when i asked thurman what influence he had on martin luther king, jr., i think he if a -- facetiously said i had less influence on martin luther king, jr., than any other professor at boston university. we both laughed because this is a time when everyone is claiming they had a major influence on the thinking of martin luther king, jr., because he took a class from them or something. thurman and king would spend sunday afternoons watching baseball together. it's this intimate, personal dimension thurman will often speak of. but in talking with persons who were close to king at the time, they said martin luther king, jr., was eager to get to chapel to listen to thurman as he preached on sunday mornings. so there is this sort of intaking that's going on also with king as wel read much of king. you can hear so many of thurman's themes being resonant in king's writing. and here king is startg century. he lists howard thurman. it says something about the significance of thurman but this conversation we are having is bringing forth the importance of the multiple influences upon thurman. we

and i think that whatever the results of televising senate proceedings, and i was only facetious when i said i would take a pass. i do think that it has been a step in the right direction of providing more transparency and disclosure and understanding on the part of the public. now i'll let you and the public be the judge of how it views us but i think in general americans should understand the challenges as well as the role that their institutions face. and since my time has expired, and i want to thank you again for being here and i am not at all dismissive of the points that you've made, on the contrary i have great respect for them, but perhaps we can provide you with some more information that would be persuasive in the advantages and the positives in those kinds of greater availability or accessibility. >> and we are back live on capitol hill here on c-span 3. the dirkeson senate office building for the senate judiciary committee. they're meeting to mark up legislation that would permit, require televising u.s. supreme court proceedings. senator grassley there in the middle of y

and i think that whatever the result of televising senate proceedings, and i was only i a facetious when i would you would take a pass. i think it has been a step in the right direction of providing transparency and understanding on the part of the public. i'll let you and the public be the judge of how it views ,

this nation's history and tradition, or implicit in the concept of ordered liberty is, at best, facetious. scholars left and right criticized the opinion. as much for its concluding tone as for its terse analysis and result. the decision was overruled in 2003. another message in the opinion which many critics elect to ignore contains justice white's deep-seeded anxiety over the breadth of the court's role. first expressed in his dissent in robinson and california. now almost a quarter century later he was still sounding the alarm. nor are we inclined to take a more expansive view of our authority to discover new fundamental rights embedded in the due process clause. the court is most vulnerable and comes nearest to ill legitimacy when it deals with judge-made constitutional law having little or no cognizable root in the text of the constitution. this is -- there should be, therefore, great resistance to expand the substantive reach of those clauses, particularly if it requires redefining the category of rights deemed to be fundamental. otherwise, the judiciary takes to itself further auth

family go no one ok it's more about a process what do you think the end game is i mean and i said facetiously you know what kind of jeffersonian democracy what kind of country do you think is going to be there is a going to be hostile to the west it's going to be and will continue a serious can traditional foreign policy what kind of relationship would have with israel with the around with hezbollah there's a lot of people you know are focused on the here and now but those are the questions going to be asked whatever whenever we get to this endgame. yes i know there's a good questions but nobody knows the answer to those questions. outcome in terms of. syria's foreign policy is a question mark and i don't think actually any of the players involved has much of a clue about that. because you i want you want regime change you're asking for really demanding regime change without understanding what the unintended consequences could be that's interesting yes we are because many thousands of innocent lives are at stake that's the key. anyone who insists on maintaining the regime is condemning thousa

deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition or implicit in the concept of order liberty is facetious. scholars left and right criticized the opinion as much for its concluding tone as for its terse analysis and result. the decision was overruled in 2003. another passage in the opinion, which many critics elect to ignore, contains justice white's deep-seeded anxiety over the breadth of the courts's role, first expressed in his dissent in robinson versus california. now, almost a quarter century later, he was still sounding the alarm. nor are we inclined to take a more expansive view of our authority to discover new fundamental rights in the due process clause. the court is most vulnerable and comes nearest to illegitimacy when it deals with judge-made constitutional law having little or no cognizable roots in the text or design of the constitution. that this is so painfully demonstrated by the face-off between the executive and the court in the 1930s, which resulted in the repudiation of much of the substantive gloss that the court had placed on the due process clauses of the 5th and

. >> we started with you in 2003 and i was facetious, i said everything had already been invented onnet by then. obviously it hadn't. now you're in stakes in all these incredible places. you made the point off camera that all of this technology is feeding on itself to create more innovation and more opportunities for similar things. so you could, reid hoffman can start again in 2012? >> yes. >> would it be social media or are we missing the next big -- because a lot of people missed this. >> i think what happened is most people, they thought the consumer was dead. they were wrong in 2002-2003. all these new major companies, facebook, twitter, linkedin got started around that time frame and are things that can change people's lives and have great businesses. for example, even just from "the social network"ing side we at graylock invested in a company which is social networking for k-12. students and teachers. similar kind of thing you have a facebook or linkedin network. we believe this can grow to be very big. when we think of something that cab massive category that changes people's

. >> i started all this trouble five or owe so years ago facetiously. i have this envelope -- i didn't have an envelope -- i made this crack that i open the envelope and i pull out the slip inside and it said check my pulse again. somehow that got the fact that there was an envelope. another one of my jokes that's gone astray. >> warren, we're going to take time right now to get a check on the markets and when we come back we'll have more of this conversation. andrew? >> absolutely. we'll come back in just a moment. are we going to the markets right now? we are. we're going to go across the pond to see our friend ross westgate who is standing by with the global markets report. ross? >>> hey, andrew. good morning to you. everybody here perking their ears up when warren says he bought eight european stocks towards the end of last year. if they were german stocks he would have done quite year, so far up around 16%. so try to work it out. today we're weighted to the down si side. advancers outpaced by decliners more than 8-1. we wiped out last week's slim g

i was being facetious. lift it up and down and then add a calf move.g over and tricep kick backs and want to work your booty at the same time you balance and you kick back,. >> not very graceful you can move up here. >> good thing when you actually do a multitasking move like this. off balance, a.b.s are work pg. this is the way i like to work out. stand and watching people. gluts, kicking it for the red carpet. >> a.b.s. very good a.b.s. >> sit down on the floor. especially some stars like jessica alba who has had a baby. i give herr credit. i have had a baby. tough to get a.b.s back. triceps like i mentioned and lean back to get the a.b.s kicked in. >> do it again. >> tricep press. >> does it hurt your back. >> no not at all. >> i recommend not doing that with a mike pack that hurts a little. >> do it enough where your a.b.s kick. in starting out lean back little bit. >> lower back workout too. >> this is pay laths oriented. >> the thing do you after you work a.b.s beauty i can't understand triceps three times in a row is add cardio to it. >> start u

whatever the results of televising senate proceedings -- and i was only facetious when i said that i would take a pass -- i do think that it has been a step in the right direction for providing more transparency, disclosure, and understanding on the part of the public. i will let you and the public be the judge of how it views us. but i think in general, americans should understand the challenges as well as the role that their institutions face. since my time has expired, i want to thank you again for being here and i'm not at all dismissive of the point to have made. on the contrast, i have great respect for them. perhaps we can provide you with some more information that would be persuasive and the advantages and the positives in those kinds of greater availability or acceptability. >> justices scalia and brier testified on capitol hill in october. the senate judiciary committee decided today to send any bill that would require the supreme court to televise all of its open proceedings. lawmakers and media organizations have asked the court to televise the five and a half hours of o