and the f.a.a. special rules for when someone challenges any of their policies and those rules directs challenges to a two different torture the court of appeals and they set a sixty day timeframe from from the date of the policy so essentially the t.s.a. gets to make a policy and then sixty days later if no one's challenge that yet it's permanent law that's that's what the government is arguing in front of this court my argument is is naturally that we have these constitutional rights that can't be time limited that if i go to a checkpoint tomorrow and i'm violated by the t.s.a. tomorrow it doesn't matter when the policy was made it matters that the t.s.a. just did it in the needs to be redressed and so if they do decide to hear case what walk us through what might happen next in the courts and i'm sure so then the next step if the court decides that they have jurisdiction would be some kind of fact gathering so right now the t.s.a. is submitted a stack of papers about a foot high four thousand pages of th

and the f.a.a. special rules for when someone challenges any of their policies and those rules directs challenges to a two different torture the court of appeals and they set a sixty day timeframe from from the date of the policy so essentially the t.s.a. gets to make a policy and then sixty days later if no one's challenge that yet it's permanent law that's that's what the government is arguing in front of this court my argument is is naturally that we have these constitutional rights that can't be time limited that if i go to a checkpoint tomorrow and i'm violated by the t.s.a. tomorrow it doesn't matter when the policy was made it matters that the t.s.a. just did it in the needs to be redressed and so if they do decide to hear case what walk us through what might happen next in the courts and i'm sure so then the next step if the court decides that they have jurisdiction would be some kind of fact gathering so right now the t.s.a. is submitted a stack of papers about a foot high four thousand pages of th

and the f.a.a. special rules for when someone challenges any of their policies and those rules directs challenges to a two different towards the court of appeals and they set a sixty day time frame from from the date of the policy so essentially the t.s.a. gets to make a policy and then sixty days later if no one's challenge that yet it's permanent law that's that's what the government is arguing in front of this court my argument is is naturally that we have these constitutional rights that can't be time limited that if i go to a checkpoint tomorrow and i'm violated by the t.s.a. tomorrow it doesn't matter when the policy was made it matters that the t.s.a. just did it in the needs to be redressed and so if they do decide to hear case what walk us through what might happen next in the courts and i'm sure so then the next step if the court decides that they have jurisdiction would be some kind of fact gathering so right now the t.s.a. is submitted a stack of papers about a foot high four thousand pages of t

and the f.a.a. special rules for when someone challenges any of their policies and those rules directs challenges to a two different torture the court of appeals and they set a sixty day time frame from from the date of the policy so essentially the t.s.a. gets to make a policy and then sixty days later if no one's challenge that yet it's permanent law that's that's what the government is arguing in front of this court my argument is is naturally that we have these constitutional rights that can't be time limited that if i go to a checkpoint tomorrow and i'm violated by the t.s.a. tomorrow doesn't matter when the policy was made it matters that the t.s.a. just did it in the needs to be redressed and so if they do decide to hear case what walk us through what might happen next in the courts and i'm sure so then the next step if the court decides that they have jurisdiction would be some kind of fact gathering so right now the t.s.a. is submitted a stack of papers about a foot high four thousand pages of thei

and the f.a.a. special rules for when someone challenges any of their policies and those rules directs challenges to two different torture the court of appeals and they set a sixty day timeframe from from the date of the policy so essentially the t.s.a. gets to make a policy and then sixty days later if no one's challenge that yet it's permanent law that's that's what the government is arguing in front of this court my argument is is naturally that we have these constitutional rights that can't be time limited that if i go to a checkpoint tomorrow and i'm violated by the t.s.a. tomorrow it doesn't matter when the policy was made it matters that the t.s.a. just did it in the needs to be redressed and so if they do decide to hear case what walk us through what might happen next in the courts and i'm sure so then the next step if the court decides that they have jurisdiction would be some kind of fact gathering so right now the t.s.a. is submitted a stack of papers about a foot high four thousand pages of thei