go back to what this is an action against the country, the grand to there's false flag and that sort of thing to but, but if you listen to the words themselves, there's something, you know, there's, there's a big difference between, we're going to destroy your country and god bless america, let's take, you know, you must listen to this. and if you say, well that doesn't matter, let me also say please. if i took the words of maxine waters or anybody else and put them in a multiple choice is a tell me what, maxine waters said, and what more brookside or anybody else you couldn't figure out and where, where steve is this a see you was prosecution for all of the n t for cases said basically showed a coordination of effort that i saw here in new york that you couldn't believe so. right. and i and what they do in portland going after going after government buildings courthouses expressing disdain for america, to me, that's closer to an insurrection, but let, let's leave it there and, and other media ploy to, to, to pin trump, supporters and trump. as you know, these evil people. now, this is a bizarre story which, which foreign referred to in in her. eric's wall well california democrat suing a number of republicans including donald trump, rudy giuliani, and now alabama republican congressmen. mo brooks now swore, well, we should note, had an affair with an alleged chinese spied by the way, eas, accusing brooks and others of bearing responsibility for the the capital riots. so please explain a few things to his line of 1st. what give swan well standing to file this suit, which is a civil suit? does he need to prove that he himself suffered harm that his civil rights were violated? if ever you want to read something, it's a felony blank. try a civil rights violation that by virtue of listen to this, i'm going to say this, as we say in the light, most favorable to the plaintiff, i'm going to read, in essence, the charges in his favor. that because of the concerted deliberate effort. so president trump at now because of the specific intent that they had not to raise a little hell, not to, we know, charge up the crowd, but to deprive eric's while while of is that all right. good luck with that. now when the actual discovery process starts, if fish, dear god, please, where to go to trial. and eric well has to take to stand. he's the plaintiff. and you started talking about impeaching in terms of the evidentiary. mr. swan well, are you the same? eric, why? well, could this be done? have you yourself done granted immunity? i mean this, this would be something that was i dream, but i read the complaint carefully and i swear to you it, i don't know in there in the light most favorable to him how he could possibly be even remotely successful. but it goes to show. ready your steve, there is a difference between saying i've got to do something and i want you to go, and i want you to deliberately disrupt the electra role. in short petition are active, but that is what that listen. they didn't charge you folks would arson. you know, for good reason, now insurrection is not a, and all of the above fill in the blank type, right? you're right. why? so let me ask, you know, because this guess even even more bizarre as, as fair and also alluded to trump junior and donald trump and julie, and they all serve papers awhile ago, but he couldn't get mo brooks serv, so swell team did it the other day but now mo brock says they, they, they trespass on my property, they sneaked into my house and they served my wife and he wants the person who did it to be arrested. does any of this matter in the, in the case? that's why well, in the suit, that's all while well is putting forth how the papers were served. yes, this sounds like, like a bar exam or a line exam law school. if you he could make in this, this will be a limited appearance where he says, listen, i want to challenge the sid, the sufficiency of service. i want to come into a court, and i don't want to in any way invoke your restriction or admit your is 6 you but i want you just for purposes of thing. you didn't serve me well, you know they're going to do. they're going to end up serving them. most of the time. you don't fight it. it does go to show you how drastic this is. and frankly, most of the time, there's substitute service lawyer said that bring it to me don't, don't, don't change. it doesn't look good when you're chase down, you know, when you're caught at 3 in the morning coming out, you know what that bark look, coming out, you know, during the watergate thing. but, but what this is going to show you though, is how ridiculous this is. and i do hope that is played out because let me just say somebody breaks seem to be clear. i am not countenance seen or agreeing, or dismissing or say it's no big deal. what i saw there was horrible. you don't do this, this is the capital, this is a tabernacle of liberty. but there are so many things that have happened that have been rude and dis courteous and subject to, to federal laws and specific laws pertaining to these, these institutions as well that do not rise to in surrendered to these people one to bring down the government or in the light most favorable