. >>> and two federal bankfá presidentsfáq newly instal lorettafágefá their policy economic data1 targets. meanwhile, charliesv4 evans say the banks have to bexde1 carefud make sure the policy-makers getw ú cf1 o >> before the fed raisewk rates we should have confidencee1 tha we don't pay all penalty in the zero balance. we should be very patiente1 inf adjustinge1 the monetary target. even to balance the risk to our objectives. >> he is quote, very uncomfortable with calls to raise interest rates sooner rather than later. >> with the possibility of a rate hike on the way, however are paying close attention to the financial sector which has 1 out-performed the dow this year, not just the money center banks. regionals have been strong but the same can't be said for thee insurers. morgan brennan explains theçó outlook for both. >> with the possibility of an interest rate hike on the horw:&n some investors are betting on a regional bank stock for big returns.% companies like pnc financial and u.s. bank corps ars3 among theo names that fuelled the rally

faq. >> you are very inspiring sister simone. you have addressed a little bit of my question but i.m. curious about the targeting of the attitude toward the of pour across society not just the policy makers and after 80 years of community actions sometimes it is tiring when people give you brought it generalizations' they just don't want to work for their lazy or they want to stay on the system and it becomes very difficult and challenging to do your work when you are faced with that you have any more inspiring words? not just the policy makers? >> the key here is fear the reason people harden their hearts because they feel trapped if they can make up their reason therefore it will not happen in to be but that economic and structured with stagnant wages and how difficult it is to support their own family that i can blame somebody else to feel better about myself. so when i try to do the be i can get away with it is i go pastoral. why do you fear for your family? i have ended up with folks in tears talking about how hard it is for

[inaudible conversations] the faq. -- thank you. how is it going? good. i'd like to hear that. >> we had such a great time. >> there is something special about her. >> how are you? >> click to we have here. [inaudible conversations] >> how many years? how many? [laughter] we both come from there. >> how long have you? >> we all care. >> but we can do better. which did you like best? yes. >> but my daughter is with a teach for america. and was in baltimore city. she worked there. >> you read not just talking about that. they're good people. my daughter's name his greatest. amazing grace. >> actually i came from here. [inaudible conversations] >> i am really honored to have governor martin o'malley hear from merrill lynch. in this venue civic other hachette? oh my goodness. in a minute. i did what to say there were a few small things in common to protect and promote the character of the city to have a strong core. n i know you did the same thing in maryland. you really help to move that for word to enhance the environment for businesses. and to put the enor

faq, and mr. green, for your leadership on this. i think it's very important. yes, there is a range, and i think that's what people have to recognize. there's a range or develop programs that are needed for common conditions. outpatient pneumonia. with a lot of drugs out there that still work. they wanted larger development programs and that's true for many. but for these very rare, fortunately, resistant organisms that are multi-drug-resistant, there's almost nothing to treat them. these cases are occurring sporadically here and there, or in outbreaks in icu or something like that. and we have to think of different ways of evaluating new treatments. we can't just set up a trial and wait for all this happened and expect we will be able to thousands of people. it is true, in fact, if we enrolled thousands of people it would be too late because this would be a terrible thing. so it is true that all antimicrobial drug development is very difficult. in addition, the economic problems there's a huge difficulty in doing trials, especially people who are really sick.

. >> faq for having me here today to talk about this issue we have been tracking for and fighters to go to syria for awhile now. it is betting that today we have more foreign fighters in serious and afghanistan. that is the incredible metric and it creates all sorts of security challenges. and then the possibility to use terrorist attacks that most of them will not come back hallway but will invest in the iraqi and syria. they can become partners to dispelled the mythologies of a grandiose quest to serve our messengers that people going off to fight in syria is not what it pretends to be. but as foreign fighters increases for shooting at the museum in brussels where we don't know if he was under correction but it is the serious threat. somebody known as the psychopath for those individuals traveling around. he had been a identified in 2013 that we have that sort of threat. we have the more nuanced one thinking about to create an 11 between 10 and 20,000 what al qaeda was doing was trying to identify the most talented and dedicated groups to report this. that gave us the trial from ge

