fagan had always said he was innocent in. september, an appeals court overturned his conviction, proving he had nothing to do with it. >> i'd never seen that woman in my life. >> reporter: in a recent interview with ktvu, he says he isn't bitter. >> i just try to do the right thing. just keep going. what happened what happened. i spent ail that time in prison for nothing, but it is what it is. >> reporter: how did he end up in prison? fagan was arrested for an unrelated offense months after derosier was killed. two informants told police he confessed to killing her. fagan says they lied. >> they did what they did. they got their freedom. and i was the one they chose to do it with. >> reporter: he was convicted of first degree murder despite no physical evidence. he fought to clear his name. >> i went through court after court after court to the ninth circuit court of apeels. >> reporter: then the northern california innocence project took up his case in. 2009, a judge granted a motion to test dna evidence. testing showed that

education crisis is mainly down to decades of underinvestment and mismanagement of the entire system and fagan politicians to finally improve things is so ill that many people are taking matters into their own hands daredevil as we play games and really enjoy ourselves they teach as well so we like coming here. i want to study to become a pilot when i grow up. they teach us in english and do i want to learn here and then become a teacher myself prime minister in non-con has vowed to prioritise and invest in education but the gloaming continues to spend less than his recommended by international standards he and millions like him have is if pakistan not only c.b.s. clearly forms of education system but also lives families like sergeants out of all the fees to send their children to school the government has its work i'll do according to the latest u.n. full cost $1.00 in 4 children will not complete their education by going to 30. in 1909000 cities germans sought refuge in the west german embassy in prague. they were finally allowed to travel to the west it was the beginning of the end of east

the problem is that stephen fagan is having to do it directly to camera. “— fagan is having to do itssile tests. that is despite being under strict sanctions will stop north korea's messages you can keep this so—called maximum pressure and even then, there are huge cracks in the sanctions pressure because it seems certainly supplies are coming in from elsewhere. there are cracks in the maximum pressure, there aren't the kind of sanctions there that perhaps the united states might like. north korea is still managing to produce weapons and still setting the deadlines themselves. they are saying, "look, we're giving you to the end of the year". the united states are still trying to apply a bit of pressure, saying there is no need for this hostility. also, donald trump just said two weeks ago that options would be on the table if there were any provocations from north korea. but it does seem that right now, north korea isn't listening. we have to wait and see. and we're certainly watching the m essa g es and we're certainly watching the messages from pyongyang very carefully over the nex

court denied the motion to dismiss because some of their names were on the williamut paul esteban, fagantheir names are on the cases because you can't take them off at this point. this has fooled scholars into continuing to frame the case in 1873 as still involving the original white butchers in those 17 investors when that is not the case at all, and bradley, in 1873, keeps on talking about the poor white butchers even though they are now the monopolists. what ismatter of law, still in question is the exclusive franchise. as a matter of law, but court still has to rule on that. bradley's rhetoric paints those original butchers as still the re. they are still the victims, they are still being deprived of a trade, even though they now on the crescent city company. ok. where does this leave us? we bradley's transformative work. he re-conceptualizes liberty and governance. he reconceptualizes liberty as against governance. he introduces the rights bearing individual. hallmark ofs the modern liberal constitutionalism, that dichotomy between private rights in public power. he gives us man aga

paul estabon, william fagan, all of those livestock dealers and butchers, in 1871, they are the new board of directors of the crescent city landing and livestock slaughterhouse company. they are the new directors. they bring the motion to dismiss. they say it is no longer a controversy. they pay campbell, they say bye to campbell. we have all of their affidavits. it is in the motion to dismiss. it is in the landmark brief. so jeremiah black is representing them. he is representing those original butchers. remember, brigands has no evidence anyway no evidence , about black. campbell at this point may or may not be working pro bono for the very few butchers who were not included in the buyout, because a couple of names were on the original cases, and they were basically left out, so they are mad, and they want to keep going. and the supreme court denied the motion to dismiss because some of their names were actually on the cases, but paul esteban, william fagan, those names are on the cases because you can't take them off at this point. this has fooled scholars into continuing to frame the