none of these were faesible. we have a couple buildings next to us. we made every effort with staff to sensitively design the project to reduce the impact on property line windows. what you can see here in red is 540 jones. we originally had a much larger u shaped buildings that reduced all of those windows. rereduced the side of the building. [inaudible] >> lastly, we heard loud and clear a lot of concerns about retention of the colannaded facade, and we wanted to respond to that. i'll note that when we began this project four years ago, we never had any intention of retaining any piece of the building. as we worked through the entitlement process, we had to redesign once or twice. we made the decision, and that decision was questioned on june 28, and since. between the 28 and now we've held multiple meetings with the most vocal group on that, san francisco heritage, in order to respond to a number of these concerns. this is the current design, and the preference is to remove the facade off of this design and leave much of the rest unaltered. and aft