and i will ask my colleagues >> faq for holding this important and timely hearing.and i take our witnesses and i am pleased you could join us. we have a long history in massachusetts and so happy to see his legacy move on. today's hearing is relevant given the proximity of social networking the internet am propaganda for premiere tools the tools are cheap and effective steven for groups as seemed to have plenty of resources for this reason that it's part of the counterterrorism strategy should focus on assets of recruitment and communication strategies this is when the roots of the problem for decades and why we must attack. course made the correction -- cooperation of regional partners the national counterterrorism center estimates as of this month as many as 12,000 individuals have traveled to support the armed militants state it is more than 100 american is. expect these numbers to be higher overseas. here is a barometer and we must continue to work to facilitate better information sharing. and then for fighters traveling through the mideast. interagency cooperat

. >> [inaudible] >> faq for your cooperation we will stop and have those who are disturbing leave the room. the committee will have testimony on the strategy for the islamic states of iraq or isil i would like to welcome secretary hagel move general dennis c. is on the trip with his defense counterparts in europe and the demands placed on the military. i received a call from secretary hagel he is in georgia he said a different georgia. then he was coming back here and it is great to have you here today. and we'll understand how much you travel and appreciate your time. and on a bipartisan basis to the continuing resolution at the president's request that authorizes the secretary of defense to train and equip the syrian opposition. we strengthen the proposals through congressional oversight and the requirements of the of not everyone supported that authority that isil is a threat to our allies and the united states. apparently the a agreement isil must be defeated that the landscape is incredibly complex and in the option will carry risk and an agreement that it is but one part of what

in that process -- >> you are going on to address some very specific faqs about the judicial view program there. that suggested it was reasonable to assume that congress had intended to preclude the review by other parties. they set out a variety of factors and the that those factors and included with respect to that program that it was a reasonable inference. i am not sure those factors came out the same way here. really saying you depend heavily on a generalization, art you? >> i do not think we are relying on a generalization. the court has made clear that inquiry needs to be based on the structure of the statutory scream at issue here -- scheme at issue here. is no provision for challenged by third parties to these orders because, as a matter of course the expectation was that at the time the third parties including people other than recipients would know about them. >> is that enough to assume the congress intended to forbid -- by thirdeview party if the third-party did find out. contemplate this kind of lawsuit and specifically authorize this kind of lawsuit. it is a good argument t

. >> caller: hello mary frances berry faq for letting me speak with you and i appreciate in depth.ither of lot but i recently heard about a saint joseph v.? have you heard about her? >> guest: no. tell me. >> it sounds so interesting she was enslaved and at the age of nine years old she was kidnapped then taken to venice in italy and that is where this story begins and ends she was a catholic nun teeeight one yes i do about her. i do one of my colleagues knows about her. >> guest: since you mentioned there we should mention that there is actual slavery in the classic sense of the word where the children become slaves right now but that is an earlier time right now sued the and and other places in africa there is actual slavery like real slavery how did you hear about her? >> guest: i just . >> caller: i happen to see the second part of her story on television and i was fascinated. >> guest: i hope i can see that. >> caller: i am glad that you heard about her but i wish people would know about her because she sounds like a beautiful person. >> host: what do you do when your again? >

. >> well next up, the eloquently in my notes, faq for terrific briefing. welcome to the club. you are our newest panelist year on the docket series. i have listed here, steve, other cases. because we decided we could put these into any type category but there of the cases worth highlighting and steve graciously volunteered to go -- to be the go to guy. you were up. >> the first one want to talk about, and one talked about how same-sex marriage is the civil rights issue of this air or this generation. sadly one of the cases i want to talk about is the civil rights era of about 40 years ago. it's a case involving pregnancy discrimination. in 1976, the supreme court ruled that discrimination in the workplace against pregnant women was not sex discrimination and, therefore, was not covered by title vii of the 1967 -- 1964 civil rights act. congress amended title vii in 1978 passing something called the pregnancy discrimination act to say, to try to change that and basically say that discrimination involving pregnancy should be seen as gender discrimination under title vii. fast fo