an exhibit that entered the museum during my work at the museum, this is a letter from faina georgievna ranevskayaion not only the soviet union, but also the whole world, to the death of the first cosmonaut of the planet, i can even quote a few lines from there , because i worked a lot with this letter, there are probably two such fragments that i can now reproduce, the first fragment sounds as follows, faina georgievna ranevskaya writes: that day i played scenes from somov, and when i returned home, i drank vodka alone, this has never happened to me, it’s immediately clear how people perceived the death of the first cosmonaut. and even further she writes, she says: why didn’t they tell gagarin that he now belonged to the world, and not to himself , and allowed him to fly, and i had this letter in special gloves next to special people from the funds, i held it in my hands, and this of course makes a colossal impression. daria, did you have the opportunity to visit various space objects, well, thanks to the fact that you work at the cosmonautics museum, of course, and you opened the museum. the mus

faina ranevskaya, in the diary entries of faina ranevskaya, you can simply see how she is seething with indignation, it would seem that she is natalya nikolaevna, who lived 100 years ago ago, but nevertheless, faina georgievnae male half, vikkendiy vikkendivich verisaev, a wonderful russian soviet writer of the first half of the 20th century, the author of such a wonderful thing. which is called pushkin in life, and somewhere there he writes that if pushkin had paid attention not to goncharova, who , of course, was a beauty, but such an empty beauty, and who crossed the road, perhaps a much more worthy girl, pushkin would be with her i would be happy, and the same thing was written by shchogalev, pavel elsech, such a wonderful pushkinist who studied the cannon duel. boris pasternak answered them all perfectly, pasternak wrote in such a way that pushkin should have married not goncharova, but shchogolev, all of us in further pushkin's work and then he would have lived to this day, then he would have written five sequels to eugene onegin, then he would have written another poltava, but pasternak goes on to say that he would not have understood such a pushkin, namely. nikolaevna, for whom she was a wonderful w