very specific criteria that might give special consideration to arts organizations or cultural facilities located in the vicinity of the building project. and thank you, commissioners, and thank you to director ram and kelly and anmarie. thanks for your consideration. president olague: thank you. >> you're welcome. >> thank you, president olague and commissioners. i served as the art task force that presented to you in 2006 and in that process we looked at the various programs and specifically the 1% art on site program and made recommendations that i believe all of which are included in the recommendations and the amendments from the planning commission. and i want to applaud the planning department for actually getting the arms around this great program. back in 2006 when we asked to see the benefit of the program and we know what art we have and a program that supports our artists and supports the public in viewing of the art and to make that experience available. and the art task force strongly recommended expanding the program citywide and in the south and why they were not able to have thos

museum of modern art, which would relocate the existing fire station from the property to a new facility located at 935 folsom st. pier 3 is 545 irving st., formerly 555 irving st., retail 1. it is a quest for a conditional use authorization to modify the conditions of a prior conditional use authorization to extend the hours of operation of an existing wine bar doing business as inner father in the inner sunset commercial neighborhood districts appeared and item four is case 2011, -- this is a request for conditional use authorization to allow at&t mobility to locate up to eight wts panel and tennis in faux vents on the roofs of two separate structures and related equipment in a building basement of the tibia and three-story commercial buildings within a residential, commercial combined, and high-density district. commissioners, following public comment, which would automatically remove the item from the consent calendar, these items are in your hands. is there any public comment on items on the consent calendar -- commissioner miguel: is there any public comment on items on the consent calenda

another source of possible exposure was a waste water treatment facility located across the river from their home. in one nine hundred ninety seven as chris's symptoms were getting worse a water well near the most baldies was blown out and contaminated by drilling. according to state records on september fifteenth one thousand nine hundred ninety seven barrett resources lost well control while drilling the burned clogged gas well the gas companies came out and told everybody not to drink the water actually started delivering water to us then they came back and told us that your water safe to drink so we started drinking the water. when the exposure is through a water pathway people are usually given an alternate drinking water supply you don't think of it but there are a lot of sources of water vapor in a house or a dishwasher every time you flush the toilet and you breathe it in. through your skin your dose of the volatile organic compounds from the the shower water will be several times the dose you would have gotten from drinking water after we started thinking. that a glass of wate

. >> with respect to the citing of this particular facility and the locations you are looking at, i assume you do not need to go any further east because that's already looks to be fairly well covered. you are looking to go west, north, and south, more or less. >> we do have a site on tunnel road, just for the record. commissioner sugaya: since there has already been approved development plans through the redevelopment agency for right across the bay shore boulevard, would at&t ever consider this to be an interim site pending new development across the way which might, to which you might locate this particular antenna facility? >> i think we could definitely look at that. we are in the process of upgrading a lot of our facilities and we could definitely look at it if it becomes available if redevelopment would be able to least to us and it meets the radio frequency requirements in that area. >> i don't know when the development will start. given the economy, it will be a number of years away, i suspect. given that it is new development, there might be an opportunity and that might make the

warless facility's present a lecture for fire hazards that should require extreme caution in deciding where they should be located. this includes photos of wireless facilities that were set on fire during routine maintenance visits. they were taken by media outlets, many because of the spectacular nature of these images presented by these cellphone tower is literally going up in flames. they still point to find the essential fact of any commercial wireless facilities. this is industrial for in nature and utilize is of much of the components that can resolve in fires. if this is in residential areas. the recent fire, this is huge. this took place in the building that hosted a number of teen mobile antennas in the basement and the roof. for the resulting investigation is not yet in. they were determined to play a role in the fire and we would not even know it. the fire department does not reflect the fact this is the san francisco fire department and the situation list from january, 2009 to december 31st. as you can see -- >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. under federal law, veri