to them as crude and is boorish and backwards. it is, do they want to maintain the government? do they think as crazy? this sounds that they're actually defending it. and also right. do you know how many people, steve are still being in jail right now that we have that are unaccounted for? that's to be discussed as well. yeah, absolutely. because they were just there and that's not good. quickly, 30 seconds. your prediction on this one. can the judge has accepted this? i mean, he's let it go forward or that hasn't happened yet. and what do you think is eventually going to happen? i was been filed, settled, settled, something proper, nothing. it's almost like killer kind of a pro forma. yeah. yeah. yeah. nominal damages, it's all for show, but, but if there is a god, and if god has a sense of humour, it will be a trial. can you imagine that to say that the bench you have trump come junior and rudy? we will have, we will have hours of conversation on the ever happens. lydel. thank you much and always appreciate it. thank you, sir. pipe folks hero or crooked politician, delete the mails from doctor anthony. found your putting the good doctor in an unfavorable light and we'll discuss with our guests coming up next. don't go away. ah ah, ah, is your media a reflection of reality? in a world transformed what will make you feel safer? type relation, community. are you going the right way or are you being that somewhere? which direction? what is truth? what is faith? in the world corrupted you need to defend. ah, so join us in the depths will remain in the shallows. ah! as a career professional spot is much tougher on some than others year old myers by everybody. so why would somebody believe me? i was just a little girl. the price paid to, to, to achieve really was was how to read in the paper this morning. usa swimming coach, arrested, allegedly had sex with a 12 year old girls. this happens almost every week. we get calls at the office, i get informed about one of my greatest fears is someone's going to start linking all this together. there's going to be a 60 minute documentary about youth coaches in sports like gymnastics. swimming. is that sell commentary? i see it on r t i. where did the covert 19 pandemic start? was it in a war on lab or was it from that's what did doctor anthony found you know about this? and when did he know it? and did he help direct funds to the kind of research that could have started it all? here now give us his perspective on foundry in china and the virus. it's chris spent in author china, expert movie producer, and his book is out there folks. it's called feeding the dragon inside the trillion dollar dilemma facing hollywood, the n b a and american businesses. chris, great to see you, sir. thanks for being with me. yeah, thanks for having me on steve. i was a pleasure. all right, so let's start some, 2000 about she's e mails were made public through our freedom of information requests. and depending on who you listen to in the media, you know, they show, they say no smoking gun, or they reveal that voucher was being less than honest with the public. throughout the pandemic making things up as we went along. what is your take on what you've seen so far? what is found? she know. what does he know now? well, it's interesting. i mean this, this discussion has been ongoing since 2017, when mad passenger shed light on what was happening at the harm lab. and then josh rogan wrote, a fabulous book called chaos under having that came out recently. that really gets in depth about the, the rank or, and the politicization of what was happening at the beginning stages of the co crisis. and the fact that this whole idea that one side of the eye or the other can common dear particular argument and try to blanket over the other side became absolutely ridiculous. i mean, we know for a fact that 99 percent of the circumstantial evidence points to the fact that the lab is probably responsible for what happened and created this global crisis number one. number 2 is we should be figuring out what exactly happened in a non partisan kind of way. i mean, i look at it and i grew up the son of an engineer for pratt and whitney aircraft, the f f a, a comes at things in regards to how they problem solve to make airline travel safer . they do investigation, data collection risk analysis in informations sharing and it's never been a democrat or republican issue. it's been something about how do we tackle the challenge and do it now? that's what needs to happen right now. and by the way, our biggest rival, china's behind it, so we have a big issue with this in regards to many geopolitical issues. yeah. you're, you're, you're correct. and in fact, donald trump, i believe it was on saturday, during his speech in north carolina said that china should pay reparations for what they did to the world. and don't forget, very early on. trump said that the virus escape the war. and lab meanwhile, found she's out there now saying don't pressure china, it's in their interests to get to the bottom of it. you gotta be kidding. it's in their interest to get to the bottom of it. so we'll china pay one way or another. well look, i always look a