. >> with respect to the citing of this particular facility and the locations you are looking at, i assume you do not need to go any further east because that's

facilities set up by the central government. in many municipalities, it is not easy to find locations for such storage sites because of concerns among residents. it is not clear where the central government's storage facilities will be located. in fukushima, decontamination work has already begun, but unless the locations of storage sites are secured, cleanup efforts cannot make progress, so the central government should so specific policies immediately. >> regarding the fukushima daiichi, already the cost to resolve the accident as well as the compensation has grown enormous. cost for decontamination are certain to be an additional burden, right? >> the environment ministry initially estimated that 1.14 trillion yen would be required to decontaminate areas with annual radiation levels of five millisieverts are more. but the recent change in the threshold would raise the cost furthermore. the government will pay the cost first and ask the tokyo electric power company to pay later. but if the cost rises substantially, it's not certain to what extent tepco can bear the cost. the environment ministry says it will do whatever it can do

not just talking about financial terms, but the tenant is maintaining and repairing facilities at other locations. that is definitely a question worth asking. also, the bid as a criteria set as a requirement for a successful venture, maybe it might be good to ask what other ventures have been done and what the method of delivery is. it was interesting that in the company's letter to you, structure worked at pier 3. we are talking about a safety issue there. we were asked to yellow tag appear with 10 ton trucks to go through. periodically, as needed to fuel the trucks there, it went on through march of 2011. action was then taken and the company stopped. to this day, we do not know if they are fueling with compliance to regulatory requirements that the port. so, and alcatraz landing project is a representative the late in 2008. we still do not have an environmental review from the company. i would suggest that these are valid questions that need to be addressed. >> is there any other public comment on this item? commissioners benoquin >> i would like to know if there is any written policy or progr

locating. third, let us discuss the process. the planning commission and the department had a lot of guidance on revoking -- reviewing wireless facilities. in 1996, the board of supervisors passed a resolution on where we should locate these facilities. it emphasized that these should be the city's top preference for these facilities. the board said specifically these are most compatible and is likely to be visually destructive. the board resolution did seek clarification on some of the lower preference sites. in response, the planning commission revised the guidelines in august 1996, and updated them again in 2003. the guidelines contained not only preferences and locations, but mandate community outreach meetings be held for installations that need review an alternative analysis studies should be done one preferred sites cannot be used. that is not the case here. it also requires a plan which must be updated annually. that is the process that led to this being declared the most preferred site. other procedural reviews include aesthetic review by planning department and health review by the city department of public health. when it com

versus leverage the services of a pre-fabricated co-location center, that is already outfitted with all the heating and air-conditioning and cooling facility that we need -- power, electricity. after weighing the costs of such, it was an easy choice and the most cost-effective choice to seek out the services of a co location site for the city and county primary data center. our former datacenter -- we look at ways to properly renovate and upgrade the facility there. from a cost perspective, it was not a benefit to the city, and we did not think it was a very use of the city's taxpayers funds, so we felt that it was best to research a co-location facility in the city, and we're very pleased with our decision to go that route. because one, we did not have to -- we no longer had the responsibility of managing a facility. we could repurchase or repo august that, those efforts that we had with our staff performing those services before -- we could be purpose those folks into other areas of the organization, teaching them a new skill set. we no longer had the burden, frankly, of a facility management. we no longer had to stress our resources in

facilities are needed. please vote to deny for rise in the equipment for this location. >> thank you. next speaker. >> hello. good afternoon. i am living on fifth avenue for almost 36 years. these areas are all residential. my family, kids. the only hospital has these buildings. the others are all residential. [speaking foreign language. >> i would just reiterate that she is against this. she has a family that lives in the neighborhood. the kaiser hospital is the only in the neighborhood. the rest are residential. when you use the land line and the verizon cell phone, 911 has been very responsive in the past. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. for 32 years now, i have lived in the richmond district these and 10 that are not necessary for this neighborhood to provide service during a natural disaster or other emergency. federal law would like to give priority to 911 calls. federal law requires that even a phone without a service provider must be allowed to connect to any side if 911 is called. this also over rights and emergency. according to the facility plan

facilities. so there's experience in using federal computing systems that are located outside of federal facilities and using contractors and using their services. that aspect of using cloud computing is actually well known and is something that the accreditation framework that's used for federal systems is actually quite capable of handling. the nuance with cloud computing that's added is that instead of using these outsourced facilities, we're now using clouds over the public internet, and we're using clouds means we don't necessarily know the location of where the computing that we're doing is taking place. so i spoke at the hearing regarding some of the nuances of making use of the internet for doing cloud computing, for shing cloud resources -- for accessing cloud resources or vendors. and the fact that that raises a number of concerns. the concerns in particular are the internet itself is a changing environment, and new technology is coming. we have to make sure the cloud keeps up with that. also, the use of the internet by the federal government is governed by government-wide initiatives. we